Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Clinical nursing visual health education pathway for patients with perianal abscess†

Frontiers of Nursing
Volume 9 (2022): Issue 4 (December 2022)
By:
Open Access
|Dec 2022

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

Between group comparison of VAS scores before and after intervention. Note: ***There were significant differences in VAS scores in the experimental group before and after intervention (P < 0.001); **There were significant differences in VAS scores in the control group before and after intervention (P < 0.01); *There were significant differences in VAS scores between the two groups after intervention (P < 0.05); VAS, visual analog scale.
Between group comparison of VAS scores before and after intervention. Note: ***There were significant differences in VAS scores in the experimental group before and after intervention (P < 0.001); **There were significant differences in VAS scores in the control group before and after intervention (P < 0.01); *There were significant differences in VAS scores between the two groups after intervention (P < 0.05); VAS, visual analog scale.

Figure 2.

Between group comparison of clinical nursing quality. Note: **There were significant differences in nursing responsibility between the two groups (P < 0.05); *indicates that there were significant differences in nursing skills between the two groups (P < 0.05); *There were significant differences in nursing ability between the two groups (P < 0.05).
Between group comparison of clinical nursing quality. Note: **There were significant differences in nursing responsibility between the two groups (P < 0.05); *indicates that there were significant differences in nursing skills between the two groups (P < 0.05); *There were significant differences in nursing ability between the two groups (P < 0.05).

Between group comparison of clinical nursing satisfaction, n (%) (n = 40)_

GroupsExperimental groupControl groupX2P
Very satisfied25 (62.5)18 (45.0)
Satisfied12 (30.0)12 (30.0)
Unsatisfied3 (7.5)10 (25.0)
Overall satisfied37 (92.5)30 (75.0)4.5010.034

Between group comparison of perianal abscess related knowledge scores, n (%) (n = 40)_

GroupExperimental groupControl groupX2P
Good mastery23 (57.5)9 (22.5)
Basic mastery15 (37.5)19 (47.5)
Non-mastery2 (5.0)12 (30.0)
Mastery rate38 (95.0)28 (70.0)8.6580.003

Comparison of general information between the two groups (n = 40)_

TypesExperimental groupControl groupP
Gender, n (%) 0.499
    Male24 (60.0)21 (52.5)
    Female16 (40.0)19 (47.5)
Average age, years41.8 ± 7.540.2 ± 8.20.728
Average height, cm165.72 ± 8.72166.32 ± 7.360.875
BMI, kg/m221.32 ± 1.7620.92 ± 1.930.937
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/fon-2022-0047 | Journal eISSN: 2544-8994 | Journal ISSN: 2097-5368
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 371 - 377
Submitted on: Apr 3, 2022
Accepted on: Aug 31, 2022
Published on: Dec 31, 2022
Published by: Shanxi Medical Periodical Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Keywords:
clinical nursing,
nursing quality,
pain,
perianal abscess,
visual health-education
Related subjects:
Medicine,
Assistive professions, nursing

© 2022 Ye-Qi He, Xu-Xia Che, En-Jie Zhu, He-Ye Jin, Li-Chao Bao, published by Shanxi Medical Periodical Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 9 (2022): Issue 4 (December 2022)Next article