Table 1
Load of surface fuel in pine forests of Kyiv Polissya
| C2 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100% Scots pine | 15 | 1.17 | 60 | 13.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 95% Scots pine + 5% European oak | 15 | 0.80 | 64 | 9.2 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| 100% Scots pine | 30 | 1.30 | 165 | 19.9 | 5 | 0.0 |
| 95% Scots pine + 5% European oak | 45 | 0.72 | 249 | 22.7 | 9.4 | 3.0 |
| 100% Scots pine | 60 | 0.71 | 314 | 37.4 | 4.2 | 3.1 |
| 95% Scots pine + 3% European oak + 2% European hornbeam | 80 | 0.71 | 370 | 16.8 | 3.5 | 5.1 |
| В2 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 95% Scots pine + 3% European oak + 2% Norway maple | 15 | 0.89 | 54 | 8.9 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| 96% Scots pine + 4% European oak | 15 | 0.88 | 43 | 7.9 | 0.2 | 0.7 |
| 95% Scots pine + 2% European oak + 2% European birch + 1% Aspen | 23 | 0.92 | 99 | 21.3 | 3.4 | 0.1 |
| 96% Scots pine + 4% European birch | 43 | 0.74 | 173 | 29.7 | 3.8 | 0.8 |
| 96% Scots pine + 4% European birch | 50 | 0.67 | 274 | 11.9 | 4.2 | 2.7 |
| 95% Scots pine + 5% Elm | 60 | 0.72 | 314 | 29.0 | 4.2 | 4.0 |
| 100% Scots pine | 70 | 0.80 | 273 | 28.7 | 4.7 | 3.2 |
| A2 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100% Scots pine | 75 | 0.74 | 370 | 45.4 | 7.9 | 4.0 |
| 100% Scots pine | 80 | 0.83 | 299 | 37.7 | 7.9 | 4.7 |
| 96% Scots pine + 4% European birch | 85 | 0.79 | 306 | 23.4 | 4.2 | 0.8 |
| 100% Scots pine | 90 | 0.65 | 313 | 46.0 | 4.2 | 5.4 |

Figure 1
Fractional composition of surface forest fuel in pure pine forests, growing in forest site conditions of fresh bir (А2).

Figure 2
Fractional composition of surface FF in pure pine stands growing in the conditions of fresh subir (В2)

Figure 3
Fractional composition of surface FF in pure pine woods growing in conditions of fresh sugrud (С2)
Table 2
Forest fuel load by fractions in various types of forest conditions (TFC) and age groups, t·ha-1
| Age class | Litter (needle fall) | Duff | Litter and duff | DWD by fractions* | Total surface fuel | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 hour | 10 hours | 100 hours | 1000 hours | |||||
| С2 | ||||||||
| II | 5.5 | 6.1 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 11.8 | |||
| III | 14.5 | 11.4 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 29.9 | |||
| IV | 8.0 | 19.6 | 3.4 | 3.7 | 2.3 | 9.4 | 41.5 | |
| V | 8.4 | 33.7 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 4.2 | 44.3 | ||
| VII | 4.4 | 14.8 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 3.5 | 23.8 | ||
| В2 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| II | 5.2 | 3.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 8.8 | |||
| III | 4.4 | 18.9 | 1.4 | 0.7 | 1.3 | 3.4 | 28.1 | |
| IV | 0.0 | |||||||
| V | 9.3 | 15.8 | 3.2 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 4.0 | 28.9 | |
| VI | 7.9 | 24.9 | 2.7 | 0.7 | 1.1 | 4.4 | 37.8 | |
| VII | 11.1 | 38.0 | 6.2 | 0.6 | 1.1 | 7.9 | 57.3 | |
| IX | 12.4 | 27.1 | 2.4 | 0.7 | 1.1 | 4.2 | 43.1 | |
| А2 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IV | 13.5 | 12.3 | 4.9 | 1.6 | 6.6 | 27.9 | ||
| V | 19.4 | 14.7 | 7.1 | 3.7 | 2.6 | 13.4 | 44.2 | |
| VI | 12.9 | 11.5 | 3.9 | 5.8 | 0.6 | 10.2 | 34.9 | |
| VII | 12.5 | 11.8 | 3.9 | 2.0 | 2.2 | 8.1 | 30.6 | |

Figure 4
Characteristics of forest litter specific gravity depending on pine stand age and type of forest growth conditions.