Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Genetic structure of Norway spruce [Picea abies (L.) Karst.] provenances tested in IPTNS-IUFRO 1964/68 experiment in Krynica Cover

Genetic structure of Norway spruce [Picea abies (L.) Karst.] provenances tested in IPTNS-IUFRO 1964/68 experiment in Krynica

Folia Forestalia Polonica
Volume 55 (2013): Issue 1 (March 2013)
By: ,   and    
Open Access
|Jun 2013
References

References

  1. Bałut S., Sabor J. 2001. Inventory provenance test of Norway Spruce [bies (L.) Karst.] IPTNSIUFRO 1964/68 in Krynica. Part I. Description of the experimental area. Wydawnictwo Akademii Rolniczej, Kraków.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Barszcz J., Małek S. 2006. The quality and viability of Picea abies (L.) Karst. seedlings in young crops laid out after a decay of stands at high mountain elevations in the Śląski Beskid Mountains and the western part of the Beskid Żywiecki Mountains. In: Current problems of forest protection in spruce stands under conversion (eds.: W. Grodzki, T. Oszako). IBL (FRI), Warsaw, 21-35.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Bergmann F., Gregorious H.R. 1979. Comparison of the genetic diversities of various populations of Norway spruce (). Proceedings of the Conference on Biochemical Genetics of Forest Trees (ed.: F. Rudin). Umeå, 99-107.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Bruchwald A., Dmyterko E. 2010. Lasy Beskidu Śląskiego i Żywieckiego - zagrożenia, nadzieja. Instytut Badawczy Leśnictwa, Sękocin Stary, pp. 80.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Burczyk J. 1998. Systemy kojarzenia drzew leśnych. Wyd. Uczelniane WSP, Bydgoszcz, pp. 105.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Chałupka W., Mejnartowicz L., Lewandowski A. 2008. Reconstitution of a lost forest tree population: A case study of Norway spruce ([L.] Karst.)., 255, 2103-2108.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Conkle M.T., Paul D.H., Nunnaly L.B., Hunter S.C. 1982. Starch Gel Electrophoresis of Conifer Seeds: a Laboratory Manual. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSWGTR-64. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  8. Forest Condition in Europe. 2004. Technical Report of ICP Forests. Federal Research Centre for Forestry and Forest Products (BFH), Hamburg.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Giannini R., Morgante M., Vendramin G.G. 1991. Allozyme variation in Italian populations of(L.) Karst., 40 (3/4), 160-166.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Giertych M. 1984. Świerk istebniański w świetle międzynarodowych doświadczeń proweniencyjnych., 128 (12), 27-42.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Giertych M. 1997. Świerk pospolity(L.) Karst. Nasze Drzewa Leśne. Warszawa-Poznań, PWN.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Giertych M. 2002. Troska o bioróżnorodność. Sesja naukowa: Zagospodarowanie oraz wartość genetyczna populacji drzew gatunków domieszkowych i introdukowanych w aspekcie stabilizacji ekosystemów leśnych Karpat.394, 289-301.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Konnert M., Maurer W. 1995. Isozymic Investigations on Norway Spruce [(L.) Karst.] and European Silver Fir (M ill.). A Practical Guide to Separation Methods and Zymogram Evaluation. Bayerische Landesanstalt für forstliche Saat- und Pflanzenzucht, Teisendorf, pp. 79.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Konnert M. 2009. Genetic variation ofin southern Germany as determined using isozyme and STS markers., 61 (Supplement), 131-136.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Kraj W. 2002. The estimation of genetic variation within and between polish provenances of Norway spruce ((L.) Karst.) on the basis of RAPD polymorphism, EJPAU 5 (2). Available online: http://www.ejpau.media.pl/volume5/issue2/forestry/abs-02.html
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Krutovskii K.V., Bergmann F. 1995. Introgressive hybridization and phylogenetic relationship between Norway,(L.) Karst., and Siberian,L edeb., spruce species studied by isozyme loci., 74 (5), 464-480.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Krutzsch P. 1968. Die Pflanzschulenergebnisse eines inventierenden Fichtenherkunftsversuches (Karst. undLedeb.). Königliche Forstliche Hochschule, Stockholm.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Langercrantz U., Ryman N. 1990. Genetic structure of Norway spruce (): concordance of morphological and allozymic variation., 44, 38-53.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Ledig F.T. 1986. Heterozygosity, heterosis, and fitness in outbreeding plants. In: Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and diversity (ed.: M.E. Soule). Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass. (USA), 77- 104.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Lewandowki A., Burczyk J., Chałupka W. 1997. Preliminary results on allozyme diversity and differentiation on Norway spruce [(L.) Karst.] in Poland based on plus tree investigations., 66 (2), 197-200.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Lewandowski A., Burczyk J. 2002. Allozyme variation ofin Poland., 17, 478-494.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Longauer R., Gömöry D., Paule L., Blada I., Popescu F., Maňkovská B. 2004. Genetic effects of air pollution on forest tree species of the Carpathian Mountains., 130, 85-92.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Masternak K., Sabor J., Majerczyk K. 2009. Effect of provenance on the survival of Norway spruce ((L.) Karst.) trees on the IPTNS-IUFRO 1964/68 site in Krynica (Poland)., 61, 53-61.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. Masternak K., Zielińska M., Sabor J. 2011. Polimorfizm izoenzymów i wzrost wybranych pochodzeń świerka pospolitego [(L.) Karst.] doświadczenia IPTNS-IUFRO 1964/68 w Krynicy., 72 (1), 65-75.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Modrzyński J., Prus-Głowacki W. 1998. Isoenzymatic variability in some of the polish populations of Norway spruce () in the IUFRO 1972 provenance trial., 67 (1), 75-85.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. Nei M. 1972. Genetic distance between populations., 106, 283-292.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. Nei M., Roychoudhury A.K. 1974. Sampling variances of heterozygosity and genetic distance., 76, 379-390.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Nowakowska J.A. 2009. Mitochondrial and nuclear DNA differentiation ofpopulations in Poland., 61 (Supplement), 119-129.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Paule L., Szmidt A.E., Yazdani R. 1990. Isozyme polymorphism of Norway spruce (Karst.) in Slovakia. I. Genetic structure of adjacent populations., 32, 57-70.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Polak-Berecka M., Perchlicka I. 2007. Polimorfizm izoenzymowy i zmienność genetyczna wybranych pochodzeń cząstkowych świerka rasy istebniańskiej., 151 (10), 47-53.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Sabor J. 1996. Możliwości zachowania i metody selekcji drzewostanów świerkowych rasy istebniańskiej., 140 (3), 61-81.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. Sabor J. 2010. Genetic basis of conversion and conservation of forest gene resources of spruce stands in Silesian and Zywiec Beskid Mountains., 3 (2), 175-186. Skroppa T. 1994. Impact of tree improvement on genetic structure and diversity of planted forests., 28 (4), 265-274.
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. Sneath P.H.A., Sokal R.R. 1973. Numerical Taxonomy: the Principles and Practice of Numerical Classification. W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. Wright S. 1978. Evolution and the Genetics of Populations. Vol. 4. Variability within and among natural populations. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. Yeh F.C., Yang R., Boyle T. 1999. Popgene Version 1,31. Microsoft Window - Based Freeware for Population Genetic Analysis. University of Alberta and Centre for International Forestry Research, Edmonton, Canada.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ffp-2013-0002 | Journal eISSN: 2199-5907 | Journal ISSN: 0071-6677
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 10 - 17
Published on: Jun 8, 2013
Published by: Forest Research Institute
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
Norway spruce,
isozymes,
polymorphism,
seed source
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Plant science

© 2013 Janusz Sabor, Marta Kempf, Katarzyna Masternak, published by Forest Research Institute
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 55 (2013): Issue 1 (March 2013)
Previous article
Next article