Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Financial Sector Supervision in Digital Age: Transformation in Progress Cover

Financial Sector Supervision in Digital Age: Transformation in Progress

Foundations of Management
Volume 14 (2022): Issue 1 (January 2022)
By: Jan Monkiewicz and  Marek Monkiewicz  
Open Access
|Apr 2022

References

  1. AIR, 2020. Barefoot, J.A., 2020. A Regtech Manifesto: Redesigning Financial Regulation for the Digital Age. [online] Available at: <https://www.dcfintechweek.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Barefoot_Jo-Ann_AIR-Regtech-Manifesto-July-2020.pdf>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. Auer, R., 2019. Embedded Supervision: How to Build Regulation into Blockchain Finance, BIS Working Papers, No. 811, September 2019. [online] Available at: <https://www.bis.org/publ/work811.htm>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. BaFin, 2018. Rüping, R., 2018. Big Data Meets Artificial Intelligence. Challenges and Implications for Supervision and Regulation of Financial Services. [online] Available at: <https://www.iaisweb.org/uploads/2022/01/181116-Keynote-Addres-Big-Data-Meets-Artificial-Intelligence.pdf>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. BFA, 2018. di Castri, S., Grasser, M., and Kulenkampff, A., 2018. Financial Authorities in the Era of Data Abundance: RegTech for Regulators and SupTech Solutions, August 2018. [online] Available at: <https://bfaglobal.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/R2AWhitePaper.pdf>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. BIS, 2010. Borio, C., Implementing a Macroprudential Framework: Blending Boldness and Realism. [online] Available at: <https://www.bis.org/repofficepubl/hkimr201007.12c.pdf>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. BIS, 2016. Kenc, T., 2016. Macroprudential Regulation: History, Theory and Policy. BIS Paper, No 86c, pp.1–16. [online] Available at: <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2844226>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. BIS, 2018. BCBS, Framework for Early Supervisory Intervention. [online] Available at: <https://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d439.htm>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. BIS, 2018. FSI. Broeders, D., Prenio, J., 2018. Innovative Technology in Financial Supervision (Suptech) - The Experience of Early Users. [online] Available at: <https://www.bis.org/fsi/publ/insights9.htm>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. BIS, 2019. FSI. Coelho, R., De Simoni, M., Prenio, J., 2019. Suptech Applications for Antimony Laundering. [online] Available at: <https://www.bis.org/fsi/publ/insights18.htm>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. BIS, 2020. FSI. Ehrentraud, J., Ocampo, D.G., Garzoni, L., Piccolo, M., 2020. Policy Responses to Fintech: A Cross-country Overview. [online] Available at: <https://www.econbiz.de/Record/policy-responses-to-fintech-a-cross-country-overview-ehrentraud-johannes/10012201536>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. Borsuk, M., Klupa, K., 2016. Testy warunków skrajnych jako metoda pomiaru ryzyka banków (Stress Tests as a Method of Measuring Banks' Risk). Bezpieczny Bank, 3(64), pp.29–46.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. Broeders, D., Prenio, J., 2018. Innovative Technology in Financial Supervision (SupTech): The Experience of Early Users. BIS, Financial Stability Institute, FSI Insights on Policy Implementation, No. 9, July 2018. [online] Available at: <https://www.bis.org/fsi/publ/insights9.htm>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. Brummer, Ch., Yadav, Y., 2019. Fintech and the Innovation Trilemma, The Georgetown Law Journal, Vol. 107, pp.235–307. [online] Available at: <https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2112&context=faculty-publications>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. Coelho, R., DeSimoni, M. and Prenio, J., 2019. SupTech Applications for Anti-Money Laundering. FSI Insights on Policy Implementation, No 18. [online] Available at: <https://www.bis.org/fsi/publ/insights18.pdf>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Dewatripont, M., Tirole J., 1994. The Prudential Regulation of Banks, MIT Press, 1994.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. EBA, 2018. Final Report on Guidelines on Institutions’ Stress Testing. [online] Available at: <https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/-/media/boe/files/paper/2020/december/gl-institutions-stress-testing.pdf>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. ESMA, 2019. RegTech and SupTech – Change for Markets and Regulators. ESMA Report on Trends, Risks and Vulnerabilities, No 1, 2019. [online] Available at: <https://www.esma.europa.eu/press-news/esma-news/regtech-and-suptech-%E2%80%93-change-markets-and-regulators>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. EU, 2019. Fitness Check of EU Supervisory Reporting Requirements. Commission Staff Working Document, Brussels, SWD(2019) 402 final. [online] Available at: <https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/business_economy_euro/banking_and_finance/documents/191107-fitness-check-supervisory-reporting-staff-working-paper_en.pdf>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. FSB, 2017. Financial Stability Implications from FinTech: Supervisory and Regulatory Issues that Merit Authorities’ Attention, 27 June 2017. [online] Available at: <https://www.fsb.org/wp-content/uploads/R270617.pdf>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. FSB, 2020. Regulation, Supervision and Oversight of Global Stablecoin Arrangement. Final Report, 13 October 2020. [online] Available at: https://www.fsb.org/2020/10/regulation-supervision-and-oversight-of-global-stablecoin-arrangements/
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. FSI, 2020. Crisanto, J.C., Kienecker, K., Prenio, J. and Tan., E., 2020. From Data Reporting to Data Sharing: How Far Can Suptech and Other Innovations Challenge the Status Quo of Regulatory Reporting? FSI Insights, No. 29, December. [online] Available at: <https://www.bis.org/fsi/publ/insights29.htm>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. Gal, M., Rubinfeld, D., 2019. Data Standardization. New York University Law Review, Vol. 94, No. 4, October (2019), pp.737–780. [online] Available at: <https://www.academia.edu/38698773/DATA_STANDARDIZATION>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. Gąsiorkiewicz, L., Monkiewicz, J. (eds), 2021. Innovation in Financial Services. Balancing Public and Private Interests. London and New York: Routledge.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. Jagtiani, J., Wall, L., Vermilyea, T., 2018. The Roles of Big Data and Machine Learning in Bank Supervision. Mimeo, 9 March 2018. <https://www.bankingperspectives.com/the-roles-of-big-data-and-machine-learning-in-bank-supervision/>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. KPMG, 2018. The Pulse of Fintech. Biannual Global Analysis of Investment in Fintech.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. Masciandaro, D., Quintyn, M., 2013. The Evolution of Financial Supervision: The Continuing Search for the Holy Grail, in: Balling M. and Gnan E., (eds). In: 50 Years of Money and Finance: Lessons and Challenges. Chapter 8, SUERF - The European Money and Finance Forum., 2013, pp.263–318. [online] Available at: <https://ideas.repec.org/h/erf/erfftc/1-8.html>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. NAIC – Insurance Data Security Model Law, 2017. NAIC Model Laws, Regulations, Guidelines and Other Resources - 4th Quarter 2017. [online] Available at: <https://content.naic.org/sites/default/files/inline-files/MDL-668.pdf>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. Renz, E., Tarnowska, M., 2011. Testowanie warunków skrajnych (Stress Conditions Testing). EFORUM Bankowość i Finanse – KNF. [online] Available at: <https://nmf.knf.gov.pl/Microportals/NMF/Images/testy_warunkow_skrajnych_tcm74-18499.pdf>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. Schoenmaker, D., Wierts, P., 2016. Macroprudential Supervision: from Theory to Policy. Working Paper Series, No. 2, Februar 2016, ESRB. [online] Available at: <https://www.esrb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/wp/esrbwp2.en.pdf>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. Toronto Centre, 2017. FinTech, RegTech and SupTech: What They Mean for Financial Supervision, TC Notes, August 2017. [online] Available at: <https://res.torontocentre.org/guidedocs/FinTech%20RegTech%20and%20SupTech%20-%20What%20They%20Mean%20for%20Financial%20Supervision%20FINAL.pdf>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. World Bank Group, 2017. Understanding Bank Recovery and Resolution in the EU: A Guidebook to the BRRD. Open Knowledge Repository – World Bank Group. [online] Available at: <https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/25974>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. Zawadzka, P., 2017. Modele nadzoru rynku finansowego (Models of Supervision of Financial Market). CeDeWu.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. Zetzsche, D., Arner, D.W., Buckley, R.P. and Weber, R.H., 2019. The Future of Data-Driven Finance and RegTech: Lessons from EU Big Bang II. UNSW Law Research Series, March 2019. [online] Available at: <https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/business-law-blog/blog/2019/05/future-data-driven-finance-and-regtech-lessons-eu-big-bang-ii>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/fman-2022-0002 | Journal eISSN: 2300-5661 | Journal ISSN: 2080-7279
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 25 - 36
Published on: Apr 4, 2022
Published by: Warsaw University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
supervisory system,
suptech,
reporting process,
supervisory reports,
big data and artificial intelligence in supervision
Related subjects:
Computer sciences,
Business computing,
Business and economics,
Business management,
Management accounting, financial controlling, cost calculation, investment

© 2022 Jan Monkiewicz, Marek Monkiewicz, published by Warsaw University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 14 (2022): Issue 1 (January 2022)Next article