Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Rethinking Performance Management Practices in Local Administrations? An Evaluation of BV, CPA, And WPI Practices in the United Kingdom Cover

Rethinking Performance Management Practices in Local Administrations? An Evaluation of BV, CPA, And WPI Practices in the United Kingdom

Foundations of Management
Volume 10 (2018): Issue 1 (March 2018)
By: Demokaan Demirel  
Open Access
|Jul 2018

References

  1. [1] Ashworth, R., Boyne, G., 2000. Promises and Performance, (edt. by T. Clark and K. Hoggart). People, Parties and Policies, Westview, Boulder.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] Audit Commission, 2002. Stewardship and Governance: A Review of the work of the Audit Commission's Appointed Auditors in 2002.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] Auguinis, H., Gottfredson, R.K., Joo, H., 2013. Avoiding a “me” versus “we” dilemma: Using Performance Management to Turn Teams into a Source of Competitive Advantage. Business Horizons, 56, pp.503-512.10.1016/j.bushor.2013.02.004
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] Auguinis, H., Gottfredson, R.K., Joo, H., 2012a. Using Performance Management to Win the Talent War. Business Horizons, 55, pp.609-616.10.1016/j.bushor.2012.05.007
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] Auguinis, H., Joo, H., Gottfredson, R.K., 2012b. Performance Management Universals: Think Globally and Act Locally. Business Horizons, 55, 385-392.10.1016/j.bushor.2012.03.004
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] Boyne, G., 2001. The Impact of Best Value on Local Authority Performance: Evidence from the Welsh Pilots. Local Government, 27 (2), pp.44-68.10.1080/714004097
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] Boyne, G.A.,. Gould-Williams, J., Law, J. and Walker, J., 2002. Plans, Performance Information and Accountability: the Case of Best Value. Public Administration, 80 (4), pp.691-710.10.1111/1467-9299.00324
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] Bovaird, T., 2008. Emergent Strategic Management and Planning Mechanisms in Complex Adaptative Systems: The Case of UK Best Value Initiative. Public Management Review, 10(3), pp.319-340.10.1080/14719030802002741
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] CRC for Construction Innovation (2002). Best Value Second Interim Report. CRC for Construction Innovation, Brisbane.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] Cuganesan, S., Guthrie J., Vranic, V., 2014. The Riskiness of Public Sector Performance Measurement: A Review and Research Agenda. Financial Accountability & Management, 30 (3), pp.279-302.10.1111/faam.12037
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] DETR, 1999. Best Value: New Roles for Members, London: DETR.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] Fryer, K., Antony J., Ogden S., 2009. Performance Management in the Public Sector. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 22 (6), pp.478-498.10.1108/09513550910982850
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] Harris, L., 2005. UK Public Sector Reform and Performance Agenda in UK Local Government: HRM Challenges and Dilemmas. Personnel Review, 34 (6), pp.681-696.10.1108/00483480510623466
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] Lin Shin-Jie and Po-Yu Lee, 2011. Performance Management in Public Organizations: A Complexity Perspective. International Public Management Review, 12 (2), pp.81-96.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] Martin, S., Downe, J., Grace, C., Nutley S., 2013. All Change? Performance Assessment Regimes in UK Local Government. Public Money & Management, 33 (4), pp.277-280.10.1080/09540962.2013.799816
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] Martin, S., 2002a. Best Value: New Public Management or New Direction (edt. by Kate McLaughlin, et al.). New Public Management: Current Trends and Future Prospects. London: Routledge, pp.129-141.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] Martin, S., 2002b. The Modernization of UK Local Government: Markets, Managers, Monitors and Mixed Fortunes. Public Management Review, 4 (3), pp.291-307.10.1080/14616670210151595
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] Martin, S. 2000. Implementing Best Value: Local Public Services in Transition. Public Administration, 78 (1), pp.209-227.10.1111/1467-9299.00200
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] Midwinter, A., 2008. Performance Management and Best Value Audit in Scotland: A Research Note on Theory and Practise. Financial Accountability & Management, 24 (4), pp.439-453.10.1111/j.1468-0408.2008.00461.x
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] Mueller-Hanson, R., Pulakos E.D., 2015. Putting the Performance Back in Performance Management. Shrm-SIOP Science of HR White Paper Series, pp.1-25.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] Navarro-Galera, A., Orti-Rodriguez, D., and López-Hernández, A.M., 2008. Identifying Barriers to the Application of Standardized Performance Indicators in Local Government. Public Management Review, 10 (2), pp.241-262.10.1080/14719030801928706
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] Nielsen, P.A., 2013. Performance Management, Managerial Authority and Public Service Performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24, pp.431-458.10.1093/jopart/mut025
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [23] Pulakos, E.D., Mueller-Hanson, R.A., O’Leary, R.S., Meyrowitz M.M., 2012. Building a High-Performance Culture: A Fresh Look At Performance Management. Alexandria, VA: Society for Human Resource Management.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. [24] Pulakos, E.D., Mueller-Hanson, R.A., Arad, S., Moye, N., 2015. Performance Management Can Be Fixed: An On-the-Job Experiential Learning Approach for Complex Behaviour Change. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8 (1), pp.51-76.10.1017/iop.2014.2
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. [25] Sanderson, I., 2001. Performance Management, Evaluation and Learning in Modern Local Government. Public Administration, 79 (2), pp.297-313.10.1111/1467-9299.00257
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. [26] Schachter, H.L., 2010. Objective and Subjective Performance Measures: A Note on Terminology. Administration & Society, 42 (5), pp.550-567.10.1177/0095399710378080
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. [27] Stevens, P., Stokes, L., O'Mahony, M., 2006. Metrics, Targets and Performance. National Institute Economic Review, Vol. 197, July, pp.80-92.10.1177/0027950106070037
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. [28] Vakkuri, J., Meklin P., 2006. Ambiguity in Performance Measurement: A Theoretical Approach to Organizational Uses of Performance Measurement. Financial Accountability & Management, 22 (3), pp.235-250.10.1111/j.0267-4424.2006.00401.x
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. [29] Wollman, H., 2004. Local Government Reforms in Great Britain, Sweden, Germany, and France: Between Multi-Function and Single- Purpose Organizations. Local Government Studies, 30 (4), pp.639-665.10.1080/0300393042000318030
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/fman-2018-0008 | Journal eISSN: 2300-5661 | Journal ISSN: 2080-7279
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 87 - 98
Published on: Jul 11, 2018
Published by: Warsaw University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
The Best Value,
Comprehensive Performance Assessment,
Comprehensive Area Assessment,
Wales Programme for Improvement,
United Kingdom
Related subjects:
Computer sciences,
Business computing,
Business and economics,
Business management,
Management accounting, financial controlling, cost calculation, investment

© 2018 Demokaan Demirel, published by Warsaw University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 10 (2018): Issue 1 (March 2018)Next article