Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Evaluation of undergraduate students’ nursing assessment and communication skills through an objective structured clinical examination within a high-fidelity simulation using a student-simulated patient† Cover

Evaluation of undergraduate students’ nursing assessment and communication skills through an objective structured clinical examination within a high-fidelity simulation using a student-simulated patient†

By: Hao-Bin Yuan  
Open Access
|Aug 2021

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

The simulated scenario for OSCE. OSCE, objective structured clinical examination.
The simulated scenario for OSCE. OSCE, objective structured clinical examination.

Communication evaluation rubric_

ItemsAPAN/I
(1)Self-introduction and explanationIntroduce herself/himself to patient; and explain the reason for visitingIntroduce herself/himself to patient; or explain the reason for visitingNeither introduction nor explanation
(2)QuestioningStart with open-ended questions and continue to use as appropriateBegin with open-ended questions but no longer usedClosed questions are used
(3)Ordering questionsGuide patient narration by asking the organized questionsGuide the patient to narrate, but ordering questions are illogicalQuestioning lacks logic and cannot guide patients to narrate
(4)Communication continuityGive patients enough time to express themselves without interruptingDo not disturb, but do not provide enough time for the patient to expressPatient narrative is interrupted
(5)Confirming informationRepeat the information and confirm that it is correctRepeat the information, but do not confirm it is correctDo not reconfirm information
(6)Wording expressionThe wording is easy to be understood and nursing/medical terms are avoidedOccasional usage of nursing/medical terms without affecting understandingUsing nursing/medical terms is difficult to be understood
(7)Focusing on patient understandingRespond appropriately to the patient’s doubts and express concern towards the patient’s understandingAsk the patient’s doubts, but do not concern the patient’s understandingNeither ask patient’s doubts nor concern patient’s understanding
(8)ExplanationThe provided information is clear and understandableMost of the information provided is clear, but some information is difficult to be understoodThe explanation was confusing, and consequently the patient is unable to understand it
(9)Eye contacting and touchingMaintain eye-contact when talking with patient and touch patient appropriatelyMaintain eye contacting when talking with patient; OR touch patient appropriatelyNonverbal behavior is negative or interferes with communication
(10)Tone and facial expressionUse appropriate voice and intonation and smile to encourage the interactionUse appropriate voice and intonation; OR smile to encourage interaction
(11)ListeningListening is more than talking; and leaning towards the patient to show listening intentlyListening is more than talking; OR leaning towards the patient to show listening intently
(12)EmpathyExpress empathy to build the relationship with the patient and understand the patient’s feelingsAttempt empathy, partially express the understanding of patient’s feelingsNeither express empathy nor understand the patient’s feelings
(13)Culture assessmentAssess the patients’ beliefs, customs, and hobbiesAssess the patient’s beliefs; OR customs and hobbiesDo not assess patients’ beliefs, customs and hobbies
(14)Assessing patient’s feelingInquire about patient’s feelings about disease/injury, and/or treatmentAssess the patient’s feelings about the disease, but not allDo not assess the patient’s feelings

Comparison of scores of nursing assessment and communication according to student characteristics_

Student characteristicsNursing assessmentCommunication


Mean (SD)Mean differenceIndependent t-test t (P-value)Mean (SD)Mean differenceIndependent t-test t (P-value)
Gender 0.050.403 (0.668) 0.221.803 (0.077)
  Male1.29 (0.39) 1.29 (0.43)
  Female1.25 (0.35) 1.06 (0.38)
Academic year −0.37−4.384 (0.000) −0.24−2.303 (0.025)
  Year 21.07 (0.31) 1.00 (0.34)
  Year 31.44 (0.32) 1.24 (0.43)
CP −0.37−4.384 (0.000) −0.24−2.303 (0.025)
  161.07 (0.31) 1.00 (0.34)
  301.44 (0.32) 1.24 (0.43)
PS 0.786.507 (0.000) 0.414.343 (0.000)
  Yes1.50 (0.31) 1.33 (0.42)
  No1.02 (0.23) 0.92 (0.25)
ISP 0.373.253 (0.002) 0.251.850 (0.070)
  Yes1.55 (0.25) 1.32 (0.42)
  No1.18 (0.35) 1.07 (0.39)

Score description of communication skills in OSCE (N = 54)_

Itemsn (%)MeanSDDifficultyDiscrimination


APAN/Ir (P-value)Level
Self-introduction and explanation5 (9.3)7 (13.0)42 (77.8)0.310.640.160.38 (0.005)Better
Questioning12 (22.2)38 (70.4)4 (7.4)1.150.530.570.65 (0.000)Good
Ordering questions23 (42.6)29 53.7)2 (3.7)1.390.560.690.68 (0.000)Good
Communication continuity26 (48.1)27 (50.0)26 (48.1)1.460.540.730.68 (0.000)Good
Confirming information3 (5.6)22 (40.7)29 (53.7)0.520.610.260.42 (0.002)Good
Wording expression27 (50.0)25 (46.3)2 (3.7)1.460.570.730.60 (0.000)Good
Focusing on patient understanding12 (22.2)25 (46.3)17 (31.5)0.910.730.450.70 (0.000)Good
Explanation14 (25.9)32 (59.3)8 (14.8)1.110.630.560.75 (0.000)Good
Eye contacting and touching30 (55.6)22 (40.7)2 (3.7)1.520.570.760.84 (0.000)Good
Tone and facial expression25 (46.3)28 (51.9)1 (1.9)1.440.540.720.83 (0.000)Good
Listening34 (63.0)17 (31.5)3 (5.6)1.570.600.790.82 (0.000)Good
Empathy23 (42.6)29 (53.7)2 (3.7)1.390.560.690.60 (0.000)Good
Culture assessment6 (11.1)11 (20.4)37 (68.5)0.430.690.210.60 (0.000)Good
Assessing patient’s feeling17 (31.5)22 (40.7)15 (27.8)1.030.780.520.70 (0.000)Good
Total 1.120.400.56

Score description of nursing assessment skills in OSCE (N = 54)_

Itemsn (%)MeanSDDifficultyDiscrimination


APAN/Ir (P-value)Level
Self-introduction and patients appease9 (6.7)45 (83.3)0 (0.0)1.170.380.590.21 (0.126)Better
Check the patient and doctor’s order45 (83.3)7 (13.0)2 (3.7)1.800.490.900.30 (0.027)Better
Causes assessment29 (53.7)1 (1.9)24 (44.4)1.090.990.550.37 (0.005)Better
Pain assessment
Time, location, and radiation40 (74.1)12 (22.2)2 (3.7)1.700.540.850.48 (0.000)Good
Nature, degree31 (57.4)8 (14.8)15 (27.8)1.300.880.650.47 (0.000)Good
Aggravating and mitigating factors26 (48.1)2 (3.7)26 (48.1)1.000.990.500.67 (0.000)Good
Vomiting assessment
Time, volume, and frequency18 (33.3)4 (7.4)32 (59.3)0.740.940.370.64 (0.000)Good
Color, nature15 (27.8)1 (1.9)38 (70.4)0.570.900.290.60 (0.000)Good
Diarrhea assessment
Time, volume, and frequency16 (29.6)2 (3.7)36 (66.7)0.630.920.320.45 (0.001)Good
Color, nature9 (16.7)5 (9.3)40 (74.1)0.430.770.220.46 (0.000)Good
Hypoxia time, intensity20 (37.0)14 (25.0)20 (37.0)1.000.870.500.51 (0.000)Good
Physical examination
Blood pressure and pulse28 (51.9)24 (44.4)2 (3.7)1.480.570.740.45 (0.001)Good
Temperature and respiration27 (50.0)24 (44.4)3 (5.6)1.440.600.720.50 (0.000)Good
Blood oxygen saturation, cyanosis47 (87.0)7 (13.0)0 (0.0)1.870.340.910.16 (0.255)Poor
Cardiac auscultation49 (90.7)2 (3.7)3 (5.6)1.850.490.930.18 (0.206)Poor
Chest palpation: tactile tremor29 (53.7)3 (5.6)22 (40.7)1.130.970.570.54 (0.000)Good
Lung auscultation (bilateral)50 (92.6)1 (1.9)3 (5.6)1.870.480.940.16 (0.247)Poor
Abdomen palpation40 (74.1)5 (9.3)9 (16.7)1.570.770.790.47 (0.000)Good
Abdomen auscultation43 (79.6)4 (7.4)7 (13.0)1.670.700.840.36 (0.007)Better
History inquiry
Disease, medication35 (64.8)4 (7.4)15 (27.8)1.370.900.690.59 (0.000)Good
Surgery/trauma, bleeding/transfusion24 (44.4)5 (99.3)25 (46.3)0.980.960.490.62 (0.000)Good
Special diet/hobbies, beliefs/family history24 (44.4)7 (13.0)23 (42.6)1.020.940.510.54 (0.000)Good
Total 1.260.360.63

Characteristics of participants in nursing assessment OSCE (N = 54)_

Characteristicsn%M ± SD
Age (years)22.54 ± 1.55
  20–244888.9
  25–29611.1
Gander
  Female4074.1
  Male1425.9
Academic year
  Year 22750
  Year 32750
CP (weeks)23.00 ± 7.07
  162750
  302750
PS
  Yes2750
  No2750
ISP
  No4395.6
  Yes1124.4
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/fon-2021-0018 | Journal eISSN: 2544-8994 | Journal ISSN: 2097-5368
Language: English
Page range: 159 - 168
Submitted on: Aug 14, 2020
Accepted on: Oct 23, 2020
Published on: Aug 18, 2021
Published by: Shanxi Medical Periodical Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2021 Hao-Bin Yuan, published by Shanxi Medical Periodical Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.