Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Obtaining callus and seedlings of Ulmus laevis – studies of their morphogenetic capacity and in vitro rooting of seedlings Cover

Obtaining callus and seedlings of Ulmus laevis – studies of their morphogenetic capacity and in vitro rooting of seedlings

Open Access
|Jun 2024

References

  1. Aoun, M., Rioux, D., Simard, M., Bernier, L. 2009. Fungal colonization and host defense reactions in Ulmus americana callus cultures inoculated with Ophiostoma novoulmi. Phytopathology, 99 (6), 642–650. DOI: 10.1094/PHYTO-99-6-0642
  2. Bull, T., Michelmore, R. 2022. Molecular Determinants of in vitro plant regeneration: Prospects for enhanced manipulation of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.). Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 888425. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.888425
  3. Conde, P., Loureiro, J., Santos, C. 2004. Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from leaves of Ulmus minor Mill. Plant Cell Reports, 22 (9), 632–639. DOI: 10.1007/s00299-003-0735-1
  4. Corchete, M.P., Fenning, T., Gartcand, J.S., Valle, T. 1997. Micropropagation of Ulmus Species (Elms). In: High-Tech and Micropropagation V. Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry, Vol. 3 (ed. Y.P.S. Bajaj). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 381–392. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-07774-0_24
  5. De Diego, N., Montalbán, I.A., Fernandez De Larrinoa, E., Moncaleán, P. 2008. In vitro regeneration of Pinus pinaster adult trees. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 38 (10), 2607–2615. DOI: 10.1139/X08-102
  6. Driver, J.A., Kuniyuki, A.H. 1984. In Vitro propagation of paradox walnut rootstock. HortScience, 19 (4), 507–509. DOI: 10.21273/HORTSCI.19.4.507
  7. Espinosa-Leal, C.A., Puente-Garza, C.A., García-Lara, S. 2018. In vitro plant tissue culture: means for production of biological active compounds. Planta, 248 (1), 1–18. DOI: 10.1007/s00425-018-2910-1
  8. Fenning, T.M., Gartland, K.M.A., Brasier, C.M. 1993. Micropropagation and regeneration of English elm, Ulmus procera Salisbury. Journal of Experimental Botany, 44 (7), 1211–1217. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/44.7.1211
  9. Harvengt, L., Meier-Dinkel, A., Dumas, E., Collin, E. 2004. Establishment of a cryopreserved gene bank of European elms. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 34 (1), 43–55. DOI: 10.1139/x03-193
  10. Jaworski, A. 2011. Hodowla lasu. T. III, Charakterystyka hodowlana drzew i krzewów leśnych. Powszechne Wydawnictwo Rolnicze i Leśne, Warszawa.
  11. Jürisoo, L., Süda, I., Agan, A., Drenkhan, R. 2021. Vectors of Dutch elm disease in Northern Europe. Insects, 12 (5), 393. DOI: 10.3390/insects12050393
  12. Kim, G., Hyun, T.K. 2023. Influence of flower bud removal on the growth and anti-inflammatory properties of Platycodon grandiflorus roots. Industrial Crops and Products, 195, 116389. DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2023.116389
  13. Kintzios, S., Papanastasiou, I., Tourgelis, P., Papastellatos, C., Georgopoulos, V., Drossopoulos, J. 2002. The effects of light on callus growth and somatic embryogenesis from Lavandula vera and Teucrium chamaedrys: A preliminary study. Journal of Herbs, Spices and Medicinal Plants, 9 (2/3), 223–227. DOI: 10.1300/J044v09n02_32
  14. Lee, H., Han, G., Cheong, E.J. 2021. Effect of different treatments and light quality on Ulmus pumila L. germination and seedling growth. Forest Science and Technology, 17 (3), 162–168. DOI: 10.1080/21580103.2021.1968960
  15. Litvay, J.D., Verma, D.C., Johnson, M.A. 1985. Influence of a loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). Culture medium and its components on growth and somatic embryogenesis of the wild carrot (Daucus carota L.). Plant Cell Reports, 4 (6), 325–328. DOI: 10.1007/BF00269890
  16. Lloyd, G., McCown, B. 1980. Commercially feasible micropropagation of mountain laurel Kalmia latifolia by use of shoot tip culture. Combined Proceedings International Plant Propagators’ Society, 30, 421–427.
  17. Malá, J., Cvikrová, M., Chalupa, V. 2007. Micropropagation of mature trees of Ulmus glabra, Ulmus minor and Ulmus laevis. In: Protocols for micropropagation of woody trees and fruits (eds. S.M. Jain, H. Häggman). Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 237–246. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6352-7_22
  18. Mezzetti, B., Minotta, G., Navacchi, O., Rosati, P. 1988. In vitro propagation of Ulmus carpinifolia. Acta Horticulturae, 227, 396–398. DOI: 10.17660/Acta-Hortic.1988.227.72
  19. Mohaddab, M. et al. 2022. Biotechnology and in vitro culture as an alternative system for secondary metabolite production. Molecules, 27 (22), 8093. DOI: 10.3390/molecules27228093
  20. Murashige, T., Skoog, F. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiologia Plantarum, 15 (3), 473–497. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x
  21. Napierała-Filipiak, A., Filipiak, M., Łakomy, P. 2019. Changes in the species composition of elms (Ulmus spp.) in Poland. Forests, 10 (11), 1008. DOI: 10.3390/f10111008
  22. Nawrot-Chorabik, K. 2015. Zastosowanie tkanki kalusa w biotechnologii drzew leśnych: badania in vitro. Cosmos, 64 (2), 305–317.
  23. Nawrot-Chorabik, K., Sułkowska, M., Gumulak, N. 2022. Secondary metabolites produced by trees and fungi: achievements so far and challenges remaining. Forests, 13 (8), 1338. DOI: 10.3390/f13081338
  24. Nawrot-Chorabik, K., Sułkowska, M., Osmenda, M., Mohytych, V., Surówka, E., Latowski, D. 2022. The Impact of biotic and abiotic stress factors on development of European ash tissue cultures. Forests, 13 (1), 59. DOI: 10.3390/f13010059
  25. Nawrot-Chorabik, K., Pluciński, B., Latowski, D. 2024. Indirect auxiliary organogenesis of Fraxinus excelsior L. as a tool for ash dieback control. New Forests, 55, 323–344. DOI: 10.1007/s11056-023-09981-x
  26. Pasternak, T.P., Steinmacher, D. 2024. Plant growth regulation in cell and tissue culture in vitro. Plants, 13 (2), 327. DOI: 10.3390/plants13020327
  27. Peng, Y. et al. 2021. Research progress on phytopathogenic fungi and their role as biocontrol agents. Frontiers in Microbiology, 12, 670135. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.670135
  28. Priyashantha, A.K.H. et al. 2023. Plant–fungi interactions: where it goes? Biology, 12, 809. DOI: 10.3390/biology12060809
  29. Santini, A., Faccoli, M. 2015. Dutch elm disease and elm bark beetles: a century of association. iForest – Biogeosciences and Forestry, 8 (2), 126–134. DOI: 10.3832/ifor1231-008
  30. Sevik, H., Guney, K. 2013. Effects of IAA, IBA, NAA, and GA3 on rooting and morphological features of Melissa officinalis L. stem cuttings. The Scientific World Journal, 2013, 1–5. DOI: 10.1155/2013/909507
  31. Shukla, M.R., Jones, A.M.P., Sullivan, J.A., Liu, C., Gosling, S., Saxena, P.K. 2012. In vitro conservation of American elm (Ulmus americana): potential role of auxin metabolism in sustained plant proliferation. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 42 (4), 686–697. DOI: 10.1139/x2012-022
  32. Siddique, A.B., Islam, S.S. 2018. Effect of light and dark on callus induction and regeneration in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.). Bangladesh Journal of Botany, 44 (4), 643–651. DOI: 10.3329/bjb.v44i4.38636
  33. Sokołowski, A.W. 2004. Lasy Puszczy Białowieskiej. Centrum Informacyjne Lasów Państwowych, Warszawa.
  34. Suhartanto, B., Astutik, M., Umami, N., Suseno, N., Haq, M.S. 2022. The effect of explants and light conditions on callus induction of srikandi putih maize (Zea mays L.). IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1001 (1), 012006. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/1001/1/012006
  35. Teixeira da Silva, J., Winarto, B., Dobránszki, J., Zeng, S. 2015. Disinfection procedures for in vitro propagation of Anthurium. Folia Horticulturae, 27 (1), 3–14. DOI: 10.1515/fhort-2015-0009
  36. Teixeira da Silva, J., Hossain, M., Sharma, M., Dobránszki, J., Cardoso, J.C., Songjun Z. 2017. Acclimatization of in vitro-derived Dendrobium. Horticultural Plant Journal, 3 (3), 110–124. DOI: 10.1016/j.hpj.2017.07.009
  37. Välimäki, S., Rusanen, M., Pečínková, D., Tikkinen, M., Aronen, T. 2021. Cryopreservation and micropropagation methods for conservation of genetic resources of Ulmus laevis and Ulmus glabra. Forests, 12 (8), 1121. DOI: 10.3390/f12081121
  38. Wahyuni, D.K., Huda, A., Faizah, S., Purnobasuki, H., Wardojo, B.P.E. 2020. Effects of light, sucrose concentration and repetitive subculture on callus growth and medically important production in Justicia gendarussa Burm.f. Biotechnology Reports, 27, e00473. DOI: 10.1016/j.btre.2020.e00473
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ffp-2024-0011 | Journal eISSN: 2199-5907 | Journal ISSN: 0071-6677
Language: English
Page range: 129 - 143
Submitted on: Apr 14, 2023
Accepted on: Mar 21, 2024
Published on: Jun 15, 2024
Published by: Forest Research Institute
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2024 Natalia Gumulak-Wołoszyn, Małgorzata Sułkowska, Katarzyna Nawrot-Chorabik, published by Forest Research Institute
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.