Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The evaluation of Pythium oligandrum and chitosan in control of Phytophthora infestans (Mont.) de Bary on potato plants Cover

The evaluation of Pythium oligandrum and chitosan in control of Phytophthora infestans (Mont.) de Bary on potato plants

Folia Horticulturae
Volume 21 (2009): Issue 2 (December 2009)
By:  and    
Open Access
|Aug 2013
References

References

  1. BELL A.A., HUBBARD C.J., LIU L., DAVIS M.R., SUBBARAO V.K., 1998. Effects of chitin and chitosan on the incidence and severity ofyellows of celery. Plant Dis. 82: 322-328.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  2. BENHAMOU N., REY P., CHERIF M., HOCKENHULL J., TRILLY J., 1997. Treatment with the mycoparasitetiggers induction of defense-related reactions in tomato roots when challenged withf. sp.. Phytopat. 87: 108-122.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. DEACON J.W., 1991. Significance of ecology in the development of biocontrol agents against soil-borne plant pathogens. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 1: 5-20.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. KAPSA J., 2004. Zmiany stanu zagrożenia i ochrony plantacji ziemniaka przed zarazą () w Polsce na tle krajów europejskich. Prog. Plant Prot. / Post. Ochr. Rośl. 44(1): 129-137.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. KOWALIK R., KRECHNIAK E., 1961. Szczegółowa metodyka biologicznych laboratoryjnych badań środków grzybobójczych. [In:] Materiały do metodyki biologicznej oceny środków ochrony roślin, Węgorek (red.). IOR Poznań: 63-91.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. KURZAWIŃSKA H., GAJDA I., 2004. Ocena przydatności niektórych fungicydów w ochronie ziemniaka przed zarazą -(Mont.) de Bary. Biul. IHAR 233: 333-338.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. LAFONTAINE P.J., BENHAMOU N., 1996. Chitosan treatment an emerging strategy for enhancing resistance of greenhouse tomato plants to infection byf. spBiocontrol Sci. Technol. 6(1): 111-124.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  8. MARTIN F.N., HANCOCK J.G., 1987. The use offor biological control of preemergence damping-off caused byPhytopathol. 77: 1013-1020.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  9. ROZTROPOWICZ S., 1985. Metodyka obserwacji i pobierania prób w agrotechnicznych doświadczeniach z ziemniakami. Inst. Ziemn. Bonin: 33 pp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. NAWROCKI J., MAZUR S., 2007. Effectiveness of Biochikol 020 PC in the control of carrot and parsley pathogens. Progress on Chemistry and Application of Chitin and its Derivatives. Monograph XII: 211-215.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. ORLIKOWSKI L.B., SKRZYPCZAK CZ., WOJDYŁA A., JAWORSKA-MAROSZ A., 2002. Wyciągi roślinne i mikroorganizmy w ochronie roślin przed chorobami. Zesz. Nauk. AR w Krakowie 387(82): 19-32.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. PIĘTA D., PATKOWSKA E., PASTUCHA A., 2006. Influence of Biochikol 020 PC used as seed dressing of bean on healthiness and yield of plants. Progress on Chemistry and Application of Chitin and its Derivatives, Monograph XI: 159-170.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. POŚPIESZNY H., 1997. Niektóre aspekty stosowania chitozanu w ochronie roślin. Prog. Plant Prot. / Post. Ochr. Rośl. 37(1): 306-309.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. VAN DER PLANK J.E., 1963. Plant disease: Epidemics and control. Academic Press, New York.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/fhort-2013-0134 | Journal eISSN: 2083-5965 | Journal ISSN: 0867-1761
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English, Polish
Page range: 13 - 23
Published on: Aug 1, 2013
Published by: Polish Society for Horticultural Sciences (PSHS)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
biological protection,
late blight,
potato
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Plant science

© 2013 Halina Kurzawińska, Stanisław Mazur, published by Polish Society for Horticultural Sciences (PSHS)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 21 (2009): Issue 2 (December 2009)
Previous article
Next article