Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Clinical nursing visual health education pathway for patients with perianal abscess† Cover

Clinical nursing visual health education pathway for patients with perianal abscess†

Open Access
|Dec 2022

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

Between group comparison of VAS scores before and after intervention.
Note: ***There were significant differences in VAS scores in the experimental group before and after intervention (P < 0.001); **There were significant differences in VAS scores in the control group before and after intervention (P < 0.01); *There were significant differences in VAS scores between the two groups after intervention (P < 0.05); VAS, visual analog scale.
Between group comparison of VAS scores before and after intervention. Note: ***There were significant differences in VAS scores in the experimental group before and after intervention (P < 0.001); **There were significant differences in VAS scores in the control group before and after intervention (P < 0.01); *There were significant differences in VAS scores between the two groups after intervention (P < 0.05); VAS, visual analog scale.

Figure 2.

Between group comparison of clinical nursing quality.
Note: **There were significant differences in nursing responsibility between the two groups (P < 0.05); *indicates that there were significant differences in nursing skills between the two groups (P < 0.05); *There were significant differences in nursing ability between the two groups (P < 0.05).
Between group comparison of clinical nursing quality. Note: **There were significant differences in nursing responsibility between the two groups (P < 0.05); *indicates that there were significant differences in nursing skills between the two groups (P < 0.05); *There were significant differences in nursing ability between the two groups (P < 0.05).

Between group comparison of clinical nursing satisfaction, n (%) (n = 40)_

GroupsExperimental groupControl groupX2P
Very satisfied25 (62.5)18 (45.0)
Satisfied12 (30.0)12 (30.0)
Unsatisfied3 (7.5)10 (25.0)
Overall satisfied37 (92.5)30 (75.0)4.5010.034

Between group comparison of perianal abscess related knowledge scores, n (%) (n = 40)_

GroupExperimental groupControl groupX2P
Good mastery23 (57.5)9 (22.5)
Basic mastery15 (37.5)19 (47.5)
Non-mastery2 (5.0)12 (30.0)
Mastery rate38 (95.0)28 (70.0)8.6580.003

Comparison of general information between the two groups (n = 40)_

TypesExperimental groupControl groupP
Gender, n (%) 0.499
    Male24 (60.0)21 (52.5)
    Female16 (40.0)19 (47.5)
Average age, years41.8 ± 7.540.2 ± 8.20.728
Average height, cm165.72 ± 8.72166.32 ± 7.360.875
BMI, kg/m221.32 ± 1.7620.92 ± 1.930.937
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/fon-2022-0047 | Journal eISSN: 2544-8994 | Journal ISSN: 2097-5368
Language: English
Page range: 371 - 377
Submitted on: Apr 3, 2022
|
Accepted on: Aug 31, 2022
|
Published on: Dec 31, 2022
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2022 Ye-Qi He, Xu-Xia Che, En-Jie Zhu, He-Ye Jin, Li-Chao Bao, published by Shanxi Medical Periodical Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.