Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Determining structure and volume of the European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) deadwood in managed stands in the Rodopi Mountain Range National Park, Greece

Open Access
|Aug 2022

References

  1. Abbott, D.T., Crossley, D.A., 1982. Woody litter decomposition following clear-cutting. Ecology, 63 (1): 35–42. https://doi.org/10.2307/1937028
  2. Ammer, U., 1991. Implications of the results of research on dead woody material for the forestry practice. Forstwissentchaftliches Centralblatt, 110 (2): 149–157.10.1007/BF02741249
  3. Atici, E., Colak, A.H., Rotherham, I.D., 2008. Coarse dead wood volume of managed oriental beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) stands in Turkey. Forest Systems, 17 (3): 216–227. https://doi.org/10.5424/srf/2008173-01036
  4. Altamirano, T.A., Ibarra, J.T., Martin, K., Bonacic, C., 2017. The conservation value of tree decay processes as a key driver structuring tree cavity nest webs in South American temperate rainforests. Biodiversity and Conservation, 26 (10): 2453–2472.10.1007/s10531-017-1369-x
  5. Bobiec, A., Gutowski, J.M., Laudenslayer, W.F., Pawlaczyk, P., Zub, K., 2005. The afterlife of a tree. Warsaw: WWF Poland. 253 p.
  6. Bradshaw, C.J.A., Warkentin, I.G., Sodhi, N.S., 2009. Urgent preservation of boreal carbon stocks and biodiversity. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24 (10): 541–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.01919679372
  7. Brassard, B.W., Chen, H.Y.H., 2008. Effects of forest type and disturbance on diversity of coarse woody debris in boreal forest. Ecosystems, 11 (7): 1078–1090.10.1007/s10021-008-9180-x
  8. Castagneri, D., Garbarino, M., Berretti, R., Motta, 2010. Site and stand effects on coarse woody debris in montane mixed forests of Eastern Italian Alps. Forest Ecology and Management, 260 (9): 1592–1598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.08.008
  9. Christensen, M., Hahn, K., Mountford, E., Odor, P., Standovar, T., Rozenbergar, D., Wijdeven, S., Mayer, P., Winter, S., Vrska, T., 2005. Dead wood in European beech (Fagus sylvatica) forest reserves. Forest Ecology and Management, 210: 267–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.02.032
  10. Cornwell, W. K., Cornelissen, J. H., Allison, S. D., Bauhus, J., Eggleton, P., Preston, C. M., Scarff, F., Weedon, J.T., Wirth, C., Zanne, A.E., 2009. Plant traits and wood fates across the globe: rotted, burned, or consumed? Global Change Biology, 15 (10): 2431–2449. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01916.x
  11. Crites, S., Dale, M.R.T., 1998. Diversity and abundance of bryophytes, lichens, and fungi in relation to woody substrate and successional stage in aspen mixed wood boreal forests. Canadian Journal of Botany, 76: 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1139/b98-03
  12. Debeljak, M., 2006. Coarse woody debris in virgin and managed forest. Ecological Indicators, 6 (4): 733–742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.08.031
  13. Deyoung, J., 2016. Forest measurements: an applied approach. Oregon: Open Oregon Educational Resources. 159 p.
  14. Ecke, F., Lofgren, O., Hornfeldt, B., Eklund, U., Ericsson, P., Sorlin, D., 2001. Volume and diversity of small mammals in relation to structural habitat factors. Ecological Bulletins, 49: 165–171.
  15. Fridman, J., Walheim, M., 2000. Amount, structure, and dynamics of dead wood on managed forestland in Sweden. Forest Ecology and Management, 131 (1-3): 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00208-X
  16. Gatzogiannis, S., 1999. Special Environmental Study of the Rodopi region. Project LIFE-NATURE, ARCTOS (Phase II), Ministry of Environment, Thessaloniki. 439 p. (In Greek).
  17. Green, P., Peterken, G.F., 1997. Variation in the amount of dead wood in the woodlands of the Lower Wye Valley, UK in relation to the intensity of management. Forest Ecology and Management, 98 (3): 229–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00106-0
  18. Guby, N.B., Dobbertin, M., 1996. Quantitative estimates of coarse woody debris and standing dead trees in selected Swiss forests. Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters, 5 (6): 327–341. https://doi.org/10.2307/2997588
  19. Hagan, J.M., Grove, S.L., 1999. Coarse woody debris: humans and nature competing for trees. Journal of Forestry, 97 (1): 6–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/jof/97.1.6
  20. Hahn, K., Christensen, M., 2004. Dead wood in European forest reserves – a reference for forest management. In Marchetti, M. (ed). Monitoring and indicators of forest biodiversity in Europe – from ideas to operationality. EFI Proceedings, 51. Joensuu: European Forest Institute, p. 181–191.
  21. Harmon, M.E., Franklin, J.F., Swanson, F.J., Sollins, P., Gregory, S.V., Lattin, J.D., Anderson, N.H., Cline, S.P., Aumen, N.G., Sedell, J.R., Lienkaemper, G.W., Cromack, K.Jr., Cummins, K.W., 1986. Ecology of coarse woody debris in temperate ecosystems. In Macfadyen, A., Ford, E.D. (eds). Advances in ecological research. Vol. 15. Orlando, FL: Academic Press, Inc., p. 133–302.10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60121-X
  22. Harmon, M.E., 2001. Carbon sequestration in forests: addressing the scale question. Journal of Forestry, 99 (4): 24–29.10.1093/jof/99.4.24
  23. Herrmann, S., Kahl, T., Bauhus, J., 2015. Decomposition dynamics of coarse woody debris of three important central European tree species. Forest Ecosystems, 2 (1): 1–14.10.1186/s40663-015-0052-5
  24. Hodge, S.J., Peterken, G.F., 1998. Deadwood in British forests: priorities and a strategy. Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research, 71 (2): 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/71.2.99
  25. Hofgaard, A., 2000. Structure and regeneration pattern in a virgin Picea abies forest in northern Sweden. Journal of Vegetation Science, 4 (5): 601–608. https://doi.org/10.2307/3236125
  26. IBM Corp., 2019. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 26.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
  27. Ježek, K., 2004. Contribution of regeneration on dead wood to the spontaneous regeneration of a mountain forest. Journal of Forest Science, 50 (9): 405–414.10.17221/4637-JFS
  28. Jonsson, B.G., 2000. Availability of coarse woody debris in an old-growth boreal spruce forest landscape. Journal of Vegetation Science, 11 (1): 51–56. https://doi.org/10.2307/3236775
  29. Kazana, V., Kazaklis, A., Raptis, D., Stamatiou, C., 2020. A combined multi-criteria approach to assess forest management sustainability: an application to the forests of Eastern Macedonia & Thrace Region in Greece. Annals of Operations Research, 294 (1): 321–343.10.1007/s10479-020-03751-0
  30. Kershaw, J.A., Ducey, M.J., Beers, T.W., Husch, B., 2016. Forest mensuration. 5th edition. New York: Wiley. 632 p.10.1002/9781118902028
  31. Kirby, K.J., Reid, C.M., Thomas, R.C., Goldsmith, F.B., 1998. Preliminary estimates of fallen dead wood and standing dead trees in managed and unmanaged forests in Britain. Journal of Applied Ecology, 35 (1): 148–155. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.1998.00276.x
  32. Krankina, O.N., Harmon, M.E., 1995. The impact of intensive forest management on carbon stores in forest ecosystems. World Resource Review, 6 (2): 161–177.
  33. Krankina, O.N., Harmon, M. E., Kukuev, Y.A., Treyfeld, R.F., Kashpor, N.N., Kresnov, V.G., Skudin, V.M., Protasov, N.A., Yatskov, M., Spycher, G., Povarov, E.D., 2002. Coarse woody debris in forest regions of Russia. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 32 (5): 768–778. https://doi.org/10.1139/x01-110
  34. Kruys, N., Jonsson, B.G., 1999. Fine woody debris is important for species richness on logs in managed boreal spruce forests of northern Sweden. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 29 (8): 1295–1299. https://doi.org/10.1139/x99-106
  35. Laiho, R., Prescott, C.E., 2004. Decay and nutrient dynamics of coarse woody debris in northern coniferous forests: a synthesis. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 34 (4): 763–777.10.1139/x03-241
  36. Lombardi, F., Lasserre, B., Tognetti, R., Marchetti, M., 2008. Deadwood in relation to stand management and forest type in Central Apennines (Molise, Italy). Ecosystems, 11 (6): 882–894. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-008-9167-7
  37. Marage, D., Lemperiere, G., 2005. The management of snags: a comparison in managed and unmanaged ancient forests of the Southern French Alps. Annals of Forest Science, 62 (2): 135–142.10.1051/forest:2005005
  38. Mason, F., 2003. Guidelines and aims of the Project Life NAT/IT/99/006245 “Bosco della Fontana: urgent conservation actions on relict habitat”. In Mason F., Nardi G., Tisato, M. (eds). Proceedings of the international symposium “Deadwood: a key to biodiversity”. Mantova, May 29 – 31, 2003. Sherwood 95, Suppl. 2, p. 41–43.
  39. McCarthy, B.C., Bailey, R.R., 1994. Distribution and abundance of coarse woody debris in a managed forest landscape of the central Appalachians. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 24 (7): 1317–1329.10.1139/x94-172
  40. MCPFE – Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe, 2003. State of Europe’s forests 2003. The MCPFE Report on sustainable forest management in Europe. Vienna: MCPFE Liaison Unit. 115 p.
  41. Merganičová, K., Merganič, J., 2010. Coarse woody debris carbon stocks in natural spruce forests of Babia hora. Journal of Forest Science, 56 (9): 397–405. https://doi.org/10.17221/11/2010-JFS
  42. Motta, R., Berretti, R., Lingua, E., Piussi, P., 2006. Coarse woody debris, forest structure and regeneration in the Valbona Forest Reserve, Paneveggio, Italian Alps. Forest Ecology and Management, 235 (1-3): 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.08.007
  43. Müller, J., Bütler, R., 2010. A review of habitat thresholds for dead wood: a baseline for Management recommendations in European forests. European Journal of Forest Research, 129: 981–992. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-010-0400-5
  44. Nordén, B., Götmark, F., Tönnberg M., Ryberg, M., 2004. Dead wood in semi-natural temperate broadleaved woodland: contribution of coarse and fine dead wood, attached dead wood and stumps. Forest Ecology and Management, 194 (1-3): 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.02.043
  45. Ódor, P., Standovár, T., 2001. Richness of bryophyte vegetation in near-natural and managed beech stands. The effects of management-induced differences in dead wood. Ecological Bulletins, 49: 219–229. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20113278
  46. O’Hara, K.L., 2016. What is close-to-nature silviculture in a changing world? Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research, 89 (1): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpv043
  47. Papadopoulou, D., 2017. Dynamics of structure and natural regeneration in the undisturbed forest ecosystem of virgin forest Frakto. PhD thesis. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki. (In Greek).
  48. Papazisimou, S., Bouzinos, A., Christanis, K., Tzedakis, P.C., Kalaitzidis, S., 2002. The upland Holocene transitional mires of Elatia forest, Northern Greece. Wetlands, 22 (2): 355–365. https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2002)022[0355:TUHTMO]2.0.CO;210.1672/0277-5212(2002)022[0355:TUHTMO]2.0.CO;2
  49. Parisi, F., Pioli, S., Lombardi, F., Fravolini, G., Marchetti, M., Tognetti, R., 2018. Linking deadwood traits with saproxylic invertebrates and fungi in European forests – a review. iForest-Biogeosciences and Forestry, 11(3): 423–436. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor2670-011
  50. Pro Silva, 2012. Pro Silva principles. Pro Silva Europe: the Association of European Foresters Practising Management which follows Natural Processes, Barr, France. 66 p. [cited 2022-03-01]. https://www.prosilva.org/fileadmin/prosilva/3_Close_to_Nature_Forestry/01_ProSilva_Principles/Pro_Silva_Principles_2012.pdf
  51. Puletti, N., Canullo, R., Mattioli, W., Gawryś, R., Corona, P., Czereko, J., 2019. A dataset of forest volume deadwood estimates for Europe. Annals of Forest Science, 76 (3): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-019-0832-0
  52. Rahman, M. M., Frank, G., Ruprechtt, H., Vacik, H., 2008. Structure of coarse woody debris in Lange-Leitn Natural Forest Reserve, Austria. Journal of Forest Science, 54 (4): 161–169.10.17221/3102-JFS
  53. Ranius, T., Kindvall, O., 2004. Modelling the amount of coarse woody debris produced by the new biodiversity -oriented silvicultural practices in Sweden. Biological Conservation, 119: 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2003.10.021
  54. Renvall, P., 2003. Community dynamics and conservation of boreal wood-decaying fungi. In Mason, F., Nardi G., Tisato, M. (eds). Proceedings of the international symposium “Deadwood: a key to biodiversity”. Mantova, May 29 – 31, 2003. Sherwood 95, Suppl. 2., p. 87–89.
  55. Robin, V., Brang, P., 2008. Methode für das Monitoring von Totholz in Kernflächen von Naturwaldreservaten [A method for monitoring deadwood in core areas of forest nature reserves]. Birmensdorf: Eidgenössische Forschungsanstalt WSL. 22 p
  56. Saniga, M., Schütz, J.P., 2001. Dynamik des Totholzes in zwei gemischten Urwäldern der Westkarpaten im pflanzengeographischen Bereich der Tannen-Buchenund der Buchenwälder in verschiedenen Entwicklungsstadien [Deadwood dynamics in two mixed virgin forests in the West Carpathians in the phytogeographic domain of pure beech and mixed fir-beech forests]. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Forstwesen, 152 (10): 407–416.10.3188/szf.2001.0407
  57. Siitonen, J., Martikainen, P., Punttil, a P., Rauh, J., 2000. Coarse woody debris and stand characteristics in mature managed and old-growth boreal mesic forests in southern Finland. Forest Ecology and Management, 128: 211–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00148-6
  58. Siitonen, J., 2001. Forest management, coarse woody debris and saproxylic organisms: Fennoscandian boreal forests as an example. Ecological Bulletins, 49: 11–41.
  59. Sippola, A.L., Siitonen, J., Kallio, R., 1998. Amount and quality of coarse woody debris in natural and managed coniferous forests near the timberline in Finnish Lapland. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 13 (1-4): 204–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827589809382978
  60. Sollins, P., 1982. Input and decay of coarse woody debris in coniferous stands in western Oregon and Washington. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 12 (1): 18–28. https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/10.1139/x82-00310.1139/x82-003
  61. Spies, T.A., Franklin, J.F., Thomas, T.B., 1988. Coarse woody debris in Douglas-fir forests of western Oregon and Washington. Ecology, 69 (6): 1689–1702. https://doi.org/10.2307/1941147
  62. Stevens, V., 1997. The ecological role of coarse woody debris: an overview of the ecological importance of CWD in B.C. forests. Working paper (British Columbia. Ministry of Forests. Research Branch), 1997/30. Victoria, B.C.: British Columbia, Ministry of Forests, Research Program.
  63. Stokland, J.N., Tomter, S.M., Söderberg, U., 2004. Development of dead wood indicators for biodiversity monitoring: experiences from Scandinavia. EFI Proceedings, 51: 207–228.
  64. Sturtevant, B.R., Bissonette, J.A., Long, J.N., Roberts, D.W., 1997. Coarse woody debris as a function of age, stand structure, and disturbance in boreal Newfoundland. Ecological Applications, 7 (2): 702–712. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(1997)007[0702:CWDAAF]2.0.CO;210.1890/1051-0761(1997)007[0702:CWDAAF]2.0.CO;2
  65. Travaglini, D., Chirici, G., 2006. ForestBIOTA Project. Forest Biodiversity Test-phase Assessments: Deadwood assessment. Work report. Accademia Italiana di Scienze Forestali. 19 p.
  66. Vaillancourt, M.A., Drapeau, P., Gauthier, S., Robert, M., 2008. Availability of standing trees for large cavitynesting birds in the eastern boreal forest of Québec, Canada. Forest Ecology and Management, 255 (7): 2272–2285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.12.036
  67. Vallauri, D., Andre, J., Blondel, J., 2003. Dead wood – a typical shortcoming of managed forests. Revue Forestiere Francaise, 55 (2): 99–112.10.4267/2042/5172
  68. Vandekerkhove, K., De Keersmaeker, L., Menke, N., Meyer, P., Verschelde, P., 2009. When nature takes over from man: dead wood accumulation in previously managed oak and beech woodlands in North-western and Central Europe. Forest Ecology and Management, 258 (4): 425–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.01.055
  69. Vanderwel, M.C., Malcolm, J.R., Smith, S.M., 2006. An integrated model for snag and downed woody debris decay class transitions. Forest Ecology and Management, 234: 48–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.06.020
  70. Vítková, L., Bače, R., Kjučukov, P., Svoboda, M., 2018. Deadwood management in Central European forests: key considerations for practical implementation. Forest Ecology and Management, 429: 394–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.07.034
  71. Vološčuk, I., Pichler, V., Pichlerová, M. 2013. The Primeval Beech Forests of the Carpathians and Ancient Beech Forests of Germany: joint natural heritage of Europe. Folia Oecologica, 40 (2): 295–303.
  72. Winter, S., Nowak, E., 2001. Totholz in bewirtschafteten und nicht bewirtschafteten Buchen- und Eichen- Hainbuchenwäldern im Biosphärenreservat Spreewald [Dead wood in managed and unmanaged beech and oak-hornbeam forests in Spreewald Biosphere Reserve]. Natur-Landschaftspflege Brandenburg, 10 (4): 128–133.
  73. Yan, E., Wang, X., Huang, J., 2006. Concept and classification of coarse woody debris in forest ecosystems. Frontiers of Biology in China, 1: 76–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11515-005-0019-y
  74. Zhou, L., Dai, L.M., Gu, H.Y., Zhong, L., 2007. Review on the decomposition and influence factors of coarse woody debris in forest ecosystem. Journal of Forestry Research, 18 (1): 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-007-0009-9
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/foecol-2022-0014 | Journal eISSN: 1338-7014 | Journal ISSN: 1336-5266
Language: English
Page range: 122 - 129
Submitted on: Mar 30, 2022
Accepted on: Jun 21, 2022
Published on: Aug 5, 2022
Published by: Slovak Academy of Sciences, Mathematical Institute
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2022 Stavros Kechagioglou, Dimitra Papadopoulou, Thekla Tsitsoni, published by Slovak Academy of Sciences, Mathematical Institute
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.