Unveiling the landscape of research methodologies in nursing literature: a comprehensive analysis

Tazik, Khalil; Maniati, Mahmood

doi:10.2478/fon-2025-0048

Abstract

Objective

To analyze the uses of research methodologies applied in nursing articles published in esteemed journals. Nursing research uses various methodologies to examine different aspects of the field. Understanding the frequency and trends of these approaches is important.

Methods

A comprehensive analysis of 697 peer-reviewed research articles (RAs) was conducted. These articles encompassed quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods designs.

Results

The analysis revealed a dominance of quantitative methodologies (78%) among the examined RAs. Qualitative approaches were less prevalent (14%) but showed a growing presence. Mixed-methods studies constituted approximately 7% of the analyzed articles.

Conclusions

This systematic exploration of research methodologies in nursing literature from 2018 and 2022 highlights the dynamic and diverse nature of research the field. This comprehensive understanding of research methodologies is a valuable guide for researchers, educators, and policymakers in shaping the future of nursing research.

References

Creswell JW. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2009.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Setia MS. Methodology series module 5: Sampling strategies. Indian J Dermatol. 2016;61:505.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mackey A, Gass SM. Second language research: Methodology and design. New York: Routledge; 2005.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Creswell JW. Steps in conducting a scholarly mixed methods study. DBER Speaker Series; 2013:48. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/dberspeakers/48. Accessed September 7, 2024.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Johnson RB, Onwuegbuzie AJ, Turner LA. Toward a definition of mixed methods research. J Mix Methods Res. 2007;1:112–133.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2011.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Soares CB, Hoga LA, Peduzzi M, Sangaleti C, Yonekura T, Silva DR. Integrative review: concepts and methods used in nursing. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2014;48:335–345.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ten Ham-Baloyi W, Jordan P. Systematic review as a research method in postgraduate nursing education. Health SA Gesondheid. 2016;21: 120–128.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Anthony S, Jack S. Qualitative case study methodology in nursing research: an integrative review. J Adv Nurs. 2009;65:1171–1181.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Munhall PL. A phenomenological method. In: Munhall PL, ed. Nursing research: A qualitative perspective. 5th ed. Sudbury: Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2012:113–175.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Maltby J, Williams G, McGarry J, Day L. Research methods for nursing and healthcare. London: Routledge; 2014.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Campbell DT, Stanley JC. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Scotts Valley: Ravenio Books; 2015.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Groves RM, Fowler FJ, Couper MP, Lepkowski JM, Singer E, Tourangeau R. Survey methodology. 2nd ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2009.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Babbie ER. The practice of social research. 15th ed. Boston: Cengage Learning; 2020.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Menard S. Longitudinal research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2002.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fink A. Conducting research literature reviews: From the internet to paper. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2019.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Shadish WR, Cook TD, Campbell DT. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 2002.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Creswell JW. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2007.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2014.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bowen GA. Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qual Res J. 2009;9:27–40.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Breen RL. A practical guide to focus-group research. J Geogr High Educ. 2006;30:463–475.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hammersley M, Atkinson P. Ethnography: Principles in practice. 3rd ed. New York: Routledge; 2007.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Stake RE. Qualitative case studies. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, eds. The sage handbook of qualitative research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2005:443–466.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article