Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The unresolved problem of determining the forest interest rate Cover

The unresolved problem of determining the forest interest rate

Open Access
|Jul 2018

References

  1. André, M.-F. 1998. Depopulation, land-use change and landscape transformation in the French Massif Central. Ambio, 27 (4), 351–353.
  2. Ansink, E., Hein, L., Hasund, K.P. 2008. To value functions or services? An analysis of ecosystem valuation approaches. Environmental Values, 17 (4), 489–503.10.3197/096327108X368502
  3. Barrena, J., Nahuelhual, L., Báez, A., Schiappacasse, I., Cerda, C. 2014. Valuing cultural ecosystem services: Agricultural heritage in Chiloé island, southern Chile. Ecosystem Services, 7, 66–75. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.12.005.10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.12.005
  4. Brukas, V., Jellesmark Thorsen, B., Helles, F., Tarp, P. 2001. Discount rate and harvest policy: implications for Baltic forestry. Forest Policy and Economics, 2 (2), 143–156. http://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-9341(01)00050-8.10.1016/S1389-9341(01)00050-8
  5. Calish, S., Fight, R.D., Teeguarden, D.E. 1978. How do nontimber values affect Douglas-fir rotations? Journal of Forestry, 76 (4), 217–221.10.1093/jof/76.4.217
  6. Campbell, E.T., Tilley, D.R. 2014. The eco-price: How environmental emergy equates to currency. Ecosystem Services, 7, 128–140. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.12.002.10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.12.002
  7. Centemeri, L. 2015. Reframing Problems of Incommensurability in Environmental Conflicts Through Pragmatic Sociology: From Value Pluralism to the Plurality of Modes of Engagement with the Environment. Environmental Values, 24 (3), 299–320. http://doi.org/10.3197/096327114X13947900181158.10.3197/096327114X13947900181158
  8. Chang, S. 1983. Rotation age, management intensity, and the economic factors of timber production: do changes in stumpage price, interest rate, regeneration cost, and forest taxation matter? Forest Science, 29, 267–277.Clark, C.W. 1973. The economics of overexploitation. Science, 181 (4100), 630–634.10.1126/science.181.4100.630
  9. Costanza, R. 2002. New editor for ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 42 (3), 351–352. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00178-7.10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00178-7
  10. Crocker, T.D. 2002. A short history of environmental and resource economics. In: Handbook of Environmental and Resource Economics (ed.: J.C.J.M. van den Bergh). Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK, 32–45.
  11. Deng, H., Zheng, P., Liu, T., Liu, X. 2011. Forest Ecosystem Services and Eco-Compensation Mechanisms in China. Environmental Management, 48 (6), 1079–1085. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-011-9742-0.10.1007/s00267-011-9742-021882001
  12. Doherty, E., Murphy, G., Hynes, S., Buckley, C. 2014. Valuing ecosystem services across water bodies: Results from a discrete choice experiment. Ecosystem Services, 7, 89–97. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.09.003.10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.09.003
  13. Endres, M. 1919. Lehrbuch der Waldwertrechnung. Forststatic, 3.10.1007/978-3-662-42400-1_2
  14. Farley, J., Costanza, R. 2010. Payments for ecosystem services: from local to global. Ecological Economics, 69 (11), 2060–2068.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.06.010
  15. Faustmann, M. 1849. Berechnung des Wertes welchen Waldboden sowie noch nicht haubare Holzbestände für die Waldwirtschaft besitzen. Allgemeine Forst-Und Jagd-Zeitung, 15 (1849), 7–44.
  16. Foster, D.R. 1992. Land-use history (1730–1990) and vegetation dynamics in central New-England, USA. Journal of Ecology, 80 (4), 753–772. http://doi.org/10.2307/2260864.10.2307/2260864
  17. Gaffney, M. 2008. Keeping land in capital theory – Ricardo, Faustmann, Wicksell, and George. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 67 (1), 119–141. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.2007.00562.x.10.1111/j.1536-7150.2007.00562.x
  18. Gan, J., Kolison, S.H., Colletti, J.P. 2001. Optimal forest stock and harvest with valuing non-timber benefits: a case of US coniferous forests. Forest Policy and Economics, 2 (2), 167–178. http://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-9341(01)00051-X.10.1016/S1389-9341(01)00051-X
  19. Garcia-Llorente, M., Martin-López, B., Diiaz, S., Montes, C. 2011. Can ecosystem properties be fully translated into service values? An economic valuation of aquatic plant services. Ecological Applications, 21 (8), 3083–3103.10.1890/10-1744.1
  20. Hartman, R. 1976. The harvesting decision whena standing forest has valuea. Economic Inquiry, 14 (1), 52–58.10.1111/j.1465-7295.1976.tb00377.x
  21. Holland, A. 2011. What do we do about bleakness? Environmental Values, 20 (3), 315–321.10.3197/096327111X13077055165947
  22. Kaffashi, S., Shamsudin, M.N., Radam, A., Rahim, K.A., Yacob, M.R., Muda, A., Yazid, M. 2011. Economic valuation of Shadegan International Wetland, Iran: notes for conservation. Regional Environmental Change, 11 (4), 925–934. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-011-0225-x.10.1007/s10113-011-0225-x
  23. Kates, R.W., Clark, W.C., Corell, R., Hall, J.M., Jaeger, C.C., Lowe, I. 2001. Sustainability science. Science, 292 (5517), 641–642.10.1126/science.1059386
  24. Lehr, J., Borggreve, B. 1879. Die Forstreinertragslehre, insbesondere die sog. forstliche Statik Prof. Dr. G. Heyers nach ihrer wissenschaftlichen Nichtigkeit und wirthschaftlichen Gefährlichkeit Oberförster in Bonn, Lehrer der Forstwissenschaft an der mit der Universität Bonn v. JSTOR.
  25. Lowry, S.T. 1965. The Classical Greek Theory of Natural Resource Economics. Land Economics, 41 (3), 203–208. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3144852.10.2307/3144852
  26. Luo, D., Zhang, W. 2014. A comparison of Markov model-based methods for predicting the ecosystem service value of land use in Wuhan, central China. Ecosystem Services, 7, 57–65. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.11.001.10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.11.001
  27. Manley, B., Bare, B.B. 2001. Computing maximum willingness to pay with Faustmann’s formula: some special situations from New Zealand. Forest Policy and Economics, 2 (2), 179–193. http://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-9341(01)00044-2.10.1016/S1389-9341(01)00044-2
  28. Martin, H. 2013. Die forstliche Statik: Ein Handbuch für leitende und ausführende Forstwirte sowie zum Studium und Unterricht. Springer-Verlag.
  29. Martinez-Alier, J. 2001. Mining conflicts, environmental justice, and valuation. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 86 (1), 153–170.10.1016/S0304-3894(01)00252-7
  30. Martinez-Alier, J., Munda, G.,O’Neill, J. 1998. Weak comparability of values as a foundation for ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 26 (3), 277–286.10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00120-1
  31. Mather, A.S. 1992. The forest transition. Area, 24, 367–379.10.1016/0010-4485(92)90063-G
  32. Mather, A.S., Needle, C.L. 1998. The forest transition: a theoretical basis. Area, 30 (2), 117–124.10.1111/j.1475-4762.1998.tb00055.x
  33. Mcconnell, K.E., Daberkow, J.N., Hardie, I.W. 1983. Planning timber production with evolving prices and costs. Land Economics, 59 (3), 292–299. http://doi.org/10.2307/3145731.10.2307/3145731
  34. Möhring, B. 2001. The German struggle between the “Bodenreinertragslehre” (land rent theory) and “Waldreinertragslehre” (theory of the highest revenue) belongs to the past — but what is left? Forest Policy and Economics, 2 (2), 195–201. http://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-9341(01)00049-1.10.1016/S1389-9341(01)00049-1
  35. Molenda, T. 1945. Wycenianie nieruchomości leśnych w ekonomii i w technice. Koło Leśników UP Poznań.
  36. Newman, D.H., Gilbert, C.B., Hyde, W.F. 1985. The optimal forest rotation with evolving prices. Land Economics, 61 (4), 347–353.10.2307/3146152
  37. Nördlinger, J.S. 1805. Versuch den Werth der Waldungen zu bestimmen. Diana, 3, 363–400.
  38. Pearce, D.W., Seccombe-Hett, T. 2000. Economic valuation and environmental decision-making in Europe. Environmental Science and Technology, 34 (8), 1419–1425.10.1021/es9906711
  39. Piekutin, J., Skreta, M. 2012. Ekonomiczny wiek rębności drzewostanów sosnowych. Sylwan, 156 (10), 741–749.
  40. Płotkowski, L. 2010. Gospodarka leśna w badaniach ekonomiki leśnictwa. Rocznik Nauk Rolniczych, Seria G, 97, 110–120.10.22630/RNR.2010.97.2.21
  41. Podgórski, M., Kikayi, R.P. 1996. Próba określenia produkcyjności i produktywności lasu za pomocą wskaźników technicznych i ekonomicznych, na przykładzie nadleśnictw Regionalnej Dyrekcji Lasów Państwowych w Szczecinie. Prace Komisji Nauk Rolniczych i Komisji Nauk Leśnych. Poznańskie Towarzystwo Przyjaciół Nauk, 82, 125–133.
  42. Price, C. 1987. Environmental benefits and optimal rotation: Comment on Johansson and Loefgren. Journal of Environmental Management, 25 (3), 215–218.
  43. Ramsey, F.P. 1928. A mathematical theory of saving. The Economic Journal, 38 (152), 543–559.10.2307/2224098
  44. Riebel, F. 1905. Die Wertermittlung der Obstbäume und anderer Einzelbäume. Fromme, 88 pp.
  45. Rudel, T.K., Coomes, O.T., Moran, E., Achard, F., Angelsen, A., Xu, J., Lambin, E. 2005. Forest transitions: towards a global understanding of land use change. Global Environmental Change, 15 (1), 23–31. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.11.001.10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.11.001
  46. Shapiro, J., Báldi, A. 2014. Accurate accounting: How to balance ecosystem services and disservices. Ecosystem Services, 7, 201–202. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.01.002.10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.01.002
  47. Shaw, M.R., Pendleton, L., Cameron, D.R., Morris, B., Bachelet, D., Klausmeyer, K., Roehrdanz, P.R. 2011. The impact of climate change on California’s ecosystem services. Climatic Change, 109 (1), 465–484. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0313-4.10.1007/s10584-011-0313-4
  48. Spangenberg, J.H., Settele, J. 2016. Value pluralism and economic valuation – defendable if well done. Ecosystem Services, 18, 100–109. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.02.008.10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.02.008
  49. Staaland, H., Holand, Ø., Nellemann, C., Smith, M. 1998. Time scale for forest regrowth: abandoned grazing and agricultural areas in southern Norway. Ambio, 27, 456–460.
  50. Tahvonen, O., Salo, S. 1999. Optimal Forest Rotation within SituPreferences. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 37 (1), 106–128. http://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1998.1055.10.1006/jeem.1998.1055
  51. Thompson, I.D., Okabe, K., Tylianakis, J.M., Kumar, P., Brockerhoff, E.G., Schellhorn, N.A., Nasi, R. 2011. Forest Biodiversity and the Delivery of Ecosystem Goods and Services: Translating Science into Policy. Bioscience, 61 (12), 972–981. http://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2011.61.12.7.10.1525/bio.2011.61.12.7
  52. Vankooten, G.C., Binkley, C.S., Delcourt, G. 1995. Effect of carbon taxes and subsidies on optimal forest rotation age and supply of carbon services. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 77 (2), 365–374. http://doi.org/10.2307/1243546.10.2307/1243546
  53. Viitala, E.-J. 2016. Faustmann formula before Faustmann in German territorial states. Forest Policy and Economics, 65, 47–58. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2015.11.004.10.1016/j.forpol.2015.11.004
  54. Zając, S., Świętojański, A. 2002. Podstawy metodyczne wyceny lasu. Sylwan, 3 (146), 5–20.
  55. Zydroń, A., Szafrański, C., Korytowski, M. 2012. Koncepcje określania wysokości leśnej stopy procentowej. Sylwan, 156 (5), 333–342.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ffp-2018-0012 | Journal eISSN: 2199-5907 | Journal ISSN: 0071-6677
Language: English
Page range: 122 - 130
Published on: Jul 20, 2018
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2018 Krzysztof Adamowicz, published by Forest Research Institute
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.