Outranking Methods: Promethee I and Promethee II
References
- Adalı, E. and Işık, A., 2016. Air conditioner selection problem with COPRAS and ARAS methods. Manas Journal of Social Studies, 5(2), pp.124–138. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b1f9/9b4c8ff39137f5f1f044df9572e5f62331b3.pdf?_ga=2.4748531.1193764185.1565108694-1821258113.1558350277
- Adalı, E. and Işık, A., 2017. The multi-objective decision making methods based on MULTI-MOORA and MOORA for the laptop selection problem. International Journal of Industrial Engineering, 13, pp.229–237. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs40092-016-0175-5.pdf
- Albadvi, A., Chaharsooghi, S.K. and Esfahanipour, A., 2007. Decision making in stock trading: An application of PROMETHEE. European Journal of Operational Research, 177(2), pp.673–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2005.11.022
- Alomoush, M, I., 2010. Multicriteria selection of optimal location of TCSC in a competitive energy market, Journal of Electrical Engineering, 61(3), pp.129–140. https://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/jee/61/3/article-p129.xml?rskey=6Byy3L&result=4&tab_body=pdf
- Ayhan, M.B., 2013. A fuzzy AHP for supplier selection problem: A case study in a gear motor company. International Journal of Managing Value and Supply Chains (IJMVSC), 4(3), pp.11–23. https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1311/1311.2886.pdf
- Behzadian, M., Kazemzadeh, R.B Albadvi, A. and Aghdasi, M., 2010. PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 200(1), pp.198–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.01.021
- Bentes, A.V., Carneiro, J., Da Silva, J.F. and Kimura, H., 2012. Multidimensional assessment of organizational performance: Integrating BSC and AHP. Journal of Business Research, 65(12), pp.1790–1799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.10.039
- Bertolini, M., Braglia, M. and Carmignani, G., 2006. Application of the AHP Methodology in Making a Proposal for a Public Work Contract. International Journal of Project Management, 24, pp.422–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.01.005
- Bhattacharyya, A. and Chakraborty, S., 2014. A DEA-TOPSIS-based approach for performance evaluation of Indian technical institutes. Decision Science Letters, 3(3), pp.397–410. http://www.growingscience.com/dsl/Vol3/dsl_2014_5.pdf
- Brans, J.P., 1982. L’ingénièrie de la décision; Elaboration d’instruments d’aide à la décision. La méthode PROMETHEE. Organized by Nadeau, R. and Landry, M., L’aide à la décision: Nature, Instruments et Perspectives d’Avenir, Québec, Canada, Presses de l’Université Laval, pp.183–213.
- Brans, J.P. and Mareschal, B., 1992. Promethee-V – MCDM problems with segmentation constraints. Information systems and operational research, 30(2), pp.85–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/03155986.1992.11732186
- Brans, J.P. and Mareschal, B., 1995. The PROMETHEE VI procedure. How to differentiate hard from soft multicriteria problems. Journal of Decision Systems, 4(3), pp.213–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.1995.10511652
- Brans, J.P. and Mareschal, P., 1994. The PROMETHEE-GAIA decision support system for multicriteria investigations. Journal of Investigation Operative, 4(2), pp.107–117.
- Brans, J.P., Mareschal, B. and Vincke, P., 1984. PROMETHEE: A new family of outranking methods in multicriteria analysis. In J.P. Brans, editor, Operational Research’84, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp.477–490.
- Brans, J.P., Mareschal, B. and Vincke, P., 1986. How to select and how to rank projects: The PROMETHEE method. European Journal of Operational Research, 24(2), pp.228–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(86)90044-5
- Brans, J.P. and Vincke, P., 1985. A preference ranking organisation method: The PROMETHEE method for MCDM. Management Science, 31(6), pp.647–656
- Brauers, W.K.M. and Zavadskas, E.K., 2006. The MOORA method and its applications to privatization in a transition economy. Control and cybernetics, 35(2), pp.445–469. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3cc0/3a4ced96c113cb8ea4bdef4fb8c85c6429c4.pdf?_ga=2.82634006.1280531091.1565892816-1821258113.1558350277
- Brauers, W.K.M. and Zavadskas, E.K., 2009. Multi objectives optimization with discrete alternatives on the basis of ratio analysis. Intellectual economics, 2(6), pp.30–41. https://www3.mruni.eu/ojs/intellectual-economics/article/view/1193/1142
- Buckley, J.J., 1985. Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 17(3), pp.233–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(85)90090-9.
- Bulut, E., Duru, O., Keçeci, T. and Yoshida, S., 2012. Use of consistency index, expert prioritization and direct numerical inputs for generic fuzzy-AHP modeling: A process model for shipping asset management. Expert Systems and Applications, 39(2), pp.1911–1923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.056
- Butowski, L., 2018. An integrated AHP and PROMETHEE approach to the evaluation of the attractiveness of European maritime areas for sailing tourism. Moravian Geographical Reports, 26(2), pp.135–148. https://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/mgr/26/2/article-p135.xml?rskey=6Byy3L&result=3&tab_body=pdf
- Büyüközkan, G. and Çifçi, G., 2012. A combined fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS based strategic analysis of electronic service quality in healthcare industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3), pp.2341–2354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.061
- Chandrakar, R. and Limje, S., 2018. A hybrid of QFD and AHP-TOPSIS for Durg dumping waste projects. Journal of Project Management, 3(3), pp.143–150. http://www.growingscience.com/jpm/Vol3/jpm_2018_8.pdf
- Chang, D.Y., 1996. Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 95(3), pp.649–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-2
- Celik, M., Deha, Er. I. and Ozok, A.F., 2009. Application of fuzzy extended AHP methodology on shipping registry selection: The case of Turkish maritime industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, pp.190–198. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.469.3751&rep=rep1&type=pdf
- Durán, O. and Aguilo, J., 2008. Computer-aided machine-tool selection based on a fuzzy-AHP approach. Expert Systems and Applications, 34(3), pp.1787–1794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.01.046
- Geldermann, J., Spengler, T. and Rentz, O., 2000. Fuzzy outranking for environmental assessment. Case study: Iron and steel making industry. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 115(1), pp.45–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(99)00021-4
- Goswami, S. and Mitra, S., 2020. Selecting the best mobile model by applying AHP-COPRAS and AHP-ARAS decision making methodology. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 4(1), pp.27–42. http://www.growingscience.com/ijds/Vol4/ijdns_2019_30.pdf
- Goumas, M. and Lygerou, V., 2000. An extension of the PROMETHEE method for decision making in fuzzy environment: Ranking of alternative energy exploitation projects. European Journal of Operational Research, 123(3), pp.606–613. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00093-4
- Holst, A., 2019, August 30. Global pc unit shipments 2006–2019. Statista. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/273495/global-shipments-of-personal-computers-since-2006/
- Hwang, C.L., Lai, Y.J. and Liu, T.Y., 1993. A new approach for multiple objective decision making. Computers and Operational Research, 20(8), pp.889–899. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0548(93)90109-V
- Hwang, C.L. and Yoon, K., 1981. Multiple Attributes Decision Making Methods and Applications. New York: Springer-Verlag.
- Jayant, A. and Sharma, J., 2018. A comprehensive literature review of MCDM techniques ELECTRE, PROMETHEE, VIKOR and TOPSIS applications in business competitive environment. International Journal of Current Research, 10(2), pp.65461–65477. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b370/ba1d421bcc7738c4b69d9a31cb61186afbf3.pdf
- Kabir, G. and Sumi, R.S., 2014. Power substation location selection using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and PROMETHEE: A case study from Bangladesh. Energy, 72, pp.717–730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.05.098
- Kilic, H.S., Zaim, S. and Delen, D., 2015. Selecting the best ERP system for SMEs using a combination of ANP and PROMETHEE methods. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(5), pp.2343–2352. http://isiarticles.com/bundles/Article/pre/pdf/46451.pdf
- Kolios, A., Mytilinou, V., Lozano-Minguez, E. and Salonitis, K., 2016. A comparative study of multiple criteria decision making methods under stochastic inputs. MDPI Journal of Energies, 9(566). https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/9/7/566/htm#B34-energies-09-00566
- Korhonen, P., Koskinen, L. and Voutilainen, R., 2006. A financial alliance compromise between executives and supervisory authorities. European Journal of Operational Research, 175(2), pp.1300–1310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2005.06.033
- Kowalski, K., Stagl, S., Madlener, R. and Omann, I., 2009. Sustainable energy futures: Methodological challenges in combining scenarios and participatory multi-criteria analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 197(3), pp.1063–1074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.12.049
- Kucharski, A., 2014. Analysis of selected investment fund type ranking position – PROMETHEE method application. Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządanie, 15(1), pp.41–53. https://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/eam/15/1/article-p41.xml?rskey=6Byy3L&result=1&tab_body=pdf
- Lee, A.H.I., Chen, W.C. and Chang, C. J., 2008. A fuzzy AHP and BSC approach for evaluating performance of IT department in the manufacturing industry in Taiwan. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(1), pp.96–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2006.08.022
- Maletic, D., Maletic, M., Lovrencic, V., Al-Najjar, B. and Gomiscek, B., 2014. An application of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and sensitivity analysis for maintenance policy selection. Organizacija. 47(3), pp.177–188. https://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/orga/47/3/article-p177.xml?rskey=kfwM8g&result=3&tab_body=pdf
- Marzouk, M. and Abdelakder, E., 2019. On the use of multi-criteria decision making methods for minimizing environmental emissions in construction projects. Decision Science Letters, 8(4), pp.373–392. http://www.growingscience.com/dsl/Vol8/dsl_2019_16.pdf
- Melón, M.G., Aragonés, B.P. and Carmen, G.C.M., 2008. An AHP-based evaluation procedure for innovative educational projects: A face-to-face vs. computer-mediated case study. Omega, 36(5), pp.754–765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2006.01.005
- Mitra, S. and Goswami, S.S., 2019a. Selection of the desktop computer model by AHP-TOPSIS hybrid MCDM methodology. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews, 6(1), pp.784–790. http://ijrar.com/upload_issue/ijrar_issue_20542876.pdf
- Mitra, S. and Goswami, S.S., 2019b. Application of simple average weighting optimization method in the selection of best desktop computer model. Advanced Journal of Graduate Research, 6(1), pp.60–68. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/bc72/cb3b02e433f9a4f2ac73a8081c23f70f05e0.pdf
- Mitra, S. and Kundu, S., 2017. Application of analytic hierarchy process for domestic refrigerator selection. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Engineering Research, 5(12), pp.126–132. http://www.ijeter.everscience.org/Manuscripts/Volume-5/Issue-12/Vol-5-issue-12-M-21.pdf
- Mitra, S. and Kundu, S., 2018. Application of TOPSIS for best domestic refrigerator selection. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews, 5(3), pp.226–231. https://ijrar.com/upload_issue/ijrar_issue_1212.pdf
- Naserizade, S.S., Nikoo, M.R. and Montaseri, H., 2018. A risk-based multi-objective model for optimal placement of sensors in water distribution system. Journal of Hydrology, 557, pp.147–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.12.028
- Ngai, E.W.T. and Chan, E.W.C., 2005. Evaluation of Knowledge Management Tools Using AHP. Expert System Applications, 29(4), pp.889–899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2005.06.025
- Nikouei, M.A., Oroujzadeh, M. and Mehdipour-Ataei, S., 2017. The PROMETHEE multiple criteria decision making analysis for selecting the best membrane prepared from sulfonated poly(ether ketone)s and poly(ether sulfone)s for proton exchange membrane fuel cell. Energy, 119, pp.77–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.12.052
- Nourbakhsh, Z. and Yousefi, H., 2017. Presenting a conceptual model of data collection to manage the groundwater quality. Journal of Water and Land Development, 35(1), pp.149–160. https://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/jwld/35/1/article-p149.xml?rskey=kfwM8g&result=5&tab_body=pdf
- Peng, A.H. and Xiao, X.M., 2013. Material selection using PROMETHEE combined with analytic network process under hybrid environment. Materials and Design, 47, pp.643–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2012.12.058
- Polat, G., 2016. Subcontractor selection using the integration of the AHP and PROMETHEE methods. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 22(8), pp.1042–1054. https://journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/JCEM/article/view/1960/1576
- Polat, G., Damci, A. and Dermili, L., 2016. Urban renewal project selection using the integration of AHP and PROMETHEE approaches. Procedia Engineering, 164, pp.339–346. https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S1877705816339698?token=B741435AA44C25D079F221DBE3E0C2193EFDF30753523526E1ABC13625755EFC5FC37F0F17B73ED3142ACD4D51C4BBDC.
- Qin, X.S., Huang, G.H., Chakma, A. and Nie, X.H., 2008. A MCDM-based expert system for climate-change impact assessment and adaptation planning. A case study for the Georgia basin, Canada. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(3), pp.2164–2179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.02.024.
- Rostamzadeh, R. and Sofian, S., 2011. Prioritizing effective 7Ms to improve production systems performance using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS (case study). Expert Systems with Applications, 38(5), pp.5166–5177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.10.045
- Roy, B., 1968. Classement et choix en présence de points de vue multiples (la méthode ELECTRE). Revue Francaise d'Informatique et de Recherche Opérationelle (RIRO), 2(8), pp.57–75. http://www.numdam.org/article/RO_1968__2_1_57_0.pdf
- Saaty, T.L., 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Saaty, T.L., 2001. Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: RWS Publications.
- Saaty, T.L., 2008. Decision Making for Leaders: The Analytic Hierarchy Process for Decisions in a Complex World. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: RWS Publications.
- Saaty, T.L., 2010. Principia Mathematica Decernendi: Mathematical Principles of Decision Making. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: RWS Publications.
- Sri Krishna, S., Sri Nivasulu Readdy, A. and Vani, S., 2014. A new car selection in the market using TOPSIS. International Journal of Engineering Research and General Science, 2(4), pp.177–181. http://ijergs.org/files/documents/A-NEW20.pdf
- Tsoutsos, T., Drandaki, M., Frantzeskaki, N., Iosifidis, E. and Kiosses, I., 2009. Sustainable energy planning by using multi-criteria analysis application in the island of crete. Energy Policy, 37(5), pp.1587–1600. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Niki_Frantzeskaki/publication/46496901_Sustainable_energy_planning_by_using_multi-criteria_analysis_application_in_the_island_of_Crete/links/56c5d53408ae736e7049255c/Sustainable-energy-planning-by-using-multi-criteria-analysis-application-in-the-island-of-Crete.pdf
- Turcksin, L., Bernardini, A. and Macharis, C., 2011. A combined AHP-PROMETHEE approach for selecting the most appropriate policy scenario to stimulate a clean vehicle fleet. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 20, pp.954–965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.08.104
- Vaillancourt, K. and Waaub, J.P., 2004. Equity in international greenhouse gases abatement scenarios: A multi criteria approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 153(2), pp.489–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00170-X
- Wang, J.J. and Yang, D.L., 2007. Using a hybrid multi-criteria decision aid method for information systems outsourcing. Computers & Operations Research, 34, pp.3691–3700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2006.01.017
- Yilmaz, B. and Dagdeviren, M., 2011. A combined approach for equipment selection: FPROMETHEE method and zero–one goal programming. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(9), pp.11641–11650. http://www.irantahgig.ir/wp-content/uploads/40014.pdf
- Yoon, K., 1987. A reconciliation among discrete compromise situations. Journal of Operational Research Society, 38 (3), pp.277–286. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.1987.44
- Zadeh, L.A., 1965. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), pp.338–353. https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S001999586590241X?token=7E8F7BB90871609078C2FA8FB927AD9370F843E3F43209FCC3CD2B59D0E7D1AF1CC306EBEE6BEB1B5A4AE6A475CFDFB4
- Zavadskas, E.K., Kaklauskas, A., Turskis, Z. and Tamošaitien, J., 2008. Selection of the effective dwelling house walls by applying attributes values determined at intervals. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 14(2), pp.85–93. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/5268/356a08cb6df2830747c841a13a3e708f1421.pdf
- Zavadskas, E.K. and Turskis, Z., 2010. A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 16(2), pp.159–172. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.3846/tede.2010.10
- Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z. and Vilutiene, T., 2010. Multiple criteria analysis of foundation instalment alternatives by applying Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) method. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 10(3), pp.123–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1644-9665(12)60141-1
- Zhao, H., Peng, Y. and Li, W., 2013. Revised PROMETHEE II for improving efficiency in emergency response. Procedia Computer Science, 17, pp.181–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.05.025.
Language: English
Page range: 93 - 110
Published on: Jul 9, 2020
Published by: Warsaw University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 times per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2020 Shankha Shubhra Goswami, published by Warsaw University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.