Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Use of Digital Technology Platforms in the Context of Cybersecurity in the Industrial Sector Cover

The Use of Digital Technology Platforms in the Context of Cybersecurity in the Industrial Sector

Open Access
|Jul 2021

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

The major risks for the industrial sector in cyberspace; RFID: radio-frequency identification (Source: Ervural and Ervural, 2017)
The major risks for the industrial sector in cyberspace; RFID: radio-frequency identification (Source: Ervural and Ervural, 2017)

The security domain during the use of digital technology platforms vs the duration of their use (Source: Own study)

Question 8. Has your company experienced any of the below-specified negative events or cybersecurity risks which were directly associated with the use of DTPs?Question 2. Please specify how long your current company has been using digital technology platforms
Up to 3 yearsMore than 3 years
n%n%
Hardware failure3051.73556.5
Internet outage attributable to, for example, network congestion due to the use of digital technology platforms1932.82438.7
Leak of information relating to company, employees, or business partners46.911.6
Customer data leak46.911.6
Phishing – a fraudulent attempt to obtain sensitive information or data by disguising a website as a trustworthy entity in an electronic communication58.6711.3
Pharming – redirection to fake websites35.2711.3
Loss of financial means46.911.6
Internet spying23.411.6
No negative events1322.41524.2
Intergroup comparisons using the Mann-Whitney U-test
  • Hardware failure vs duration of use – not statistically significant

  • Internet outage vs duration of use – not statistically significant

  • Company data leak vs duration of use – not statistically significant

  • Customer data leak vs duration of use – not statistically significant

  • Phishing vs duration of use – not statistically significant

  • Pharming vs duration of use – not statistically significant

  • Loss of financial means vs duration of use – not statistically significant

  • Internet spying vs duration of use – not statistically significant

  • No negative events vs duration of use – not statistically significant

Test for significance of relationships between Pearson's chi-square and Cramer's V contingency coefficient
  • Hardware failure vs duration of use – not statistically significant

  • Internet outage vs duration of use – not statistically significant

  • Company data leak vs duration of use – not statistically significant

  • Customer data leak vs duration of use – not statistically significant

  • Phishing vs duration of use – not statistically significant

  • Pharming vs duration of use – not statistically significant

  • Loss of financial means vs duration of use – not statistically significant

  • Internet spying vs duration of use – not statistically significant

  • No negative events vs duration of use – not statistically significant

Cybersecurity-related consequences of the use of DTPs in companies (Source: Own study)

Question 8. Please specify if your company experienced any of the below-specified negative events or cybersecurity risks which were directly associated with the use of DTPs
ResponsesPercentage of observations
nPercentage
Hardware failure6536.153.7
Internet outage attributable to, for example, network congestion due to the use of digital technology platforms4323.935.5
Leak of information relating to company, employees, or business partners63.35.0
Customer data leak63.35.0
Phishing – a fraudulent attempt to obtain sensitive information or data by disguising a website as a trustworthy entity in an electronic communication126.79.9
Pharming – redirection to fake websites105.68.3
Loss of financial means63.35.0
Internet spying31.72.5
No negative events2815.623.1
Total180100.0148.8

Manifestations of the negative approach of management staff of the surveyed companies toward the implementation and use of digital technology platforms (Source: Own study)

Question 7. Please specify how the negative attitude of management staff toward the implementation and use of digital technology platforms manifests itself in your company
ResponsesPercentage of observations
nPercentage
High-level resistance toward the implementation of digital technology platforms due to potential changes to the organizational and employment structure in the company240.0100.0
A number of concerns attributable to economic factors (high costs of implementation and possible cost reductions in other operational areas of the company)120.050.0
Numerous cybersecurity concerns240.0100.0
Total5100.0250.0

The essential features of the STOE (Source: Borysiewicz and Michalik, 2007)

FeatureDescription
AuditRecording – in an audit register – information about users’ operations that were unsuccessful
Authorization
  • Use of configuration modifications that cover control algorithms or border points

  • Authorization of users who have access to control systems or actuation mechanisms

Operational preparednessProtection against loss of operational readiness of control servers or communication lines
Access controlInspections of system and platform interfaces, their functions, modifiable configurations, and critical processes
MonitoringDetection of unauthorized operations on an ongoing basis
RecoveryExistence of tools for critical elements and processes aimed at data recovery at the time of failure
ConfidentialityData protection against unauthorized disclosure (relevant data are determined based on a risk assessment and they mostly include operational, control, and financial information)
Security proceduresExistence of plans and policies relating to security management, business continuity, or assignment of roles and responsibilities
Self-checkPerformance of self-tests used for validation of the integrity of security functions
CoherenceProtection against unauthorized changes to the information flow or configuration of systems and platforms
Border protectionProtection against attempts aimed at slipping across physical and digital logic borders of a system or platform

Security domain during the use of digital technology platforms vs company size (Source: Own study)

Question 8. Has your company experienced any of the below-specified negative events or cybersecurity risks which were directly associated with the use of DTPs?Company size
Micro-sized companiesSmall-sized companiesMedium-sized companiesLarge-sized companies
n%n%n%n%
Hardware failure325.01139.32356.12871.8
Internet outage attributable to, for example, network congestion due to the use of digital technology platforms433.3932.12048.81025.6
Leak of information relating to company, employees, or business partners00.027.112.425.1
Customer data leak00.000.049.812.6
Phishing – a fraudulent attempt to obtain sensitive information or data by disguising a website as a trustworthy entity in an electronic communication325.013.637.3512.8
Pharming – redirection to fake websites216.727.137.337.7
Loss of financial means00.027.112.425.1
Internet spying00.013.612.412.6
No negative events758.3932.1614.6615.4
Intergroup comparisons using the Kruskal–Wallis H-test and Mann-Whitney U-test
  • Hardware failure vs company size

    H (χ2)(3, n = 120) = 11.46, p ≤ 0.05

  • Micro-sized vs small-sized companies – not statistically significant

  • Micro-sized vs medium-sized companies

    U(n = 54) = 178.5, p ≤ 0.05

  • Micro-sized vs large-sized companies

    U(n = 52) = 130.0, p ≤ 0.05

  • Small-sized vs medium-sized companies – not statistically significant

  • Small-sized vs large-size dcompanies

    U(n = 67) = 368.5, p ≤ 0.05

  • Medium-sized vs large-sized companies – not statistically significant

  • Internet outage vs company size – not statistically significant

  • Company data leak vs company size – not statistically significant

  • Customer data leak vs company size – not statistically significant

  • Phishing vs company size – not statistically significant

  • Pharming vs company size – not statistically significant

  • Loss of financial means vs company size – not statistically significant

  • Internet spying vs company size – not statistically significant

  • No negative events vs company size – not statistically significant

Test for significance of relationships between Pearson's chi-square and Cramer's V contingency coefficient
  • Hardware failure vs company size

    H (χ2) (3, n = 121) = 12.46, p ≤ 0.05, V = 321

  • Internet outage vs company size – not statistically significant

  • Company data leak vs company size – not statistically significant

  • Customer data leak vs company size – not statistically significant

  • Phishing vs company size – not statistically significant

  • Pharming vs company size – not statistically significant

  • Loss of financial means vs company size – not statistically significant

  • Internet spying vs company size – not statistically significant

  • No negative events vs company size – not statistically significant

Factors relevant to attitudes toward digital technology platforms (Source: Own study)

Model component (predictor)Beta coefficientNumber of degrees of freedom (df)FSignificanceZero-order correlation
Structural (sociodemographic) factor0.2610.201110.6820.197
Structural factor0.1470.16330.8160.488
Human factor0.1410.16320.7490.475
Economic factor0.0700.20730.1140.952
Cybersecurity factor–0.1380.15910.7560.386
Structural (sociodemographic) factor0.2740.2620.2540.5470.944
Structural factor0.1400.1540.1450.1570.975
Human factor0.1450.1480.1390.1570.972
Economic factor0.1050.0720.0670.0560.932
Cybersecurity factor−0.078−0.141−0.1330.0830.928
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/fman-2021-0009 | Journal eISSN: 2300-5661 | Journal ISSN: 2080-7279
Language: English
Page range: 117 - 130
Published on: Jul 28, 2021
Published by: Warsaw University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2021 Krzysztof Bartczak, published by Warsaw University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.