Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Ranking of Efficient Fuzzy Portfolios by Hybrid MSBM-TOPSIS Technique Cover

Ranking of Efficient Fuzzy Portfolios by Hybrid MSBM-TOPSIS Technique

Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences
Volume 50 (2025): Issue 1 (February 2025)
By: Abha Aggarwal,  Anjana Gupta,  Rajkumar Verma and  Reenu Kumari  
Open Access
|Mar 2025

References

  1. A. Aldamak and S. Zolfaghari. Review of efficiency ranking methods in data envelopment analysis. Measurement, 106:161–172, 2017.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. P. Andersen and N. C. Petersen. A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Management science, 39(10):1261–1264, 1993.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. B. Arabi, M. Toloo, Z. Yang, P. Zhang, and B. Xu. Sustainable refrigeration technology selection: An innovative dea-topsis hybrid model. Environmental Science & Policy, 158:103780, 2024.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. S. A. Banihashemi and M. Khalilzadeh. A new approach for ranking efficient DMUs with data envelopment analysis. World Journal of Engineering, 17(4):573–583, 2020.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. R. D. Banker, A. Charnes, and W. W. Cooper. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management science, 30(9):1078–1092, 1984.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. P. Bansal and A. Mehra. Integrated dynamic interval data envelopment analysis in the presence of integer and negative data. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 18(2):1339–1363, 2022.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. C. Carlsson and R. Fullér. On possibilistic mean value and variance of fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 122(2):315–326, 2001.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. C. Carlsson, R. Fullér, and P. Majlender. A possibilistic approach to selecting portfolios with highest utility score. Fuzzy sets and systems, 131(1):13–21, 2002.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European journal of operational research, 2(6):429–444, 1978.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. W. Chen. Artificial bee colony algorithm for constrained possibilistic portfolio optimization problem. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 429: 125–139, 2015.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. W. Chen, Y. Gai, and P. Gupta. Efficiency evaluation of fuzzy portfolio in di erent risk measures via DEA. Annals of Operations Research, 269(1):103–127, 2018.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. G. Cheng, P. Zervopoulos, and Z. Qian. A variant of radial measure capable of dealing with negative inputs and outputs in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 225(1):100–105, 2013.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. A. Chitnis and O. S. Vaidya. Efficiency ranking method using DEA and topsis (erm-dt): case of an indian bank. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 2016.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. H. Ding, Z. Zhou, H. Xiao, C. Ma, and W. Liu. Performance evaluation of portfolios with margin requirements. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2014, 2014.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. A. Emrouznejad, A. L. Anouze, and E. Thanassoulis. A semi-oriented radial measure for measuring the efficiency of decision making units with negative data, using dea. European Journal of Operational Research, 200(1):297–304, 2010.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. Y. Ersoy. Performance evaluation in distance education by using data envelopment analysis (dea) and topsis methods. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 46(2):1803–1817, 2021.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. P. Gupta, M. K. Mehlawat, A. Kumar, S. Yadav, and A. Aggarwal. A credibilistic fuzzy dea approach for portfolio efficiency evaluation and rebalancing toward benchmark portfolios using positive and negative returns. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 22(3):824–843, 2020.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. A. Hadi-Vencheh and A. Esmaeilzadeh. A new super-efficiency model in the presence of negative data. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 64(3):396–401, 2013.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. A. Hatami-Marbini, J. Pourmahmoud, and E. Babazadeh. A modified superefficiency in the range directional model. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 120:442–449, 2018.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. C.-L. Hwang and K. Yoon. Methods for multiple attribute decision making. In Multiple attribute decision making, pages 58–191. Springer, 1981.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. J. Jablonsky. Multicriteria approaches for ranking of efficient units in DEA models. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 20(3):435–449, 2012.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. R. Lin. Cross-efficiency evaluation capable of dealing with negative data: A directional distance function based approach. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 71(3):505–516, 2020.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. R. Lin and Z. Chen. A directional distance based super-efficiency dea model handling negative data. Journal of the operational Research Society, 68(11):1312–1322, 2017.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. W. Liu, Z. Zhou, D. Liu, and H. Xiao. Estimation of portfolio efficiency via dea. Omega, 52:107–118, 2015.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. Y. J. Liu and W. G. Zhang. Fuzzy portfolio optimization model under real constraints. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 53(3):704–711, 2013.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. F. H. Lotfi, R. Fallahnejad, and N. Navidi. Ranking efficient units in DEA by using TOPSIS method. Applied Mathematical Sciences, 5(17):805–815, 2011.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. H. M. Markowitz. Portfolio selection. Yale university press, 1968.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. Z. Mashayekhi and H. Omrani. An integrated multi-objective markowitz-DEA cross-efficiency model with fuzzy returns for portfolio selection problem. Applied Soft Computing, 38:1–9, 2016.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. M. K. Mehlawat, P. Gupta, A. Kumar, S. Yadav, and A. Aggarwal. Multiobjective fuzzy portfolio performance evaluation using data envelopment analysis under credibilistic framework. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 28(11):2726–2737, 2020.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. N. R. Mohd Rashid, B. A. Halim, N. S. Tarmizi, N. F. S. Faizal, and I. Zulkeflee. Efficiency measurement and ranking of malaysian water supply service using hybrid dea-topsis. In AIP Conference Proceedings, volume 2905. AIP Publishing, 2024.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. H. Omrani, M. Shamsi, and A. Emrouznejad. Evaluating sustainable efficiency of decision-making units considering undesirable outputs: an application to airline using integrated multi-objective dea-topsis. Environment, Development and Sustainability, pages 1–32, 2022.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. Z. Pan, Y. Wang, Y. Zhou, and Y. Wang. Analysis of the water use efficiency using super-efficiency data envelopment analysis. Applied Water Science, 10(6): 1–11, 2020.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. M. Portela, E. Thanassoulis, and G. Simpson. A directional distance approach to deal with negative data in DEA: An application to bank branches. Journal of Operational Research Society, 55(10):1111–1121, 2004.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. S. A. Rakhshan. Efficiency ranking of decision making units in data envelopment analysis by using TOPSIS-DEA method. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 68(8):906–918, 2017.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. K. Rashidi and K. Cullinane. A comparison of fuzzy dea and fuzzy topsis in sustainable supplier selection: Implications for sourcing strategy. Expert Systems with Applications, 121:266–281, 2019.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. A. Saeidifar and E. Pasha. The possibilistic moments of fuzzy numbers and their applications. Journal of computational and applied mathematics, 223(2):1028–1042, 2009.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. J. A. Sharp, W. Meng, and W. Liu. A modified slacks-based measure model for data envelopment analysis with ’natural’ negative outputs and inputs. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 58(12):1672–1677, 2007.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. M. Soltanifar, M. Tavana, F. J. Santos-Arteaga, and H. Sharafi. A hybrid multi-attribute decision-making and data envelopment analysis model with heterogeneous attributes: The case of sustainable development goals. Environmental Science & Policy, 147:89–102, 2023.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. K. Tone, T.-S. Chang, and C.-H. Wu. Handling negative data in slacks-based measure data envelopment analysis models. European Journal of Operational Research, 282(3):926–935, 2020.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. T. H. Tran, Y. Mao, P. Nathanail, P.-O. Siebers, and D. Robinson. Integrating slacks-based measure of efficiency and super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Omega, 85:156–165, 2019.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. E. Vercher and J. D. Bermúdez. Portfolio optimization using a credibility mean-absolute semi-deviation model. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(20):7121–7131, 2015.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. F. Wei, J. Song, C. Jiao, and F. Yang. A modified slacks-based ranking method handling negative data in data envelopment analysis. Expert Systems, 36(1): e12329, 2019.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. H. Xiao, T. Ren, and T. Ren. Estimation of fuzzy portfolio efficiency via an improved DEA approach. INFOR: Information Systems and Operational Research, 58(3):478–510, 2020.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  44. L. A. Zadeh. Fuzzy set theory and its applications. University of California, California, 8:338, 1965.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  45. L. A. Zadeh. Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy sets and systems, 1(1):3–28, 1978.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  46. W.-G. Zhang and Z.-K. Nie. On possibilistic variance of fuzzy numbers. In International Workshop on Rough Sets, Fuzzy Sets, Data Mining, and Granular-Soft Computing, pages 398–402. Springer, 2003.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  47. X.-X. Zhang, W. Liu, X. Wang, W. Zuo, Y.-M. Wang, and L. Sun. Ranking dmus by using interval efficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, (Preprint):1–13, 2024.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  48. Z. Zhou, Q. Jin, H. Xiao, Q. Wu, and W. Liu. Estimation of cardinality constrained portfolio efficiency via segmented dea. Omega, 76:28–37, 2018.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/fcds-2025-0001 | Journal eISSN: 2300-3405 | Journal ISSN: 0867-6356
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 24
Submitted on: Jun 3, 2024
|
Accepted on: Dec 21, 2024
|
Published on: Mar 8, 2025
Published by: Poznan University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
Fuzzy Set,
Modified Slack based Measure,
Data Envelopment Analysis,
Portfolio,
TOPSIS method
Related subjects:
Computer sciences,
Artificial intelligence,
Software development

© 2025 Abha Aggarwal, Anjana Gupta, Rajkumar Verma, Reenu Kumari, published by Poznan University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 50 (2025): Issue 1 (February 2025)Next article