References
- Aluchna, M. (2015). Strategies of Sustainable Business. Warsaw, Poland: Warsaw School of Economics.
- Banker, R.D., Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W. (1984). Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078–1092.
- Bruna, M.G., Lahouel, B.B. (2022). CSR & financial performance: Facing methodological and modeling issues commentary paper to the eponymous FRL article collection. Finance Research Letters, 44(2), 1–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2021.102036.
- Burchard-Dziubińska, M. (2014). Idea zrównoważonego rozwoju. In: M. Burchard-Dziubińska, A. Rzeńca, D. Drzazga, Zrównoważony rozwój – naturalny wybór (pp. 9–33). Łódź, Poland: Publisher of the University of Lodz.
- Card of the ESG-WIG index (2022). Retrieved from https://gpwbenchmark.pl/en-kartaindeksu?isin=PL9999998955 (27.09.2022).
- Card of the mWIG40 index (2022). Retrieved from https://gpwbenchmark.pl/en-kartaindeksu?isin=PL9999999912 (27.09.2022).
- Card of the WIG20 index (2022). Retrieved from https://gpwbenchmark.pl/en-kartaindeksu?isin=PL9999999987 (27.09.2022).
- Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444.
- Composition of the WIG20 index after annual revision on March 18, 2022 (2022). Warsaw, Poland: GPW. Retrieved from https://gpwbenchmark.pl/komunikaty-i-uchwaly-gpw_czytaj?cmn_id=1750&title=WIG20+/+WIG20TR+/+mWIG40+/+mWIG40TR+/+sWIG80+/+sWIG80TR+/+WIG30+/+WIG30TR+(Komunikat) (27.09.2022).
- Composition of the WIG-ESG index after revision on March 18, 2022 (2022). Warsaw, Poland: GPW. Retrieved from https://gpwbenchmark.pl/komunikaty-i-uchwaly-gpw_czytaj?cmn_id=1754&title=WIG+/+WIG140+/+WIG-ESG+/+WIGtech+/+WIGtechTR+/+WIGPoland+/+WIG-Ukraine+/+WIG-CEE+/+WIG.MS-BAS+/+WIG.MS-FIN+/+WIG.GAMES5+/+WIG.MS-PET+/+WIGdiv+(Komunikat) (27.09.2022).
- Conte, M.A., Svejnar, J. (1988). Productivity Effects of Worker Participation in Management, Profit-Sharing, Worker Ownership of Assets and Unionization in U.S. Firms. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 6(1), 139–151.
- Debreu, G. (1951). The Coefficient of Recourse Utilization. Econometrica, 19(3), 273–292.
- Domagała, A. (2007). Metoda Data Envelopment Analysis jako narzędzie badania względnej efektywności technicznej. Operations Research and Decisions, 17(3–4), 21–34.
- Douissa, I.B., Azrak, T. (2022). Long-run dynamics between CFP and CSP in the GCC banking sector: estimation non-statutory heterogeneous panels allowing for cross-sectional dependence. Social Responsibility Journal, 18(3), 518–533. DOI: 10.1108/SRJ-09-2020-0365.
- Dyllick, T., Hockerts, K. (2002). Beyond the case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(2), 130–141. DOI: 10.1002/bse.323.
- Fäare, R., Grosskopf, S., Lovell, C.A.K. (1985). The Measurement of Efficiency of Production. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Farrell, M.J. (1957). The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 120(3), 253–290.
- Feng, Y.J., Lu H., Bi, K. (2004). An AHP/DEA method for measurement of the efficiency of R&D management activities in universities. International Transactions in Operational Research, 11(2), 181–191. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-3995.2004.00450.x.
- Feruś, A. (2006). Zastosowanie metody DEA do określania poziomu ryzyka kredytowego przedsiębiorstw, Bank & Credit, 7, 44–59.
- Gillan, S.L., Koch, A., Starks, L.T. (2021). Firms and social responsibility: a review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 66, 1–34. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101889.
- Giovannoni, E., Fabietti, G. (2013). What is sustainability? A review of the concept and its applications. In: C. Busco, M. L. Frigo, P. Quattrone, A. Riccaboni (eds.), Integrated reporting. Concepts and cases that redefine corporate accountability (pp. 21–40). Berlin, Germany: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-02168-3_2.
- Gond, J., Grubnic, S., Herzig, C., Moon, J. (2012). Configuring management control systems: Theorizing the integration of strategy and sustainability. Management Accounting Research, 23(3), 205–223. DOI: 10.1016/j.mar.2012.06.003.
- Gray, R. (2010). Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability... and how would we know? An exploration of narratives of organizations and the planet. Accounting Organizations and Society, 35(1), 47–62. DOI: 10.1080/0969160X.2011.556420.
- Helta, M. (2009). Zastosowanie metody DEA do opracowania rankingu efektywności spółek Agencji Nieruchomości Rolnych w 2006 roku. Annals of Agricultural Sciences, series G, 96(3), 107–111.
- Jacobs, R. (2001). Alternative methods to examine hospital efficiency: data envelopment analysis and stochastic frontier analysis. Health Care Management Science, 4(2), 103–115. DOI: 10.1023/A:1011453526849.
- Jha, M.K., Rangarajan, K. (2020). Analysis of corporate sustainability performance and corporate financial performance causal linkage in the Indian context. Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, 5(1), 1–30. DOI: 10.1186/s41180-020-00038-z.
- Knežević, B., Škrobot, P. (2021). Sustainable development in corporate strategy. In: M. Stefańska (ed.), Sustainability and sustainable development (pp. 71–82). Poznań, Poland: PUEB Poznan University of Economics and Business. DOI: 10.18559/978-83-8211-074-6/I2.
- Kucharski, A. (2014). Metoda DEA w ocenie efektywności gospodarczej. Lodz, Poland: Publisher of the University of Lodz.
- Lu, L., Taylor, M. (2016). Which factors moderate the relationship between sustainability performance and financial performance? A meta-analysis study. Journal of International Accounting research, 15(1), 1–15. DOI: 10.2308/jiar-51103.
- Matuszewska-Pierzynka, A. (2020). The comparative analysis for gross domestic product of China and ASEAN member states. In: M. Rosińska-Bukowska, K. Zielińska-Lont (eds.), Asia’s global expansion: business and financial aspects (pp. 89–109). Łódź, Poland: Publisher of the University of Lodz. DOI: 10.18778/8142-990-0.
- Mensah, J. (2019). Sustainable development: Meaning, history, principles, pillars, and implications for human action: Literature review. Cogent Social Sciences, 5(1), 1–21. DOI: 10.1080/23311886.2019.1653531.
- Myers, J.L., Well, A.D. (2003). Research Design and Statistical Analysis (2nd ed.). New Jersey, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
- Nizam, E., Ng, A., Dewandaru, G., Nagayev, R., Nkoba, M.A. (2019). The impact of social and environmental sustainability on financial performance: a global analysis of the banking sector. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 49, 35–53. DOI: 10.1016/j. mulfin.2019.01.002.
- Nollet, J., Filis, G., Mitrokostas, E. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: A non-linear and disaggregated approach. Economic Modelling, 52, 400–407. DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2015.09.019.
- Oželienė, D. (2017). A review of enterprise sustainable development models: Critical appraisal. International Scientific Journal “Science. Business. Society”, 2(2), 97–103.
- Przychodzeń, W. (2013). Zrównoważone przedsiębiorstwo. Teoria, praktyka, wycena, nauczanie. Warsaw, Poland: Poltext.
- Rau, P.R., Yu, T. (2023). A survey on ESG: investor, institutions and firms. China Finance Review International. Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. DOI: 10.1108/CFRI-12-2022-0260.
- Sajnóg, A., Sosnowski, T. (2015). Efektywność realizacji procesów dezinwestycji funduszy private equity na GPW w Warszawie. Studies and Work of the Collegium of Management and Finance, 143, 55–76.
- Sanders, N.R., Wood, J.D. (2015). Foundations of Sustainable Business. New Jersey, NJ: Wiley. Soana, M-G. (2011). The relationship between corporate social performance and corporate financial performance in the bank sector. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(1), 133–148. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-011-0894-x.
- Sobczyk, M. (2010). Statystyka opisowa. Warsaw, Poland: C.H. Beck.
- Sueyoshi, T., Goto, M. (2012). Data envelopment analysis for environmental assessment: Comparison between public and private ownership in petroleum industry. European Journal of Operational Research, 216(3), 668–678. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2011.07.046.
- Sustainable Development Solution Network (SDSN) (2013). An action agenda for sustainable development. New York, NY: UN.
- Tsai, W.-H., Lee, H.-L., Yang, C.-H., Huang, C.-C. (2016). Input-Output Analysis for Sustainability by Using DEA Method: A Comparison Study between European and Asian Countries. Sustainability, 8(12), 1–17. DOI: 10.3390/su8121230.
- United Nations (UN) (2012). Future we want. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: UN.
- Wagner, M. (2010). The role of corporate sustainability performance for economic performance: a firm-level analysis of moderation effects. Ecological Economics, 69(7), 1553–1560. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.02.017.
- Witkowska, J. (2016). Koszty i korzyści społecznej odpowiedzialności przedsiębiorstw. In: Z. Wysokińska, J. Witkowska, Zrównoważony rozwój. Wybrane aspekty makro-i mikroekonomiczne (pp. 155–160). Łódź, Poland: Publisher of the University of Lodz.
- World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) (1987). Our common future. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
- Xiao, C., Wang, Q., van der Vaart, T., van Donk, D.P. (2018). When does corporate sustainability performance pay off? The impact of Country-level sustainability performance. Ecological Economics, 146, 325–333. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.11.025.
- Ylvinger, S. (2000). Essays on Production Performance Assessment. Umeå Economic Studies, 531, PhD thesis.
- Ziegler, A., Schröder, M., Rennings, K. (2007). The effect of environmental and social performance on the stock performance of European corporations. Environmental and Resource Economics, 37(4), 661–680. DOI: 10.1007/s10640-007-9082-y.