Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Predicting forest biodiversity from spaceborne GEDI LiDAR and machine learning: structural drivers and regional transferability across Pacific Northwest forests Cover

Predicting forest biodiversity from spaceborne GEDI LiDAR and machine learning: structural drivers and regional transferability across Pacific Northwest forests

By:   
Open Access
|Sep 2026

References

  1. Altmann, A., Toloşi, L., Sander, O., Lengauer, T., 2010. Permutation importance: a corrected feature importance measure. Bioinformatics, 26 (10): 1340–1347. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq134
  2. Atkins, J.W., Costanza, J., Dahlin, K.M., Dannenberg, M.P., Elmore, A.J., Fitzpatrick, M.C., Hakkenberg, C.R., Hardiman, B.S., Kamoske, A., LaRue, E.A., Silva, C.A., Stovall, A.E.L., Tielens, E.K., 2023. Scale dependency of lidar-derived forest structural diversity. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 14 (2): 708–723. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.14040
  3. Bechtold, W.A., Patterson, P.L., 2005. The enhanced Forest Inventory and Analysis program — national sampling design and estimation procedures. General Technical Report SRS-80. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. 85 p. https://doi.org/10.2737/SRSGTR-80
  4. Breiman, L., 2001. Random forests. Machine Learning, 45 (1): 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324
  5. Burns, P., Hakkenberg, C.R., Goetz, S.J., 2024. Multi-resolution gridded maps of vegetation structure from GEDI. Scientific Data, 11: 881. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-03668-4
  6. Chao, A., Chiu, C.-H., Jost, L., 2014. Unifying species diversity, phylogenetic diversity, functional diversity, and related similarity and differentiation measures. Ecological Monographs, 84 (1): 45–67. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-120213-091540
  7. Coulston, J.W., Reams, G.A., 2004. The effect of blurred plot coordinates on interpolating forest biomass. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 36 (5): 801–807. https://doi.org/10.1139/X05-265
  8. de Conto, T., Armston, J., Dubayah, R., 2024. Characterizing the structural complexity of the Earth’s forests with spaceborne lidar. Nature Communications, 15: 8116. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-52468-2
  9. Dhargay, S., Lyell, C.S., Brown, T.P., Inbar, A., Sheridan, G.J., Lane, P.N.J., 2022. Performance of GEDI space-borne LiDAR for quantifying structural variation in the temperate forests of south-eastern Australia. Remote Sensing, 14 (15): 3615. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14153615
  10. Dhargay, S., Lyell, C.S., Brown, T.P., Inbar, A., Sheridan, G.J., Lane, P.N.J., 2020. The Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation: high-resolution laser ranging of the Earth’s forests and topography. Science of Remote Sensing, 1: 100002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srs.2020.100002
  11. Duncanson, L.I., Armston, J., Kellner, J.R., Dubayah, R., 2022 Aboveground biomass density models for NASA’s Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) lidar mission. Remote Sensing of Environment, 270: 112845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112845
  12. FAO, UNEP, 2020. The State of the World’s Forests 2020: Forests, biodiversity and people. Rome: FAO. 188 p. https://doi.org/10.4060/ca8642en
  13. Friedman, J.H., 2001. Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Annals of Statistics, 29 (5): 1189–1232. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1013203451
  14. Gorelick, N., Hancher, M., Dixon, M., Ilyushchenko, S., Thau, D., Moore, R., 2017. Google Earth Engine: planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sensing of Environment, 202: 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.031
  15. Hancock, S., Armston, J., Hofton, M., Sun, X., Tang, H., Duncanson, L.I., Kellner, J.R., Dubayah, R., 2019. The GEDI simulator: a large-footprint wave form lidar simulator for calibration and validation of spaceborne missions. Earth and Space Science, 6 (2): 294–310. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018EA000506
  16. Hernández-Stefanoni, J.L., Dupuy, J.M., Johnson, K.D., Birdsey, R., Tun-Dzul, F., Peduzzi, A., Caamal-Sosa, J.P., Sánchez-Santos, G., López-Merlín, D., 2014. Improving species diversity and biomass estimates of tropical dry forests using airborne LiDAR. Remote Sensing, 6 (6): 4741–4763. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs6064741
  17. Hijmans, R.J., Cameron, S.E., Parra, J.L., Jones, P.G., Jarvis, A., 2005. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology, 25 (15): 1965–1978. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1276
  18. Hoerl, A.E., Kennard, R.W., 1970. Ridge regression: biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems. Techno-metrics, 12 (1): 55–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1970.10488634
  19. Kamoske, A.G., Dahlin, K.M., Read, Q.D., Record, S., Stark, S.C., Serbin, S.P., Zarnetske, P.L., Dornelas, M., 2022. Towards mapping biodiversity from above: can fusing lidar and hyperspectral remote sensing predict taxonomic, functional, and phylo-genetic tree diversity in temperate forests? Global Ecology and Biogeography, 31 (7): 1440–1460. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13516
  20. Leutner, B.F., Reineking, B., Müller, J., Bachmann, M., Beierkuhnlein, C., Dech, S., Wegmann, M., 2012. Modelling forest α-diversity and floristic composition – on the added value of LiDAR plus hyper-spectral remote sensing. Remote Sensing, 4 (9): 2818–2845. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs4092818
  21. MacArthur, R.H., MacArthur, J.W., 1961. On bird species diversity. Ecology, 42 (3): 594–598. https://doi.org/10.2307/1932254
  22. Magurran, A.E., 2004. Measuring biological diversity. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. 256 p.
  23. Mandl, L., Stritih, A., Seidl, R., Ginzler, C., Senf, C., 2023. Spaceborne LiDAR for characterizing forest structure across scales in the European Alps. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation, 9 (5): 599–614. https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.330
  24. Moeslund, J.E., Zlinszky, A., Ejrnæs, R., Brunbjerg, A.K., Bøcher, P.K., Svenning, J.-C., Normand, S., 2019. Light detection and ranging explains diversity of plants, fungi, lichens, and bryophytes across multiple habitats and large geographic extent. Ecological Applications, 29 (5): e01907. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1907
  25. Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Prettenhofer, P., Weiss, R., Dubourg, V., Vanderplas, J., Passos, A., Cournapeau, D., Brucher, M., Perrot, M., Duchesnay, E., 2011. Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12: 2825–2830. https://doi.org/10.5555/1953048.2078195
  26. Roberts, D.R., Bahn, V., Ciuti, S., Boyce, M.S., Elith, J., Guillera-Arroita, G., Hauenstein, S., Lahoz-Monfort, J.J., Schröder, B., Thuiller, W., Warton, D.I., Wintle, B.A., Hartig, F., Dormann, C.F., 2017. Cross-validation strategies for data with temporal, spatial, hierarchical, or phylogenetic structure. Ecography, 40 (8): 913–929. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.02881
  27. Schneider, F.D., Morsdorf, F., Schmid, B., Petchey, O. L., Hueni, A., Schimel, D.S., Schaepman, M.E., 2017. Mapping functional diversity from remotely sensed morphological and physiological forest traits. Nature Communications, 8: 1441. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01530-3
  28. Simonson, W.D., Allen, H.D., Coomes, D.A., 2014. Applications of airborne lidar for the assessment of animal species diversity. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 5 (8): 719–728. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12219
  29. Stanke, H., Finley, A.O., Weed, A.S., Walters, B.F., Domke, G.M., 2020. rFIA: an R package for estimation of forest attributes with the US Forest Inventory and Analysis database. Environmental Modelling & Software, 127: 104664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104664
  30. Tews, J., Brose, U., Grimm, V., Tielbörger, K., Wich-mann, M.C., Schwager, M., Jeltsch, F., 2004. Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: the importance of keystone structures. Journal of Biogeography, 31 (1): 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0305-0270.2003.00994.x
  31. Toivonen, J., Kangas, A., Maltamo, M., Kukkonen, M., Packalen, P., 2023. Assessing biodiversity using forest structure indicators based on airborne laser scanning data. Forest Ecology and Management, 546: 121376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2023.121376
  32. Torresani, M., Rocchini, D., Sonnenschein, R., Zebisch, M., Hauffe, H.C., Heym, M., Pretzsch, H., Tonon, G., 2023. LiDAR GEDI derived tree canopy height heterogeneity reveals patterns of biodiversity in forest ecosystems. Ecological Informatics, 73: 102082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2023.102082
  33. UNEP-WCMC, IUCN, 2020. Protected Planet Report 2020. Cambridge, UK and Gland, Switzerland: UNEP-WCMC and IUCN. https://doi.org/10.34892/jg6t-xn70
  34. USDA Forest Service, 2022. Forest Inventory and Analysis National Core Field Guide. https://doi.org/10.2737/FIA-FG-2022
  35. Woudenberg, S.W., Conkling, B.L., O’Connell, B.M., LaPoint, E.B., Turner, J.A., Waddell, K.L., 2010. The Forest Inventory and Analysis Database: database description and users manual version 4.0 for Phase 2. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-245. Fort Collins, CO: U.S, Department of Agricuture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. https://doi.org/10.2737/RMRS-GTR-245
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/foecol-2026-0018 | Journal eISSN: 1338-7014 | Journal ISSN: 1336-5266
Language: English
Page range: 213 - 226
Submitted on: Jan 26, 2026
Accepted on: Aug 5, 2026
Published online: Sep 30, 2026
Published in print: Sep 1, 2026
Published by: Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Forest Ecology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year

© 2026 Satyam Shah, published by Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Forest Ecology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.