Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Comparative study of low dose of capecitabine versus standard dose in metastatic breast cancer: Efficacy and safety Cover

Comparative study of low dose of capecitabine versus standard dose in metastatic breast cancer: Efficacy and safety

Open Access
|Aug 2021

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Time to progression in both groups.
Time to progression in both groups.

Figure 2

Overall survival in both groups.
Overall survival in both groups.

Patients and tumor characteristics_

ItemsStandard doseLow doseP value
Age (years)
  Range40–5938–640.87
  Mean ± SD49.5 ± 4.950.6 ± 7.2
  Median4950
Age groups
  ≤45 years4 (19%)4 (21.1%)0.516
  >45 years17 (81%)15 (78.9%)
Menopausal state 8 (42.1%)0.971
  Premenopausal11 (52.4%)11 (57.9%)
  Postmenopausal10 (47.6%)
PS 4 (21.1)0.507
05 (23.8%)10 (52.6%)
111 (52.4%)5 (26.3%)
25 (23.8%)
Surface area1.824 ± 0.181.795 ± 0.160.86
Mean ± SD
Site of metastasis
Bone14 (66.7%)13 (68.4%)0.906
Lung7 (33.3%)7 (36.8%)0.816
Liver11 (52.4%)9 (47.4%)0.752
Brain6 (28.6%)5 (26.3%)0.873
LNs2 (9.5%)1 (5.3%)0.935
No. of involved site
      16 (28.6%)7 (36.8%)0.84
    28 (38.1%)6 (31.6%)
  > or =37 (33.3%)6 (31.6%)
Hormonal state/Her 2 status
ER positive13 (61.9%)12 (63.2%)0.342
PR positive12 (57.1%)8 (42.1%)0.302
Her 2 positive4 (19%)5 (26.3%)0.58
Triple negative5 (23.8%)4 (21.1%)0.83
-
Initial stage
Tumor stage
  28 (38.1%)10 (52.6%)0.312
  311 (52.4%)9 (47.4%)
  42 (9.5%)0 (0%)
Lymph node stage
  03 (14.3%)4 (21.1%)0.952
  17 (33.3%)6 (31.6%)
  27 (33.3%)6 (31.6%)
  34 (19 %)3 (15.8%)
Grade
  12 (9.5%)1 (5.3%)0.754
  211 (52.4%)12 (63.2%)
  38 (38.1%)6 (31.6%)
- Type
  Infiltrating duct carcinoma17 (81%)17 (89.5%)0.664
  Infiltrating lobular carcinoma4 (19%)2 (10.5%)

Treatment toxicities_

ItemsStandard dose no. (%)Low dose no. (%)P value

AllG 1G 2G 3AllG 1G 2G 3
-HFS13 (61.9)7 (33.3)4 (19)2 (9.5)9 (47.3)7 (36.8)2 (10.5)00.42
-Fatigue12 (57.1)8 (38)3 (14.2)1 (4.7)8 (42.1)6 (31.5)2 (10.5)00.66
-Nausea7 (33.3)5 (23.8)1 (4.7)1 (4.7)4 (21)4 (21)000.94
-Vomiting7 (33.3)4 (19)3 (14.2)04 (21)2 (10.5)2 (10.5)00.93
-Diarrhea9 (42.8)4 (19)2 (9.5)3 (14.2)6 (31.5)5 (26.3)1 (5.2)00.58
-Stomatitis7 (33.3)3 (14.2)3 (14.2)1 (4.7)4 (21)3 (15.7)1 (5.2)00.33
-Hematological
Anemia10 (47.6)6 (28.5)3 (14.2)1 (4.7)4 (21)4 (21)000.17
Neutropenia8 (38)3 (14.2)4 (19)1 (4.7)4 (21)3 (15.7)1 (5.2)00.41
Thrombocytopenia7 (33.3)4 (19)3 (14.2)02 (10.5)2 (10.5)000.14

Relations of response data_

Prognostic factorsAll patients (40)P valueStandard dose (group 1 = 21)P valueLow dose (group 2 = 19)P value



Response no. (%)No response no. (%)Response no. (%)No response no. (%)Response no. (%)No response no. (%)
Age group
  ≤45 years7 (17.5)8 (20)0.0014 (19)4 (19)0.0053 (15.7)4 (21)0.075
  >45 years1 (2.5)24 (60) 013 (61.9) 1 (5.2)11 (57.8)
Menopausal state
  Premenopausal7 (17.5)8 (20)0.934 (19)4 (19)0.843 (15.7)4 (21)0.96
Postmenopausal12 (30)13 (32.5) 7 (33.3)6 (28.5) 5 (26.3)7 (36.8)
Grade
  13 (7.5)00.0152 (9.5)00.611 (5.2)00.23
  25 (12.5)18 (45) 2 (9.5)9 (42.8) 3 (15.7)9 (47.3)
  37 (17.5)7 (17.5) 4 (19)4 (19) 3 (15.7)3 (15.7)
Triple negative
  No14 (35)17 (42.5)0.0638 (38)8 (38)0.0446 (31.5)9 (47.3)0.85
  Yes1 (2.5)8 (20) 05 (23.8) 3 (15.7)1 (5.2)
No. of metastatic sites
  110 (25)3 (7.5)0.014 (19)1 (4.7)0.0516 (31.5)2 (10.5)0.011
  24 (10)10 (25) 3 (14.2)5 (23.8) 1 (5.2)5 (26.3)
  ≥ 31 (2.5)12 (30) 1 (4.7)7 (33.3) 05 (26.3)
Treatment line
  First14 (35)11 (27.5).0077 (33.3)6 (28.5)0.157 (36.8)5 (26.3)0.039
  Second1 (2.5)9 (22.5) 1 (4.7)5 (23.8) 04 (21)
  Third or more05 (12.5) 02 (9.5) 03 (15.7)

Treatment characteristics_

ItemsStandard dose No. (%)Low dose No. (%)P value
Prior adjuvant/NA CTH
  No3 (14.3%)2 (10.5%)0.899
Anthracycline/taxanes13 (61.9%)11 (57.9%)
Anthracycline + 5-FU5 (23.8%)6 (31.6%)
Adjuvant HT14 (66.7%)11 (57.9%)0.567
- Palliative CTH before capecitabine
Taxanes ± carboplatin2 (9.5%)3 (15.8%)0.587
Navelbine ± FU2 (9.5%)4 (21.1%)
Gem–cisplatin/carboplatin3 (14.3%)2 (10.5%)
Others
- Palliative HT11 (52.4%)10 (52.6%)0.987
Use of capecitabine
  First14 (66.7%)9 (47.4%)0.417
  Second5 (23.8%)6 (31.6%)
  Third or more2 (9.5%)4 (21.1%)
Median no. of cycles (range)6 (2–8)8 (4–10)0.762
Dose reduction12 (57.1%)1 (5.3%)<0.0005
Cycle delay11 (52.3%)4 (21.1%)0.041

Response data_

ItemsStandard doseLow doseP value
-Complete response1 (4.7)2 (10.5)
-Overall clinical response (CR+ PR)8 (38)7 (36.8)
-Stable disease3 (14.2)4 (21)0.81
-Progressive disease10 (47.6)8 (42.1)
-Mean TTP8.16 ± 0.638.98 ± 0.750.66
-Median TTP10.110
-Mean OS11.94 ± 0.75411.24± 0.6650.9
-Median OS13.113
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/fco-2019-0015 | Journal eISSN: 1792-362X | Journal ISSN: 1792-345X
Language: English
Page range: 12 - 21
Submitted on: Jul 5, 2019
Accepted on: Nov 5, 2019
Published on: Aug 9, 2021
Published by: Helenic Society of Medical Oncology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2021 Engy M Aboelnaga, Wafaa El-beshbishi, published by Helenic Society of Medical Oncology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.