Figure 1.
Geographic distribution of patients
(Source: Author’s own research)
Table 1.
Gender analysis of beneficiaries
(Source: Author’s own research)
| Gender | Number | Percentage | Cumulative number | Cumulative % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Man | 8227 | 45.80 | 8227 | 45.80 |
| Women | 9736 | 54.20 | 17,963 | 100.00 |
| Total | 17,963 | 100.00 | 17,963 | 100.00 |
Figure 2.
Geographic distribution of beneficiaries
(Source: Author’s own research)
Figure 3.
Age of the study population
(Source: Author’s own research)
Figure 4.
Average length of hospital stays (per day)
(Source: Author’s own research)
Figure 5.
Distribution of invoiced amounts
(Source: Author’s own research)
Table 2.
Descriptive statistics (amount invoiced)
(Source: Author’s own research)
| Average | Median | Maximum | Minimum | Typical deviation | Jarque–Bera |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6284 | 3000 | 320,000 | 32 | 13,000 | Prob (0.00) |
Table 3.
Type of coverage
(Source: Author’s own research)
| Coverage | Number | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Far | 12,530 | 69.75 |
| CNOPS | 2705 | 15.06 |
| DIRECT PAYMENT | 2000 | 11.13 |
| DNA | 331 | 1.84 |
Table 4.
Presentation of SEM structure
(Source: Author’s own research)
| Latent variable | Link | Parameter | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fy | <=== | Request | beta_dem |
| Fy | <=== | Consumption | beta_cons |
| Fy | <=== | Length of stay | beta_dur |
| Request | ===> | Sex | A1 |
| Request | ===> | Age | A2 |
| Request | ===> | City1 | A3 |
| Request | ===> | DEBTOR | A4 |
| consumption | ===> | Uh | b1 |
| consumption | ===> | Type | b2 |
| Fy | ===> | Invoice amount | |
Figure 6.
Distribution of acts by pathology as a percentage (% of total acts)
(Source: Author’s own research)
Table 6.
Presentation of SEM structure
(Source: Author’s own research)
| Path | Estimate | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Fy | <=== | Request | 0.50000 |
| Fy | <=== | consumption | 0.50000 |
| Fy | <=== | Length of stay | 0.50000 |
| Request | ===> | Sex | 0.00669 |
| Request | ===> | Age | 0.69107 |
| Request | ===> | City1 | 0.02500 |
| Request | ===> | DEBTOR | 0.50000 |
| consumption | ===> | Uh | 0.50000 |
| consumption | ===> | Type | -0.99736 |
| Fy | ===> | Invoice amount | 1.00000 |
Table 7.
Presentation of SEM structure
(Source: Author’s own research)
| Path | Parameter | Estimate | Value of the t-test | Pr > |t| | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fy | <=== | Request | beta_dem | 0.50000 | - | . |
| Fy | <=== | consumption | beta_cons | 0.50000 | - | . |
| Fy | <=== | Duration Stay | beta_dur | 0.50000 | - | . |
| Request | ===> | Sex | A1 | 0.01894 | 10.9786 | <0.0001 |
| Request | ===> | Age | A2 | 0.29706 | 10.1371 | <0.0001 |
| Request | ===> | City | A3 | 0.03281 | 1.1142 | 0.2652 |
| Request | ===> | DEBTOR | A4 | 0.50000 | - | . |
| Consumption | ===> | UH | b1 | 0.50000 | - | . |
| Consumption | ===> | Type | b2 | -0.99714 | -151525 | <0.0001 |
| Fy | ===> | Amount Invoice | 1.00000 | |||
Table 8.
Presentation of SEM structure
(Source: Author’s own research)
| Variable | Estimate | Standard error | Value of the t-test | Pr > |t| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 392.07850 | 5.11595 | 76.6384 | <0.0001 |
| City1 | 803.83147 | 8.72375 | 92.1429 | <0.0001 |
| Sex | 0.18436 | 0.01172 | 15.7296 | <0.0001 |
| DEBTOR | -1940 | 0 | - | . |
| Fy | 50.05812 | 0 | - | . |
| Length of stay | 126.11341 | 1.36793 | 92.1928 | <0.0001 |
| Request | 178.08767 | 0.20671 | 861.5 | <0.0001 |
| Consummation | -25.27073 | 0.0001509 | -167412 | <0.0001 |
| Type | 25.14150 | 0.0001524 | 165011 | <0.0001 |
| Uh | 113834419 | 0 | - | . |
| Invoice amount | -97497550 | 0 | - | . |
Figure 7.
Presentation of SEM structure
(Source: Author’s own research)
Figure 8.
Presentation of SEM structure
(Source: Author’s own research)