Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The influence of forest types on manganese content in soils Cover

The influence of forest types on manganese content in soils

Open Access
|Mar 2021

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Characteristics of the areas from which the soil samples were selected

AreaAltitude (m)Soil parent materialSoil type (FAO 1988)Vegetation
Amfilohia360Sandy flyschHaplic LuvisolQuercus ilex, L., Arbutus unedo, L. Phyllirea latifolia, L.
Ossa-Mountain890Mica schistHaplic AlisolFagus sylvatica, L.
Karpenisi1170Argil-laceus flyschHumic AlisolAbies borisii-regis, M.
Table 2

Concentrations (mg kg-1) of Mn in standing leaves and litterfall as well as fluxes of Mn (kg ha-1 yr-1) in the litterfall in the three forested plots. Values with different letters in the same row differ significantly for at least 0.05 probability level

Standing leaves of the dominant trees in the three forested stands
AverageHolm oakBeechFir
561 a1876 b299 a
(33)(13)(33)
Litterfall
AverageMaquisBeechFir
405 a1475 b354 a
(23)(19)(15)
Litterfall fluxes
AverageMaquisBeechFir
2.00 a7.66 b2.09 a
(29)(26)(29)

[i] Values in parentheses denote coefficients(%) of variation.

Table 3

Selected soil properties in the soil layers of the three forested stands. Clay and CEC are expressed in percentages (%) and CEC in meq/100 g of soil

LayerpHClayCECC
12345
Maquis
L49.4 (2.8)
FH6.6 (3.7)71.6 (8.1)26.0 (7.1)
0–10 cm6.26 (2.0)23.6 (6.2)24.5 (12)(5.0 14)
10–20 cm6.18 (6.6)24.2 (14)15.8 (20)2.73 (17)
20–406.12 (2.3)26.0 (19)12.8 (11)1.44 (17)
40–806.53 (5.7)29.3 (15)13.7 (13)0.86 (14)
Beech
L47.3 (0.6)
FH5.75 (4.9)41.2 (12)26.9 (3.5)
0–10 cm4.83 (2.4)20.0 (5.5)2.13 (18)4.32 (4.5)
10–20 cm5.08 (2.1)21.81.44 (9.2)2.95 (8.7)
20–40 cm5.24 (0.6)21.5 (0.3)1.20 (4.8)2.09 (12)
40–80 cm5.27 (1.1)(15 4.1)0.973 (9.3)0.91 (3.2)
Fir
L50.8 (0.7)
FH6.48 (0.2)57.8 (9.5)23.0 (14)
0–10 cm6.07 (2.0)27.2 (2.0)17.9 (15)5.12 (20)
10–20 cm5.77 (3.1)31.2 (2.1)10.9 (15)3.36 (10)
20–40 cm5.54 (1.2)33.0 (6.7)(7.5 7.9)2.75 (3.5)
40–80 cm5.32 (1.5)34.9 (14)3.8 (15)1.53 (19)

[i] Values in parentheses denote coefficients of variation (%).

Table 4

Concentrations (mg kg-1) of total and available Mn in the soil layers of the three-forested stands. Values with different letters in the same row differ significantly for at least 0.05 probability level

MaquisBeechFir
1244
Total Mn
L306 a (65)1745 b (12)613 a (52)
FH1790 a (12)4398 b (10)1730 a (4.2)
0–10 cm687 a (13)1130 b (12)1208 bc (6.3)
10–20 cm607 a (7.0)842 ab (4.7)969 b (26)
20–40 cm665 a (6.8)1087bc (7.0)1015 c (30)
40–80 cm644 a (5.1)697 a (13)650 a (49)
Available Mn
FH738 a (21)561 b (20)370 c (21)
0–10 cm114 a (15)196 b (11)151 c (15)
10–20 cm95.4 a (62.8)148 b (6.8)116 ab (14)
20–40 cm62.8 a (5.9)113 b (4.5)92.6b (28)
40–80 cm61.5 a (24)46.2 a (24)56.6 a (40)

[i] Values in parentheses denote coefficients of variation (%).

Table 5

Pearson correlation coefficients between available Mn and soil properties

CECpHClayOrganic CTotal Mn
Available Mn0.588*0.264–0.620.962**0.867**

[i] * and ** mean significant correlations for 0.05 and 0.01 probability levels, respectively.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ffp-2021-0001 | Journal eISSN: 2199-5907 | Journal ISSN: 0071-6677
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 9
Submitted on: Oct 15, 2020
Accepted on: Dec 9, 2020
Published on: Mar 13, 2021
Published by: Forest Research Institute
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Related subjects:

© 2021 Panagiotis Michopoulos, Marios Kostakis, Nikolaos S. Thomaidis, Ioannis Pasias, published by Forest Research Institute
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.