Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Value of Postgraduate Students Opinions in the Quality Management of Academic E-Learning Cover

The Value of Postgraduate Students Opinions in the Quality Management of Academic E-Learning

Open Access
|Dec 2021

Figures & Tables

Students’ answers to the questions specifically regarding the online classes (Source: Own elaboration)

QuestionsYes (%)No (%)
In your opinion, were the online classes interesting?8119
Were the online classes engaging?6139
Were the online classes dynamic?5941

Students’ answers to the questions regarding the didactic materials (Source: Own elaboration)

QuestionsYes (%)No (%)
Did you have access to various didactic materials?8911
In your view, were the didactic materials sufficient?6733
Were the didactic materials for the classes attractive and encouraging to study?6436

Students’ answers to the questions regarding the online delivery – e-learning platform and the support from the School (Source: Own elaboration)

QuestionsYes (%)No (%)
Was the e-learning platform working properly?9010
Was the support of the School sufficient?9010

Students’ answers to the questions regarding the lecturers (Source: Own elaboration)

QuestionsYes (%)No (%)
Was the contact with the lecturers sufficient?7030
Was the support from the lecturers sufficient?8416
Did the lecturers provide feedback for each didactic activity performed by you (tasks, exercises, projects)?6931

Students’ answers to the question: Which aspects of e-learning do you think need improvement and why? (Source: Own elaboration)

Question:Which aspects of e-learning do you think need improvement and why?% Respondents*
More networking and group work60
More interactive presentations to engage students – Mentimeter, Mural, Kahoot, etc. could be used more often by lecturers40
To have cameras on during the classes mandatory40
Lectures and consultations work well online and should remain this way after the pandemic; exams should be done online30
All online classes should be recorded, and the recordings should be available to students30
Availability of lecturers after the classes for extra consultations20
Some of the lecturers did introductory videos before the class, which was brilliant. Everyone should do that. I would watch with pleasure15
Making sure that no external noise will disturb the classes, e.g., “barking dog.” Sound quality10

Students’ answers to the question regarding networking with other students (Source: Own elaboration)

QuestionYes (%)No (%)
In your opinion, was networking with other program participants sufficient?3367

Students’ answers to the questions specifically regarding the methods of assessment of the online classes (Source: Own elaboration)

QuestionsYes (%)No (%)
In your opinion, were the methods of assessing students’ achievements satisfactory?7030
Were you familiar with the evaluation criteria of the subject?9010

Students’ answers to the question regarding the quality of online classes – a scale of 1–5 (1- very bad, 5- very good) (Source: Own elaboration)

Questions1 (%)2 (%)3 (%)4 (%)5 (%)
How do you generally rate the quality of online classes?04205323
How do you rate the quality of online classes organization?16244623
How do you rate the quality of the content of online classes?07195619
How do you rate the quality of teaching materials?310244419
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/fman-2021-0014 | Journal eISSN: 2300-5661 | Journal ISSN: 2080-7279
Language: English
Page range: 183 - 194
Published on: Dec 13, 2021
Published by: Warsaw University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2021 Grażyna Rembielak, Renata Marciniak, published by Warsaw University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.