Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Comparative study of low dose of capecitabine versus standard dose in metastatic breast cancer: Efficacy and safety Cover

Comparative study of low dose of capecitabine versus standard dose in metastatic breast cancer: Efficacy and safety

Open Access
|Aug 2021

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Patients and tumor characteristics.

ItemsStandard doseLow doseP value
Age (years)
  Range40–5938–640.87
  Mean ± SD49.5 ± 4.950.6 ± 7.2
  Median4950
Age groups
  ≤45 years4 (19%)4 (21.1%)0.516
  >45 years17 (81%)15 (78.9%)
Menopausal state8 (42.1%)0.971
  Premenopausal11 (52.4%)11 (57.9%)
  Postmenopausal10 (47.6%)
PS4 (21.1)0.507
05 (23.8%)10 (52.6%)
111 (52.4%)5 (26.3%)
25 (23.8%)
Surface area1.824 ± 0.181.795 ± 0.160.86
Mean ± SD
Site of metastasis
Bone14 (66.7%)13 (68.4%)0.906
Lung7 (33.3%)7 (36.8%)0.816
Liver11 (52.4%)9 (47.4%)0.752
Brain6 (28.6%)5 (26.3%)0.873
LNs2 (9.5%)1 (5.3%)0.935
No. of involved site
      16 (28.6%)7 (36.8%)0.84
    28 (38.1%)6 (31.6%)
  > or =37 (33.3%)6 (31.6%)
Hormonal state/Her 2 status
ER positive13 (61.9%)12 (63.2%)0.342
PR positive12 (57.1%)8 (42.1%)0.302
Her 2 positive4 (19%)5 (26.3%)0.58
Triple negative5 (23.8%)4 (21.1%)0.83
-
Initial stage
Tumor stage
  28 (38.1%)10 (52.6%)0.312
  311 (52.4%)9 (47.4%)
  42 (9.5%)0 (0%)
Lymph node stage
  03 (14.3%)4 (21.1%)0.952
  17 (33.3%)6 (31.6%)
  27 (33.3%)6 (31.6%)
  34 (19 %)3 (15.8%)
Grade
  12 (9.5%)1 (5.3%)0.754
  211 (52.4%)12 (63.2%)
  38 (38.1%)6 (31.6%)
- Type
  Infiltrating duct carcinoma17 (81%)17 (89.5%)0.664
  Infiltrating lobular carcinoma4 (19%)2 (10.5%)
Table 2

Treatment characteristics.

ItemsStandard dose No. (%)Low dose No. (%)P value
Prior adjuvant/NA CTH
  No3 (14.3%)2 (10.5%)0.899
Anthracycline/taxanes13 (61.9%)11 (57.9%)
Anthracycline + 5-FU5 (23.8%)6 (31.6%)
Adjuvant HT14 (66.7%)11 (57.9%)0.567
- Palliative CTH before capecitabine
Taxanes ± carboplatin2 (9.5%)3 (15.8%)0.587
Navelbine ± FU2 (9.5%)4 (21.1%)
Gem–cisplatin/carboplatin3 (14.3%)2 (10.5%)
Others
- Palliative HT11 (52.4%)10 (52.6%)0.987
Use of capecitabine
  First14 (66.7%)9 (47.4%)0.417
  Second5 (23.8%)6 (31.6%)
  Third or more2 (9.5%)4 (21.1%)
Median no. of cycles (range)6 (2–8)8 (4–10)0.762
Dose reduction12 (57.1%)1 (5.3%)<0.0005
Cycle delay11 (52.3%)4 (21.1%)0.041

[i] CTH: chemotherapy; FU: fluorouracil; HT: hormonal treatment; NA: neoadjuvant.

Table 3

Treatment toxicities.

ItemsStandard dose no. (%)Low dose no. (%)P value
AllG 1G 2G 3AllG 1G 2G 3
-HFS13 (61.9)7 (33.3)4 (19)2 (9.5)9 (47.3)7 (36.8)2 (10.5)00.42
-Fatigue12 (57.1)8 (38)3 (14.2)1 (4.7)8 (42.1)6 (31.5)2 (10.5)00.66
-Nausea7 (33.3)5 (23.8)1 (4.7)1 (4.7)4 (21)4 (21)000.94
-Vomiting7 (33.3)4 (19)3 (14.2)04 (21)2 (10.5)2 (10.5)00.93
-Diarrhea9 (42.8)4 (19)2 (9.5)3 (14.2)6 (31.5)5 (26.3)1 (5.2)00.58
-Stomatitis7 (33.3)3 (14.2)3 (14.2)1 (4.7)4 (21)3 (15.7)1 (5.2)00.33
-Hematological
Anemia10 (47.6)6 (28.5)3 (14.2)1 (4.7)4 (21)4 (21)000.17
Neutropenia8 (38)3 (14.2)4 (19)1 (4.7)4 (21)3 (15.7)1 (5.2)00.41
Thrombocytopenia7 (33.3)4 (19)3 (14.2)02 (10.5)2 (10.5)000.14

[i] HFS: Hand and foot syndrome

Table 4

Response data.

ItemsStandard doseLow doseP value
-Complete response1 (4.7)2 (10.5)
-Overall clinical response (CR+ PR)8 (38)7 (36.8)
-Stable disease3 (14.2)4 (21)0.81
-Progressive disease10 (47.6)8 (42.1)
-Mean TTP8.16 ± 0.638.98 ± 0.750.66
-Median TTP10.110
-Mean OS11.94 ± 0.75411.24± 0.6650.9
-Median OS13.113

[i] CR: complete response; OS: overall survival; PR: partial response; TTP: time to progression.

Table 5

Relations of response data.

Prognostic factorsAll patients (40)P valueStandard dose (group 1 = 21)P valueLow dose (group 2 = 19)P value
Response no. (%)No response no. (%)Response no. (%)No response no. (%)Response no. (%)No response no. (%)
Age group
  ≤45 years7 (17.5)8 (20)0.0014 (19)4 (19)0.0053 (15.7)4 (21)0.075
  >45 years1 (2.5)24 (60)013 (61.9)1 (5.2)11 (57.8)
Menopausal state
  Premenopausal7 (17.5)8 (20)0.934 (19)4 (19)0.843 (15.7)4 (21)0.96
Postmenopausal12 (30)13 (32.5)7 (33.3)6 (28.5)5 (26.3)7 (36.8)
Grade
  13 (7.5)00.0152 (9.5)00.611 (5.2)00.23
  25 (12.5)18 (45)2 (9.5)9 (42.8)3 (15.7)9 (47.3)
  37 (17.5)7 (17.5)4 (19)4 (19)3 (15.7)3 (15.7)
Triple negative
  No14 (35)17 (42.5)0.0638 (38)8 (38)0.0446 (31.5)9 (47.3)0.85
  Yes1 (2.5)8 (20)05 (23.8)3 (15.7)1 (5.2)
No. of metastatic sites
  110 (25)3 (7.5)0.014 (19)1 (4.7)0.0516 (31.5)2 (10.5)0.011
  24 (10)10 (25)3 (14.2)5 (23.8)1 (5.2)5 (26.3)
  ≥ 31 (2.5)12 (30)1 (4.7)7 (33.3)05 (26.3)
Treatment line
  First14 (35)11 (27.5).0077 (33.3)6 (28.5)0.157 (36.8)5 (26.3)0.039
  Second1 (2.5)9 (22.5)1 (4.7)5 (23.8)04 (21)
  Third or more05 (12.5)02 (9.5)03 (15.7)
Figure 1

Time to progression in both groups.

Figure 2

Overall survival in both groups.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/fco-2019-0015 | Journal eISSN: 1792-362X | Journal ISSN: 1792-345X
Language: English
Page range: 12 - 21
Submitted on: Jul 5, 2019
Accepted on: Nov 5, 2019
Published on: Aug 9, 2021
Published by: Helenic Society of Medical Oncology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2021 Engy M Aboelnaga, Wafaa El-beshbishi, published by Helenic Society of Medical Oncology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.