Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Species variability in the relative strength of intraspecific and interspecific interactions

Open Access
|Aug 2022

References

  1. Abbott, J.M., Stachowicz, J.J., 2016. The relative importance of trait vs. genetic differentiation for the outcome of inter actions among plant genotypes. Ecology, 97: 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1890/15-148.1
  2. Adler, P.B., Smull, D., Beard, K.H., Choi, R.T., Furniss, T., Kulmatiski, A., Meiners, J.M., Tredennick, A.T., Veblen, K.E., 2018. Competition and coexistence in plant communities: intraspecific competition is stronger than interspecific competition. Ecology Letters, 21: 1319–1329. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.1309829938882
  3. Callaway, R.M., Ridenour, W.M., 2004. Novel weapons: invasive success and the evolution of increased competitive ability. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2: 436. https://doi.org/10.2307/3868432
  4. Cardinale, B.J., Wright, J.P., Cadotte, M.W., Carroll, I.T., Hector, A., Srivastava, D.S., Loreau, M., Weis, J.J. 2007. Impacts of plant diversity on biomass production increase through time because of species complementarity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. U. S. A., 104: 18123–18128. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0709069104208430717991772
  5. Casper, B.B., Jackson, R.B., 1997. Plant competition underground. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 28: 545–570.10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.545
  6. Chesson, P., 2000. Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 31: 343–366.10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.343
  7. Cruz, S.S. da, Andreotti, M., Pascoaloto, I.M., Lima, G.C. de, Soares, C. de A., 2020. Production in forage sorghum intercropped with grasses and pigeon pea at crop cutting. Revista Ciência Agronômica, 51: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.5935/1806-6690.20200031
  8. Ebeling, A., Klein, A.M., Schumacher, J., Weisser, W.W., Tscharntke, T., 2008. How does plant richness affect pollinator richness and temporal stability of flower visits? Oikos, 117: 1808–1815. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2008.16819.x
  9. Fargione, J., Tilman, D., 2005. Niche differences in phenology and rooting depth promote coexistence with a dominant C4 bunchgrass. Oecologia, 143: 598–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-005-0010-y15791430
  10. Felker-Quinn, E., Schweitzer, J.A., Bailey, J.K., 2013. Meta-analysis reveals evolution in invasive plant species but little support for Evolution of Increased Competitive Ability (EICA). Ecology and Evolution, 3: 739–751. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.488360586023531703
  11. Fort, F., Cruz, P., Jouany, C., 2014. Hierarchy of root functional trait values and plasticity drive early-stage competition for water and phosphorus among grasses. Functional Ecology, 28: 1030–1040. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12217
  12. Foster, B.L., 1999. Establishment, competition and the distribution of native grasses among Michigan old-fields. Journal of Ecology, 87: 476–489.10.1046/j.1365-2745.1999.00366.x
  13. Fowler, N., 1986. The role of competition in plant communities in arid and semiarid regions. Annual Revue of Ecology and Systematics, 17: 89–110. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.17.110186.000513
  14. Foxx, A., Fort, F., 2019. Root and shoot competition lead to contrasting competitive outcomes under water stress: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One, 14: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1101/712208
  15. Haidet, M., Olwell, P., 2015. Seeds of Success: a national seed banking program working to achieve long-term conservation goals. Natural Areas Journal, 35: 165–173. https://doi.org/10.3375/043.035.0118
  16. Hedges, L. V, Gurevitch, J., Curtis, P.S., 1999. The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology. Ecology, 80: 1150–1156.10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1150:TMAORR]2.0.CO;2
  17. Herben, T., Hadincová, V., Krahulec, F., Pecháčková, S., Skálová, H., 2020. Which traits predict pairwise interactions in a mountain grassland? Journal of Vegetation Science, 31: 699–710. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12872
  18. HilleRisLambers, J., Adler, P.B., Harpole, W.S., Levine, J.M., Mayfield, M.M., 2012. Rethinking community assembly through the lens of coexistence theory. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 43: 227–248.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110411-160411
  19. Hortal, S., Lozano, Y.M., Bastida, F., Armas, C., Moreno, J.L., Garcia, C., Pugnaire, F.I., 2017. Plant-plant competition outcomes are modulated by plant effects on the soil bacterial community. Scientific Reports, 7: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-18103-5
  20. James, J.J., Svejcar, T.J., Rinella, M.J., 2011. Demographic processes limiting seedling recruitment in arid grassland restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology, 48: 961–969. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02009.x
  21. Keddy, P., Nielsen, K., Weiher, E., Lawson, R., 2002. Relative competitive performance of 63 species of terrestrial herbaceous plants. Journal of Vegetation Science, 13: 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2002.tb02018.x
  22. Kiaer, L.P., Weisbach, A.N., Weiner, J., 2013. Root and shoot competition: a meta-analysis. Journal of Ecology, 101: 1298–1312. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12129
  23. Knops, M.H.J., Tilman, D., Haddad, N.M., Naeem, S., Mitchell, C.E., Haarstad, J., Ritchie, M.E., Howe, K.M., Reich, P.B., Siemann, E., Groth, J., 1999. Effects of plant species richness on invasion dynamics, disease outbreaks, insect abundances and diversity. Ecology Letters, 2: 286–293.10.1046/j.1461-0248.1999.00083.x33810630
  24. Kraft, N.J.B., Crutsinger, G.M., Forrestel, E.J., Emery, N.C. 2014. Functional trait differences and the outcome of community assembly: an experimental test with vernal pool annual plants. Oikos, 123: 1391–1399. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.01311
  25. Kunstler, G., Lavergne, S., Courbaud, B., Thuiller, W., Vieilledent, G., Zimmermann, N.E., Kattge, J., Coomes, D. 2012. Competitive interactions between forest trees are driven by species’ trait hierarchy, not phylogenetic or functional similarity: implications for forest community assembly. Ecology Letters, 15: 831–840. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01803.x400353122625657
  26. Li, S., Evers, J.B., van der Werf, W., Wang, R., Xu, Z., Guo, Y., Li, B., Ma, Y., 2020. Plant architectural responses in simultaneous maize/soybean strip intercropping do not lead to a yield advantage. Annals of Applied Biology, 177: 195–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/aab.12610
  27. Makumba, W., Akinnifesi, F.K., Janssen, B.H., 2009. Spatial rooting patterns of gliricidia, pigeon pea and maize intercrops and effect on profile soil N and P distribution in southern Malawi. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 4: 278–288.
  28. Mayfield, M.M., Levine, J.M., 2010. Opposing effects of competitive exclusion on the phylogenetic structure of communities. Ecology Letters, 13: 1085–1093. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01509.x20576030
  29. Pustejovsky, J., 2018. Using response ratios for meta-analyzing single-case designs with behavioral outcomes. Journal of School Psychology, 68: 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2018.02.00329861034
  30. R Core Team, 2021. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
  31. Ravenek, J.M., Bessler, H., Engels, C., Scherer-Lorenzen, M., Gessler, A., Gockele, A., De Luca, E., Temperton, V.M., Ebeling, A., Roscher, C., Schmid, B., Weisser, W.W., Wirth, C., de Kroon, H., Weigelt, A., Mommer, L., 2014. Long-term study of root biomass in a biodiversity experiment reveals shifts in diversity effects over time. Oikos, 123: 1528–1536. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.01502
  32. Read, J.J., Morgan, J.A., 1996. Growth and partitioning in Pascopyrum smithii (C3) and Bouteloua gracilis (C4) as influenced by carbon dioxide and temperature. Annals of Botany, 77: 487–496. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1996.0059
  33. Schenk, H.J., Jackson, R.B., 2002. Rooting depths, lateral root spreads and below-ground/above-round allometries of plants in water-limited ecosystems. Journal of Ecology, 90: 480–494. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2745.2002.00682.x
  34. Schlaepfer, M.A., Sax, D.F., Olden, J.D., 2011. The potential conservation value of non-native species. Conservation Biology, 25: 428–437. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01646.x
  35. Suding, K., Goldberg, D., Hartman, K., 2003. Relationships among species traits: separating levels of response and identifying linkages to abundance. Ecology, 84: 1–16.10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[0001:RASTSL]2.0.CO;2
  36. Utah’s Watershed Restoration Initiative, n.d. [cit. 2022-01-21]. https://wri.utah.gov/wri/.
  37. Venables, W., Ripley, B., 2002. Modern applied statistics with S. Fourth edition. New York: Springer. 495 p.10.1007/978-0-387-21706-2
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/foecol-2022-0019 | Journal eISSN: 1338-7014 | Journal ISSN: 1336-5266
Language: English
Page range: 168 - 174
Submitted on: Jan 31, 2022
Accepted on: May 27, 2022
Published on: Aug 5, 2022
Published by: Slovak Academy of Sciences, Mathematical Institute
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2022 Alicia J. Foxx, published by Slovak Academy of Sciences, Mathematical Institute
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.