Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The local populations of the fungus Schizophyllum commune Fr. as drivers of its biodiversity Cover

The local populations of the fungus Schizophyllum commune Fr. as drivers of its biodiversity

By:   
Open Access
|Dec 2021

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

The local populations of Schizophyllum commune (1 – Holosiivskyi National Nature Park, 2 – Lysa Hora Regional Landscape Park, 3 – Feofaniya forest parcel)

Table 1

Frequency of Schizophyllum commune alleles in studied populations and in total.

LocusAlleleHNNP (1)LHRLP (2)Ffp (3)Total
Eg2Eg21020.0000.0000.3850.132
Eg21001.0000.9440.6150.855
Eg2930.0000.0560.0000.013
Amy2Amy21100.1560.1110.0000.092
Amy21070.0000.0560.1150.053
Amy21000.8130.6670.8460.789
Amy2950.0310.1670.0380.066
CatCat1070.0000.0000.0770.026
Cat1000.6560.7220.8460.737
Cat970.1880.2220.0380.145
Cat860.1560.0560.0380.092
GotGot1000.8440.9440.9230.895
Got840.1250.0560.0770.092
Gotnull0.0310.0000.0000.013
Table 2

Genetic variation of fungus Schizophyllum commune in local populations and in total

Local populationLocusnAAeIHoHeF
HNNPEg2161.0001.0000.0000.0000.000N/D
Amy2163.0001.4590.5670.2500.3140.205
Cat163.0002.0400.8800.3130.5100.387
Got163.0001.3730.5120.2500.2710.079
Average162.5001.4680.4900.2030.2740.224
LHRLPEg292.0001.1170.2150.1110.105−0.059
Amy294.0002.0510.9740.5560.512−0.084
Cat93.0001.7420.7300.2220.4260.478
Got92.0001.1170.2150.1110.105−0.059
Average92.7501.5070.5330.2500.2870.069
FfpEg2132.0001.8990.6660.0000.4731.000
Amy2133.0001.3680.5160.3080.269−0.143
Cat134.0001.3800.5890.0770.2750.720
Got132.0001.1660.2710.1540.142−0.083
Average132.7501.4530.5110.1350.2900.374
Total12.72.6671.4760.5110.1960.2840.222

[i] A – average number of alleles per locus; Ae – effective number of alleles;

[ii] I – Shannon’s diversity index; observed (Ho) and expected (He) heterozygosity;

[iii] F – Wright’s fixation index.

Table 3

Parameters of Schizophyllum commune populations structure according to F-statistic

LocusFisFitFstNm
Eg20.8080.8550.2440.773
Amy2−0.0160.0280.0435.546
Cat0.4950.5150.0396.091
Got0.0070.0230.01714.710
Average0.3230.3550.0866.780
Figure 2

The position of S. commune cultures from locations in the space of the first two principal coordinates

Table 4

Ewens-Watterson test on neutrality for S. commune loci

LocusnkObs. FSE*L95*U95*
Eg27630.74900.03090.36530.9484
Amy27640.63890.02780.30440.8985
Cat7640.57310.02770.30510.8985
Got7630.80920.03100.36530.9484

Obs. F – sum of squares of observed allele frequencies; SE – standard error; L95 and U95 – lower and upper limits of 95% confidence interval;

* denotes statistics calculated for 100000 simulations.

Figure 3

Correlograms of different S. commune loci

Figure 4

UPGMA dendrogram of the genetic similarity of cultures of S. commune (1–37 dikaryotic culture)

Figure 5

Topography of the landscape and repetition of the wind direction* in the explored territories

*Boris Sreznevsky Central Geophysical Observatory data for April–October 2016

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ffp-2021-0031 | Journal eISSN: 2199-5907 | Journal ISSN: 0071-6677
Language: English
Page range: 308 - 316
Submitted on: Apr 7, 2021
Accepted on: Oct 2, 2021
Published on: Dec 11, 2021
Published by: Forest Research Institute
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Related subjects:

© 2021 Sergiy Boiko, published by Forest Research Institute
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.