References
- Abdulvahitoğlu, A., Abdulvahitoğlu, A., Vural, D. (2022). Elektrikli Otomobil Seçiminde Çok Kriterli Karar Verme: Borda Tümleşik MULTIMOORA Yöntemi. 4th International Conference on Applied Engineering and Natural Sciences, ICAENS Kasım 2022, Konya.
- Anadolu Ajansı (2025). Retrieved from https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/bilim-teknoloji/turkiyedeelektrikli-otomobil-sayisi-bir-yilda-yuzde-130artti/3461020#:~:text=Elektrikli%20otomobillerin%20kay%C4%B1tlara%20girdi%C4%9Fi%20ilk,80%20bin%2043’e%20y%C3%BCkseldi.
- Ballı, S., Karasulu, B., Korukoğlu, S. (2007). En Uygun Otomobil Seçimi Sorunu İçin Bir Bulanık Promethee Yöntemi Uygulaması. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 22(1), 139–147.
- Bošković, S., Švadlenka, L., Jovčić, S., Dobrodolac, M., Simić, V., Bačanin, N. (2023). An Alternative Ranking Order Method Accounting for Two-Step Normalization (AROMAN) – A Case Study of the Electric Vehicle Selection Problem. IEEE Access. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3265818.
- Chu, W., Im, M., Song, M.R., Park, J. (2019). Psychological and behavioral factors affecting electric vehicle adoption and satisfaction: A comparative study of early adopters in China and Korea. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 76, 1–18. DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2019.09.009.
- Çoşkun, İ.T. (2022). Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Teknikleri ile Elektrikli Otomobil Seçimi: SD-MULTIMOORA Yaklaşımı. Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi Dergisi, 57(1), 68–82. DOI: 10.15659/3.sektor-sosyal-ekonomi.22.01.1735.
- Dwivedi, P.P., Sharma, D.K. (2023). Evaluation and ranking of battery electric vehicles by Shannon’s entropy and TOPSIS methods. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 212, 457–474. DOI: 10.1016/j.matcom.2023.05.013.
- Gavcar, E., Kara, N. (2020). Elektrikli Otomobil Seçiminde Entropi ve TOPSIS Yöntemlerinin Uygulanması. İş ve İnsan Dergisi, 7(2), 351–359. DOI : 10.18394/iid.695702.
- Güleryüz, S., Çokyaşar, A. (2021). Otomobil Seçimi İçin TOPSIS Temelli Bir Karar Verme Yaklaşımı. European Journal of Science and Technology, 31, 713–724. DOI: 10.31590/ejosat.1010625.
- Huang, Y., Qian, L. (2018). Consumer pReferences for electric vehicles in lower tier cities of China: Evidences from south Jiangsu region. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 63, 482–497. DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2018.06.017.
- Jian, W., Wei, Z. (2019). Factors Influencing the Purchase Willingness towards Electric Vehicles in China.
- Kaczyńska, A., Sulikowski, P., Wątróbski, J., Sałabun, W. (2023). Enhancing Sustainable Assessment of Electric Vehicles: A Comparative Study of the TOPSIS Technique with Interval Numbers for Uncertainty Management. Energies, 16(18), 6652. DOI: 10.3390/en16186652
- Pavic, Z., Novoselac, V. (2013). Notes on TOPSIS Method. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Science (IJRES), 1(2), 5–12.
- Sovacool, B.K., Abrahamse, W., Zhang, L., Ren, J. (2019). Pleasure or profit? Surveying the purchasing intentions of potential electric vehicle adopters in China. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 124, 69–81. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2019.03.002.
- Štilić, A., Puška, A., Đurić, A., Božanić, D. (2022). Electric vehicles selection based on Brčko District Taxi service demands, a multi-criteria approach. Urban Science, 6(4), 73. DOI: 10.3390/urbansci6040073.
- Türkiye Istatistik Kurumu-TUIK (2025). Erişim Tarihi. Retroeved from https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Motorlu-Kara-Tasitlari-Ocak-2025-54048 (25.01.2025).
- Więckowski, J., Wątróbski, J., Kizielewicz, B., Sałabun, W. (2023). Complex sensitivity analysis in Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: An application to the selection of an electric car. Journal of Cleaner Production, 390, 136051. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136051.
- Ziemba, P. (2020). Multi-criteria stochastic selection of electric vehicles for the sustainable development of local government and state administration units in Poland. Energies, 13(23), 6299. DOI: 10.3390/en13236299.