
Figure 1
The local populations of Schizophyllum commune (1 – Holosiivskyi National Nature Park, 2 – Lysa Hora Regional Landscape Park, 3 – Feofaniya forest parcel)
Table 1
Frequency of Schizophyllum commune alleles in studied populations and in total.
| Locus | Allele | HNNP (1) | LHRLP (2) | Ffp (3) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eg2 | Eg2102 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.385 | 0.132 |
| Eg2100 | 1.000 | 0.944 | 0.615 | 0.855 | |
| Eg293 | 0.000 | 0.056 | 0.000 | 0.013 | |
| Amy2 | Amy2110 | 0.156 | 0.111 | 0.000 | 0.092 |
| Amy2107 | 0.000 | 0.056 | 0.115 | 0.053 | |
| Amy2100 | 0.813 | 0.667 | 0.846 | 0.789 | |
| Amy295 | 0.031 | 0.167 | 0.038 | 0.066 | |
| Cat | Cat107 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.077 | 0.026 |
| Cat100 | 0.656 | 0.722 | 0.846 | 0.737 | |
| Cat97 | 0.188 | 0.222 | 0.038 | 0.145 | |
| Cat86 | 0.156 | 0.056 | 0.038 | 0.092 | |
| Got | Got100 | 0.844 | 0.944 | 0.923 | 0.895 |
| Got84 | 0.125 | 0.056 | 0.077 | 0.092 | |
| Gotnull | 0.031 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.013 |
Table 2
Genetic variation of fungus Schizophyllum commune in local populations and in total
| Local population | Locus | n | A | Ae | I | Ho | He | F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HNNP | Eg2 | 16 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | N/D |
| Amy2 | 16 | 3.000 | 1.459 | 0.567 | 0.250 | 0.314 | 0.205 | |
| Cat | 16 | 3.000 | 2.040 | 0.880 | 0.313 | 0.510 | 0.387 | |
| Got | 16 | 3.000 | 1.373 | 0.512 | 0.250 | 0.271 | 0.079 | |
| Average | 16 | 2.500 | 1.468 | 0.490 | 0.203 | 0.274 | 0.224 | |
| LHRLP | Eg2 | 9 | 2.000 | 1.117 | 0.215 | 0.111 | 0.105 | −0.059 |
| Amy2 | 9 | 4.000 | 2.051 | 0.974 | 0.556 | 0.512 | −0.084 | |
| Cat | 9 | 3.000 | 1.742 | 0.730 | 0.222 | 0.426 | 0.478 | |
| Got | 9 | 2.000 | 1.117 | 0.215 | 0.111 | 0.105 | −0.059 | |
| Average | 9 | 2.750 | 1.507 | 0.533 | 0.250 | 0.287 | 0.069 | |
| Ffp | Eg2 | 13 | 2.000 | 1.899 | 0.666 | 0.000 | 0.473 | 1.000 |
| Amy2 | 13 | 3.000 | 1.368 | 0.516 | 0.308 | 0.269 | −0.143 | |
| Cat | 13 | 4.000 | 1.380 | 0.589 | 0.077 | 0.275 | 0.720 | |
| Got | 13 | 2.000 | 1.166 | 0.271 | 0.154 | 0.142 | −0.083 | |
| Average | 13 | 2.750 | 1.453 | 0.511 | 0.135 | 0.290 | 0.374 | |
| Total | 12.7 | 2.667 | 1.476 | 0.511 | 0.196 | 0.284 | 0.222 | |
[i] A – average number of alleles per locus; Ae – effective number of alleles;
[ii] I – Shannon’s diversity index; observed (Ho) and expected (He) heterozygosity;
[iii] F – Wright’s fixation index.
Table 3
Parameters of Schizophyllum commune populations structure according to F-statistic
| Locus | Fis | Fit | Fst | Nm |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eg2 | 0.808 | 0.855 | 0.244 | 0.773 |
| Amy2 | −0.016 | 0.028 | 0.043 | 5.546 |
| Cat | 0.495 | 0.515 | 0.039 | 6.091 |
| Got | 0.007 | 0.023 | 0.017 | 14.710 |
| Average | 0.323 | 0.355 | 0.086 | 6.780 |

Figure 2
The position of S. commune cultures from locations in the space of the first two principal coordinates
Table 4
Ewens-Watterson test on neutrality for S. commune loci

Figure 3
Correlograms of different S. commune loci

Figure 4
UPGMA dendrogram of the genetic similarity of cultures of S. commune (1–37 dikaryotic culture)

Figure 5
Topography of the landscape and repetition of the wind direction* in the explored territories
*Boris Sreznevsky Central Geophysical Observatory data for April–October 2016