Figure 1.
Annual publications of China (A) and Australia (B) from 2010 to 2020.
Table 1.
Top 10 productive authors according to the number of publications in China and Australia from 2010 to 2020.
| Ranking | China | Australia | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Publication | Author | Publication | |
| 1 | Weidong Dai | 13 | Wendy Moyle | 38 |
| 2 | Yuhuan Wang | 9 | Simon Bell | 18 |
| 3 | Jun Tang | 8 | David Edvardsson | 15 |
| 4 | Ying Wang | 7 | Cindy Jones | 13 |
| 5 | Renyao Zhong | 6 | Henry Brodaty | 13 |
| 6 | Mingchao Xiao | 5 | Elizabeth Beattle | 12 |
| 7 | Weiwei Hou | 5 | Brian Draper | 11 |
| 8 | Yang Tian | 5 | Lynn Chenoweth | 10 |
| 9 | Fangchao Huang | 5 | Tanya Davison | 9 |
| 10 | Liping Jiang | 5 | Renuka Visvanathan | 7 |
Figure 2.
Collaboration network of some productive authors related to LTC research in China (A) and Australia (B). LTC, long-term care.
Table 2.
Top 10 productive institutions in terms of publications from China and Australia between 2010 and 2020.
| Ranking | China | Australia | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Institution | Publication | Institution | Publication | |
| 1 | Renmin University of China | 25 | University Sydney | 60 |
| 2 | East China Normal University | 11 | Griffith University | 52 |
| 3 | Shanghai Jiao Tong University | 11 | Monash University | 50 |
| 4 | China Research Center on Aging | 10 | University New South Wales | 46 |
| 5 | Fudan University | 10 | La Trobe University | 39 |
| 6 | Chinese Academy of Social Sciences | 10 | University Queensland | 38 |
| 7 | Zhejiang University of Finance & Economics | 10 | University Melbourne | 21 |
| 8 | Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine | 9 | Queensland University of Technology | 21 |
| 9 | Wuhan University | 8 | University South Australia | 18 |
| 10 | Jilin University | 7 | Deakin University | 15 |
Figure 3.
Collaboration network of some important institutions in China (A) and Australia (B).
Figure 4.
Keyword cooccurrence maps of LTC research in China (A) and Australia (B). Abbreviation: LTC, long-term care.
Table 3.
Top 10 keywords according to frequency related to LTC research in China and Australia from 2010 to 2020.
| Ranking | China | Australia | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frequency | Keyword | Centrality | Frequency | Keyword | Centrality | |
| 1 | 316 | LTC/service | 0.13 | 242 | Long-term care | 0.03 |
| 2 | 281 | Elderly/aged/old people | 0.21 | 223 | Older/elderly/aged people | 0.34 |
| 3 | 243 | LTC insurance | 0.59 | 208 | Nursing home | 0.35 |
| 4 | 235 | Aging | 0.13 | 128 | Dementia | 0 |
| 5 | 135 | Combination of medical and health care | 0.08 | 59 | Aged care | 0.14 |
| 6 | 114 | Disabled elderly | 0.32 | 45 | Prevalence | 0.16 |
| 7 | 112 | Elderly care service | 0 | 43 | Quality of life | 0.12 |
| 8 | 60 | Nursing home | 0.03 | 32 | Staff | 0.12 |
| 9 | 35 | Japan | 0.1 | 31 | Intervention | 0.22 |
| 10 | 32 | Demand | 0.03 | 30 | Management | 0.05 |
Figure 5.
Top keywords with strongest bursts in China (A) and Australia (B).