Figure 1.
![Location of Łukowa [12]](https://sciendo-parsed.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/64f1ecce774f3e139faa0df7/j_ffp-2023-0014_fig_001.jpg?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Credential=ASIA6AP2G7AKGQBOBDHX%2F20260320%2Feu-central-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20260320T052243Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-Security-Token=IQoJb3JpZ2luX2VjEGEaDGV1LWNlbnRyYWwtMSJGMEQCICeDAA0RwHVQsv5KQDAtqJvT0%2BDak69pCNiiIcscGfRdAiA6%2F3sVRwJRBN%2BCUOoq87jy5WB5b5xiePaLwza3oMXuiSq8BQgqEAIaDDk2MzEzNDI4OTk0MCIMaw8Xs9rmI6%2F5Lkz7KpkFSwzvfJstXyIT71BNri%2BK9cdf1pDj%2Bjc7V3FvyPD66ksYZMa9FTAx3roMrwiS%2BdDnT3SoNtdmfWR6zP3lLvQOrzT9zCQeG%2Br%2FJBcJ1prKYItCgSKvOxQOdSITseI%2B1oxVWt3MUy2s73yxRje0dXnk5RFWnc2bcyAV1pyCI2Y6IIg83WDlu4p0mGBTmE11W81ZvU%2BlpR%2BKUM%2FBI8I6TT2y5YuMG3DT2gwkCc15VM8xZEo0OpKgszDyU2qpfPlo%2Bu00L7JLR%2B11bmuCx%2BkeVb9AV2CO48LAd4oCDLRj168Mlg1TOdyk9r8w0auV7qt1uKFLTtaOeFjF80sudeO8TZtjkkDzkG6rsdEAm5wJK87yscwA8%2BUnRJ049rvrRrmUju1DmSA8c8%2FTtySCqUWSq15VA4lZNqDCYeCnfC6qzlSNNSnqamyHxtadVesr6%2F9%2FUmFqrKkH3tzl4kspZSHze2d2nons5JL%2BBtLh6mNIb1wq3LdTrCiTvfRCzVT75f0wU5JhbNg%2BXvXsmMfIMo6X0GBpM9VeF4E2CJQDlnawB6%2FK82U5mh20f1gdR8FZywT7VErLUlvd1zDWTrUrWmm2oVVMIvmLrZBN2vBzV249QIAD2ay9L4CVYR1rFTrvFT57BindkpFs2u4aja2jdzKu%2BIyD%2B%2B0ndFTSM%2FKmCmxQoJ6lXcGf9sAEDnl5%2B04ioAy1JVI48UIDD%2FES7llY3JEjWyt5NL7w4zycAKoBIlMo4zjDNjn2rSJ231HTysInmXMO2R34tioBFKUj8b%2BXMw5QIBRf2%2F3t367DJwLwuo%2FaNAPYxj%2FqZL%2BDKm2XAnmTT4f1%2BYvTOLhchT%2BKLkZo6tXp9dK687UXyUpbQ10TZ%2BoXIM0Y%2FLjf%2FJIyWQaual8wlazyzQY6sgFi0xEzzf8MekBu66%2F81TwFKz67t2IwDQo6FS521CVrzWqT8iSsMwsrruSlMBGkGQpN2uMwq7PBlS%2FCDSJYtuxeGQeB%2BN8CtJ3tNpRykzBnadWk5NuSZZGp4g9OH%2BgCnjKOUQbAjGMERBi3sS%2FEmvMpli0qF%2F%2F6VmVRsXqV%2Frd7Fm4XIPm3l8pFXVieuB%2Fr2ZfWws7jp0BU165XMXZqp8GfORQ3mbnJcxpnc0GCjZgk8B9d&X-Amz-Signature=48e345f50d7c1bfa3a8420f7127f8714cc948561377203555828b3ecf6f20139&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&x-amz-checksum-mode=ENABLED&x-id=GetObject)
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
Figure 4.
Figure 5.
Figure 6.
Figure 7.
Figure 8.
Figure 9.
Figure 10.
Figure 11.
Figure 12.
Figure 13.
Figure 14.
Figure 15.
Figure 16.
Figure 17.
Status of Łukowa before and after land consolidation
| Component | Status consolidation | |
|---|---|---|
| before | after | |
| Number of registration units | 743 | 725 |
| Number of plots | 3182 | 1652 |
| Average number of plots per registered unit | 4.35 | 2.28 |
List of objects for which the road network has been changed
| Registration unit | Number of plots before consolidation | Number of plots after consolidation | Difference in network distances before and after consolidation (m) | Difference in linear distances before and after consolidation (m) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 131 | 3 | 2 | –43.38 | 62.68 |
| 133 | 6 | 3 | –910.71 | –467.72 |
| 268 | 6 | 3 | –2.13 | 45.54 |
| 371 | 4 | 3 | –236.09 | –4.87 |
| 545 | 8 | 2 | –419.30 | –29.01 |
| 737 | 9 | 7 | –164.03 | 41.64 |
| 763 | 5 | 4 | –89.02 | 29.77 |
| 806 | 13 | 5 | –96.66 | 31.93 |
| Mean values | 6.75 | 3.63 | –245.17 | –36.26 |
List of objects that have been merged or moved away from the habitat plot
| Registration unit | Number of plots before consolidation | Number of plots after consolidation | Difference in network distances before and after consolidation (m) | Difference in linear distances before and after consolidation (m) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| 43 | 22 | 7 | –79.16 | –42.60 |
| 58 | 5 | 2 | –66.88 | –62.35 |
| 79 | 13 | 5 | –418.51 | –375.54 |
| 101 | 9 | 5 | –171.94 | –318.17 |
| 115 | 11 | 3 | –165.78 | –301.15 |
| 126 | 10 | 4 | –256.45 | –258.81 |
| 128 | 5 | 3 | –540.04 | –134.89 |
| 140 | 4 | 3 | –102.43 | –42.41 |
| 154 | 23 | 9 | –248.80 | –288.00 |
| 168 | 9 | 4 | –377.71 | –261.75 |
| 193 | 18 | 7 | –448.39 | –341.70 |
| 212 | 12 | 5 | –74.73 | –2.23 |
| 213 | 10 | 8 | –127.76 | –99.21 |
| 223 | 8 | 4 | –59.23 | –195.33 |
| 267 | 13 | 6 | –95.84 | –72.06 |
| 284 | 4 | 3 | –324.85 | –202.50 |
| 303 | 4 | 2 | –205.04 | –39.44 |
| 336 | 8 | 4 | –386.27 | –151.12 |
| 363 | 20 | 8 | –93.21 | –90.55 |
| 380 | 16 | 3 | –166.70 | –148.69 |
| 387 | 19 | 5 | –175.65 | –122.48 |
| 512 | 9 | 3 | –359.36 | –219.48 |
| 727 | 15 | 5 | –261.18 | –244.92 |
| Mean values | 11.61 | 4.70 | –226.34 | –174.58 |
List of objects for which the distance from the habitat has increased
| Registration unit | Number of plots before consolidation | Number of plots after consolidation | Difference in network distances before and after consolidation (m) | Difference in linear distances before and after consolidation (m) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 390 | 6 | 6 | –45.57 | –0.18 |
| 749 | 3 | 2 | –620.53 | –544.62 |
| Mean values | 4.50 | 4.00 | –333.05 | –272.40 |
List of the number of holdings selected for analysis in the study
| Component | Status consolidation | |
|---|---|---|
| before | after | |
| Number of plots selected for analyses carried out in the study | 1287 | 607 |
| Average number of plots per farm | 10.55 | 4.98 |
Differences in farm area between before and after land consolidation
| Ranges of area difference | 0.1–0.1(ha) | 0.1–0.2(ha) | 0.2–0.3(ha) | 0.3–0.4(ha) | 0.4–0.5(ha) | 0.5–1.0(ha) | Above1 ha |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of registration units in the area interval | 78 | 19 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 2 |
| Percentage share of parcels in total | 62.9 | 15.3 | 6.5 | 1.6 | 0 | 3.2 | 1.6 |
Analysis of the distribution road coefficient
| Distribution road coefficient | Before consolidation | After consolidation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| number of objects in the interval | percentage share in the interval (%) | number of objects in the interval | percentage share in the interval (%) | |
| More than 2.5 | 1 | 0.82 | 1 | 0.82 |
| 2.0–2.5 | 2 | 1.64 | 1 | 0.82 |
| 1.5–2.0 | 7 | 5.74 | 8 | 6.56 |
| 1.0–1.5 | 104 | 85.25 | 99 | 81.15 |
| 0.5–1.0 | 7 | 5.74 | 12 | 9.84 |
| Below 0.5 | 1 | 0.82 | 1 | 0.82 |
Comparison of network and linear analyses
| Ranges of differences between network analyses and linear analyses | Before consolidation | After consolidation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of objects in the interval | Percentage share in the interval (%) | Number of objects in the interval | Percentage share in the interval (%) | |
| Above 600 m | 5 | 4.10 | 2 | 1.64 |
| 500–600 m | 3 | 2.46 | 6 | 4.92 |
| 400–500 m | 9 | 7.38 | 8 | 6.56 |
| 300–400 m | 11 | 9.02 | 12 | 9.84 |
| 200–300 m | 28 | 22.95 | 22 | 18.03 |
| 100–200 m | 37 | 30.33 | 34 | 27.87 |
| 0–100m | 20 | 16.39 | 23 | 18.85 |
| Below 0 m | 9 | 7.38 | 15 | 12.30 |
Comparison of differences between before and after land consolidation
| Ranges of distance differences between pre- and post-land consolidation | Network analyses | Linear analyses | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of objects in the interval | Percentage share in the interval (%) | Number of objects in the interval | Percentage share in the interval (%) | |
| Above 1000 m | 1 | 0.82 | 0 | 0.00 |
| 750–1000 m | 6 | 4.92 | 3 | 2.46 |
| 500–750 m | 4 | 3.28 | 3 | 2.46 |
| 250–500 m | 25 | 20.49 | 15 | 12.30 |
| 0–250 m | 51 | 41.80 | 59 | 48.36 |
| –250–0 m | 23 | 18.85 | 32 | 26.23 |
| –500 to –250 m | 9 | 7.38 | 9 | 7.38 |
| Above –1000 m | 3 | 2.46 | 1 | 0.82 |