Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A Novel Scale for Inconsistency Reduction in the Pair-Wise Comparison Matrices Cover

A Novel Scale for Inconsistency Reduction in the Pair-Wise Comparison Matrices

Open Access
|Mar 2025

References

  1. Brans J. P., Vincke P., Mareschal B. How to select and how to rank projects: The PROMETHEE method, European Journal of Operations Research, 24, 228-238, 1986.
  2. Cagno E., Caron F., Pereg A. Multicriteria assessment of the probability of winning in competitive bidding process, International Journal of Production Management, 19, 313-324, 2001.
  3. Chamodrakas I., Batis D., Martakos D. Supplier selection in electronic market places using satisficing and fuzzy AHP, Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 490-498, 2010.
  4. Dagdeviren M., Yavuz S., Killinc N. Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environments, Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 8143-8151, 2009.
  5. Dodd F. J., Donegan H. A. Comparison of prioritization techniques using hierarchy mappings, Journal of the operational research society, 46(40), 492-498, 1995.
  6. Donegan H. A., Dodd F. J. A note on Saaty's random indexes, Mathematical Computer Modelling, 15, 135-137, 1991.
  7. Dong Y. Xu Y., Li H., Dai M., A comparative study of the numerical scales and the prioritization methods in AHP, European Journal of Operational Research, 186, 229-242, 2008.
  8. Franek J., Kresta A., Judgment Scales and Consistency Measure in AHP, Procedia Econ. Financ., 12, 164–173, 2014.
  9. French S. Decision Theory - an Introduction to the Mathematics off rationality, Chapter 10, Section 10.3, Ellis Horwood Ltd, 1988.
  10. Harker P., Vegas L. The theory of ratio scale estimation: Saaty's Analytic Hierarchy Process, Management Science, 33(11), 1383-1403, 1987.
  11. Hwang C. L., Yoon K. P. Multiple attribute decision making methods and applications, Springer, New York, 1981.
  12. Ishikaza A., Balkenborg D., Kaplan T. Influence of aggregation and measurement scale on ranking a compromise alternatives in AHP, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 62(4), 700-710, 2010.
  13. Ji P., Jiang R. Scale sensitivity in the AHP, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54, 896-905, 2003.
  14. Kahraman C., Kaya İ. A fuzzy multicriteria methodology for selection among energy alternatives. Expert Syst. Appl. 37, 6270–6281, 2010.
  15. Lai V. Wong B. K., Cheng W. Group decision making in a multiple criteria environment. A case of using AHP in software selection, European Journal of Operations Research, 137, 134-144, 2002.
  16. Lootsma, F. Conflict resolution via Pairwise comparison of concessions, European Journal of Operational Research, 40(1), 109-116, 1989.
  17. Ma D., Zheng X. Scale method of AHP, In 2nd International Symposium on (Vol.I), University of Pittsburgh, 197-202,1991.
  18. Munizu M., Riyadi S. An application of analytical hierarchy process (AHP) in formulating priority strategy for enhancing creative industry competitiveness, Decision Science Letters, 10(3), 443-450, 2021.
  19. Roy B. The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods., Theory Decis, 31, 49-73, 1991.
  20. Saaty T. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15, 234-281, 1977.
  21. Saaty T. Decision making with the AHP. Why is the principal eigenvector necessary, European Journal of Operational Research, 145, 85-91,2003.
  22. Salo A., Hamalaimen R. On the measurement of preference in the Analytical Hierarchy Process, Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 6 (6), 309-319, 1997.
  23. Shivade A. S., Sapkal, S. U. Selection of optimum plant layout using AHP-TOPSIS and WASPAS approaches coupled with entropy method, Decision Science Letters,11(4), 545-562, 2022.
  24. Siregar H., Suroso A. I., Siregar H., Djohar S. Development of efficient strategies to optimize production efficiency: Evidence from pine chemical industry, Decision Science Letters, 11(4), 419-430, 2022.
  25. Vidal L., Sahin E., Martelli N., Berhoune M., Bonan B. Applying AHP to select drugs to be produced by anticipation in a chemotherapy compounding unit, Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 1528-1534, 2010.
  26. Vommi V. B. TOPSIS with statistical distances: A new approach to MADM, Decision Science Letters, 6(1), 49-66, 2017.
  27. Vommi V. B., Kakollu S. A simple approach to multiple attribute decision making using loss function approach, Journal of Industrial Engineering International, 13, 107-116, 2017.
  28. Yu P. L. A class of solutions for group decision problems, Management Science, 19, 936-946, 1973.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/fcds-2025-0004 | Journal eISSN: 2300-3405 | Journal ISSN: 0867-6356
Language: English
Page range: 87 - 114
Submitted on: Mar 11, 2024
|
Accepted on: Dec 21, 2024
|
Published on: Mar 8, 2025
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2025 Amukta MalyadaVommi, Vijaya babu Vommi, published by Poznan University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.