References
- Aggestam, F., Pülzl, H., Sotirov, M., Winkel, G., 2017: The EU policy framework. In: Winkel, G. (ed.): Towards a sustainable European forest-based bio-economy– assessment and the way forward. European Forest Institute, Joensuu, p. 19–35.
- Agrawal, A., Chhatre, A., Hardin, R., 2008: Changing governance of the world’s forests. Science, 320:1460–1462.
- Bell, J., Paula, L., Dodd, T., Németh, S., Nanou, C., Mega, V. et al., 2018: EU ambition to build the world’s leading bioeconomy–Uncertain times demand innovative and sustainable solutions. New Biotechnology 40: 25–30.
- Bezama, A., 2018: Understanding the systems that char-acterise the circular economy and the bioeconomy. Waste Management and Research, 36:553–554.
- Böcher, M., Töller, A. E., Perbandt, D., Beer, K., Vogel-pohl, T., 2020: Research trends: Bioeconomy politics and governance, Forest Policy and Economics, 118:102219.
- Brodrechtová, Y., Navrátil, R., Sedmák, R., Tuček, J., 2018: Using the politicized IAD framework to assess integrated forest management decision making in Slovakia. Land Use Policy, 79.
- Brodrechtová, Y., 2019: Aktéri a ich moc pri obhospodarovaní lesov Slovenska – empirická analýza a poznatky z regiónu Podpoľania. Zvolen, Vydavateľstvo TU vo Zvolene.
- Davies, S., Griestop, L., Vironen, H., Bachtler, J., Dozhdeva, V., Michie, R., 2016: Case studies of national bioeconomy strategies in Finland and Germany. In: BioSTEP Promoting stakeholder engagement and public awareness for a participative governance of the European bioeconomy. 56 p.
- Gerdes, H., Kiresiewa, D. Z., Beekman, V., Bianchini, C., Davies, S., Griestop, L. et al., 2018: Engaging Stakeholders and Citizens in the Bioeconomy: Lessons Learned from BioSTEP and Recommendations for Future Research. In: BioSTEP Promoting stake-In: BioSTEP Promoting stake-BioSTEP Promoting stake-holder engagement and public awareness for a participative governance of the European bioeconomy, 56 p.
- Hodge, D., Brukas, V., Giurca, A., 2017: Forests in a bio-economy: bridge, boundary or divide? Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 32:582–587.
- Kircher, M., Breves, R., Taden, A., Herzberg, D., 2018: How to capture the bioeconomy’s industrial and regional potential through professional cluster management. New Biotechnology, 40:119–128.
- Kleinschmit, D., Arts, B., Giurca, A., Mustalahti, I., Sergent, A., Pulzl, H., 2017: Environmental concerns in political bioeconomy discourses. International Forestry Review, 19:41–55.
- Laibach, N., Borner, J., Broring, S., 2019: Exploring the future of the bioeconomy: An expert-based scoping study examining key enabling technology fields with potential to foster the transition toward a bio-based economy. Technology in Society, 58:101–118.
- Lazdinis, M., Carver, A., Schmithüsen, T., Tõnisson, K., Vilkriste, L., 2005: Forest-sector concerns in the Baltic States: implications for an expanded European Union. Society & Natural Resources, 18:839–848.
- McCormick, K., Kautto, N., 2013: The Bioeconomy in Europe: An overview. Sustainability, 5:2589–2608.
- Navrátilová, L., Výbošťok, J., Dobšinská, Z., Šálka, J., Pichlerová, M., Pichler, V., 2020: Assessing the potential of bioeconomy in Slovakia based on public perception of renewable materials in contrast to non-renewable materials. Ambio, 49:1912–1924.
- Navrátilová, L., Giertliová, B., Hajdúchová, I., Šálka, J., 2021: Acceptance of bioeconomy principles in strategic documents on European and Slovak level. In: SHS Web of Conferences, 92:02044
- Paluš, H., Krahulcová, M., Parobek, J., 2021: Assessment of Forest Certification as a Tool to Support Forest Ecosystem Services. Forests, 12:300.
- Parobek, J., Paluš, H., Moravčík, M., Kovalčík, M., Dzian, M., Murgaš, V. et al., 2019: Changes in carbon balance of harvested wood products resulting from different wood utilization scenarios. Forests, 10:590.
- Pülzl, H., Giurca, A., Kleinschmit, D., Arts, B., Mustalahti, I., Sergent, A. et al. 2017: The role of forests in bio-The role of forests in bio-economy strategies at the domestic and EU level. In: Winkel, G. (ed.): Towards a sustainable European forest-based bioeconomy – assessment and the way forward, Joensuu, European Forest Institute, p. 36–51.
- Sarvašová, Z., Šálka, J., Dobšinská, Z., 2013: Mechanism of cross-sectoral coordination between nature protection and forestry in the Natura 2000 formulation process in Slovakia. Journal of environmental management, 127:65–72.
- Stein, M., 2017: Die Bedeutung der Bioökonomie für den deutschen Forst- und Holzsektor Untersuchung der Wahrnehmung und Akzeptanz für das Thema Bioökonomie von Akteuren aus dem Forst- und Holzsektor. University of Freiburg in German.
- Zeug, W., Bezama, A., Moesenfechtel, U., Jähkel, A., Thrän, D., 2019: Stakeholders’ Interests and Per-Perceptions of Bioeconomy Monitoring Using a Sustainable Development Goal Framework. Sustainability, 11:1511.
- Wolfslehner, B., Linser, S., Pülzl, H., Bastrup-Birk, A., Camia, A., Marchetti, M., 2016: Forest bioeconomy- a new role for sustainability indicators. From Science to Policy, 4:32.