Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Juniperus excelsa s. str. in crimea – differentiation and history inferred from genetic and morphological markers Cover

Juniperus excelsa s. str. in crimea – differentiation and history inferred from genetic and morphological markers

Open Access
|Dec 2021

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Geographical positions and names of sampled populations of J. excelsa s. str. in Crimea (arrows) against the ranges of communities where the species dominate [in grey; based on Didukh (1992) with O. Kukushkin’s corrections and additions].
Geographical positions and names of sampled populations of J. excelsa s. str. in Crimea (arrows) against the ranges of communities where the species dominate [in grey; based on Didukh (1992) with O. Kukushkin’s corrections and additions].

Figure 2

Results of discriminant analysis of six populations of J. excelsa from Crimea based on morphological traits. A – Scatterplot showing populations means, B – Scatter of all cases.
Results of discriminant analysis of six populations of J. excelsa from Crimea based on morphological traits. A – Scatterplot showing populations means, B – Scatter of all cases.

Figure 3

Maximum likelihood (ML) tree based on the nuclear ITS sequence of the J. excelsa individuals. Samples from the Crimean Peninsula are listed in Supplementary Tab. 1. GenBank accessions of other J. excelsa, J. chinensis and J. communis are included (Supplementary Tab. 2). The bootstrap values ≥ 50% are shown only (1,000 replicates)
Maximum likelihood (ML) tree based on the nuclear ITS sequence of the J. excelsa individuals. Samples from the Crimean Peninsula are listed in Supplementary Tab. 1. GenBank accessions of other J. excelsa, J. chinensis and J. communis are included (Supplementary Tab. 2). The bootstrap values ≥ 50% are shown only (1,000 replicates)

Morphological characteristics used for the evaluation of the Crimean J_ excelsa populations: mean values (M) with standard deviation (SD), minima (Min) and maxima (Max), coefficient of variation (CV), and results of comparisons between populations performed data: Kruskal-Wallis (KW) test between all populations and U Mann-Whitney (UMW) test between montane (M) and coastal (C) population and between eastern (E) and southernmost (S) populations, and basing on the set of individuals means: ANOVA and Student’s t test, respectively based on all data: Kruskal-Wallis (KW) test between all populations and U Mann-Whitney (UMW) test between montane (M) and coastal (C) population and between eastern (E) and southernmost (S) populations, and basing on the set of individuals means: ANOVA and Student’s t test, respectively

CodeCharacterMean ± SDMinMaxCV [%]F ANOVAKW Pcomparison M-Ccomparison E-S
F test tUMW PF test tUMW P
CLLength of cone [mm]9.1 ± 1.086.4512.7111.863.57*0.00*2.320.291.030.25
CDDiameter of cone [mm]8.83 ± 1.156.3113.2313.043.60*0.00*2.110.461.210.09
CSNNumber of cone scales7.59 ± 0.996.0010.0013.042.030.00*2.150.6814.99*0.00*
SNNumber of seeds6.04 ± 1.662.0011.0027.461.120.101.230.02*1.300.74
SLLength of seed [mm]4.77 ± 0.593.196.3712.321.860.00*1.040.081.340.19
SWWidth of seed [mm]3.06 ± 0.501.814.5416.383.64*0.00*2.130.03*1.550.00*
LNNumber of leaves20.33 ± 4.0212.0034.0019.785.79*0.00*2.57*0.00*1.620.00*
STThickness of the last ramification shoot with leaves [mm]0.76 ± 0.100.541.0712.946.28*0.00*1.880.441.010.23
CL/CDRatio of length of cone/diameter of cone1.04 ± 0.070.871.276.901.690.00*1.000.00*1.180.28
SL/SWRatio of length of seed/width of seed1.59 ± 0.261.092.5716.192.67*0.00*1.85*0.00*2.740.00*
CD/SNRatio of diameter of cone/number of seeds1.56 ± 0.430.843.2927.530.960.01*1.140.00*1.120.16
CD/SWRatio of diameter of cone/width of seed2.93 ± 0.441.944.3515.120.800.071.030.03*1.020.10
CL/SLRatio of length of cone/length of seed1.93 ± 0.231.512.7111.950.540.041.570.182.170.03*
CSN/CDRatio of number of cone scales/diameter of cone0.87 ± 0.130.581.2714.630.760.01*1.550.621.400.26
CD/STRatio of diameter of cone/number of seeds11.87 ± 6.856.8518.7720.487.54*0.00*3.550.362.890.02*
LN/STRatio of number of leaves/thickness of the last ramification shoot with leaves27.27 ± 3.6413.6453.9724.294.11*0.00*1.01*0.00*1.35*0.00*

Number of individuals (Nind), haplotypes of two polymorphic cpDNA sequences: trnD-trnT and trnH-psbA and haplotype diversity (Hd) in the populations of J_ excelsa sampled in the Crimean Peninsula

PopulationNindNumber of cpDNA haplotypesHd
H1H2H3H4H5H6H7H8H9H10
Kara Dag5410.400
Sudak53110.700
Uzundza53110.700
Fiolent521110.900
Nikita10820.356
Bogatoye Ushelye44 0.000
Laspy1071110.533
Chatyr Dag440.000
Total4835421111111

Sampled populations of J_ excelsa in Crimea

PopulationGeographical positionNo. of specimens analyzedLongitude NLatitude EAltitudeCollector
biometry1genetics
Kara Dageastern coastal1/10 (4/4/56)544°54′52.97″35°12′55.18″234O. Kukushkin, Yu. Krasylenko
Sudak12 (36)544°50′32.92″34°56′37.11″139Yu. Krasylenko, O. Kukushkin
Uzundzamontane10 (50)544°27′47.9″33°52′09.4″768–770Yu. Krasylenko, O. Kukushkin
Fiolentsouthern coastal5 (25)544°30′15.3″33°30′29.0″55Yu. Krasylenko, O. Kukushkin
Nikita10 (50)1044°30′25.09″34°14′52.28″50S. Sadogurska, Yu. Krasylenko
Bogatoye Ushelyemontane4 (4)444°32′05.56″33°51′23.24″700–770O. Kukushkin
Laspysouthern coastal9 (36)1044°25′09.25″33°40′36.57″50S. Sadogurska, Yu. Krasylenko
Chatyr Dagmontane4 (40)444°48′02.63″34°19′16.36″650–1000O. Kukuskin, Yu. Krasylenko
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ffp-2021-0028 | Journal eISSN: 2199-5907 | Journal ISSN: 0071-6677
Language: English
Page range: 276 - 288
Submitted on: Aug 2, 2021
|
Accepted on: Sep 1, 2021
|
Published on: Dec 11, 2021
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2021 Małgorzata Mazur, Katarzyna A. Jadwiszczak, Agnieszka Bona, Yuliya Krasylenko, Oleg Kukushkin, Katarzyna Marcysiak, published by Forest Research Institute
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.