References
- Addington, R. N., Mitchell, R. J., Oren, R., Donovan, L. A., 2004: Stomatal sensitivity to vapor pressure deficit and its relationship to hydraulic conductance in Pinus palustris. Tree Physiology 24:561-569.
- Aranda, I., Gil, L., Pardos, J. A., 2000: Water relations and gas exchange in Fagus sylvatica L. and Quercus petraea (Mattuschka) Liebl. in a mixed stand at their southern limit of distribution in Europe. Trees: Structure and Function 14:344-352.
- Baker, N. R., 2008: Chlorophyll fluorescence: a probe of photosynthesis in vivo Annual Review of Plant Biology 59:89-113.
- Bréda, N., Cochard, H., Dreyer, E., Granier, A., 1993: Water transfer in a mature oak stand (Quercus petraea): seasonal evolution and effects of a severe drought. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 23:1136-1143.
- Bréda, N., Huc, R., Granier, A., Dreyer, E., 2006: Temperate forest trees and stands under severe drought: a review of ecophysiological responses, adaptation processes and long-term consequences. Annals of Forest Science 63:625-644.
- Brestič, M., Živčák, M., 2013: PSII fluorescence techniques for measurement of drought and high temperature stress signal in crop plants: protocols and applications. In: Rout, G. R. & Das, A. B. (eds.): Molecular Stress Physiology of Plants. Springer India, p. 87-131.
- Ciais, P. et al., 2005: Europe-wide reduction in primary productivity caused by the heat and drought in 2003. Nature 437:529-533.
- Cochard, H., Lemoine, D., Dreyer, E., 1999: The effects of acclimation to sunlight on the xylem vulnerability to embolism in Fagus sylvatica L. Plant, Cell & Environment 22:101-108.
- Coll, L., Balandier, P., Picon-Cochard, C., 2004: Morphological and physiological responses of beech (Fagus sylvatica) seedlings to grass-induced belowground competition. Tree Physiology 24:45-54.
- Cornic, G., 2000: Drought stress inhibits photosynthesis by decreasing stomatal aperture - not by affecting ATP synthesis. Trends in Plant Science 5:187-188.
- Englisch, M., 2006: Die Rotbuche - ein Baumartenportrait. BFW- -Praxis Information 12:3-6.
- Ewers, B.E., Oren, R., Phillips, N., Strömgren, M., Linder, S., 2001: Mean canopy stomatal conductance responses to water and nutrient availabilities in Picea abies and Pinus taeda. Tree Physiology 21:841-850.
- FAO (2006) World reference base for soil resources. World soil resources reports 103. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
- Flexas, J. et al., 2012: Mesophyll diffusion conductance to CO2: An unappreciated central player in photosynthesis. Plant Science 193:70-84.
- Fotelli, M. A., Nahm, M., Radoglou, K., Rennenberg, H., Halyvopoulos, G., Matzarakis, A., 2009: Seasonal and interannual ecophysiological responses of beech (Fagus sylvatica) at its south-eastern distribution limit in Europe. Forest Ecology and Management 257:1157-116.
- Fuhrer, J., Beniston, M., Fischlin, A., Frei, C., Goyette, S., Jasper, K. et al., 2006: Climate risks and their impact on agriculture and forests in Switzerland. Climatic Change 79:79-102.
- Gallé, A., Feller, U., 2007: Changes of photosynthetic traits in beech saplings (Fagus sylvatica) under severe drought stress and during recovery. Physiologia Plantarum 131:412-421.
- Geßler, A., Keitel, C., Kreuzwieser, J., Matyssek, R., Seiler, W., Rennenberg, H., 2007: Potential risks for European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in a changing climate. Trees 21:1-11.
- Green Report of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development of the Slovak Republic, 2013: Report of the forestry sector in the Slovak Republic for the year 2012, 25 p.
- Hlásny, T., Barcza, Z., Fabrika, M., Balázs, B., Churkina, G., Pajtík, J. et al., 2011: Climate change impacts on growth and carbon balance of forests in Central Europe. Climate Research 47:219-236.
- Innes, J. L., 1992: Observation of the condition of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in Britain in 1990. Forestry 65:35-60.
- Jamnická, G., Ditmarová, Ľ., Kurjak, D., Kmeť, J., Pšidová, E., Macková, M. et al., 2013: The soil hydrogel improved photosynthetic performance of beech seedlings treated under drought. Plant Soil and Environment 59:446-451.
- Ježík, M., Blaženec, M., Střelcová, K., Ditmarová, Ľ., 2011: The impact of the 2003-2008 weather variability on intra-annual stem diameter changes of beech trees at a submontane site in central Slovakia. Dendrochronologia 29:227-235.
- Kurjak, D., Střelcová, K., Ditmarová, Ľ., Priwitzer, T., Homolák, M., Pichler, V., 2012. Physiological response of irrigated and non-irrigated Norway spruce trees as a consequence of drought in field conditions. European Journal of Forest Research 131:1737-1746.
- Landscape Atlas of the Slovak Republic, 2002: Bratislava, Ministry of the Environment of the Slovak Republic. Available at http://mapserver.geology.sk/Atlas_krajiny_sk/mapviewer.jsf.
- Larcher, W., 1988: Fyziologická ekologie rostlin. Academia, Praha, 368 p.
- Lendzion, J., Leuschner, C., 2008: Growth of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) saplings is limited by elevated atmospheric vapour pressure deficits. Forest Ecology and Management 256:648-655.
- Masarovičová, E., Štefančík, L., 1990: Some ecophysiological features in sun and shade leaves of tall beech trees. Biologia Plantarum 32:374-387.
- Mátyás, C., Berki, I., Czúcz, B., Gálos, B., Móricz, N., Rasztovits, E., 2010: Future of Beech in Southeast Europe from the Perspective of Evolutionary Ecology. Acta Silvatica et Lignaria Hungarica 6:91-110.
- McDowell, N. G. et al., 2008: Mechanisms of plant survival and mortality during drought: why do some plants survive while others succumb? New Phytologist 178:719-739.
- Medrano, H., Escalona, J. M., Bota, J., Gulias, J., Flexas, J., 2002: Regulation of photosynthesis of C3 plants in response to progressive drought: stomatal conductance as a reference parameter. Annals of Botany 89:895-905.
- Oren, R., Sperry, J. S., Katul, G. G., Pataki, D. E., Ewers, B. E., Phillips, N. et al., 1999: Survey and synthesis of intra- and interspecific variation in stomatal sensitivity to vapour pressure deficit.
- Plant, Cell & Environment 22:1515-1526.
- Pagan, J., Randuška, D., 1987: Atlas drevín 1. Bratislava, Obzor, 360 p.
- Priwitzer, T., 2001: Vertical distribution of selected gas exchange parameters of leaves within the tall beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) crown profile. In: Minďáš, J. (ed.): Perspectives of the ecological research in mountain forest ecosystems. Zvolen, LVÚ Zvolen, p. 31-32.
- Raftoyannis, Y., Radoglou, K., 2002: Physiological Responses of Beech and Sessile Oak in a Natural Mixed Stand During a Dry Summer. Annals of Botany 89:723-730.
- Sitková, Z., Nalevanková, P., Střelcová, K., Fleischer, P. Jr., Ježík, M., Sitko, R. et al., 2014: How does soil water potential limit the seasonal dynamics of sap flow and circumference changes in European beech? Lesnícky časopis - Forestry Journal 60:19-30.
- Strasser, R. J., Srivastava, A., Tsimilli-Michael, M., 2000: The fluorescence transient as a tool to characterize and screen photosynthetic samples. In: Yunus, M., Pathre, U., Mohanty, P. (eds.): Probing photosynthesis: mechanisms, regulation and adaptation. Taylor & Francis, London, p. 445-483.
- Tognetti, R., Johnson, J.D., Michelozzi, M., 1995: The response of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) seedlings from two Italian populations to drought and recovery. Trees 9:348-354.
- Urban, O., Anouš, D., Acosta, M., Czerny, R., Marková, I., Navratil, M. et al., 2007: Ecophysiological controls over the net ecosystem exchange of mountain spruce stand. Comparison of the response in direct vs. diffuse solar radiation. Global Change Biology 13:157-168.
- Wilkinson, S., Davies, W. J., 2002: ABA-based chemical signalling: the co-ordination of responses to stress in plants. Plant, Cell & Environment 25:195-210.
- Yordanov, I., Velikova, V., Tsonev, T., 2003: Plant responses to drought and stress tolerance. Bulgarian Journal of Plant Physiology special issue:187-206.
- Živčák, M., Brestič, M., Olšovská, K., Slamka, P., 2008: Performance index as a sensitive indicator of water stress in Triticum aestivum L. L. Plant Soil and Environment 54:133-139.