Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Machine Learning for Multi Objective Convex Separable Programming (MOCSP) with Aggregation of Linear Approximations and Portfolio Optimization Cover

Machine Learning for Multi Objective Convex Separable Programming (MOCSP) with Aggregation of Linear Approximations and Portfolio Optimization

Open Access
|Mar 2026

References

  1. Abrham J., Arri P.S., Approximation of separable functions in convex programming, Information Systems and Operations Research, 11, 3, 1973, 245-252.
  2. Akhil P.T., Sundaresan R., A survey of algorithms for separable convex optimization with linear ascending constraints, Optimization and Control, Cornell University, 2016.
  3. Akhil P.T., Sundaresan R., Algorithms for separable convex optimization with linear ascending constraints, Sadhana, 43, 146, 2018, 1-18.
  4. Al-Qudaimi A., Ishita approach to construct an intuitionistic fuzzy linear regression model, Fuzzy Optimization and Modeling, 2, 1, 2021, 1-11.
  5. Ali A.S., Ebrahimnejad A., Homayun M., The fuzzy inference approach to solve multi-objective constrained shortest path problem, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 38, 4, 2020, 4711-4720.
  6. Ali I., Charnes A., Song T., A two-segment approximation algorithm for separable convex programming with linear constraints, Optimization, A Journal of Mathematical Programming and Operations Research, 17, 2, 1986, 147-159.
  7. Bagheri M., Ebrahimnejad A., Razavyan S., Lotfi F.H., Malekmohammadi M., Solving the fully fuzzy multi-objective transportation problem based on the common set of weights in DEA, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 39, 3, 2020, 3099-3124.
  8. Bagheri M., Ebrahimnejad A., Razavyan S., Lotfi F.H., Malekmohammadi M., Fuzzy arithmetic DEA approach for fuzzy multi-objective transportation problem, Operational Research, 22, 2022, 1479-1509.
  9. Bard J., Falk J., A separable programming approach to the linear complementarity problem, Computers and Operations Research, 9, 1982, 153-159.
  10. Bera A.K., Park S.Y., Optimal portfolio diversification using the maximum entropy principle, Econometric Reviews, 27, 4-6, 2008, 484-512.
  11. Bourgeron T., Lezmi E., Roncalli T., Robust asset allocation for Robo-Advisors, arXiv, 2018.
  12. Brodie J., Daubechies I., De Mol C., Giannone D., Loris I., Sparse and stable Markowitz portfolios, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 30, 2009, 12267-12272.
  13. Bruder B., Gaussel N., Richard J.C., Roncalli T., Regularization of portfolio allocation, SSRN, 2013.
  14. Bruder B., Kostyuchyk N., Roncalli T., Risk parity portfolios with skewness risk: An application to factor investing and alternative risk premia, SSRN, 2016.
  15. Cables E.H., Lamata M.T., Verdegay J.J., The reference ideal method and the Pythagorean fuzzy numbers, Fuzzy Optimization and Modeling, 1, 1, 2020, 32-41.
  16. Carmichael B., Koumou G.B., Moran K., Rao’s quadratic entropy and maximum diversification indexation, Quantitative Finance, 18, 6, 2018, 1017-1031.
  17. Charnes A., Lemke C., Minimization of nonlinear separable convex functionals, Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 1, 1954, 301-312.
  18. Chen C., Chan R.H., Ma S., Yang J., Inertial proximal ADMM for linearly constrained separable convex optimization, SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, 8, 4, 2015, 2239-2267.
  19. Chen W., Zhou Z., Characterizations of the solution set of generalized convex fuzzy optimization problem, Open Mathematics, 17, 2019, 52-70.
  20. Choueifaty Y., Froidure T., Reynier J., Properties of the most diversified portfolio, Journal of Investment Strategies, 2, 2, 2013, 49-70.
  21. Coelho R., Solving real-world fuzzy quadratic programming problems by dual parametric approach, in: P. Melin et al. (eds.), Fuzzy Logic in Intelligent System Design, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 648, Springer, 2018.
  22. Cottle R.W., Infanger G., Harry Markowitz and the early history of quadratic programming, in: J.B. Guerard (ed.), Handbook of Portfolio Construction, Springer, New York, 2010.
  23. Dahiya K., Suneja S.K., Verma V., Convex programming with single separable constraint and bounded variables, Computational Optimization and Applications, 36, 1, 2007, 67-82.
  24. de-Jong M., Portfolio optimization in an uncertain world, Journal of Asset Management, 19, 4, 2018, 216-221.
  25. Ebrahimnejad A., Bounded linear programs with trapezoidal fuzzy numbers, International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 18, 3, 2010, 269-286.
  26. Ebrahimnejad A., Linear programmes with trapezoidal fuzzy numbers: A duality approach, International Journal of Operational Research, 13, 1, 2012, 67-89.
  27. Ebrahimnejad A., Fuzzy linear programming approach for solving transportation problems with interval-valued trapezoidal fuzzy numbers, Sadhana, 41, 3, 2016, 299-316.
  28. Ebrahimnejad A., Tavana M., Charles V., Analytics under uncertainty: a novel method for solving linear programming problems with trapezoidal fuzzy variables, Soft Computing, 26, 2022, 327-347.
  29. Ellis J.H., Revelle C.S., A separable linear algorithm for hydropower optimization, Water Resources Bulletin, 1988.
  30. Falk J.E., Soland R.M., An algorithm for separable nonconvex programming problems, Management Science, 15, 9, 1969, 550-569.
  31. Fukushima M., Application of the alternating direction method of multipliers to separable convex programming problems, Computational Optimization and Applications, 1, 1992, 93-111.
  32. Gonzalvez J., Lezmi E., Roncalli T., Xu J., Financial applications of Gaussian distributions, 2019.
  33. Hadley G., Nonlinear and dynamic programming, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, 1964.
  34. He B., Tao M., Yuan X., A splitting method for separable convex programming, IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis, 35, 2015, 394-426.
  35. He B., Yuan X., Linearized alternating direction method of multipliers with Gaussian back substitution for separable convex programming, Numerical Algebra, Control and Optimization, 3, 2, 2013, 247-260.
  36. Jurczenko E., Machine learning for asset management: New developments and financial applications, John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, 2020.
  37. Khan I.U., Aamir M., Ullah M., Shah M.S., Fuzzy neural network for fuzzy quadratic programming with penalty function and mean-variance Markowitz portfolio model, Applied Computational Intelligence and Soft Computing, 2024, 8694583.
  38. Khan I.U., Aftab M., Dynamic programming approach for fuzzy linear programming problems FLPs and its application to optimal resource allocation problems in education system, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 42, 4, 2022, 3517-3535.
  39. Khan I.U., Khan R.M.U.A., Ullah M., Shah M.S., Fuzzy neural network with backpropagation for fuzzy quadratic programming problems and portfolio optimization problems, Nonlinear Engineering, 13, 1, 2024, 20240023.
  40. Kochenberger G.A., Woolsey R., McCarl B., On the solution of geometric programs via separable programming, Operational Research Quarterly, 24, 1973, 285-294.
  41. Lezmi E., Malongo H., Roncalli T., Sobotka R., Portfolio allocation with skewness risk: A practical guide, SSRN, 2018.
  42. Li L., Wang X., Wang G., Alternating direction method of multipliers for separable convex optimization of real functions in complex variables, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2015, 104531.
  43. Malek A., Oskoei H.G., Numerical solutions for constrained quadratic problems using high performance neural networks, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 169, 2005, 451-471.
  44. Mansoori A., Effati S., Eshaghnezhad M., An efficient recurrent neural network for solving fuzzy non-linear programming problems, Applied Intelligence, 46, 2017, 308-327.
  45. Mansoori A., Effati S., Eshaghnezhad M., A neural network to solve quadratic programming problems with fuzzy parameters, Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 17, 2018, 75-101.
  46. Markowitz H., Portfolio selection, Journal of Finance, 7, 1, 1952, 77-91.
  47. Michaud R.O., The Markowitz optimization enigma: Is ‘optimized’ optimal?, Financial Analysts Journal, 45, 1, 1989, 31-42.
  48. Miller C.E., The simplex method for local separable programming, in: R.L. Graves, P. Wolfe (eds.), Recent Advances in Mathematical Programming, 1963.
  49. Moehle N., Gindi J., Boyd S., Kochenderfer M.J., Portfolio construction as linearly constrained separable optimization, Optimization and Engineering, 24, 2023, 1667-1687.
  50. Ragsdale C.T., The portfolio selection problem, in: Spreadsheet Modeling and Decision Analysis: A Practical Introduction to Management Science, Thomson Learning, Cincinnati, 2001, 368-374.
  51. Shi L., Wang Y., Li W., Zhang Z., Multi-period mean-variance portfolio optimization with capital injections, Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 233, 2025, 400-412.
  52. Spingarn J.E., Applications of the method of partial inverses to convex programming: Decomposition, Mathematical Programming, 32, 1985, 199-223.
  53. Stefanov S.M., Minimization of a strictly convex separable function subject to convex separable inequality constraint and box constraints, Journal of Interdisciplinary Mathematics, 12, 5, 2009, 647-673.
  54. Stefanov S.M., Solution of some convex separable resource allocation and production planning problems with bounds on the variables, Journal of Interdisciplinary Mathematics, 13, 5, 2010, 541-569.
  55. Sui Y., Peng X., Explicit model of dual programming and solving method for a class of separable convex programming problems, Engineering Optimization, 51, 9, 2019, 1604-1625.
  56. Sun H., Sun M., Zhou H., A proximal splitting method for separable convex programming and its application to compressive sensing, Journal of Nonlinear Sciences and Applications, 9, 2, 2016, 392-403.
  57. Taha H.A., Operations research: An introduction, Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 2007.
  58. Thomas W.L., Blakeslee L.R., Whittlesey N., Separable programming for considering risk in farm planning, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 54, 1972, 260-266.
  59. Wu X.Y., Xia Y.S., Li J., Chen W.K., A high performance neural network for solving linear and quadratic programming problems, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 7, 3, 1996, 643-651.
  60. Zwick D., Best approximation by convex functions, The American Mathematical Monthly, 94, 6, 1987, 528-534.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/fcds-2026-0002 | Journal eISSN: 2300-3405 | Journal ISSN: 0867-6356
Language: English
Page range: 25 - 69
Submitted on: Jul 20, 2025
Accepted on: Feb 18, 2026
Published on: Mar 17, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2026 Izaz Ullah Khan, Zahoor Ahmad, Mehran Ullah, Muhammad Shahbaz Shah, published by Poznan University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.