Woodland planting on UK pasture land is not economically feasible, yet is more profitable than some traditional farming practices
By: Jessica Flack, Martin Lukac and Lindsay Todman
References
- Bartholomee, O., Grigulis, K., Colace, M. P., Arnoldi, C., Lavorel, S., 2018: Methodological uncertainties in estimating carbon storage in temperate forests and grasslands. Ecological Indicators, 1:331–342.
- Bateman, I., Lovett, A., 2000: Estimating and valuing the carbon sequestered in softwood and hardwood trees, timber products and forest soils in Wales. Journal of Environmental Management, 60:301–323.
- Burke, T., Whyatt, D., Blackburn, A., Rowland, C., Abbatt, J., 2020: Large-scale tree planting in the UK: feasibility and implications, Lancaster: UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, 9 p.
- De Long, J. R., Jackson, B. G., Wilkinson, A., Pritchard, W. J., Oakley, S., Mason, K.E. et al., 2019: Relationships between plant traits, soil properties and carbon fluxes differ between monocultures and mixed communities in temperate grassland. Journal of Ecology, 107:1704–1719.
- Dunn, M., Sing, L., Clarke, T., Moseley, D., 2020: Attitudes Towards Landscape Benefits and Woodland Creation in Southern Scotland, Forest Research, 42 p.
- Elwin, A., Clark, J. M., Short, C., Badjana, M., Neumann, J., Elwin, A., 2020: LANDWISE NFM scenario workshop initial findings for the Loddon Catchment – Report of Loddon Catchment workshop, 11 October 2019, for workshop participants and the Loddon Catchment Partnership. Unpublished.
- England, J. R., Paul, K. L., Cunningham, S. C., Madhavan, D. B., Baker, T. G., Read, Z. et al., 2016: Previous land use and climate influence differences in soil organic carbon following reforestation of agricultural land with mixed-species plantings. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 227:61–72.
- Evans, M., 2013: 12.11 Peatland Geomorphology. In: Shroder, J. (eds.): Treatise on Geomorphology. Academic Press, p. 165–181.
- Garcia de Jalon, S., Graves, A., Palma, J. H. N., Williams, A., Upson, M., 2018: Modelling and valuing the environmental impacts of arable, forestry and agroforestry systems: a case study. Agroforestry Systems, 4:1059–1073.
- Giannitsopoulos, M. L., Graves, A. R., Burgess, P. J., Crous-Duran, J., Moreno, G., Herzog, F. et al., 2020: Whole system valuation of arable, agroforestry and tree-only systems at three case study sites in Europe. Journal of Cleaner Production, 23.
- Gregg, R., Elias, J. L., Alonso, I., Crosher, I. E., Muto, P., Morecroft, M. D., 2021: Carbon storage and sequestration by habitat: a review of the evidence (second edition) – Natural England Research Report NERR094, York: Natural England, 58 p.
- Grunelberg, E., Ziche, D., Wellbrock, N., 2014: Organic Carbon Stocks and Sequestration Rates of Forest Soils in Germany. Global Change Biology, 8:2644–2662.
- Hall, S., 2018: A novel agroecosystem: Beef production in abandoned farmland as a multifunctional alternative to rewilding. Agricultural Systems, 167:10–16.
- Hamilton, W., Bosworth, G., Ruto, E., 2015: Entrepreneurial younger farmers and the “young farmer problem” in England. Agriculture and Forestry, 61:61–69.
- Hardaker, A., 2018: Is forestry really more profitable than upland farming? A historic and present day farm level economic comparison of upland sheep farming and forestry in the UK. Land Use Policy, 71:98–120.
- Howley, P., Buckley, C., O’Donoghue, C., Ryan, M., 2015. Explaining the economic ‘irrationality’ of farmers’ land use behaviour: The role of productivist attitudes and non-pecuniary benefits. Ecological Economics, 109:186–193.
- Hyland, J. J., Jones, D. L., Parkhill, K. A., Barnes, A. P., Williams, A. P., 2016: Farmers’ perceptions of climate change: identifying types. Agriculture and Human Values, 33:323–339.
- Kaske, K., Garcia de Jalon, S., Williams, A., Graves, A., 2021: Assessing the Impact of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on Economic Profitability of Arable, Forestry, and Silvoarable Systems. Sustainability, 7:3637
- Lange, M., Eisenhauer, N., Sierra, C. A., Bessler, H., Engels, C., Griffiths, R. I. et al., 2015: Plant diversity increases soil microbial activity and soil carbon storage. Nature Communications, 6:1–8.
- Lawerence, A., Dandy, N., Urquhart, J., 2010: Landowner attitudes to woodland creation and management in the UK, Farnham: Forest Research.
- Lawrence, A., Edwards, D., 2013: Prospects for new productive woodland in Scotland: Insights from stake-holders, Roslin: Forestry Commission, 75 p.
- Maguire, P., Donofrio, S., Merry, W., Myers, K., Weatherer, L., Wildish, J. et al., 2021: A Green Growth Spurt – State of Forest Carbon Finance 2021, Washington DC: Ecosystem Marketplace, 64 p.
- Manzoor, S. A., Griffiths, G., Rose, D. C., Lukac, M., 2021: The Return of Wooded Landscapes in Wales: An Exploration of Possible Post-Brexit Futures. Land, 10: 59–64.
- Matthews, K. B., Wardell-Johnson, D., Miller, D., Fitton, N., Jones, E., Bathgate, S. et al., 2020: Not seeing the carbon for the trees? Why area-based targets for establishing new woodlands can limit or underplay their climate change mitigation benefits. Land Use Policy, 97: 104690.
- Morison, J., Matthews, R., Miller, G., Perks, M., Randle, T., Vanguelova, E. et al., 2012: Understanding the carbon and greenhouse gas balance of forests in Britain - Forestry Commission Research Report, Edinburgh: Forestry Commission, 149 p.
- Nijnik, M., Pajot, G., Moffat, A., Slee, B., 2013: An economic analysis of the establishment of forest plantations in the United Kingdom to mitigate climatic change. Forest Policy and Economics, 26:34–42.
- O’Neill, C., Lim, F., Edwards, D., Osborne, C., 2020: Forest regeneration on European sheep pasture is an economically viable climate change mitigation strategy. Environmental Research Letters, 15: 104090.
- Ostle, N., Levy, P., Evans, C., Smith, P., 2009: UK land use and soil carbon sequestration. Land Use Policy, 26:274–283.
- Ovando, P., Begueria, S., Campos, P., 2019: Carbon sequestration or water yield? The effect of payments for ecosystem services on forest management decisions in Mediterranean forests. Water Resources and Economics, 28:100119.
- Patenaude, G., Briggs, B.D.J., Milne, R., Rowland, C.S., Dawson, T.P., Pryor, S.N., 2003: The carbon pool in a British Semi-Natural Woodland. Forestry, 76:109–119.
- Poulton, P., Pye, E., Hargreaves, P., Jenkinson, D., 2003: Accumulation of carbon and nitrogen by old arable land reverting to woodland. Global Change Biology, 9:942–955.
- Redman, G., 2020: John Nix Pocketbook. 51st ed. Melton Mowbray, The Andersons Centre, 303 p.
- Reid, C., Hornigold, K., McHenry, E., Nichols, C., Townsend, M., Lewthwaite, K. et al., 2021: State of the UK’s Woods and Trees, Woodland Trust, 245 p.
- Ruskule, A., Nikodemus, O., Kasparinskis, R., Prižavoite, D., Bojāre, D., Brūmelis, G., 2016: Soil–vegetation interactions in abandoned farmland within the temperate region of Europe. New Forests, 47:587–605.
- Ryan, M., O’Donoghue, C. & Hynes, S., 2018: Heterogeneous economic and behavioural drivers of the Farm afforestation decision. Journal of Forest Economics, 33:63–74.
- Senapati, N., Chabbi, A., Gastal, F., Smith, P., Mascher, N., Loubet, B. et al., 2014: Net carbon storage measured in a mowed and grazed temperate sown grassland shows potential for carbon sequestration under grazed system. Carbon Management, 5:131–144.
- Sławski, M., Tarabuła, T., Sławska, M., 2020: Does the enrichment of post-arable soil with organic matter stimulate forest ecosystem restoration–A view from the perspective of three decades after the afforestation of farmland. Forest Ecology and Management, 478:118525.
- Sharps, K., Masante, D., Thomas, A., Jackson, B., Redhead, J., May, L. et al., 2017: Comparing strengths and weaknesses of three ecosystem services modelling tools in a diverse UK river catchment. Science of the Total Environment, 584–585:118–130.
- Tupek, B., Zanchi, G., Verkerk, P. J., Churkina, G., Viovy, N., Hughes, J. K. et al., 2010: A comparison of alternative modelling approaches to evaluate the European forest carbon fluxes. Forest Ecology and Management, 260:241–251.
- Upson, M., Burgess, P., Morison, J., 2016: Soil carbon changes after establishing woodland and agroforestry trees in a grazed pasture. Geoderma, 283:10–20.
- Vanguelova, E. I., Nisbet, T. R., Moffat, A. J., Broadmeadow, S., Sanders, T. G. M., Morison, J. I. L., 2013: A New Evaluation of Carbon Stocks in British Forest Soils. Soil Use and Management, 29:169–181.
- Vinogradovs, I., Nikodemus, O., Elferts, D., Brūmelis, G., 2018: Assessment of site-specific drivers of farmland abandonment in mosaic-type landscapes: A case study in Vidzeme, Latvia. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 253:113–121.
- Vlek, P. L. G., Khamzina, A., Azadi, H., Bhaduri, A., Bharati, L., Braimoh, A. et al., 2017: Trade-Offs in Multi-Purpose Land Use under Land Degradation. Sustainability, 9:1–19.
- Watkins, C., Williams, D., Lloyd, T., 1996: Constraints on farm woodland planting in England: a study of Nottinghamshire farmers. Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research, 69:167–176.
- Wilkes, M. A., Bennett, J., Burbi, S., Charlesworth, S., Dehnen-Schmutz, K., Rayns, F. et al., 2020: Making Way for Trees? Changes in Land-Use, Habitats and Protected Areas in Great Britain under “Global Tree Restoration Potential”. Sustainability, 12.
- Willett, W., Rockstrom, J., Loken, B., Springmann, M., Lang, T., Vermeulen, S. et al., 2019: Food in the Anthropocene: The EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet, 393:447–492.
- Wynne-Jones, S., 2013: Carbon blinkers and policy blindness: The difficulties of “Growing Our Woodland in Wales”. Land Use Policy, 32:250–260.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/forj-2022-0001 | Journal eISSN: 2454-0358 (formerly 0323-1046, 1338-4295) | Journal ISSN: 2454-034X (formerly 0323-1046)
Language: English
Page range: 61 - 71
Published on: May 9, 2022
Published by: National Forest Centre and Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2022 Jessica Flack, Martin Lukac, Lindsay Todman, published by National Forest Centre and Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.