Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Agronomic traits, secondary metabolites and element concentrations of Lavandula angustifolia leaves as a response to single or reiterated drought stress: How effective is the previously experienced stress? Cover

Agronomic traits, secondary metabolites and element concentrations of Lavandula angustifolia leaves as a response to single or reiterated drought stress: How effective is the previously experienced stress?

Open Access
|Feb 2022

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Keywords related to stress memory in the agriculture field.
Keywords related to stress memory in the agriculture field.

Figure 2

Experimental scheme of the study.
Experimental scheme of the study.

Figure 3

Heat map clustering of (A) plant growth and biomass production traits, (B) mineral contents in leaf, (C) essential oil compounds in leaf and (D) phenolic acids in leaf corresponding to the stressed and non-stressed groups.
Heat map clustering of (A) plant growth and biomass production traits, (B) mineral contents in leaf, (C) essential oil compounds in leaf and (D) phenolic acids in leaf corresponding to the stressed and non-stressed groups.

Figure 4

PCA of (A) plant growth and biomass production traits, (B) mineral contents in leaf, (C) essential oil compounds in leaf and (D) phenolic acids in leaf corresponding to the stressed and non-stressed groups. PCA, principal component analysis.
PCA of (A) plant growth and biomass production traits, (B) mineral contents in leaf, (C) essential oil compounds in leaf and (D) phenolic acids in leaf corresponding to the stressed and non-stressed groups. PCA, principal component analysis.

Essential oil compounds corresponding to the stressed and non-stressed groups (%)_

TreatmentsDelta-3-careneCamphene2(10)-pinene4(10)-thujeneo-cymeneD-limoneneEucalyptolCamphorEndoborneol
Sampling at Day 00.690 g5.300 c0.000 b1.790 a2.570 b0.000 e68.970 a13.280 bc6.580 ef
Stress after 11 days1.490 e4.200 e0.690 a0.000 f1.780 e0.000 e68.473 a17.320 a6.020 f
Control after 11 days1.690 d4.670 d0.000 b0.920 d2.190 c3.020 b66.010 a14.990 b8.020 cd
Stress group: recovery1.670 d5.360 c0.730 a0.000 f0.000 g0.000 e69.170 a14.180 bc8.900 bc
Control group: recovery0.050 h4.160 e0.000 b0.990 d2.783 a1.450 c69.200 a14.220 bc7.140 de
Stress group: stress2.360 b6.210 b0.000 b1.270 c2.530 b3.720 a62.670 a18.030 a8.940 bc
Stress group: control1.330 f3.980 f0.000 b0.800 e1.500 f0.000 e64.940 a12.300 c9.420 ab
Control group: stress1.800 c6.770 a0.000 b1.550 b1.990 d0.000 e64.317 a17.480 a8.840 bc
Control group: control2.950 a3.160 g0.000 b0.910 d0.000 g0.150 d65.983 a12.540 bc10.060 a
Significancep = 0.000p = 0.000p = 0.000p = 0.000p = 0.000p = 0.000p = 0.201p = 0.000p = 0.000

Experimental groups of the study, modified according to Kulak (2020) and Pintó-Marijuan et al_ (2017)_

TreatmentsExperimental groups
Sampling at Day 0Sampling before treatments at Day 0
Stress after 11 daysSampling on Day 11 in stressed plant groups
Control after 11 daysSampling on Day 11 in irrigated plant groups
Stress group: recoverySamplings on Day 17 after the recovery stage of stressed plant groups
Control group: recoverySamplings on Day 17 after the recovery stages of irrigated plant groups
Stress group: stressSamplings on Day 28 in plants, which were subjected to a 11-day stress, a 6-day recovery and a 11-day stress
Stress group: controlSamplings on Day 28 in plants, which were subjected to a 6-day stress, a 11-day recovery and a 7-day irrigation
Control group: stressSampling on Day 28 in plants that were irrigated for 17 days and then stressed for 11 days
Control group: controlSampling on Day 28 in plants that were irrigated for 28 days

Mineral content changes corresponding to the stressed and non-stressed groups (mg · kg−1)_

TreatmentsCaKPMgBMoFeCuZnMn
Sampling at Day 0253.53 e144.78 c196.26 ab542.33 a21.83 b3.59 c307.17 g11.44 abc7.90 e61.34 f
Stress after 11 days327.05 a116.15 f166.33 d464.33 d19.43 c4.92 a603.00 c8.21 c13.30 a78.26 d
Control after 11 days282.83 d103.03 g117.33 f498.67 b23.69 a2.24 e423.87 e8.94 bc3.39 g60.21 fg
Stress group: recovery312.06 b142.65 cd182.80 c465.00 d18.49 e2.17 e669.39 b11.38 abc10.56 b85.96 b
Control group: recovery290.60 cd153.83 b153.50 e430.33 e15.72 h2.01 f596.30 c10.70 abc5.42 f80.54 c
Stress group: stress229.85 f124.78 e200.97 a393.00 f18.53 e1.50 g594.60 c12.86 a13.54 a78.62 d
Stress group: control295.47 c138.42 d193.67 b504.33 b18.03 f2.60 d833.13 a12.69 ab8.99 c90.38 a
Control group: stress321.58 a164.02 a194.00 b461.67 d19.49 d4.12 b401.57 f10.79 abc8.44 d73.38 e
Control group: control249.99 e142.30 cd170.67 d481.67 c16.74 g1.70 g454.60 d9.87 abc5.30 f59.45 g
Significancep = 0.000p = 0.000p = 0.000p = 0.000p = 0.000p = 0.000p = 0.000p = 0.121p = 0.000p = 0.000

Individual phenolic acids corresponding to the stressed and non-stressed groups (ng · μL−1)_

TreatmentsAscorbic acidCatechinCaffeic acidFerulic acido-Coumaric acidRosmarinic acidQuercetinKaempferol
Sampling at Day 00.000 f2.150 g1.567 g3.805 b1.293 c6.460 f0.650 d1.099 g
Stress after 11 days12.753 a10.511 d5.797 d1.072 d5.970 a11.619 c0.000 e1.607 cde
Control after 11 days0.000 f2.864 g1.884 fg4.970 a1.933 b8.121 e1.599 b1.462 ef
Stress group: recovery4.066 d43.124 a14.511 a3.934 b5.794 a25.434 a0.000 e1.938 b
Control group: recovery0.000 f11.412 d2.703 ef1.741 c1.935b9.941 d2.399 a1.374 f
Stress group: stress7.654 b8.362 e7.961 b0.000 e1.896 b3.997 g0.000 e2.773 a
Stress group: control2.737 e4.849 f7.172 c1.253 d1.367 c6.330 f1.236 bc1.689 c
Control group: stress5.982 c17.827 c2.954 e1.789 c1.941 b10.796 cd1.278 bc1.654 cd
Control group: control3.179 e21.540 b2.199 efg2.001 c1.379 c13.427 b1.025 c1.500 def
Significancep = 0.000p = 0.000p = 0.000p = 0.000p = 0.000p = 0.000p = 0.000p = 0.201

Plant growth and biomass production traits corresponding to the stressed and non-stressed groups_

TreatmentsLeaf (FW; g)Leaf (DW; g)Leaf rehydration (g)SWC (g)Leaf length (%)Leaf width (cm)
Sampling at Day 024.21 bcd8.70 c2.08 b0.39 b3.23 c0.33 bc
Stress after 11 days20.95 cd13.88 abc0.88 c0.11 d3.83 bc0.23 de
Control after 11 days35.25 b14.06 abc2.80 a0.20 c4.33 ab0.33 bc
Stress group: recovery20.17 cd9.14 c2.08 b0.40 b4.10 bc0.27 cde
Control group: recovery34.87 b17.06 ab2.13 b0.52 a5.13 a0.40 b
Stress group: stress13.79 d12.07 bc0.39 cd0.048 e3.80 bc0.25 de
Stress group: control27.05 bc13.08 abc2.85 a0.37 b3.77 bc0.30 cd
Control group: stress15.81 cd12.03 bc0.21 d0.058 e4.07 bc0.20 e
Control group: control50.36 a18.42 a2.38 ab0.23 c5.100 a0.50 a
Significancep = 0.000p = 0.026p = 0.000p = 0.000p = 0.007p = 0.000
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/fhort-2022-0005 | Journal eISSN: 2083-5965 | Journal ISSN: 0867-1761
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 16
Submitted on: Oct 19, 2021
|
Accepted on: Jan 19, 2022
|
Published on: Feb 27, 2022
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2022 Ahmet Metin Kumlay, Mehmet Zeki Kocak, Gholamreza Gohari, Mojtaba Nouraein, Ferdi Celikcan, Mustafa Guven Kaysim, Muhittin Kulak, published by Polish Society for Horticultural Sciences (PSHS)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.