Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Spatial resolution of unmanned aerial vehicles acquired imagery as a result of different processing conditions Cover

Spatial resolution of unmanned aerial vehicles acquired imagery as a result of different processing conditions

Open Access
|Jun 2021

References

  1. Cramer, M., 2013: The UAV@LGL BW Project – A NMCA Case Study. In: Fritsch, D. (ed.): Photogram-metric Week 2013. Wichmann/VDE Verlag, Belin & Offenbach, p. 165–179.10.1127/1432-8364/2013/0195
  2. Cramer, M., Zhang, S., 2020: Quality Assessment of High-Resolution UAV Imagery and Products. In: 40. Wissenschaftlich-Technische Jahrestagung der DGPF in Stuttgart, p. 33–46.
  3. Dabrowski, R., Jenerowicz, A., 2015: Portable Imagery Quality Assessment Test Field for UAV Sensors. In: The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences -ISPRS Archives, 40:117–122.10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-1-W4-117-2015
  4. Dabrowski, R., Orych, A., Jenerowicz, A., Walczykowski, P., 2015: Preliminary Results from the Portable Imagery Quality Assessment Test Field (PIQuAT) of UAV Imagery for Imagery Reconnaissance Purposes. In: The International Archives of the Photo-grammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences – ISPRS Archives, 40:111–115.10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-1-W4-111-2015
  5. Harvey, P., 2016: ExifTool. Available in: http://exiftool.org.
  6. Honkavaara, E., Jaakkola, J., Markelin, L., Becker, S., 2006a: Evaluation of Resolving Power and MTF of DMC. In: The International Archives of the Photo-grammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences – ISPRS Archives, 36:1–6.
  7. Honkavaara, E., Jaakkola, J., Markelin, L., Peltoniemi, J., Ahokas, E., Becker, S., 2006b: Complete Photogrammetric System Calibration and Evaluation in the Sjökulla Test Field – Case Study With Dmc Abstract. In: Proceedings of EuroSDR Commission I and ISPRS Working Group 1/3 Workshop Euro-COW 2006, 6 p.
  8. Klouček, T., Komárek, J., Surový, P., Hrach, K., Janata, P., Vašíček, B., 2019: The Use of UAV Mounted Sensors for Precise Detection of Bark Beetle Infestation. Remote Sensing, 11:1–17.10.3390/rs11131561
  9. Lee, J., Sung, S., 2016: Evaluating Spatial Resolution for Quality Assurance of UAV Images. Spatial Information Research, 24:141–154.10.1007/s41324-016-0015-0
  10. Lim, P. C., Kim, T., Na, S. Il, Lee, K. Do, Ahn, H. Y., et al., 2018a: Analysis of Uav Image Quality Using Edge Analysis. In: The International Archives of the Photo-grammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences – ISPRS Archives, 42:425–32.
  11. Lim, P. C., Seo, J., Kim, T., 2018b: Extraction of UAV Image Sharpness Index Using Edge Target Analysis. Korean Journal of Remote Sensing, 34:905–23.
  12. Long, J. A., 2020: Jtools: Analysis and Presentation of Social Scientific Data. Available in: https://cran.r-project.org/package=jtools
  13. Meißner, H., Cramer, M., Reulke, R., 2018: Towards Standardized Evaluation of Image Quality for Airborne Camera Systems. In: The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences - ISPRS Archives, 42:295–300.10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-1-295-2018
  14. Meißner, H., Cramer, M., Reulke, R., 2020: Evaluation of Structures and Methods for Resolution Determination of Remote Sensing Sensors. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 11994 LNCS: 59–69.10.1007/978-3-030-39770-8_5
  15. Orych, A., 2015: Review of Methods for Determining the Spatial Resolution of UAV Sensors. In: The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences - ISPRS Archives. 40:391–395.10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-1-W4-391-2015
  16. Pricope, N. G., Mapes, K. L., Woodward, K. D., Olsen, S. F., Britton Baxley, J., 2019: Multi-Sensor Assessment of the Effects of Varying Processing Parameters on Uas Product Accuracy and Quality. Drones, 3:1–17.10.3390/drones3030063
  17. R Core Team 2020: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Available in: https://www.r-project.org/
  18. RStudio Team 2019: RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R. Available in: https://www.rstudio.com/
  19. Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S., Eliceiri, K. W., 2012: NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 Years of Image Analysis. Nature Methods, 9:671–675.10.1038/nmeth.2089555454222930834
  20. Stöcker, C., Koeva, M., Nex, F., 2018: Deliverable 4.2 Data Quality Assessment of UAV-Based Products for Land Tenure Recording. H2020 its4land 687828, 55 p.
  21. Wickham, H., 2016: Ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer-Verlag New York, 213 p.10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4_9
  22. Wickham, H., Hester, J., 2020: Readr: Read Rectangular Text Data. Available in: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=readr
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/forj-2021-0011 | Journal eISSN: 2454-0358 | Journal ISSN: 2454-034X
Language: English
Page range: 148 - 154
Published on: Jun 24, 2021
Published by: National Forest Centre and Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2021 Jaroslav Kubišta, Peter Surový, published by National Forest Centre and Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.