References
- Arlot, S., Celisse, A., 2010: A survey of cross-validation procedures for model selection. Statistics surveys, 4:40–79.
- Bartelink, H. H., 1996: Allometric relationships on bio-mass and needle area of Douglas-fir. Forest Ecology and Management, 86:193–203.
- Baskerville, G. L., 1972: Use of logarithmic regression in the estimation of plant biomass. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2:49–53.
- Beran, F., 2018: Douglaska tisolistá v ČR – poznatky z provenienčního výzkumu. In: Novák, J. et al. (eds.): Uplatnění douglasky tisolisté v lesním hospodářství ČR. Kostelec nad Černými Lesy, Lesnická práce, p. 6–37.
- Černý, M., Pařez, J., Malík, Z., 1996: Yield and mensurational tables of the principal tree species of the Czech Republic (Norway spruce, Scots pine, European beech, oak. Růstové a taxační tabulky hlavních dřevin České republiky. Smrk, borovice, buk, dub. Jílové u Prahy, IFER, 245 p.
- Černý, M., Pařez, J., 1998: Mensurational tables of the tree species of the Czech Republic. Larch, silver fir, ash, birch, alder, poplar, hornbeam, acacia, Douglas fir. Růstové tabulky dřevin České republiky. Modřín, jedle, jasan, bříza, olše černá, topol, habr, akát, doug-laska. Jílové u Prahy, IFER, 119 p.
- Chojnacky, D. C., Heath, L. S., Jenkins, J. C., 2014: Updated generalized biomass equations for North American tree species. Forestry, 87:129–151.
- Cienciala, E., Černý, M., Tatarinov, F. A., Apltauer, J., Exnerová, Z., 2006: Biomass functions applicable to Scots pine. Trees–Structure and Function, 20:483–495.
- Čihák, T., Vejpustková, M., 2018: Parameterisation of allometric equations for quantifying aboveground biomass of Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] H. Karst.) in the Czech Republic. Journal of Forest Science, 64:108–117.
- Eilmann, B., Rigling, A., 2012: Tree-growth analyses to estimate tree species‘ drought tolerance. Tree Physiology, 32:178–187.
- Forrester, D., I., Tachauer, I. H. H., Annighoefer, P., Barbeito, I., Pretzsch, H., Ruiz-Peinado, R.et al., 2017: Generalized biomass and leaf area allometric equations for European tree species incorporating stand structure, tree age and climate. Forest Ecology and Management, 396:160–175.
- Harrison, R. B., Terry, T. A., Licata, C. W., Flaming, B. L., Meade, R., Guerrini, I. A. et al., 2009: Biomass and stand characteristics of a highly productive mixed Douglas-fir and western hemlock plantation in coastal Washington. Western Journal of Applied Forestry, 24:180–186.
- Henry, M., Picard, N., Trotta, C., Manlay, R., Valentini, R., Bernoux, M. et al., 2011: Estimating tree biomass of sub-Saharan African forests: a review of available allometric equations. Silva Fennica, 45:477–569.
- Jenkins, J. C., Chojnacky, D. C., Heath, L., Birdsey, R. A., 2003: National – scale biomass estimators for United States tree species. Forest Science, 49:12–35.
- Kantor, P., 2008: Production potential of Douglas fir at mesotrophic sites of Křtiny Training Forest Enterprise. Journal of Forest Science, 54:321–332.
- Kantor P., Mareš R., 2009: Production potential of Douglas fir in acid sites of Hůrky training forest district. Secondary forestry school in Písek. Journal of Forest Science, 55:312–322.
- Klimo, E., Hager, H., Kulhavý, J., 2000: Spruce monocultures in Central Europe – problems and prospects. EFI proceedings No. 33. Joensuu, European Forest Institute, 208 p.
- Krtková, E., 2020: National greenhouse gas inventory report of the Czech Republic (reported inventories 1990–2018) [on line]. Prague. Czech Hydrometeorological Institute: 512 p. Available at:https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/cze-2020-nir-7may20.pdf
- Kubeček, J., Štefančík, I., Podrázský, V., Longauer, R., 2014: Výsledky výzkumu douglasky tisolisté (Pseudotsuga menziesii/Mirb./Franco) v České republice a na Slovensku – přehled. Lesnícky časopis – Forestry Journal, 60:116–124.
- Kučera, M., Adolt, R., Kohn, I. et al., 2019: Národní inventarizace lesů v České republice – výsledky druhého cyklu 2011–2015. Brandýs nad Labem, Ústav pro hospodářskou úpravu lesů Brandýs nad Labem, 439 p.
- Marklund, L. G., 1987: Biomass functions for Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) in Sweden. [Report.] Umea, Department of Forest Survey, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 127 p.
- Mauer, O., Palátová, E., 2012: Root system development in Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii /Mirb./ Franco) on fertile sites. Journal of Forest Science, 58:400–409.
- Menšík, L., Kulhavý, J., Kantor, P., Remeš, M., 2009: Humus conditions of stands with the different proportion of Douglas fir in training forest district Hůrky and the Křtiny forest training enterprise. Journal of Forest Science, 55:345–356.
- Muukkonen, P., 2007: Generalized allometric volume and biomass equations for some tree species in Europe. European Journal of Forest Research, 126:157–166.
- MZe, 2020: Zpráva o stavu lesa a lesního hospodářství České republiky v roce 2020. Praha, Ministerstvo zemědělství, 124 p.
- Nadezhdina, N., Urban, J., Čermák, J., Nadezhdin, V., Kantor, P., 2014: Comparative study of long-term water uptake of Norway spruce and Douglas-fir in Moravian upland. Journal of Hydrology and Hydro-mechanics, 62:1–6.
- Nord-Larsen, T., Nielsen, A., T., 2015: Biomass. stem basic density and expansion factor functions for five exotic conifers grown in Denmark. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 30:135–153.
- Plíva, K., 2000: Trvale udržitelné obhospodařování lesů podle souborů lesních typů. Brandýs nad Labem, Ústav pro hospodářskou úpravu lesů.
- Petersson, H., Holm, S., Ståhl, G., Alger, D., Fridman, J., Lehtonen, A. et al., 2012: Individual tree biomass equations or biomass expansion factors for assessment of carbon stock changes in living biomass – A comparative study. Forest Ecology and Management, 270:78–84.
- Petráš, R., Mecko, J., 2008: Analysis of the production potential of raw wood in the forests of Slovakia. Journal of Forest Science, 54:314–320.
- Podrázský, V., Čermák, R., Zahradník, D., Kouba, J., 2013: Production of Douglas fir in the Czech Republic based on national forest inventory data. Journal of Forest Science, 59:398–404.
- Podrázský, V., Pulkrab, K., Sloup, R., Prknová, H., Paduchová, M., 2014: Zhodnocení produkčního potenciálu douglasky tisolisté v České republice. In: Slodičák, M. et al. (eds.): Pěstební postupy při zavádění douglasky do porostních směsí v podmínkách ČR. Lesnická práce, p. 232–261.
- Podrázský, V., Kupka, I., 2018: Vliv douglasky na půdní dynamiku. In: Novák, J. et al. (eds.): Uplatnění doug-lasky tisolisté v lesním hospodářství ČR. Lesnická práce, p. 106–121.
- Ponette, Q., Ranger, J., Ottorini, J., M., Ulrich, E., 2001: Aboveground biomass and nutrient content of five Douglas-fir stands in France. Forest Ecology and Management, 142:109–127.
- Poudel, K., P., Temesgen, H., 2016: Calibration of volume and component biomass equations for Douglas-fir and lodgepole pine in Western Oregon forests. The Forestry Chronicle, 92:172–182.
- Poudel, K. P., Temesgen, H., Radtke, P. J., Gray, A. N., 2019: Estimating individual-tree aboveground bio-mass of tree species in the western USA. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 49:701–714.
- Prietzel, J., Bachmann, S., 2012: Changes in soil organic C and N stocks after forest transformation from Norway spruce and Scots pine into Douglas fir, Douglas fir/spruce, or European beech stands at different sites in Southern Germany. Forest Ecology and Management, 269:134–148.
- Remeš, J., Zeidler, A., 2014: Production potential and wood quality of Douglas fir from selected sites in the Czech Republic. Wood Research, 59:509–520.
- Repola, J., 2009: Biomass equations for Scots pine and Norway spruce in Finland. Silva Fennica, 43:625–647.
- Shmueli, G., 2010: To explain or to predict? Statistical science 25:289–310.
- Ung, C., H., Bernier, P., Guo, X., J., 2008: Canadian national biomass equations: new parameter estimates that include British Columbia data. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 38:1123–2232.
- Vejpustková, M., Čihák, T., 2019: Modely pro výpočet nadzemní biomasy douglasky tisolisté v České republice. Models for estimating aboveground biomass of Douglas fir in the Czech Republic. Lesnický průvodce 3/2019. Strnady, VÚLHM, 40 p.
- Viewegh, A., Kusbach, J., Mikeska, M., 2003: Czech forest ecosystem classification. Journal of Forest Science, 49:85–93.
- Vinš, B., Šika, A., 1981: Srovnání růstové reakce doug-lasky a smrku na stanovištní faktory v podmínkách ČSR. Práce VÚLHM, 58:7–33.
- Vonderach, Ch., Kändler, G., Dormann, C., F., 2018: Consistent set of additive biomass functions for eight tree species in Germany fit by nonlinear seemingly unrelated regression. Annals of Forest Science, 75: 49.
- Wirth, C., Schumacher, J., Schulze, E. D., 2004: Generic biomass functions for Norway spruce in Central Europe - a meta-analysis approach toward prediction and uncertainty estimation. Tree Physiology, 24:121–139.
- Zianis, D., Mencuccini, M., 2003: Aboveground biomass relationships for beech (Fagus moesiaca Cz.) trees in Vermio Mountain, Northern Greece, and generalized equations for Fagus sp. Annals of Forest Science, 60:436–448.
- IPCC, 2006: IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories [on line]. Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme. Available at: http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/index.html
- ÚHÚL, 2020: Informace o stavu lesů z LHP (LHO) [on line]. Available at: http://www.uhul.cz/ke-stazeni/informace-o-lese/slhp
- UNFCCC, 1997: Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change adopted at COP3 in Kyoto, Japan, on 11 December 1997