Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Activity patterns and habitat selection by terrestrial mammals in a mosaic landscape of silvopastoral system and forest fragments in the Andean piedmont in Colombia Cover

Activity patterns and habitat selection by terrestrial mammals in a mosaic landscape of silvopastoral system and forest fragments in the Andean piedmont in Colombia

Open Access
|Jul 2025

References

  1. Abramsky, Z., Rosenzweig, M. L., Subach, A., 2001. The cost of interspecific competition in two gerbil species. Journal of Animal Ecology, 70 (4): 561–567. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2656.2001.00520.x
  2. Adler, G. H., Arboledo, J.J., Travi, B.L., 1997. Population dynamics of Didelphis marsupialis in Northern Colombia. Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment, 32 (1): 7–11. https://doi.org/10.1076/snfe.32.1.7.13462
  3. Alexandratos, N., Bruinsma, J., Boedeker, G., Schmidhuber, J., Broca, S., Shetty, P., Ottaviani, M.G., 2006. World agriculture: towards 2030/2050. Interim report. Prospects for food, nutrition, agriculture and major commodity groups. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Global Perspective Studies Unit. 71 p.
  4. Alfonso, C., Sánchez, F., 2019. Mamíferos no voladores en un campus universitario de la Orinoquia colombiana [Non-flying mammals on a university campus in the Colombian Orinoquia region]. Mammalogy Notes, 5 (1-2): 29–39. https://doi.org/10.47603/manovol5n2.29-39. (In Spanish).
  5. Azevedo, F.C., Lemos, F.G., Freitas-Junior, M.C., Fabiano, E.C., Azevedo, F.C.C., 2025. Foraging ecology of an apex predator in forested patches within a human-dominated landscape at Southeast Brazil. Journal for Nature Conservation, 86: 126929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2025.126929
  6. Ballesteros Correa, J., 2015. Efecto del manejo silvopastoril y convencional de ganadería extensiva sobre el ensamblaje de murciélagos asociados a fragmentos de bosque seco tropical en Córdoba, Colombia [The effect of silvo-pastoral management and conventional extensive livestock farming on the assemblage of bats associated with tropical dry forest fragments in Córdoba, Colombia]. Doctoral thesis. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Colombia. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.10554.19650 .(In Spanish).
  7. Beca, G., Vancine, M.H., Carvalho, C.S., Pedrosa, F., Alves, R.S.C., Buscariol, D., Peres, C.A., Ribeiro, M.C., Galetti, M., 2017. High mammal species turnover in forest patches immersed in biofuel plantations. Biological Conservation, 210: 352–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.02.033
  8. Benavides, C., Arce, A., Pacheco, L.F., 2020. Common opossum population density in an agroforestry system in Bolivia. Acta Amazonica, 50: 246–251.
  9. Berta, A., 1982. Cerdocyon thous. Mammalian Species, 186: 1–4. https://doi.org/10.2307/3503974
  10. Bertassoni, A., Costa, R., Gouvea, J.A., Bianchi, R. de C., Ribeiro, J.W., Vancine, M.H., Ribeiro, M.C., 2019. Land-use changes and the expansion of biofuel crops threaten the giant anteater in southeastern Brazil. Journal of Mammalogy, 100 (2): 435–444. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyz042
  11. Bianchi, R. de C., Campos, R.C., Xavier-Filho, N.L., Olifiers, N., Gompper, M.E., Mourão, G., 2014. Intraspecific, interspecific, and seasonal differences in the diet of three mid-sized carnivores in a large neotropical wet-land. Acta Theriologica, 59 (1): 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-013-0137-x
  12. Bisbale, F.J., 1986. Food habits of some neotropical carnivores in Venezuela (Mammalia, Carnivora). Mammalia, 50 (3): 329–340. https://doi.org/10.1515/mamm.1986.50.3.329
  13. Blake, J.G., Mosquera, D., Loiselle, B.A., Swing, K., Guerra, J., Romo, D., 2012. Temporal activity patterns of terrestrial mammals in lowland rainforest of eastern Ecuador. Ecotropica, 18 (2): 137–146.
  14. Botero, L., De La Ossa, J., 2011. Fauna silvestre asociada a ganado vacuno doble propósito en sistema de silvopastoreo, Pinto, Magdalena, Colombia [Wildlife associated with dual-purpose cattle in a silvopastoral system, Pinto, Magdalena, Colombia]. Revista MVZ Córdoba, 16 (3): 2733–2741. https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.274. (In Spanish).
  15. Calenge, C., 2006. The package “adehabitat” for the R software: a tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals. Ecological Modelling, 197 (3-4): 516–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.03.017
  16. Callejas Ávila, Y.A., 2017. Evaluación morfométrica del caño Quebradón como aporte al ordenamiento ambiental del municipio de Cubarral,Meta [Morphometric evaluation of the Quebradón canal as a contribution to the environmental planning of the municipality of Cubarral, Meta]. Bachelor thesis. Universidad Santo Tomás, Bogotá, Colombia. (In Spanish).
  17. Cassaigne, I., Medellín, R.A., Thompson, R.W., Culver, M., Ochoa, A., Vargas, K., Childs, J. L., Sanderson, J., List, R., Torres-Gómez, A., 2016. Diet of pumas (Puma concolor) in Sonora, Mexico, as determined by GPS kill sites and molecular identified scat, with comments on jaguar (Panthera onca) diet. The Southwestern Naturalist, 61 (2): 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1894/0038-4909-61.2.125
  18. Castro-Arellano, I., Zarza, H., Medellín, R.A., 2000. Philander opossum. Mammalian Species, 638: 1–8.
  19. Ceotto, P., Finotti, R., Santori, R., Cerqueira, R., 2009. Diet variation of the marsupials Didelphis aurita and Phi-lander frenatus (Didelphimorphia, Didelphidae) in a rural area of Rio de Janeiro state, Brazil. Mastozoologia Neotropical, 16 (1): 49–58.
  20. Chacón-Pacheco, J. J., Ballesteros-Correa, J., 2019. Mejor condición corporal de Artibeus lituratus en fragmentos de bosque seco asociados a sistemas silvopastoriles que en sistemas convencionales de ganadería en Córdoba, Colombia [Better body condition of Artibeus lituratus in dry forest fragments associated with silvopastoral systems than in conventional livestock systems in Córdoba, Colombia]. Oecologia Australis, 23 (3): 589–605. https://doi.org/10.4257/oeco.2019.2303.16. (In Spanish).
  21. Chaudhary, A., Pfister, S., Hellweg, S., 2016. Spatially explicit analysis of biodiversity loss due to global agriculture, pasture and forest land use from a producer and consumer perspective. Environmental Science and Technology, 50 (7): 3928–3936. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b06153
  22. Cruz-Rodríguez, C., González-Maya, J.F., Rodríguez-Bolaños, A., Cepeda-Mercado, A.A., Zárrate-Charry, D., Belant, J.L., 2015. Ocelot Leopardus pardalis (Carnivora: Felidae) spatial ecology in a fragmented landscape of Colombia. Revista Mexicana de Mastozoología (Nueva Época), 5 (1): 17–24. https://doi.org/10.22201/ie.20074484e.2015.5.1.204
  23. Davis, M.L., Kelly, M.J., Stauffer, D.F., 2011. Carnivore co-existence and habitat use in the Mountain Pine Ridge Forest Reserve, Belize. Animal Conservation, 14 (1): 56–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795.2010.00389.x
  24. de Souza, J.C., da Silva, R.M., Gonçalves, M.P.R., Jardim, R.J.D., Markwith, S.H., 2018. Habitat use, ranching, and human-wildlife conflict within a fragmented landscape in the Pantanal, Brazil. Biological Conservation, 217: 349–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.11.019
  25. Desbiez, A.L.J., Medri, Í.M., 2010. Density and habitat use by giant anteaters (Myrmecophaga tridactyla) and southern tamanduas (Tamandua tetradactyla) in the Pantanal wet-land, Brazil. Edentata, 11 (1): 4–10. https://doi.org/10.1896/020.011.0102
  26. Di Bitetti, M.S., Albanesi, S.A., Foguet, M.J., De Angelo, C., Brown, A.D., 2013. The effect of anthropic pressures and elevation on the large and medium-sized terrestrial mammals of the subtropical mountain forests (Yungas) of NW Argentina. Mammalian Biology, 78 (1): 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2012.08.006
  27. Dudley, N., Alexander, S., 2017. Agriculture and biodiversity: a review. Biodiversity, 18 (2-3): 45–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/14888386.2017.1351892
  28. Eisenberg, J.F., Reid, F., Bonner, S.J., 1989. Mammals of the Neotropics. Vol. 1, The Northern Neotropics: Panama, Colombia, Venezuela, Guyana, Suriname, French Guiana. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 449 p.
  29. Emmons, L.H., Feer, F., 1997. Neotropical rainforest mammals: a field guide. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  30. Estrada, A., Coates-Estrada, R., Meritt Jr, D., 1994. Non flying mammals and landscape changes in the tropical rain forest region of Los Tuxtlas, Mexico. Ecography, 17 (3): 229–241.
  31. Etter, A., Zuluaga, A.F., 2017. Areas aptas para la actividad ganadera en Colombia: Análisis espacial de los impactos ambientales y niveles de productividad de la ganadería [Areas suitable for livestock farming in Colombia: Spatial analysis of environmental impacts and livestock productivity levels]. In. Biodiversidad 2017. Estado y tendencias de la biodiversidad continental de Colombia. Bogotá: Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt. (In Spanish).
  32. Farrell, L.E., Roman, J., Sunquist, M.E., 2000. Dietary separation of sympatric carnivores identified by molecular analysis of scats. Molecular Ecology, 9 (10): 1583– 1590. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.01037.x
  33. Fegraus, E.H., Lin, K., Ahumada, J.A., Baru, C., Chandra, S., Youn, C., 2011. Data acquisition and management software for camera trap data: a case study from the TEAM Network. Ecological Informatics, 6 (6): 345–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2011.06.003
  34. Forero Simijaca, L.N., 2016. Composición y estructura de la comunidad de mamíferos medianos y grandes en un paisaje palmero de los llanos de Casanare, Colombia [Composition and structure of the medium and large mammal community in a palm-growing landscape of the Casanare plains, Colombia]. Thesis for the degree of Biologist. Universidad de La Salle, Bogotá, Colombia.[cit. 2025-01-23]. https://ciencia.lasalle.edu.co/biologia/10. 67 p. (In Spanish).
  35. Galef Jr, B.G., Mittermeier, R.A., Bailey, R.C., 1976. Predation by the tayra (Eira barbara). Journal of Mammalogy, 57 (4): 760–761.
  36. Gallo, J.A., Abba, A.M., Elizalde, L., Di Nucci, D., Ríos, T.A., Ezquiaga, M.C., 2017. First study on food habits of anteaters, Myrmecophaga tridactyla and Tamandua tetradactyla, at the southern limit of their distribution. Mammalia, 81 (6): 601–604. DOI: 10.1515/mammalia-2016-0117
  37. Giraldo, C., Escobar, F., Chara, J. D., Calle, Z., 2011. The adoption of silvopastoral systems promotes the recovery of ecological processes regulated by dung beetles in the Colombian Andes. Insect Conservation and Diversity, 4 (2): 115–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-4598.2010.00112.x
  38. González Rey, I.C., 2017. Caracterización socioeconómica de la población del municipio de Cubarral 2015 [Socioeconomic characterization of the population of the Mu nicipality of Cubarral 2015]. Thesis for the degree of Economist. Universidad de Llos Lanos, Villavicencio, Colombia. 84 p. (In Spanish).
  39. González Valdivia, N.A., 2003. Dos sistemas silvopastoriles como refugios de vida silvestre en el municipio de Estelí [Two silvopastoral systems as wildlife refuges in the municipality of Estelí]. Thesis for the degree of Master of Science. Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Nicaragua, UNAN-León, Nicaragua. 226 p. (In Spanish).
  40. Grotta-Neto, F., Mello, M.C.H., Mello, R.C., Bernardi, I.P., Carrano, E., Passos, F.C., 2021. The role of tayra (Eira barbara) as predator of medium and large-sized mammals. Austral Ecology, 46 (2): 329–333. https://doi.org/10.1111/aec.12982
  41. Guerrero, Y.M., Cadena, A., 2000. Caracterización, evaluación y uso de hábitats del zorro perruno (Cerdocyon thous) en los llanos orientales de Colombia [Characterization, evaluation and use of habitats of the fox (Cerdocyon thous) in the eastern plains of Colombia]. Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, 24 (92): 383–392. (In Spanish).
  42. Harvey, C.A., 2003. La conservación de la biodiversidad en sistemas silvopastoriles [Biodiversity conservation in silvopastoral systems]. In Potencialidades de los sistemas silvopastoriles para la generación de servicios ambientales. Turrialba, C.R.: CATIE, p. 23–32. 198 p. (In Spanish).
  43. Hernández Leal, O.F., Sánchez, F., Lizcano, D.J., 2021. Murciélagos insectívoros aéreos en un paisaje ganadero del piedemonte llanero colombiano [Aerial insect-eating bats in a livestock landscape in the Colombian foot-hills. Colombian Biota]. Biota Colombiana, 22 (1): 164–183. https://doi.org/10.21068/c2021.v22n01a11. (In Spanish).
  44. Hernández-SaintMartín, A.D., Rosas-Rosas, O.C., Palacio-Núñez, J., Tarango-Arambula, L. A., Clemente-Sánchez, F., Hoogesteijn, A.L., 2015. Food habits of jaguar and puma in a protected area and adjacent fragmented landscape of Northeastern Mexico. Natural Areas Journal, 35 (2): 308–317. https://doi.org/10.3375/043.035.0213
  45. Huck, M., Juarez, C.P., Rotundo, M., Dávalos, V., Fernandez-Duque, E., 2017. Mammals and their activity patterns in a forest area in the Humid Chaco, northern Argentina. Check List, 13 (4): 363–378. https://doi.org/10.15560/13.4.363
  46. IDEAM (Instituto de Hidrología, Meteorología y Estudios Ambientales), 2017. Instituto de Hidrología, Meteorología y Estudios Ambientales [Dataset]. [cit. 2025-01-08]. www.ideam.gov.co. (In Spanish).
  47. IGAC (Instituto Geográfico Agustín Codazzi), 2017. Ganadería ‘al rojo vivo’ solo debería imponerse en el 2,4% de Colombia [‘Red-hot’ livestock farming should only be imposed on 2.4% of Colombia]. [cit. 2024-12-17]. https://www.igac.gov.co/es/noticias/ganaderia-al-rojovivo-solo-deberia-imponerse-en-el-24-de-colombia-igac
  48. IUCN, 2020. The IUCN Red list of threatened species. [cit. 2024-12-11]. https://www.iucnredlist.org/
  49. Kotler, B.P., Brown, J.S., Hasson, O., 1991. Factors affecting gerbil foraging behavior and rates of owl predation. Ecology, 72 (6): 2249–2260. https://doi.org/10.2307/1941575
  50. Kreutz, K., Fischer, F., Linsenmair, K.E., 2012. Timber plantations as favourite habitat for giant anteaters. Mammalia, 76: 137–142. https://doi.org/10.1515/mammalia-2011-0049
  51. Kronfeld-Schor, N., Dayan, T., 2003. Partitioning of time as an ecological resource. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 34: 153–181. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132435
  52. Laino, R., Musalem, K., Caballero-Gini, A., Bueno-Villafañe, D., González-Maya, J.F., Chaparro, S., 2020. Anteaters on the edge: giant and lesser anteaters (Myrmecophaga tridactyla and Tamandua tetradactyla) at their geographic distributional limits in Paraguay. Iheringia. Série Zoologia, 110: e2020007. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766e2020007
  53. Lima, K.C.B., Passamani, M., Rosa, C., 2020. Daily tayra (Eira barbara, Linnaeus 1758) activity patterns and habitat use in high montane tropical forests. Acta Oecologica, 108: 103624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2020.103624
  54. Lindell, C.A., 2008. The value of animal behavior in evaluations of restoration success. Restoration Ecology, 16 (2): 197–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00389.x
  55. Lizcano, D.J., Cervera, L., Espinoza-Moreira, S., Poaquiza-Alva, D., Parés-Jiménez, V., Ramírez-Barajas, P.J., 2016. Riqueza de mamíferos medianos y grandes del Refugio de vida silvestre marina y costera Pacoche, Ecuador [Richness of medium and large mammals in the Pacoche Marine and Coastal Wildlife Refuge, Ecuador]. Therya, 7 (1): 135–145. https://doi.org/10.12933/therya-16-308. (In Spanish).
  56. López-Ramírez, C., Restrepo-Quiroz, T., Solari, S., 2020. Diversidad y ecología de mamíferos no voladores asociados a un sistema agro-productivo de cacao, Granja Yariguíes, Santander, Colombia [Diversity and ecology of non-flying mammals associated with a cocoa agro-production system, Yariguíes Farm, Santander, Colombia]. Actualidades Biológicas, 42 (112): 1–13.https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.acbi.v42n112a01. (In Spanish).
  57. Manly, B.F., McDonald, L.L., Thomas, D.L., McDonald, T.L., Erickson, W.P., 2002. Introduction to resource selection studies. In Resource selection by animals: statistical design and analysis for field studies.Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, p. 1–15.
  58. Massara, R.L., Paschoal, A.M.O., Bailey, L.L., Doherty, P.F., Chiarello, A.G., 2016. Ecological interactions between ocelots and sympatric mesocarnivores in protected areas of the Atlantic Forest, southeastern Brazil. Journal of Mammalogy, 97 (6): 1634–1644. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyw129
  59. Mella-Méndez, I., Flores-Peredo, R., Pérez-Torres, J., Hernández-González, S., González-Uribe, D.U., del Socorro Bolívar-Cimé, B., 2019. Activity patterns and temporal niche partitioning of dogs and medium-sized wild mammals in urban parks of Xalapa, Mexico. Urban Ecosystems, 22 (6): 1061–1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-019-00878-2
  60. Meredith, M., Ridout, M., Meredith, M.M., 2021. Estimates of coefficient of overlapping for animal activity patterns. Package ‘overlap’.
  61. Montgomery, G.G., 1985. Movements, foraging and food habits of the four extant species of neotropical vermilinguas (Mammalia; Myrmecophagidae). In Montgomery, G.G. (ed.). The evolution and ecology of armadillos, sloths, and vermilinguas. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press, p. 365–377.
  62. Moreno, R.S., Kays, R.W., Samudio, R., 2006. Competitive release in diets of ocelot (Leopardus pardalis) and puma (Puma concolor) after jaguar (Panthera onca) decline. Journal of Mammalogy, 87 (4): 808–816. https://doi.org/10.1644/05-MAMM-A-360R2.1
  63. Morris, D.W., Kotler, B.P., Brown, J.S., Sundararaj, V., Ale, S.B., 2009. Behavioral indicators for conserving mammal diversity. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1162 (1): 334–356. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04494.x
  64. Murgueitio, E., 2005. Sistemas silvopastoriles en el trópico de América. Libro de Actas Silvopastoralismo y Manejo Sostenible [Silvopastoral systems in tropical America. Proceedings Silvopastoral systems and sustainable management]. Lugo: Unicopia. 151 p. (In Spanish).
  65. Nielsen, C., Thompson, D., Kelly, M., Lopez-Gonzalez, C.A., 2015. Puma concolor. The IUCN Red list of threatened species, 4.
  66. Norris, D., Michalski, F., Peres, C.A., 2010. Habitat patch size modulates terrestrial mammal activity patterns in Amazonian forest fragments. Journal of Mammalogy, 91 (3): 551–560. https://doi.org/10.1644/09-MAMM-A-199.1
  67. Nowak, R.M., Walker, E.P., 1999. Walker’s mammals of the world. Vol. 1. Baltimore: John Hopkins University.
  68. Pardo-Vargas, L.E., Payán-Garrido, E., 2015. Mamíferos de un agropaisaje de palma de aceite en las sabanas inundables de Orocué, Casanare, Colombia [Mammals of an oil palm agrolandscape in the floodplain savannas of Orocué, Casanare, Colombia]. Biota Colombiana, 16 (1): 54–66. (In Spanish).
  69. Payán, E., Soto, C., 2012. Los felinos de Colombia [The felines of Colombia]. Bogotá: Ministerio de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible, Instituto de Investigaciones de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt y Panthera Colombia. 48 p. (In Spanish).
  70. Pineda-Guerrero, A., González-Maya, J. F., Pérez-Torres, J., 2015. Conservation value of forest fragments for mediumsized carnivores in a silvopastoral system in Colombia. Mammalia, 79 (1): 115–119.
  71. Piña, T.E., Carvalho, W.D., Rosalino, L.M.C., Hilário, R.R., 2019. Drivers of mammal richness, diversity and occurrence in heterogeneous landscapes composed by plantation forests and natural environments. Forest Ecology and Management, 449: 117467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117467
  72. Presley, S.J., 2000. Eira barbara. Mammalian Species, iss. 636: 1–6. https://doi.org/10.2307/0.636.1
  73. Racero-Casarrubia, J., Pinedo-Hernández, J., Ballesteros-Correa, J., Marrugo-Negrete, J., 2017. Metales pesados en especies de murciélagos (Quiróptera) asociados a una finca bajo manejo silvopastoril en el departamento de Córdoba, Colombia [Heavy metals in bat species (Chiroptera) associated with a farm under silvopastoral management in the department of Córdoba, Colombia]. Acta Zoológica Mexicana, 33 (1): 45–54. (In Spanish).
  74. Ramírez-Chaves, H.E., Suárez-Castro, A.F., González-Maya, J.F., 2016. Cambios recientes a la lista de los mamíferos de Colombia [Recent changes to the list of mammals of Colombia]. Mammalogy Notes, 3 (1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.47603/manovol3n1.1-9. (In Spanish).
  75. Ramírez-Mejía, A.F., Sánchez, F., 2016. Activity patterns and habitat use of mammals in an Andean forest and a Eucalyptus reforestation in Colombia. Hystrix, the Italian Journal of Mammalogy, 27 (2): 104–110.
  76. Rangel-Ch, J. O., Velázquez, A., 1997. Métodos de estudio de la vegetación [Methods for the study of vegetation]. In Colombia diversidad biótica II. Tipos de vegetación en Colombia. Instituto de Hidrología, Meteorología y Estudios Ambientales, Ministerio del Medio Ambiente, p. 59–82. (In Spanish).
  77. Ridout, M.S., Linkie, M., 2009. Estimating overlap of daily activity patterns from camera trap data. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 14 (3): 322–337.
  78. Rodríguez, J., Bohórquez, J.S., Raigozo, O.G., Clavijo, A., 2020. Evento de depredación de Venado Soche (Mazama rufina, Pucheran, 1851) por Taira (Eira barbara Linnaeus, 1758) en el Parque Nacional Natural Chingaza, Colombia [Predation event of the Soche Deer (Mazama rufina, Pucheran, 1851) by Taira (Eira barbara Linnaeus, 1758) in the Chingaza National Natural Park, Colombia]. Mammalogy Notes, 6 (2): 169–169. https://doi.org/10.47603/mano.v6n2.169. (In Spanish).
  79. Rojano, C., Padilla, H., Giraldo, A., Alvarez, G., Ramos, E., 2015. Registro de presencia del oso palmero (Myrmecophaga tridactyla) en plantaciones forestales comerciales en Colombia [Record of the presence of the palm bear (Myrmecophaga tridactyla) in commercial forest plantations in Colombia]. Edentata, 16: 72–77. (In Spanish).
  80. Romero, H.G., García Romero, H., 2013. Deforestación en Colombia: retos y perspectivas [Deforestation in Colombia: challenges and prospects]. In El Desafío del Desarrollo Sustentable en América Latina. Rio de Janeiro: Sopla, p. 123–142. (In Spanish).
  81. Rosenzweig, M.L., 1981. A theory of habitat selection. Ecology, 62 (2): 327–335. https://doi.org/10.2307/1936707
  82. Ruth, T.K., Murphy, K., 2009. Competition with other carnivores for prey. In Cougar: ecology and conservation. Chicago: University of Chigaco Press, p. 163–172).
  83. Sánchez-Lalinde, C., Pérez-Torres, J., 2008. Uso de hábitat de carnívoros simpátricos en una zona de bosque seco tropical de Colombia [Habitat use by sympatric carnivores in a tropical dry forest area of Colombia]. Mastozoología Neotropical, 15 (1): 67–74. (in Spanish).
  84. Santos, T., Marinho, P.H., Venticinque, E.M., Fonseca, C.R., 2024. Spatial and temporal ecology of Cerdocyon thous: A mesopredator canid coping with habitat loss, fragmentation, and chronic anthropogenic disturbances. Landscape Ecology, 39 (8): 157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-024-01913-0
  85. Siegfried, A.C., Harris, S.N., Olfenbuttel, C., Jachowski, D.S., 2024. Effects of sardines as an attractant on carnivore detection and temporal activity patterns at remote camera traps. Wildlife Research, 51 (1): WR22196. https://doi.org/10.1071/WR22196
  86. Srbek-Araujo, A.C., Chiarello, A.G., 2005. Is camera-trapping an efficient method for surveying mammals in Neo-tropical forests? A case study in south-eastern Brazil. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 21 (1): 121–125. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467404001956
  87. Sunquist, M.E., 1989. Ecological separation in a Venezuelan llanos carnivore community. Advances in Neotropical mammalogy. Gainesville, FL, USA: Sandhill Crane Press, 197–232.
  88. Team, R.C., 2020. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
  89. Tirira, D., 2007. Guía de campo de los mamíferos del Ecuador [Field guide to the mammals of Ecuador]. Publicación especial sobre los mamíferos del Ecuador 6. Quito, Ecuador: Ediciones Murciélago Blanco. 576 p. (In Spanish).
  90. Van Huis, A., 2013. Potential of insects as food and feed in assuring food security. Annual Review of Entomology, 58: 563–583. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-120811-153704
  91. Villafañe-Trujillo, Á.J., Kolowski, J.M., Cove, M.V., Medici, E.P., Harmsen, B.J., Foster, R.J., Hidalgo-Mihart, M.G., Espinosa, S., Ríos-Alvear, G., Reyes-Puig, C., 2021. Activity patterns of tayra (Eira barbara) across their distribution. Journal of Mammalogy, 102 (3): 772–788. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyaa159
  92. Voss, R.S., Díaz-Nieto, J.F., Jansa, S.A., 2018. A revision of Philander (Marsupialia: Didelphidae), part 1: P. quica, P. canus, and a new species from Amazonia. American Museum Novitates, 3891: 1–70.
  93. Voss, R.S., Emmons, L., 1996. Mammalian diversity in Neotropical lowland rainforests: a preliminary assessment. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 230: 1–115.
  94. Voss, R.S., Lunde, D.P., Simmons, N.B., 2001. The mammals of Paracou, French Guiana: a Neotropical lowland rain-forest fauna part 2. Nonvolant species. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 263: 3–236.
  95. Ziv, Y., Abramsky, Z., Kotler, B.P., Subach, A.,1993. Interference competition and temporal and habitat partitioning in two gerbil species. Oikos, 66: 237–246.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/foecol-2025-0016 | Journal eISSN: 1338-7014 | Journal ISSN: 1336-5266
Language: English
Page range: 162 - 173
Submitted on: Feb 11, 2025
|
Accepted on: Jun 10, 2025
|
Published on: Jul 23, 2025
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year

© 2025 Gabriela Moreno, Diego J. Lizcano, Francisco Sánchez, published by Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Forest Ecology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.