Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Species-specific physiological responses of four sympatric Quercus species to water deficit during seedling establishment Cover

Species-specific physiological responses of four sympatric Quercus species to water deficit during seedling establishment

Open Access
|Sep 2026

References

  1. Alonso-Forn, D., Peguero-Pina, J.J., Ferrio, J.P., Mencuccini, M., Mendoza-Herrer, Ó., Sancho-Knapik, D., Gil-Pelegrín, E., 2021. Contrasting functional strategies following severe drought in two Mediterranean oaks with different leaf habit: Quercus faginea and Quercus ilex subsp. rotundifolia. Tree Physiology, 41 (3): 371–387. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpaa135
  2. Arend, M., Brem, A., Kuster, T.M., Günthardt-Goerg, M. S., 2013. Seasonal photosynthetic responses of European oaks to drought and elevated daytime temperature. Plant Biology, 15: 169–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.2012.00625.x
  3. Bantis, F., Radoglou, K., Brüggemann, W., 2019. Differential ecophysiological responses to seasonal drought of three co-existing oak species in northern Greece. Plant Biosystems-An International Journal Dealing with all Aspects of Plant Biology, 153 (3): 378–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2018.1492990
  4. Barton, K., 2023. MuMIn: Multi-Model Inference. R package version 1.48.19. [cit.2026-04-17]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn
  5. Baselga, A., Araújo, M.B., 2009. Individualistic vs community modelling of species distributions under climate change. Ecography, 32 (1): 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.05856.x
  6. Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., Walker, S., 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67 (1): 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
  7. Černý, J., Špulák, O., Kománek, M., Žižková, E., Sýkora, P., 2024. Sessile oak (Quercus petraea [Matt.] Liebl.) and its adaptation strategies in the context of global climate change: a review. Central European Forestry Journal, 70 (2): 77–94. https://doi.org/10.2478/forj-2024-0012
  8. Chatziphilippidis, G., Spyroglou, G., 2006. Modelling the growth of Quercus frainetto in Greece. In Sustainable forest management: growth models for Europe. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, p. 373–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31304-4_21
  9. Daas, C., Montpied, P., Hanchi, B., Dreyer, E., 2008. Responses of photosynthesis to high temperatures in oak saplings assessed by chlorophyll-a fluorescence: inter-specific diversity and temperature-induced plasticity. Annals of Forest Science, 65 (3): 305. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2008002
  10. Damesin, C., Rambal, S., 1995. Field study of leaf photosynthetic performance by a Mediterranean deciduous oak tree (Quercus pubescens) during a severe summer drought. New Phytologist, 131 (2): 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1995.tb05717.x
  11. De Rigo, D., Enescu, C.M., Houston Durrant, T., Caudullo, G., 2016. Quercus cerris in Europe: distribution, habitat, usage and threats. In San-Miguel-Ayanz, J., de Rigo, D., Caudullo, G., Houston Durrant, T., Mauri, A. (eds). European atlas of forest tree species. Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Communities, p. 148–149.
  12. Deligöz, A., Bayar, E., 2017. Variations in physiological and biochemical traits of drought-stressed Quercus cerris seedlings. Turkish Journal of Forestry, 18 (4): 269–74. https://doi.org/10.18182/tjf.318318
  13. Deligöz, A., Bayar, E., 2018. Drought stress responses of seedlings of two oak species (Quercus cerris and Quercus robur). Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 42 (2): 114–123. https://doi.org/10.3906/tar-1709-29
  14. Denk, T., Grimm, G.W., Manos, P.S., Deng, M., Hipp, A.L., 2017. An updated infrageneric classification of the oaks: review of previous taxonomic schemes and synthesis of evolutionary patterns. In Gil-Pelegrín, E., Peguero-Pina, J., Sancho-Knapik, D. (eds). Oaks physiological ecology. Exploring the functional diversity of genus Quercus L. Tree Physiology, vol 7. Cham: Springer, p. 13–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69099-5_2
  15. Eaton, E.G.S.D.J., Caudullo, G., Oliveira, S., De Rigo, D., 2016. Quercus robur and Quercus petraea in Europe: distribution, habitat, usage and threats. In San-Miguel-Ayanz, J., de Rigo, D., Caudullo, G., Houston Durrant, T., Mauri, A. (eds). European atlas of forest tree species. Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Communities, p. 160–163.
  16. European Environment Agency, 2006. EEA environmental statement 2006. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
  17. Fekete, G., Király, G., Molnár, Zs., 2016. Delineation of the Pannonian vegetation region. Community Ecology, 17 (1): 114–124. https://doi.org/10.1556/168.2016.17.1.14
  18. Filella, I., Llusia, J., Piñol, J., Peñuelas, J., 1998. Leaf gas exchange and fluorescence of Phillyrea latifolia, Pistacia lentiscus and Quercus ilex saplings in severe drought and high temperature conditions. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 39 (3): 213–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-8472(97)00045-2
  19. Filipović, L., Putniković, S., Stosic, B., Stosic, T., Djurdjević, V., Tošić, I., 2025. Analysis of spatio-temporal characteristics of drought in Serbia from 1961 to 2020 using SPI and SPEI. International Journal of Climatology, 45 (7): e8803. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.8803
  20. Fotelli, M.N., Radoglou, K.M., Constantinidou, H.I., 2000. Water stress responses of seedlings of four Mediterranean oak species. Tree Physiology, 20 (16): 1065–1075. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/20.16.1065
  21. Gallé, A., Haldimann, P., Feller, U., 2007. Photosynthetic performance and water relations in young pubescent oak (Quercus pubescens) trees during drought stress and recovery. New Phytologist, 174 (4): 799–810. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02047.x
  22. Ganatsas, P., Tsakaldimi, M., 2013. A comparative study of desiccation responses of seeds of three drought-resistant Mediterranean oaks. Forest Ecology and Management, 305: 189–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.05.042
  23. Ganatsas, P., Tsakaldimi, M., Karydopoulos, T., Petaloudi, L.M., Papaemmanouil, A., Papadopoulos, S., Gerochristou, S., 2022. Carbon pools in a 77 year-old oak forest under conversion from coppice to high forest. Sustainability, 14 (21): 13764. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142113764
  24. Graves, S., Piepho, H.-P., Selzer, L., Dorai-Raj, S., 2019. multcompView: visualizations of paired comparisons. R package version 0.1.11. [cit. 2026-05-04]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=multcompView
  25. Gross, K., Homlicher, A., Weinreich, A., Wagner, E., 1996. Effect of shade on stomatal conductance, net photosynthesis, photochemical efficiency and growth of oak saplings. Annales des Sciences Forestières, 53 (2-3): 279–290. [cit. 2026-08-02]. https://hal.science/hal-00883051v1
  26. Gross, J., Ligges, U., 2015. nortest: Tests for Normality. R package version 1.0-4. [cit. 2026-05-04]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nortest
  27. Grossnickle, S.C., 2012. Why seedlings survive: influence of plant attributes. New Forests, 43 (5): 711–738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-012-9336-6
  28. Ivetić, V., Devetaković, J., 2016. Reforestation challenges in Southeast Europe facing climate change. Reforesta, 1 (1): 178–220. https://doi.org/10.21750/10.21750/REFOR.1.10.10
  29. Kabaoğlu, A., Kulaç, S., Baysal, İ., Özbayram, A.K., Akbulut, S., Öztürk, N., 2023. Some physiological and biochemical changes in oak trees after fire. Cerne, 29: e-103199. https://doi.org/10.1590/01047760202329013199
  30. Kalaji, H.M., Schansker, G., Brestic, M., Bussotti, F., Calatayud, A., Ferroni, L., Goltsev, V., Guidi, L., Jajoo, A., Li, P., Losciale, P., Mishra,, V.K., Misra, A.N., Nebauer, S.G., Pancaldi, S., Penella, C., Pollastrini, M., Suresh, K., Tambussi, E., Yanniccari, M., Zivcak, M., Cetner, M.D., Samborska, I.A., Stirbet, A., Olsovska, K., Kunderlikova, K., Shelonzek, H., Rusinowski, S., Bąba, W., 2017. Frequently asked questions about chlorophyll fluorescence, the sequel. Photo-synthesis Research, 132 (1): 13–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-016-0318-y
  31. Kanjevac, B., Ljubičić, J., Kerkez Janković, I., Mijatović, Lj., Devetaković, J., 2024 2024. Regeneration of hilly-mountainous oak forests in Serbia – past experiences and future perspectives. Reforesta, 18: 34–58. https://doi.org/10.21750/REFOR.18.03.119
  32. Kaproth, M.A., Fredericksen, B.W., González-Rodríguez, A., Hipp, A.L., Cavender-Bares, J., 2023. Drought response strategies are coupled with leaf habit in 35 evergreen and deciduous oak (Quercus) species across a climatic gradient in the Americas. New Phytologist, 239 (3): 888–904. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.19019
  33. Kebert, M., Vuksanović, V., Stefels, J., Bojović, M., Horák, R., Kostić, S., Kovačević, B., Orlović, S., Neri, L., Magli, M., Rapparini, F., 2022. Species-level differences in osmoprotectants and antioxidants contribute to stress tolerance of Quercus robur L., and Q. cerris L. seedlings under water deficit and high temperatures. Plants, 11 (13): 1744. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11131744
  34. Killi, D., Bussotti, F., Gottardini, E., Pollastrini, M., Mori, J., Tani, C., Papini, C., Ferrini, F., Fini, A., 2018. Photosynthetic and morphological responses of oak species to temperature and [CO2] increased to levels predicted for 2050. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 31: 26–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.01.012
  35. Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P.B., Christensen, R.H.B., 2017 lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82 (13): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13
  36. Leverkus, A.B., Medina, M., Lázaro-González, A., Levy, L., Lorente-Casalini, O., Martín, M.P.R., Vendiņa, V., 2026. Drivers of seedling emergence and early growth of 12 European oak species: results from a cross-continental experiment. Forest Ecology and Management, 599: 123223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2025.123223
  37. Limousin, J.M., Roussel, A., Rodríguez-Calcerrada, J., Torres-Ruiz, J.M., Moreno, M., Garcia de Jalon, L., Ourcival, J.M., Simioni, G., Cochard, H., Martin-St Paul, N., 2022. Drought acclimation of Quercus ilex leaves improves tolerance to moderate drought but not resistance to severe water stress. Plant, Cell & Environment, 45 (7): 1967–1984. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.14326
  38. Löf, M., 2024. Challenges for management of rich Quercus forests in Europe. In Martens, C., Clark, S., Schweitzer, C. (eds). The international oak symposium: science-based management for dynamic oak forests.General Technical Report SRS-278. Asheville: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station, p. 9–10.
  39. Manes, F., Vitale, M., Donato, E., Giannini, M., Puppi, G., 2006. Different ability of three Mediterranean oak species to tolerate progressive water stress. Photosynthetica, 44 (3): 387–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11099-006-0040-7
  40. Martínez-Vilalta, J., Garcia-Forner, N., 2016. Water potential regulation, stomatal behaviour and hydraulic transport under drought: deconstructing the iso/anisohydric concept. Plant, Cell & Environment, 40 (6): 962–976. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12846
  41. McDowell, N., Pockman, W.T., Allen, C.D., Breshears, D.D., Cobb, N., Kolb, T., Plaut, J., Sperry, J., West, A., Williams, D.G., Yepez, E.A., 2008. Mechanisms of plant survival and mortality during drought: why do some plants survive while others succumb to drought? New Phytologist, 178 (4): 719–739. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02436.x
  42. Mediavilla, S., Escudero, A., 2003. Stomatal responses to drought at a Mediterranean site: a comparative study of co-occurring woody species differing in leaf longevity. Tree Physiology, 23 (14): 987–996. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/23.14.987
  43. Mediavilla, S., Escudero, A., 2004. Stomatal responses to drought of mature trees and seedlings of two co-occurring Mediterranean oaks. Forest Ecology and Management, 187 (2-3): 281–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2003.07.006
  44. Mijatović, Lj., Kanjevac, B., Ljubičić, J., Kerkez Janković, I., Devetaković, J., 2026. Early post-germination physiological traits of oak species under various environmental conditions in oak forests. Forests, 17 (3): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.3390/f17010003
  45. Mondanelli, L., Mariotti, B., Maltoni, A., Salbitano, F., Traversi, M.L., Giovannelli, A., Maserti, B.E., Cocozza, C., 2026. First-year seedlings respond to a 21-day summer water deficit: morphological and physiological insights of two populations of five Mediterranean Quercus species. iForest, 19: 149–156. DOI: 10. 3832/ifor4928-019
  46. Moreno, M., Simioni, G., Cochard, H., Doussan, C., Guillemot, J., Decarsin, R., Fernandez-Conradi, P., Dupuy, J.L., Trueba, S., Pimont, F., Ruffault, J., Jean, F., Móricz, N., Mészáros, I., Kern, Z., Illés, G.Z., Garamszegi, B., Eötvös, C. B., ..., Németh, T.M., 2025. Evaluating the drought tolerance of five native broadleaf tree species using dendroecological analysis in East Central Europe. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, 8: 625371. DOI: 10.3389/ffgc.2025.1625371
  47. Nakagawa, S., Schielzeth, H., 2013. A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 4 (2): 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00261.x
  48. Nicolescu, V.N., Vor, T., Brus, R., Đodan, M., Perić, S., Podrázský, V., ... Bartlett, D. 2025. Management of sessile oak (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.), a major forest species in Europe. Journal of Forestry Research, 36 (1): 78.
  49. Ogaya, R., Peñuelas, J., 2003. Comparative seasonal gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence of two dominant woody species in a Holm Oak Forest. Flora-Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants, 198 (2): 132–141. https://doi.org/10.1078/0367-2530-00085
  50. Pasta, S., De Rigo, D., Caudullo, G., 2016. Quercus pubescens in Europe: distribution, habitat, usage and threats. In San-Miguel-Ayanz, J., de Rigo, D., Caudullo, G., Houston Durrant, T., Mauri, A. (eds). European atlas of forest tree species. Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Communities, p. 156–157.
  51. Pietras, J., Stojanović, M., Knott, R., Pokorný, R., 2016. Oak sprouts grow better than seedlings under drought stress. iForest-Biogeosciences and Forestry, 9 (4): 529. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor1823-009
  52. Poorter, H., Bühler, J., van Dusschoten, D., Climent, J., Postma, J. A., 2012. Pot size matters: a meta-analysis of the effects of rooting volume on plant growth. Functional Plant Biology, 39 (11): 839–850. https://doi.org/10.1071/FP12049
  53. Popa, I., Popa, A., 2026. Finding the winner: resilience to drought of six oak species in a forest-steppe long-term multi-species trial. Forest Ecology and Management, 602: 123319.
  54. Praciak, A., Pasiecznik, N., Sheil, D., Van Heist, M., Sassen, M., Correia, C.S., Dixon, C., Fyson, G., Rush-forth, K., Teeling, C., 2013. The CABI encyclopedia of forest trees. Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK: CABI. 536 p.
  55. R Core Team, 2026. R. A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [cit.2026-05-18]. https://www.R-project.org/
  56. Savill, P.S., 2019. The silviculture of trees used in British forestry. Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK: CABI. 424 p.
  57. Siam, A.M., Radoglou, K.M., Noitsakis, B., Smiris, P., 2009. Differences in ecophysiological responses to summer drought between seedlings of three deciduous oak species. Forest Ecology and Management, 258 (1): 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.03.048
  58. Sobrino-Plata, J., Cano, F.J., Aranda, I., Fernández De Simón, M.B., Rodríguez-Calcerrada, J., 2024. The impact of drought on plant metabolism in Quercus species– from initial response to recovery. In António, C. (ed.). Monitoring forest damage with metabolomics methods. Hoboken, New Jersey, USA: John Wiley and Sons, p. 267–313. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119868750.ch10
  59. Spiecker H., 2021. Production of valuable oak wood in Europe. Annals of Forest Research, 64 (1): 5–12. https://doi.org/10.15287/afr.2021.2207
  60. Stojanović, D., Orlović, S., Zlatković, M., Kostić, S., Vasić, V., Miletić, B., Kesić, L., Matović, B., Božanić, D., Pavlović, L., Milović, M., Pekeč, S., Đurđević, V., 2021. Climate change within Serbian forests: current state and future perspectives. Topola, 208: 39–56. https://doi.org/10.5937/topola2108039S
  61. Stojanović, D.B., Stojsavljević, R., Pavkov, S.D., Tenji, D., Djalović, I., Vidović, D., ... Višacki, V., 2026. Impact of climate change on tree species distribution and vulnerability in key protected forest ecosystems in Serbia. Forests, 17 (4): 469. https://doi.org/10.3390/f17040469
  62. Stojanović, M., Szatniewska, J., Kyselová, I., Pokorný, R., Čater, M., 2017. Transpiration and water potential of young Quercus petraea (M.) Liebl. coppice sprouts and seedlings during favourable and drought conditions. Journal of Forest Science, 63 (7): 613–623. https://doi.org/10.17221/36/2017-JFS
  63. Tognetti, R., Cherubini, P., Marchi, S., Raschi, A., 2007. Leaf traits and tree rings suggest different water-use and carbon assimilation strategies by two co-occurring Quercus species in a Mediterranean mixed-forest stand in Tuscany, Italy. Tree Physiology, 27 (12): 1741–1751. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/27.12.1741
  64. Tsakaldimi, M., Tsitsoni, T., Ganatsas, P., Zagas, T., 2009. A comparison of root architecture and shoot morphology between naturally regenerated and container-grown seedlings of Quercus ilex. Plant and Soil, 324 (1): 103–113.
  65. Turner, N.C., 2018. Imposing and maintaining soil water deficits in drought studies in pots. Plant and Soil, 439 (1): 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-018-3893-1
  66. Vuković, A.J., Vujadinović, M.P., Rendulić, S.M., Đurđević, V.S., Ruml, M.M., Babić, V.P., Popović, D.P., 2018. Global warming impact on climate change in Serbia for the period 1961–2100. Thermal Science, 22 (6 Part A): 2267–2280. https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI180411168V
  67. Walker, A., 2024. writexl: Export Data Frames to Excel ‘xlsx’ Format. [cit.2026-04-30]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=writexl
  68. Wickham, H., 2019. stringr: Simple, Consistent Wrappers for Common String Operations. [cit.2026-04-30]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=stringr
  69. Wickham, H., François, R., Henry, L., Müller, K., 2023a. dplyr: A Grammar of Data Manipulation. [cit.2026-04-30]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dplyr
  70. Wickham, H., Hester, J., Bryan, J., 2023b. readr: Read Rectangular Text Data. [cit.2026-06-01]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=readr
  71. Wickham, H., Vaughan, D., 2023. tidyr: Tidy Messy Data. [cit.2026-04-30]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=tidyr
  72. Wu, J., Wang, J., Hui, W., Zhao, F., Wang, P., Su, C., Gong, W., 2022. Physiology of plant responses to water stress and related genes: a review. Forests, 13 (2): 324. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13020324
  73. Zeneli, G., Kola, H., 2017. Coppice forests: c an traditional coppice forest management help the Western Balkan region? Forest Research, 6 (3). https://doi.org/10.4172/2168-9776.1000212
  74. Živanović, S., 2017. Impact of drought in Serbia on fire vulnerability of forests. International Journal Bioautomation, 21 (2): 217. https://biomed.bas.bg/bioautomation/2017/vol_21.2/files/21.2_06.pdf
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/foecol-2026-0022 | Journal eISSN: 1338-7014 | Journal ISSN: 1336-5266
Language: English
Page range: 264 - 277
Submitted on: Jun 30, 2026
Accepted on: Aug 24, 2026
Published online: Sep 30, 2026
Published in print: Sep 1, 2026
Published by: Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Forest Ecology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year

© 2026 Jovana Devetaković, Ljubica Mijatović, Janko Ljubičić, Branko Kanjevac, Ivona Kerkez Janković, published by Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Forest Ecology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.