What affects the choice of forestry profession by Ukrainian students?

Zibtseva, Olha

doi:10.2478/ffp-2023-0016

Abstract

Currently, Ukraine is outlining a problem with the recruitment of students to the Faculty of Forestry. The solution to this problem is possible only if the necessity of transformation of the forestry industry and the corresponding transformation of the forestry education system are realised. Based on the study of scientific literature, the main motivating factors, according to which future students decide to become foresters, were identified. These factors were included in a questionnaire offered to first-year forestry students. The results of the questionnaire were compared with the data from the scientific articles. As a result, some aspects to pay attention to in order to increase the attractiveness of forestry as a field of study were identified. It was found that the predominant motivating factors for choosing a forestry profession are enjoyment of nature, recreation in nature, spending time in the fresh air, concern for the environment and interest in forests. Salary of forestry specialists proved to be the strongest factor for hesitation in choosing the profession. The next step of our research will probably be to investigate the opinion of Ukrainian students about the quality of educational programmes.

References

Anić, I. 2019. Važnost šumarske nastave i znanosti na Sveučilistu u Zagrebu za razvoj hrvatskog šumarstva. Šumarski List, 143 (1/2), 59–71. DOI: 10.31298/sl.143.1-2.7
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bal, T.L., Rouleau, M.D., Sharik, T.L., Wellstead, A.M. 2020. Enrollment decision-making by students in forestry and related natural resource degree programmes globally. International Forestry Review, 22 (3), 287–305. DOI: 10.1505/146554820830405627
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dahle, G.A., Benjamin, A., McGill, D. 2020. Assessment of skills needed in entry-level urban foresters in the USA. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 52, 126694. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126694
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
de Jong, W. et al. 2021. A Comparison of Forestry Continuing Education Academic Degree Programs. Forests, 12 (7), 824. DOI: 10.3390/f12070824
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Diemer, J.A., Alvarez, R.A. 1995. Sustainable community, sustainable forestry, a participatory model. Journal of Forestry, 93 (11), 10–14.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dokes, T.J., Roloff, G.J., Millenbah, K.F., Wolter, B.H.K., Montgomery, R.A. 2020. Natural Resource Undergraduate Students in the New Millennium. Wildlife Society Bulletin, wsb.1128. DOI: 10.1002/wsb.1128
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Guan, X., Jia, Y., Hou, Y., Zhang, Z. 2021. Study on the Differences of Urban Forestry Demands of Citizens in Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou, China. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 621(1), 012138. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/621/1/012138
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Horvat, G. 2009. Improvement of forestry office business operation by developing basic managing functions. Šumarski List, 133 (1/2), 39–51.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hull, R.B. 2011. Forestry’s conundrum: High value, low relevance. Journal of Forestry, 109 (1), 50–56.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jazbec, A., Vedriš, M., Šegotic, K. 2019. Analysis of the duration of studies at the undergraduate studies of the Faculty of Forestry, University of Zagreb (in Croatian). Sumarski List, 143 (9/10), 435–443. DOI: 10.31298/sl.143.9-10.5
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jegatheswaran, R., Florin, I., Hazirah, A., Shukri, M., Abdul Latib, S. 2018. Transforming forest education to meet the changing demands for professionals. Journal of Tropical Forest Science, 30 (5), 431–438. DOI: 10.26525/jtfs2018.30.5.431438
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Konijnendijk, C.C. 2003. A decade of urban forestry in Europe. Forest Policy and Economics, 5 (2), 173–186. DOI: 10.1016/S1389-9341(03)00023-6
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Konijnendijk, C., Randrup, T.B. 2005. Urban Forestry Education. In: Urban Forests and Trees (eds. C. Konijnendijk et al.), Springer-Verlag, 465–478. DOI: 10.1007/3-540-27684-X_18
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Krajter Ostoic, S., Vuletic, D., Planinšek, Š., Vilhar, U., Japelj, A. 2020. Three Decades of Urban Forest and Green Space Research and Practice in Croatia and Slovenia. Forests, 11 (2), 136. DOI: 10.3390/f11020136
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lidestav, G., Egan Sjölander, A. 2007. Gender and forestry: A critical discourse analysis of forestry professions in Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 22 (4), 351–362. DOI: 10.1080/02827580701504928
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Moreno, B., Crandall, C., Monroe, M.C. 2020. Factors Influencing Minority and Urban Students’ Interest in Natural Resources. Journal of Forestry, 118 (4), 373–384. DOI: 10.1093/jofore/fvaa008
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
O’Herrin, K., Day, S.D., Wiseman, P.E., Friedel, C.R., Munsell, J.F. 2018. University student perceptions of urban forestry as a career path. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 34, 294–304. DOI: 10.1016/j. ufug.2018.07.002
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
O’Herrin, K., Wiseman, P.E., Day, S.D., Hauer, R.J. 2020. Professional identity of urban foresters in the United States. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 54, 126741. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126741
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Radetskaya, I.V., Novikov, A.N., Novikova, M.S., Varfolomeeva, O.G. 2020. School forestries movement: mission and strategy for developing (case study of the Russian city Chita in the Transbaikal territory). Turismo-Estudos e Praticas, 2.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Searle, S., Bryant, C. 2009. Why students choose to study for a forestry degree and implications for the forestry profession. Australian Forestry, 72 (2), 71–79. DOI:10.1080/00049158.2009.10676292
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Storch, S. 2011. Forestry professionalism overrides gender: A case study of nature perception in Germany. Forest Policy and Economics, 13 (3), 171–175. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2010.11.003
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wilkinson, S.J., Hoxley, M. 2005. The impact of the 2001 RICS education reforms on building surveying. QUT Research Week 2005. In: Conference proceedings, 4–5 July 2005, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Williamson, E.G., Darley, J.G. 1935. Trends in the occupational choices of high school seniors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 19 (4), 361–370. DOI: 10.1037/h0055253
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zeide, B. 2001. Resolving contradictions in forestry: Back to science. The Forestry Chronicle, 77 (6), 973–981. DOI: 10.5558/tfc77973-6
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article

What affects the choice of forestry profession by Ukrainian students?

Abstract

Paradigm

My account