Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Litterfall nutrient return in thinned young stands with Douglas fir Cover

Litterfall nutrient return in thinned young stands with Douglas fir

Open Access
|Jun 2020

References

  1. Augusto, L., Ranger, J., Binkley, D., Rothe, A., 2002: Impact of several common tree species of European temperate forests on soil fertility. Annals of Forest Science, 59:233–253.10.1051/forest:2002020
  2. Berg, B., McClaugherty, C., De Santo, A. V., Johnson, D., 2001: Humus buildup in boreal forests: effects of litter fall and its N concentration. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 31:988–998.10.1139/x01-031
  3. Binkley, D., Lousier, J.D., Cromack, K., 1984: Ecosystem effects of Sitka alder in a Douglas-fir plantation. Forest Science, 30:26–35.
  4. Blanco, J. A., Imbert, J. B., Castillo, F. J., 2008: Nutrient return via litterfall in two contrasting Pinus sylvestris forests in the Pyrenees under different thinning intensities. Forest Ecology and Management, 256:1840–1852.10.1016/j.foreco.2008.07.011
  5. Bueis, T., Bravo, F., Pando, V., Belén Turrión, M., 2018: Local basal area affects needle litterfall, nutrient concentration, and nutrient release during decomposition in Pinus halepensis Mill. plantations in Spain. Annals of Forest Science, 75:21.10.1007/s13595-018-0699-5
  6. Chase, Ch. W., Kimsey, M. J., Shaw, T. M., Coleman M. D., 2016: The response of light, water, and nutrient availability to pre-commercial thinning in dry inland Douglas-fir forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 363:98–109.10.1016/j.foreco.2015.12.014
  7. del Río, M., Bravo-Oviedo, A., Pretzsch, H., Löf, M., Ruiz-Peinado, R., 2017: A review of thinning effects on Scots pine stands: From growth and yield to new challenges under global change. Forest Systems, 26, 2:eR03S.10.5424/fs/2017262-11325
  8. Dong, Z., Driscoll, Ch. T., Johnson, S. L., Campbell, J. L., Pourmokhtarian, A., Stoner, A. M. K. et al., 2019: Projections of water, carbon, and nitrogen dynamics under future climate change in an old-growth Douglas-fir forest in the western Cascade Range using a biogeochemical model. Science of the Total Environment, 656:608–624.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.37730529965
  9. Erkan, N., Comez, A., Cem Aydin, A., Denli, O., Erkan, S., 2018: Litterfall in relation to stand parameters and climatic factors in Pinus brutia forests in Turkey. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 33:338–346.10.1080/02827581.2017.1406135
  10. Fried, J. S., Boyle, J. R., Tappeiner, J. C., Cromack, K., 1990: Effects of bigleaf maple on soils in Douglas-fir forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 20:259–266.10.1139/x90-038
  11. Hansen, K., Vesterdal, L., Schmidt, I. K., Gundersen, P., Sevel, L., Bastrup-Birk, A. et al., 2009: Litterfall and nutrient return in five tree species in a common garden experiment. Forest Ecology and Management, 257:2133–2144.10.1016/j.foreco.2009.02.021
  12. Jenkins, T. A. R., Gilbert, J., Mackie, E. D., Matthews, R.W., 2012: Tree Species, A document listing the tree species included in the 2011 Production Forecast. Forecast technical document, Forestry Comission, 7 p.
  13. Kacálek, D., Novák, J., Dušek, D., Slodičák, M., 2018: Litter fall and forest floor under conifer stands: silvi-culture consequences – a review. In: A. C. Gonçalves: Conifers. IntechOpen, p. 77–89.10.5772/intechopen.79653
  14. Kantor, P., Knott, R., Martiník, A., 2001: Production capacity of Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii [Mirb.] Franco) in a mixed stand. Ekológia (Bratislava), 20 (Suppl.), 1:5–14.
  15. Kubeček, J., Štefančík, I., Podrázský, V., Longauer, R., 2014: Výsledky výzkumu douglasky tisolisté (Pseudotsuga menziesii [Mirb.] Franco) v České republice a na Slovensku – přehled. Lesnícky časopis–Forestry Journal, 60:116–124.10.2478/forj-2014-0012
  16. Livingston, W. H., Kenefic, L. S., 2018: Low densities in white pine stands reduce risk of drought-incited decline. Forest Ecology and Management, 423:84–93.10.1016/j.foreco.2017.12.047
  17. Longdoz, B., Yernaux., M, Aubinet, M., 2000: Soil CO2 efflux measurements in a mixed forest: impact of chamber disturbances, spatial variability and seasonal evolution. Global Change Biology, 6:907–917.10.1046/j.1365-2486.2000.00369.x
  18. Maguire, D. A., 1994: Branch mortality and potential litterfall from Douglas-fir trees in stands of varying density. Forest Ecology and Management, 70:41–53.10.1016/0378-1127(94)90073-6
  19. Mcshane, M. C., Carlile, D. W., Hinds, W. T., 1983: The effect of collector size on forests litter-fall collection and analysis. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 13:1037–1042.10.1139/x83-138
  20. Menšík, L., Kulhavý, J., Kantor, P., Remeš, M., 2009: Humus conditions of stands with the different proportion of Douglas fir in training forest district Hůrky and the Křtiny Forest Training Enterprise. Journal of Forest Science, 55:345–356.10.17221/9/2009-JFS
  21. Novák, J., Dušek, D., Slodičák, M., 2014: Quantity and quality of litterfall in young oak stands. Journal of Forest Science, 60:219–225.10.17221/2/2014-JFS
  22. Podrázský, V., Čermák, R., Zahradník, D., Kouba, J., 2013: Production of Douglas-fir in the Czech Republic based on national forest inventory data. Journal of Forest Science, 59:398–404.10.17221/48/2013-JFS
  23. Podrázský, V., Remeš, J., 2005: Retenční schopnost svrchní vrstvy půd lesních porostů s různým druhovým složením. Zprávy lesnického výzkumu, 50:46–48.
  24. Podrázský, V., Viewegh, J., 2005: Comparison of humus form state in the beech and spruce parts of the Žákova hora National Nature Reserve. Journal of Forest Science (Special Issue), 51:29–37.10.17221/11846-JFS
  25. Podrázský, V., Remeš, J., 2008: Půdotvorná role významných introdukovaných jehličnanů – doug-lasky tisolisté, jedle obrovské a borovice vejmutovky. Zprávy lesnického výzkumu, 53:27–34.
  26. Podrázský, V., Moser, W. K., Novák, J., 2006: Changes in the quantity and characteristics of surface humus after thinning treatments. Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica, 37:25–28.
  27. Podrázský, V., Remeš, J., Hart, V., Moser, W. K., 2009: Production and humus form development in forest stands established on agricultural lands – Kostelec nad Černými lesy region. Journal of Forest Science, 55:299–305.10.17221/11/2009-JFS
  28. Podrázský, V., Kupka, I., 2011: Vliv douglasky tisolisté (Pseudotsuga menziesii [Mirb] Franco) na základní pedofyzikální charakteristiky lesních půd. Zprávy lesnického výzkumu, 56 (Special):1–5.
  29. Ponette, Q., Ranger, J., Ottorini, J.-M., Ulrich, E., 2001: Aboveground biomass and nutrient content of five Douglas-fir stands in France. Forest Ecology and Management, 142:109–127.10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00345-5
  30. Roig, S., del Río, M., Cañellas, I., Montero, G., 2005: Litter fall in Mediterranean Pinus pinaster Ait. stands under different thinning regimes. Forest Ecology and Management, 206:179–190.10.1016/j.foreco.2004.10.068
  31. Settineri, G., Mallamaci, C., Mitrović, M., Sidari, M., Muscolo, A., 2018: Effects of different thinning intensities on soil carbon storage in Pinus laricio forest of Apennine South Italy. European Journal of Forest Research, 137:131–141.10.1007/s10342-017-1077-9
  32. Slodičák, M., Novák, J., Mauer, O., Podrázský, V. et al., 2014: Pěstební postupy při zavádění douglasky do porostních směsí v podmínkách ČR. Kostelec nad Černými lesy, Lesnická práce, 272 p.
  33. Šarman, J., 1982: Vliv probírky na povrchový humus ve smrkovém porostu. Lesnictví-Forestry, 28:31–42.
  34. Thomas, K. D., Prescott, C. E., 2000: Nitrogen availability in forest floors of three tree species on the same site: The role of litter quality. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 11:1698–1706.10.1139/x00-101
  35. Trofymow, J. A., Barclay, H. J., McCullough, K. M., 1991: Annual rates and elemental concentrations of litter fall in thinned and fertilized Douglas-fir. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 21:1601–1615.10.1139/x91-223
  36. Turner, J., 1981: Nutrient cycling in an age sequence of Western Washington Douglas-fir stands. Annals of Botany, 48:159–169.10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a086109
  37. Turner, J., Long, J. N., 1975: Accumulation of organic matter in a series of Douglas-fir stands. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 5:681–690.10.1139/x75-094
  38. Ulbrichová, I., Kupka, I., Podrázský, V., Kubeček, J., Fulín, M., 2014: Douglaska jako meliorační a zpevňující dřevina. Zprávy lesnického výzkumu, 59: 72–78.
  39. Viewegh, J., Kusbach, A., Mikeska, M., 2003: Czech forest ecosystem classification. Journal of Forest Science, 49:85–93.10.17221/4682-JFS
  40. Wang, L., Zhao, G., Sun, Y., Yang, Y., Zhou, H., 2019: Effects of Thinning on Microbial Community Structure in the Organic Horizon of Chinese Pine Plantations in Badaling, Beijing, China. Forests, 10:828.10.3390/f10100828
  41. Wilhelmi, V., 1988: Düngung und Durchforstung als kombinierte Waldsanierungsmaßnahme. Allgeme-Allgemeine Forstzeitschrift, 159:844–846.
  42. Will, G. M., 1959: Nutrient return in litter and rainfall under some exotic conifer stands in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 2:719–734.10.1080/00288233.1959.10422832
  43. Wright, T. W., 1957: Some effects of thinning on the soil of a Norway spruce plantation. Forestry, 30:123–133.10.1093/oxfordjournals.forestry.a063106
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/forj-2020-0006 | Journal eISSN: 2454-0358 | Journal ISSN: 2454-034X
Language: English
Page range: 78 - 84
Published on: Jun 29, 2020
Published by: National Forest Centre and Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2020 Jiří Novák, Dušan Kacálek, David Dušek, published by National Forest Centre and Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.