Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The concept of associated persons as a key and potentially problematic aspect in transfer pricing Cover

The concept of associated persons as a key and potentially problematic aspect in transfer pricing

Open Access
|Mar 2023

References

  1. Al-Rawashded, B.H. (2020). Mutual Agreement Procedure, Double Taxation Treaties and Protection of Taxpayers´ Rights in the BRICS Countries. Lawyer Quaterly, 10(3), 260-278.
  2. Barbosa, M.R. & Santos, J.V.G. (2020). Brazil. In: The Transfer Pricing Law Review. Law Business Research, 25-35.
  3. Barreto, P.A. & Takano, C.A. (2014). Tributação do resultado das coligadas e controladas no exterior, em face da Lei nº 12.973/14. In: Rocha, V. O. (ed.). Grandes questões atuais do direito tributário, 18th Vol., São Paulo Dialética.
  4. Brazilian Act No. 11,727 (2008). Act No. 11.727, 23 June 2008, as amended. Retrieved from: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2007-2010/2008/lei/l11727.htm (Accessed: 26.06.2022).
  5. Brazilian Act No. 11,795 (2008). Act No. 11,795, of October 8, 2008, on consortium, as amended.
  6. Brazilian Act No. 9,278 (1996). Act No. 9,278, 10 May 1996, as amended. Retrieved from: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l9278.htm (Accessed: 26.06.2022).
  7. Brazilian Act No. 9,430 (1996). Act No. 9,430, 27 December 1996, as amended. Retrieved from: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l9430.htm (Accessed: 26.06.2022).
  8. Brazilian Act on Joint Stock Companies (1976). Act No. 6,404, 15 December 1976, as amended. Retrieved from: https://conteudo.cvm.gov.br/export/sites/cvm/subportal_ingles/menu/investors/anexos/Law-6.404-ing.pdf (Accessed: 26.06.2022).
  9. Brazilian Civil Code (2002). Act No. 10,406, 10 January 2002, as amended. Retrieved from: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/2002/l10406compilada.htm (Accessed: 26.06.2022).
  10. Brazilian Constitution (1988). Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil, 5 October 1988, as amended. Retrieved from: https://www.refworld.org/docid/4c4820bf2.html (Accessed: 26.06.2022).
  11. Brazilian National Tax Code (1966). Act No. 5,172, 25 October 1966, as amended. Retrieved from: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l5172compilado.htm (Accessed: 26.06.2022).
  12. Brazilian Normative Instruction RFB No. 1,037 (2010). Brazilian Normative Instruction RFB No. 1,037, 4 June 2010, as amended. Retrieved from: http://normas.receita.fazenda.gov.br/sijut2consulta/link.action?visao=anotado&idAto=16002#:~:text=IN%20RFB%20n%C2%BA%201037%2F2010&text=Relaciona%20pa%C3%ADses%20ou%20depend%C3%AAncias%20com%20tributa%C3%A7%C3%A3o%20favorecida%20e%20regimes%20fiscais%20privilegiados (Accessed: 26.06.2022).
  13. Brazilian Normative Instruction RFB No. 1,312 (2012). Normative Instruction RFB No. 1,312, 28 December 2012, as amended. Retrieved from: http://normas.receita.fazenda.gov.br/sijut2consulta/link.action?visao=anotado&idAto=39257 (Accessed: 26.06.2022).
  14. Constitution of the Czech Republic (1993). Constitutional Act No. 1/1993 Coll., Constitution of the Czech Republic, as amended. Retrieved from: https://www.zakonyprolidi.cz/cs/1993-1 (Accessed: 26.06.2022).
  15. Czech Act on Business Corporations (2012). Act No. 90/2012 Coll., on Business Corporations, as amended. Retrieved from: https://www.zakonyprolidi.cz/cs/2012-90 (Accessed: 26.06.2022).
  16. Czech Civil Code (2012). Act No 89/2012 Coll., Civil Code, as amended. Retrieved from: https://www.zakonyprolidi.cz/cs/2012-89 (Accessed: 26.06.2022).
  17. Czech Income Tax Act (1992)> Act No. 586/1992 Coll., Income Tax Act, as amended. Retrieved from: https://www.zakonyprolidi.cz/cs/2012-89 (Accessed: 26.06.2022).
  18. Czech Supreme Administrative Court: Judgement of 27 January 2011 File No. 7 Afs 74/2010. Retrieved from: www.nssoud.cz (Accessed: 01.01.2022).
  19. Develva, F., Scornos, D., Van den Berghen, J. & Van Braband, P. (2015). LOB Clauses and EU-Law Compatibility: A Debate Revived by BEPS? EC Tax Review, 24(1), 132 - 143. doi: 10.54648/ecta2015014.
  20. Devereux, M.P. & Keuschnigg, C. (2009). The Distorting Arm´s Length Principle in International Transfer Pricing. Working Papers 0910, Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation.
  21. Edge, S. & Robertson, D. (Eds) (2020). The Transfer Pricing Law Review (4th ed). London: Law Business Research.
  22. European Commission (2022). Joint transfer pricing forum. Member States’ Transfer Pricing Profiles. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/joint-transfer-pricing-forum_en (Accessed: 26.06.2022).
  23. Gealfow, J. A. (2018). Case Law and its Binding Effect in the System of Formal Sources of Law. Journal of the University of Latvia. Law, (11), 38-61.
  24. Guvenen F., Mataloni, F. J. Jr., Rassier, D. G., Ruhl, K. J. (2022). Offshore Profit Shifting and Aggregate Measurement: Balance of Payments, Foreign Investment, Productivity and the Labor Share. American Economic Review 112(6), 1848-1884.
  25. Hájek, J. (2018). Do Czech companies influences tax base using intercompany transactions? [Ovlivňují české společnosti základ daně transakcemi se zahraničními spřízněnými osobami?] Politická Ekonomie, 66(3), 330-343. doi: https://doi.org/10.18267/j.polek.1191.
  26. Holtzman, Y., Nagel, P. (2014). An introduction to transfer pricing. Journal of Management Development, 33(1), 57-61. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-11-2013-0139.
  27. Kumar, S. & Pandey, N. (2021). What do we know about transfer pricing? Insights from bibliometric analysis. Journal of Business Research, 134, 275-287. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.05.041.
  28. Lang, M. (2020). Introduction to the Law of Double Taxation Conventions. Vienna: Linde.
  29. Latvian Act on Taxes and Fees (1995). Latvian Law “On Taxes and Fees”, Latvijas Vestnesis, Vol.26 (1995), as amended. Retrieved from https://likumi.lv/ta/en/en/id/33946-on-taxes-and-fees (Accessed: 26.06.2022).
  30. Latvian Declaration on the Restoration of Independence of the Republic of Latvia (1990). The Supreme Council of the Latvian Soviet Socialist Republic on the Restoration of Independence of the Republic of Latvia. Latvijas Republikas Augstākās Padomes un Valdības Ziņotājs, Vol. 20, 1990. Retrivede from https://likumi.lv/ta/en/en/id/75539-onthe-restoration-of-independence-of-the-republic-of-latvia (Accessed: 26.06.2022).
  31. Latvian Enterprise Income Tax Act (1995). Latvian Act on Enterprise Income Tax, Latvijas Vestnesis, Vol. 156 (2017), as amended. Retrieved from: https://likumi.lv/ta/en/en/id/292700-enterprise-income-tax-law (Accessed: 26.06. 2022).
  32. Latvian State Revenue Service (2019). Methodological Material: Transfer Price Documentation. Retrieved from: https://www.vid.gov.lv/sites/default/files/27122019_transfertcenas._informativais_materials.pdf (Accessed: 22.06.2022).
  33. Ministry of Finance of the Czech Republic (2022). List of the Agreements for the elimination of double taxation with respect to taxes on income or with respect to taxes on income and on capital in force as of 13 June 2022. Retrieved from: https://www.mfcr.cz/cs/legislativa/dvoji-zdaneni/prehled-platnych-smluv (Accessed: 26.06.2022).
  34. Mosquera Valderrama, I.J. (2020). BEPS Principal Purpose Test and Customary International Law. Leiden Journal of International Law, 33(2), 745-766. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156520000278.
  35. Nikolaou, P. (2021). Mandatory Binding Arbitration: Avoiding Stalemates Over the Tax Chessboard. Intertax, 49(12), 974-985. doi: https://doi.org/10.54648/taxi2021099.
  36. OECD (2013). Addressing Base Erosion and Profit Shifting. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from: www.oecd.org. (Accessed: 25.05.2022).
  37. OECD (2019). Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital (Full Version). Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from: www.oecd.org (Accessed: 25.05.2022).
  38. OECD (2022a). OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Tax Administrations 2022. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from www.oecd.org (Accessed: 25.05.2022).
  39. OECD (2022b). Transfer Pricing Country Profiles. Retrieved from: https://www.oecd.org/tax/transfer-pricing/transfer-pricing-country-profiles.htm (Accessed: 25.05.2022).
  40. OECD, Receita Federal do Brasil (2019). Transfer Pricing in Brazil: Towards Convergence with the OECD Standard. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from cwww.oecd.org (Accessed: 26.06.2022).
  41. Receita Federal do Brasil (2021). Acordos para evitar a dupla tributação e prevenir a evasão fiscal. Retrieved from: https://www.gov.br/receitafederal/pt-br/acesso-a-informacao/legislacao/acordos-internacionais/acordos-paraevitar-a-dupla-tributacao/acordos-para-evitar-a-dupla-tributacao (Accessed: 26.06.2022).
  42. Schoueri, LE (2013a). Preços de transferência no direito tributário, São Paulo, Dialética.
  43. Schoueri, L.E. (2013b). O Princípio Arm’s Length em um Panorama Internacional. In: Schoueri, L. E. (ed), Tributos e preços de transferência, Dialética, São Paulo, 208-227.
  44. White, J. (2020). OECD Looks Beyond the Arm´s Length Principle. Retrieved from: https://www.internationaltaxreview.com/article/b1fydc48yqvvcz/oecd-looks-beyond-the-arms-length-principle (Accessed: 5.03.2020).
  45. Xavier, A. (2014). A Lei nº 12.973, de 13 de maio de 2014, em matéria de lucros no exterior: objetivos e características essenciais. In: Rocha, V.O. (ed.), Grandes questões atuais do direito tributário, Vol. 18, São Paulo, Dialética.
Language: English
Page range: 21 - 33
Submitted on: Oct 19, 2022
|
Accepted on: Jan 31, 2023
|
Published on: Mar 29, 2023
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2023 Karel Brychta, Matheus Chebli de Abreu, Justina Hudenko, Lucas Scheremetta Santos, Lucas Cunha do Valle Poubel, published by University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszow
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.