Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Distribution and natural regeneration of Tilia cordata Mill. in Ukrainian plain forests in a changing climate Cover

Distribution and natural regeneration of Tilia cordata Mill. in Ukrainian plain forests in a changing climate

Open Access
|Jun 2021

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Distribution map of Tilia cordata Mill. (dark-grey) in Europe (Svejgaard 2003; Radoglou et al. 2009; De Jaegere et al. 2016)

Figure 2

Location of the study site (grey pattern is the distribution of oak and lime stands within Ukraine and the study area)

Table 1

Current state of small-leaved lime (Tilia cordata) stands in Ukraine (as of 2016)

Administrative regionsTotal forest area (ha)Including small-leaved lime stands
haPercent of the total area
Autonomous of Crimea Republic227,7001500.1
Cherkasy Region255,4002,6601.0
Chernihiv Region355,5001,6800.5
Chernivtsi Region157,3003500.2
Dnipropetrovsk Region65,700500.1
Donetsk Region92,5001100.1
Ivano-Frankivsk Region425,8001,8300.4
Kharkiv Region282,3001,6600.6
Kherson Region77,300<0.1
Khmelnytskyi Region167,4002600.2
Kyiv Region355,1001,1500.3
Kirovohrad Region103,5007400.7
Luhansk Region228,2001500.1
Lviv Region428,2001,2800.3
Mykolaiv Region37,400<0.1
Odesa Region90,200800.1
Poltava Region157,3002,2201.4
Rivne Region584,200200<0.1
Sumy Region255,6004,2401.7
Ternopil Region143,6004600.3
Transcarpathian Region461,20020<0.1
Vinnytsia Region199,7005800.3
Volyn Region436,800100<0.1
Zaporizhzhia Region34,00010<0.1
Zhytomyr Region660,3004500.1
Total Ukraine6,282,20020,4300.3
Table 2

Distribution of lime stands by origin within the study area

Administrative regionsOrigin of small-leaved lime (Tilia cordata) standsTotal small-leaved lime
vegetativenatural seedplanted seed(Tilia cordata) stands
ha%ha%ha%ha%
Cherkasy Region1,12942.426510.01,26647.62,660100
Chernihiv Region1,40583.61368.11398.31,680100
Kharkiv Region1,30578.6382.331719.11,660100
Kyiv Region57449.921018.336631.81,150100
Poltava Region1,78480.4291.340718.32,220100
Sumy Region2,84767.160914.478418.54,240100
Total9,04466.51,2879.53,27924.013,610100
Figure 3

Productivity of stands with different lime proportion in their composition

Table 3

Percentage of oak-lime stands in the total area of oak forests

Administrative regionsArea of oak stands [ha]Area of oak- lime stands [ha]Percentage of oak-lime stands
Cherkasy Region117,69059,86050.9
Chernihiv Region54,56011,74021.5
Kharkiv Region150,80052,31034.7
Kyiv Region64,38014,44022.4
Poltava Region55,78024,91044.7
Sumy Region95,50046,52048.7
Total538,710209,78038.9
Table 4

Distribution of the area of oak stands with different proportions of lime in their composition (numerator – ha, denominator – % of the area)

Origin of small-leafed lime (Tilia cordata) standsUnitLime proportion in oak stands
10%20%30%40%50%60%total
123456789
Cherkasy Region
Vegetativeha14,89411,7343,2857311556030,860
%48.338.010.62.40.50.2100
Natural seedha8,5036,2051,8485061011017,172
%49.536.110.82.90.60.1100
Planted seedha4,0784,1261,95996348821411,828
%34.534.916.68.14.11.8100
Totalha27,47422,0657,0922,20174428459,860
%45.936.911.83.71.20.5100
Chernihiv Region
Vegetativeha3,3302,177922337174286,969
%47.831.213.24.82.50.4100
Natural seedha1,2081,0186613804883,324
%36.330.619.911.41.50.2100
Planted seedha5894842329133241,452
%40.533.316.06.22.31.7100
Totalha5,1263,6791,8138082546011,740
%43.731.315.46.92.20.5100
123456789
Kharkiv Region
Vegetativeha22,77411,2313,7301,0531964239,025
%58.428.89.62.70.50.1100
Natural seedha4,5412,823723276155268,543
%53.233.08.53.21.80.3100
Planted seedha1,9171,467872222166994,742
%40.430.918.44.73.52.1100
Totalha29,23215,5215,3241,55151716752,310
%55.929.710.23.01.00.3100
Kyiv Region
Vegetativeha4,4811,17342218711296,303
%71.118.66.73.00.20.5100
Natural seedha2,8501,11648918583184,741
%60.123.510.33.91.80.4100
Planted seedha2,02080232913182313,396
%59.523.69.73.92.40.9100
Totalha9,3513,0911,2405031777814,440
%64.821.48.63.51.20.5100
Poltava Region
Vegetativeha8,8236,3982,7727602082818,988
%46.533.714.64.01.10.1100
Natural seedha1,33397142316535132,940
%45.333.014.45.61.20.5100
Planted seedha1,191890479254106612,982
%39.929.916.18.53.62.1100
Totalha11,3468,2593,6741,17934910324,910
%45.533.214.74.71.40.4100
Sumy Region
Vegetativeha12,1409,2674,3091,59346215527,925
%43.533.215.45.71.70.6100
Natural seedha5,8844,8932,1375721513813,674
%43.035.815.64.21.10.3100
Planted seedha1,8901,595811418168414,921
%38.432.416.58.53.40.8100
Totalha19,91315,7547,2562,58278123346,520
%42.833.915.65.61.70.5100
Figure 4

Productivity of oak stands with different lime proportion in their composition

Table 5

Natural regeneration aged below 15 years under the canopy of oak stands of different ages, compositions and relative densities of stocking

Sample plot numberCharacteristics of oak standsThe number of naturally regenerated seedlings
total [trees ha-1]including small-leaved lime
stand composition[years] agedensity relative of stockingtrees [ha-1]%
Oak stands aged 50–100 years
1Oak 50%, ash 30%, N-maple 10%, lime 10%500.854,3002004.7
2Oak 40%, ash 30%, N-maple 20%, lime 10%600.658,3002002.4
3Oak 50%, ash 30%, lime 10%, N-maple 10%700.6014,6004002.7
4Oak 80%, ash 10%, lime 10%700.6014,8004002.7
5Oak 70%, lime 30%790.806,5005007.7
6Oak 90%, lime 10%920.6212,9002001.6
7Oak 60%, lime 20%, ash 10%, N-maple 10%990.8311,6005004.3
Mean740.7110,4003003.7
Oak stands aged 101–130 years
8Oak 60%, lime 30%, N-maple 10%1040.765,9001,20020.3
9Oak 70%, lime 20%, N-maple 10%1040.7522,1001,1005.0
10Oak 70%, lime 20%, N-maple 10%1050.753,9001,00025.6
11Oak 70%, ash 10%, lime 10%, N-maple 10%1080.7016,7003001.8
12Oak 70%, lime 20%, ash 10%1100.6512,2008006.6
13Oak 60%, ash 20%, lime 20%1150.668,6002,10024.4
14Oak 80%, lime 10%, N-maple 10%1240.809,4001,40014.9
Mean1100.7011,3001,10014.1
Oak stands aged 131–200 years
15Oak 50%, ash 20%, lime 20%, N-maple 10%1440.808,1004004.9
16Oak 50%, ash 20%, N-maple 20%, lime 10%1570.7410,2002002.0
17Oak 100%1830.6112,9001000.8
18Oak 90%, lime 10%1880.6625,0006002.4
19Oak 100%1930.6926,8003001.1
20Oak 50%, lime 30%, ash 10%, N-maple 10%1980.5913,0002001.5
Mean1770.7016,0003002.1

[i] Note: Oak – English oak (Quercus robur L.), ash – common ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.), N-maple – Norway maple (Acer platanoides L.), lime – small-leaved lime (Tilia cordata Mill.).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ffp-2021-0014 | Journal eISSN: 2199-5907 | Journal ISSN: 0071-6677
Language: English
Page range: 125 - 137
Submitted on: Sep 8, 2020
Accepted on: Apr 1, 2021
Published on: Jun 8, 2021
Published by: Forest Research Institute
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Related subjects:

© 2021 Maksym Rumiantsev, Volodymyr Luk’yanets, Oleksii Kobets, Iryna Obolonyk, Oksana Tarnopilska, Svitlana Poznіakova, Sergiy Musienko, Olha Tupchii, published by Forest Research Institute
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.