Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Green Manufacturing: An Assessment of Enablers’ Framework Using ISM-MICMAC Analysis Cover

Green Manufacturing: An Assessment of Enablers’ Framework Using ISM-MICMAC Analysis

Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences
Volume 47 (2022): Issue 3 (September 2022)
By: Sadia Samar Ali  
Open Access
|Oct 2022

References

  1. [1] Akabar, M., & Irohara, T. (2018). Scheduling for sustainable manufacturing: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 205, 866–883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.100.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] Chobar,P., Adibi, A., & M., Kazemi, A. (2021). A novel multi-objective model for hub location problem considering dynamic demand and environmental issues. Journal of Industrial Engineering
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] Ali, S.S., Kaur, R. & Khan, S. (2022) Evaluating sustainability initiatives in warehouse for measuring sustainability performance: an emerging economy perspective. Ann Oper Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04454-w.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] Ali, S. S.; and Kaur. R. (2021) Effectiveness of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in implementation of social sustainability in warehousing of developing countries: A hybrid approach, Journal of Cleaner Production, 324,129154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129154
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] Ali, S. S., Paksoy, T., Torgŭl, B., & Kaur, R. (2020a). Reverse logistics optimization of an industrial air conditioner manufacturing company for designing sustainable supply chain: A fuzzy hybrid multi criteria decision-making approach. Wireless Network, 26, 5759–5782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-019-022, 46-6.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] Ali, S. S., Kaur, R., Ersoz, F., Altaf, B., Basu, A., & Weber, G.-W. (2020b). Measuring carbon performance for sustainable green supply chain practices. Central Journal of European Research, 28(4), 1389–1416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-020-00673-x.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] Ali, Sadia Samar, Kaur, R., Persis, D. J., Saha, R., Pattusamy, M. & Sreedharan, V. R. (2020c), Developing a hybrid evaluation approach for the low carbon performance on sustainable manufacturing environment, Annals of Operations Research, DOI:10.1007/s10479-020-03877-1
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. 10.1007/s10479-020-03877-1.10.1007/s10479-020-03877-1
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [8] Ali, S. S., Kaur, R., & Ersöz, F. (2019a). Evaluation of the effectiveness of green practices in manufacturing sector using CHAID analysis. Journal of Remanufacturing, 9, 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13243-018-0053-y.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [9] Ali, S. S., Kaur, R., & Marmolejo, J. A. (2019b). Best practices of green supply chain management: A developing countries perspectives. Emerald Global Publications ISBN: 9781787562165, pp. 10, 30, 51.10.1108/9781787562158
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [10] Ali, S. S., Kaur, R., & Jarmillo, L. A. B. (2018). An assessment of green supply chain framework in Indian automobile industry using interpretive structural modelling and its validation using MICMAC analysis. International Journal of Service and Operations Management, 30(3), 318–356. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSOM.2018.092607.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [11] Allevi, E., Gnudi, A., Konnov, I. V., & Oggioni, G. (2018). Evaluating the effects of environmental regulations on a closed-loop supply chain network: A variational inequality approach. Annals of Operations Research, 261(1), 1–43.10.1007/s10479-017-2613-1
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [12] Altaf, B. Ali, S. S. and G. W. Weber (2020) Modelling the relationship between organizational performance and green supply chain practices using Canonical correlation analysis, Wireless Networks (S.I Intelligent Resource Management using analytical methods), 26, 5835–5853, http://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-020-02313-3.10.1007/s11276-020-02313-3
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [13] Bendoly, E. 2014. System Dynamics Understanding in Projects: Information Sharing, Psychological Safety, and Performance Effects. Production and Operations Management 23 (8): 1352–1369.10.1111/poms.12024
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [14] Brandenburg, M., Govindan, K., Sarkis, J., & Seuring, S. (2014). Quantitative models for sustainable supply chain management: Developments and directions. European Journal of Operational Research, 233, 299–312.10.1016/j.ejor.2013.09.032
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [15] Cardoso, R., R. Leite, and A. de Aquino. (2016) A Graph is Worth a Thousand Words: How Overconfidence and Graphical Disclosure of Numerical Information Influence Financial Analysts Accuracy on Decision Making. PLOS ONE 11 (8): 0160443.10.1371/journal.pone.0160443498004527508519
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [16] Damert, M., Feng, Y., Zhu, Q., & Baumgartner, R. J. (2018). Motivating low-carbon initiatives among suppliers: The role of risk and opportunity perception. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 136, 276-286.10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.05.002
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [17] Duperrin, J., and M. Godet. 1973. Méthode De Hiérarchisation Des Éléments D’un Système: Essai De Prospective Du Système De L’énergie Nucléaire Dans Son Contexte Sociétal [Method of Hierarchization of Elements of a System: Prospective Testing of the Nuclear Energy System in its Societal Context]. Paris, France: Commissariat à l’énergie Atomique.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [18] Govindan, K., Agarwal, V., & Darbari, J.D. (2019). An integrated decision-making model for the selection of sustainable forward and reverse logistic providers. Annals of Operations Research, 273, 607–650.10.1007/s10479-017-2654-5
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [19] Hashim, M., Nazam, M., Yao, L., Baig, A.S., Zia-ur-Rehman, M., (2017). Application of multi-objective optimization based on genetic algorithm for sustainable strategic supplier selection under fuzzy environment, Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 10(2) 182-212.10.3926/jiem.2078
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [20] Hughes, D., N. Rana, and Y. Dwivedi. 2019. Elucidation of IS Project Success Factors: An Interpretive Structural Modelling Approach. Annals of Operations Research 285: 35–66.10.1007/s10479-019-03146-w
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [21] IPCC, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change available at http://www.ipcc.ch.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [22] Kumar, A., Mangla, S.K., Luthra, S., & Ishizaka A. (2019). Evaluating the human resource related soft dimensions in green supply chain management implementation. Production Planning & Control, 30(9), 699-715.10.1080/09537287.2018.1555342
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. [23] Malesios, C., Dey, P. K., & Abdelaziz, F. B. (2018). Supply chain sustainability performance measurement of small and medium sized enterprises using structural equation modeling. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-3080-z.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. [24] Mishra, N., A. Singh, N. P. Rana, and Y. K. Dwivedi. 2017. Interpretive Structural Modelling and Fuzzy MICMAC Approaches for Customer Centric Beef Supply Chain: Application of a big Data Technique. Production Planning & Control 28 (11-12): 945–963.10.1080/09537287.2017.1336789
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. [25] Netland, T. H., & Aspelund, A. (2013). Company-specific production systems and competitive advantage: A resource-based view on the Volvo production system. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 33(11–12), 1511–1531.10.1108/IJOPM-07-2010-0171
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. [26] Ning, T., Wang, Z., Zhang, P., & Gou, T. (2020). Integrated optimization of disruption management and scheduling for reducing carbon emission in manufacturing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 263, 121449.10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121449
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. [27] Oliver, J., Janssens-Maenhout Jeroen, G., Peters, J. (2012). Trends in global CO2 emissions, Publisher: PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. [28] Rao, P. & Holt, D. (2005). Do green supply chains lead to competitiveness and economic performance? International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25 (9) 898-916.10.1108/01443570510613956
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. [29] Richards, D.J., (1994). Environmentally conscious manufacturing, World Class Design to Manufacture, 1 (3).10.1108/09642369210056601
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. [30] Smith, L., & Ball, P. (2012). Steps towards sustainable manufacturing through modelling material, energy and waste flows. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 227–238.10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.036
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. [31] Tachizawa, E.M., Gimenez C., Sierra V., (2015). Green supply chain management approaches: drivers and performance implications, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 35 (11) 1546-1566.10.1108/IJOPM-01-2015-0023
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. [32] Thamsatitdej, P., S. Boon-itt, P. Samaranayake, M. Wannakarn, and T. Laosirihongthong. (2017) Eco-design Practices Towards Sustainable Supply Chain Management: Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM) Approach. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering 10 (6): 326–338.10.1080/19397038.2017.1379571
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. [33] Validi, S., Bhattacharya, A., & Byrne, P. J. (2014). Integrated low-carbon distribution system for the demand side of a product distribution supply chain: A DoE-guided MOPSO optimiser-based solution approach. International Journal of Production Research, 52(10), 3074–3096.10.1080/00207543.2013.864054
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. [34] Warfield, J. 1974. “Developing Interconnected Matrices in Structural Modelling.” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 4 (1): 51–81.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. 1) https://home.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/pdf/2016/04/KPMG-Flash-News-India-Economic-Survey-2015-16%E2%80%93Key-Highlights-3.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. 2) http://www.makeinindia.com/article/-/v/direct-foreign-investment-towards-india-s-growth
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. 3) http://www.tradingeconomics.com/india/gdp-from-manufacturing
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. 4) https://www.equitymaster.com/5minWrapUp/charts/index.asp?date=10/04/2016&story=1&title=Indias-Performance-in-Manufacturing-Sector-Growth-in-September
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. 5) http://www.dell.com/learn/us/en/uscorp1/corp-comm/earth-transportation-logistics
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/fcds-2022-0015 | Journal eISSN: 2300-3405 | Journal ISSN: 0867-6356
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 271 - 290
Submitted on: Feb 17, 2022
Accepted on: May 10, 2022
Published on: Oct 8, 2022
Published by: Poznan University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
Green manufacturing practices,
ISM,
MICMAC analysis
Related subjects:
Computer sciences,
Artificial intelligence,
Software development

© 2022 Sadia Samar Ali, published by Poznan University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 47 (2022): Issue 3 (September 2022)Next article