Evaluation of the efficacy of Tian dan shu gan rehabilitation exercise in improving the short-term quality of life of patients with acute myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention

Qu, Jia-Yan; Lu, Jing-Bo; Shen, Yong-Hong; Yao, Rong; Meng, Cai-Ping; Rong, Li-Yuan

Evaluation of the efficacy of Tian dan shu gan rehabilitation exercise in improving the short-term quality of life of patients with acute myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention

Frontiers of Nursing

Volume 9 (2022): Issue 4 (December 2022)

By:

Jia-Yan Qu, Jing-Bo Lu, Yong-Hong Shen, Rong Yao, Cai-Ping Meng and Li-Yuan Rong

Open Access

|Dec 2022

Figures & Tables

Comparison of quality-of-life scores of patients with different educational backgrounds in the experimental group after 3 wk (x̄ ± s)_

Group	Symptom score	Physical function score	Cognitive function score	Psychosocial function score	Adverse reaction control score
Primary school	18.40 ± 2.41^a	20.20 ± 1.48	14.80 ± 0.45	58.80 ± 3.83	21.00 ± 3.00
Junior high school	26.10 ± 3.31^bc	20.00 ± 1.25	12.70 ± 1.70	59.90 ± 3.28	20.90 ± 1.73
High school	23.68 ± 4.85^abc	19.95 ± 2.04	12.26 ± 1.76	61.37 ± 3.45	21.95 ± 1.47
College	22.81 ± 4.21^ab	20.31 ± 1.74	12.94 ± 1.84	59.44 ± 4.21	22.37 ± 1.50
Undergraduate course	28.80 ± 4.21^c	20.60 ± 1.52	12.60 ± 1.95	56.60 ± 4.16	22.6 ± 1.14
F-value	4.802***	0.201	2.192	1.858	1.779

Comparison of quality-of-life scores of patients with different BMI values in the experimental group after 3 wk (x̄ ± s)_

Age group, years	Symptom score	Physical function score	Cognitive function score	Psychosocial function score	Adverse reaction control score
18.5~23.9	24.30 ± 4.62	20.30 ± 1.70^ab	13.00 ± 1.63	59.60 ± 5.02	22.10 ± 1.85
24~26.9	23.53 ± 4.58	19.60 ± 1.59^a	12.73 ± 1.83	59.33 ± 4.22	22.13 ± 1.19
27~29.9	23.58 ± 5.04	21.21 ± 1.23^b	12.89 ± 1.85	59.84 ± 3.55	22.00 ± 1.83
>30	24.36 ± 5.22	18.91 ± 1.51^a	12.55 ± 2.02	60.91 ± 3.02	21.00 ± 2.00
F-value	0.109	6.551***	0.132	0.363	1.151

Comparison of quality-of-life scores between the two groups (x ± s)_

Group	Symptom score	Physical function score	Cognitive function score	Psychosocial function score	Adverse reaction control score
Control group	14.54 ± 3.00	10.85 ± 2.40	8.63 ± 2.26	20.79 ± 6.49	20.10 ± 3.16
Experimental group	23.85 ± 4.76	20.15 ± 1.69	12.80 ± 1.80	59.87 ± 3.87	21.85 ± 1.73
T-value	−12.183***	−23.067***	−10.515***	−37.544***	−3.546**

CROQ quality-of-life scoring criteria_

Dimension	Number of entries	Theoretical score
Symptom score	7	7–35
Body score	8	8–24
Cognitive function	3	3–18
Psychosocial function	14	14–70
Adverse reaction control	6	6–30
Total score	38	38–177

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/fon-2022-0049 | Journal eISSN: 2544-8994 | Journal ISSN: 2097-5368

Journal RSS Feed

Language: English

Page range: 389 - 394

Submitted on: Feb 20, 2022

Accepted on: Apr 28, 2022

Published on: Dec 31, 2022

Published by: Shanxi Medical Periodical Press

In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

Publication frequency: 4 times per year

Keywords:

acute myocardial infarction,

percutaneous coronary intervention,

quality of life,

Tian dan shu gan rehabilitation exercise

Related subjects:

Medicine,

Assistive professions, nursing

© 2022 Jia-Yan Qu, Jing-Bo Lu, Yong-Hong Shen, Rong Yao, Cai-Ping Meng, Li-Yuan Rong, published by Shanxi Medical Periodical Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous article Volume 9 (2022): Issue 4 (December 2022)Next article