Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Native versus non-native Prosopis woody species: Which fertilize the soil better? Cover

Native versus non-native Prosopis woody species: Which fertilize the soil better?

Open Access
|Jan 2025

References

  1. Aguilera, A.G., Alpert, P., Dukes, J.S., Harrington, R., 2010. Impacts of the invasive plant Fallopia japonica (Houtt.) on plant communities and ecosystem processes. Biological Invasions, 12: 1243–1252. 10.1007/s10530-009-9543-z
  2. Alizadeh, T., Habashi, H., Matinizadeh, M., Sadeghi, S., 2022. Investigating the enzyme activities and physicochemical properties of soil in the habitat of Prosopis cineraria (L.) Druce and P. juliflora (SW.) DC. Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research, 30 (1): 57–69. DOI: 10.22092/IJFPR.2022.357166.2034
  3. Baek, G., Kim, C., 2024. Litterfall, litter decomposition, and carbon storage of Pinus densiflora and Quercus variabilis stands in South Korea. Folia Oecologica, 51 (1): 39–46. https://doi.org/10.2478/foecol-2024-0004
  4. Beck, K.G., Zimmerman, K., Schardt, J.D., Stone, J., Lukens, R.R., Reichard, S., Randall, J., Cangelosi, A.A., Cooper, D., Thompson, J.P., 2008. Invasive species defined in a policy context: recommendations from the Federal Invasive Species Advisory Committee. Invasive Plant Science and Management, 1: 414–421. DOI: 10.1614/IPSM-08-089.1
  5. Bibi, S., Bibi, A., Al-Ghouti, M.A., Abu-Dieyeh, M.H., 2023. Allelopathic effects of the invasive Prosopis juliflora (Sw.) DC. on native plants: perspectives toward agrosystems. Agronomy, 13: 590. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13020590
  6. Bijani, A., Moslehi, M., Parvaresh, H., 2020. Effects of Prosopis cineraria (L.) Druce and Prosopis juliflora (SW.) DC on some chemical characteristics of soil. Iranian Journal of Forest, 12: 101–111. [cit. 2024-06-07]. https://www.ijf-isaforestry.ir/article_107500.html?lang=en
  7. Black, C., 1965. Methods of soil analysis. Part 2: Chemical and microbiological properties. Agronomy, part 2. Madison: American Society of Agronomy, p. 771–1572.[cit. 2024-05-31]. https://search.worldcat.org/en/title/454626992
  8. Bouyoucos, G.J., 1962. Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analyses of soils. Agronomy Journal, 54: 464–465. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1962.00021962005400050028x
  9. Cable, D.R., 1976. Twenty years of changes in grass production following mesquite control and reseeding. Rangeland Ecology & Management/Journal of Range Management Archives, 29: 286–289. DOI: 10.2307/3897083
  10. Castillo-Figueroa, D.,2024. Litter mixture effects on decomposition change with forest succession and are influenced by time and soil fauna in tropical mountain Andes. Folia Oecologica, 51 (1): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.2478/foecol-2024-0001
  11. Catovsky, S., Bazzaz, F., 2002. Feedbacks between canopy composition and seedling regeneration in mixed conifer broad‐leaved forests. Oikos, 98: 403–420. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.980305.x
  12. Chodak, M., Niklinska, M., 2010. The effect of different tree species on the chemical and microbial properties of reclaimed mine soils. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 46: 555–566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-010-0462-z
  13. Drake, S.J., Weltzin, J.F., Parr, P.D., 2003. Assessment of non-native invasive plant species on the United States Department of Energy Oak Ridge National 4 Environmental Research PARK. Castanea, 68: 15–30. [cit. 2024-05-05]. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4034154
  14. El-Keblawy, A., Abdelfatah, M.A., 2014. Impacts of native and invasive exotic Prosopis congeners on soil properties and associated flora in the arid United Arab Emirates. Journal of Arid Environments, 100: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2013.10.001
  15. El-Keblawy, A., Al-Rawai, A., 2007. Impacts of the invasive exotic Prosopis juliflora (Sw.) DC on the native flora and soils of the UAE. Plant Ecology, 190: 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-006-9188-2
  16. Essl, F., Bacher, S., Blackburn, T.M., Booy, O., Brundu, G., Brunel, S., Cardoso, A., Eschen, R., Gallardo, B., Galil, B., Garcia-Berthou, E., Genovesi, P., Groom, Q., Harrower, C., Hulme, P.E., Katsanevakis, S., Kenis, M., Kuhn, I., Kumschick, S., Martinou, A.F., Nentwig, W., O’flynn, C., Pagad, S., Pergl, J., Pysek, P., Rabitsch, W., Richardson, D.M., Roques, A., Roy, H.E., Scalera, R., Schindler, S., Seebens, H., Vanderhoeven, S., Vila, M., Wilson, J R U., Zenetos, A., Eschke, J.M., 2015. Crossing frontiers in tackling pathways of biological invasions. BioScience, 65 (8): 769–782. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biv082
  17. Facelli, J.M., Carson, W.P., 1991. Heterogeneity of plant litter accumulation in successional communities. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club, 118: 62–66. https://doi.org/10.2307/2996977
  18. Farahi, M., Mofidi Chalan, M., Moghimi Nejad, F., Khatibi, R., Jahantab, E., 2014. Investigation on the effects of Haloxylon and Tamarix on soil properties in Niatak region of Sistan. Iranian Journal of Range and Desert Research, 21: 307–316. https://doi.org/10.22092/ijrdr.2015.11377
  19. Ferguson, J.J., Rathinasabapathi, B., Chase, C.A., 2013. Allelopathy: how plants suppress other plants.HS944/hs186. EDIS, 2013 (3): 5 p.
  20. Follastad Shah, J., Harner, M., Tibbets, T., 2010. Elaeagnus angustifolia elevates soil inorganic nitrogen pools in riparian ecosystems. Ecosystems, 13: 46–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-009-9299-4
  21. Hejda, M., Pysek, P., Jarosik, V., 2009. Impact of invasive plants on the species richness, diversity and composition of invaded communities. Journal of Ecology, 97: 393–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01480.x
  22. Imani, F., Moradi, M., Basiri, R., 2016. The effect of Prosopis juliflora afforestation on soil physicochemical properties in sand dunes (Case study: Magran Shush). JWSS - Journal of Water and Soil Science (Isfahan University of Technology), 20: 173–184. DOI: 10.18869/acadpub.jstnar.20.77.173
  23. Inderjit, Cahill, J.F., 2015. Linkages of plant–soil feedbacks and underlying invasion mechanisms. AoB Plants, 7: plv022. https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plv022
  24. Jia, G.-m., Cao, J., Wang, C., Wang, G., 2005. Microbial biomass and nutrients in soil at the different stages of secondary forest succession in Ziwulin, northwest China. Forest Ecology and Management, 217: 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.05.055
  25. Kaur, R., Gonzales, W.L., Llambi, L.D., Soriano, P.J., Callaway, R.M., Rout, M.E., Gallaher, T.J., Inderjit, 2012. Community impacts of Prosopis juliflora invasion: biogeographic and congeneric comparisons. PLoS ONE, 7 (9): e44966. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044966
  26. Kourtev, P.S., Ehrenfeld, J.G., Haggblom, M., 2002. Exotic plant species alter the microbial community structure and function in the soil. Ecology, 83 (11): 3152–3166. https://doi.org/10.2307/3071850
  27. Linders, T.E.W., Schaffner, U., Eschen, R., Abebe, A., Choge, S. K., Nigatu, L., Mbaabu, P.R., Shiferaw, H., Allan, E., 2019. Direct and indirect effects of invasive species: biodiversity loss is a major mechanism by which an invasive tree affects ecosystem functioning. Journal of Ecology, 107 (6): 2660–2672. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13268
  28. Mahdhi, M., Tounekti, T., Khemira, H., 2019. Effects of Prosopis juliflora on germination, plant growth of Sorghum bicolor, mycorrhiza and soil microbial properties. Allelopathy Journal, 46: 265–276. DOI: 10.26651/allelo.j/2019-46-2-1214
  29. Moslehi, M., Habashi, H., Khormali, F., Ahmadi, A., Brunner, I., Zimmermann, S., 2019. Base cation dynamics in rainfall, throughfall, litterflow and soil solution under Oriental beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) trees in northern Iran. Annals of Forest Science, 76: 55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-019-0837-8
  30. Moslehi Jouybari, M., Bijani, A., Parvaresh, H., Shack-leton, R., Ahmadi, A., 2022. Effects of native and invasive Prosopis species on topsoil physiochemical properties in an arid riparian forest of Hormozgan Province, Iran. Journal of Arid Land, 14 (10): 1099–1108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-022-0104-y
  31. Nelson, R.,1982. Carbonate and gypsum. In Methods of soil analysis. Part 2, Chemical and microbiological properties. Agronomy Monograph, 9. Madison, Wis.: American Society of Agronomy; Soil Science Society of America, p. 181–197. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.2ed.c11
  32. Pasiecznik, N.M., Felker, P., Harris, P.J., Harsh, L., Cruz, G., Tewari, J., Cadoret, K., Maldonado, L.J., 2001. The Prosopis juliflora-Prosopis pallida complex: a monograph. Coventry, UK: HDRA. 162 p. [cit. 2024-05-16]. https://gardenorganic-assets.s3.eu-west2.amazonaws.com/documents/ProsopisMonographMainText.pdf
  33. Plaster, E.J., 1985. Soil science and management. Albany, NY: Delmar Publishers Inc. 454 p. [cit. 2024-05-21]. https://www.amazon.com/Soil-Science-Management-Edward-Plaster/dp/0840024320
  34. Prasad, S., Baishya, R., 2019. Interactive effects of soil moisture and temperature on soil respiration under native and non-native tree species in semi-arid forest of Delhi, India. Tropical Ecology, 60: 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42965-019-00028-x
  35. Pysek, P., Hulme, P.E., Simberloff, D., Bacher, S., Blackburn, T.M., Carlton, J.T., Dawson, W., Essl, F., Foxcroft, L.C., Genovesi, P., 2020. Scientists’ warning on invasive alien species. Biological Reviews, 95: 1511–1534. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12627
  36. Raich, J.W., Tufekciogul, A., 2000. Vegetation and soil respiration: correlations and controls. Biogeochemistry, 48: 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006112000616
  37. Richarson, D.M., Pysek, P., Rejmanek, M., Barbour, M.G., Panetta, F.D., West, C.J., 2000. Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concep, ts and definitions. Diversity and Distributions, 6: 93–107. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1472-4642.2000.00083.x
  38. Shackleton, R.T., Le Maitre, D.C., Pasiecznik, N.M., Richarson, D.M., 2014. Prosopis: a global assessment of the biogeography, benefits, impacts and management of one of the world’s worst woody invasive plant taxa. AoB Plants, 6: plu027. https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plu027
  39. Sharifian, A., Niknahad–Gharmakher, H., Foladizada, M., Tabe, A., Shackleton, R.T., 2023. Socio‐ecological evidence highlights that native Prosopis species are better for arid land restoration than non‐ native ones. Restoration Ecology, 31: e13756. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13756
  40. Shen, C., Wang, J., He, J.-Z., Yu, F.-H., Ge, Y., 2021. Plant diversity enhances soil fungal diversity and microbial resistance to plant invasion. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 87: e00251-00221.
  41. Stonlnikova, E., Ananyeva, N., Chernova, O., 2011. The microbial biomass and its activity and structure in the soils of old forests in the European Russia. Eurasian Soil Science, 44: 437–452. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229311040107
  42. Sundarapandian, S., Muthumperumal, C., Subashree, K., 2015. Biological invasion of vines, their impacts and management. In Parthasarathy, N. (ed.). Bio-diversity of lianas Vol. 5. Cham: Springer, p. 211–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14592-1_12
  43. Sundarapandian, S., Subashree, K., 2017. Status of invasive plants in Tamil Nadu, India: their impact and significance. In Plant biodiversity: monitoring, assessment and conservation, Wallingford: CABI, p. 371–387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/9781780646947.0371
  44. Thomas, G.W.,1982. Exchangeable cations. In Methods of soil analysis. Part 2, Chemical and microbiological properties. Agronomy Monograph, 9. Madison, Wis.: American Society of Agronomy; Soil Science Society of America, p. 159–165.
  45. Turbelin, A.J., Cuthbert, R.N., Essl, F., Haubrock, J.P., Ricciardi, A., Courchamp, F., 2023. Biological invasions are as costly as natural hazards. Perspectives in Ecology and Coservation, 21: 143–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2023.03.002
  46. Watts, D.B., Torbert, H.A., Feng, Y., Prior, S.A., 2010. Soil microbial community dynamics as influenced by composted dairy manure, soil properties, and landscape position. Soil Science, 175: 474–486. DOI: 10.1097/SS.0b013e3181f7964f
  47. Zhang, Z., Liu, Y., Brunel, C., Van Kleunen, M., 2020. Soil-microorganism-mediated invasional meltdown in plants. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 4: 1612–1621. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-01311-0
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/foecol-2025-0008 | Journal eISSN: 1338-7014 | Journal ISSN: 1336-5266
Language: English
Page range: 70 - 81
Submitted on: Jun 18, 2024
Accepted on: Dec 10, 2024
Published on: Jan 28, 2025
Published by: Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Forest Ecology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2025 Maryam Moslehi, Farzad Ahmadi, Mohammad Matinizadeh, Seyed Mousa Sadeghi, Masoumeh Izadi, Nafiseh Faunae, Tahereh Alizadeh, Ross T. Shackleton, published by Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Forest Ecology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.