Figure 1
Main immaturity models found in the literature (Source: Authors’ own research)
| Model Name | Focus Area | Levels of Immaturity | Author |
|---|---|---|---|
| A software process immaturity | Software engineering capabilities |
| (Finkelstein, 1992) |
| The Capability Im-Maturity Model (CIMM) | Chaotic software development processes |
| (Schorsch, 1996) |
| A Project Management Immaturity Model | Companies in general that work with projects |
| (Piney, 2009) |
Immaturity assessment form (Source: Authors’ own research)
| LPIM Immaturity Assessment Form | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Immaturity Model Processes | Immaturity Levels | Not applicable | |||
| # | Processes | Level -1 Negligent | Level -2 Obstructive | Level -3 Contemptuous | |
| 1 | Warehouse Management and Control | ||||
| 2 | Inventory Management and Control | ||||
| 3 | Production Control | ||||
| 4 | Customer Relationship Management | ||||
| 5 | Supply and Procurement Management | ||||
| 6 | Logistic and Production Planning | ||||
| 7 | Organizational and Human Resource Management | ||||
| 8 | Sales and Internationalization | ||||
| 9 | Technological Appropriation and Logistics 4.0 | ||||
| TOTAL COUNT: | |||||
| PERCENTAGE (TOTAL COUNT / 9): | |||||
Immaturity levels of the model (Source: Authors’ own research)
| Immaturity Level | Level Name | Characteristic Practice (CP) | Criticality level |
|---|---|---|---|
| Level -1 | Negligent | Failure to allow a successful execution process | Medium |
| Level -2 | Obstructive | Counter-productive effects of the process | High |
| Level -3 | Contemptuous | Total disregard for any order or sense of management | Very High |