Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A MCDM Based on Goal Programming and GIS-Based Risk Assessment for the Evaluation of Educational Locations in Conflict Areas Cover

A MCDM Based on Goal Programming and GIS-Based Risk Assessment for the Evaluation of Educational Locations in Conflict Areas

Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences
Volume 46 (2021): Issue 4 (December 2021)
By: Jamil Hallak and  Elifcan Göçmen Polat  
Open Access
|Dec 2021

References

  1. [1] Aburas, R., Najeeb, A., Baageel, L., Mackey, T. K. The Syrian conflict: a case study of the challenges and acute need for medical humanitarian operations for women and children internally displaced persons. BMC Medicine, 16(1): 65, 2018.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] Al Garni, H. Z., Awasthi, A. Solar PV power plant site selection using a GIS-AHP based approach with application in Saudi Arabia. Applied Energy, 206, 2017, 1225-1240.10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.10.024
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] Al-Sabbagh, T. A. GIS location-allocation models in improving accessibility to primary schools in Mansura city-Egypt. GeoJournal, 2020, 1-18.10.1007/s10708-020-10290-5
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] Alkaradaghi, K., Ali, S. S., Al-Ansari, N., Laue, J., Chabuk, A. Landfill site selection using MCDM methods and GIS in the Sulaimaniyah governorate, Iraq. Sustainability, 11(17): 4530, 2019.10.3390/su11174530
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] Asakereh, A., Omid, M., Alimardani, R., Sarmadian, F. Developing a GIS-based fuzzy AHP model for selecting solar energy sites in Shodirwan region in Iran. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 68, 2014, 37-48.10.14257/ijast.2014.68.04
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] Aydi, A., Zairi, M., Dhia H.B. Minimization of environmental risk of landfill site using fuzzy logic, analytical hierarchy process, and weighted linear combination methodology in a geographic information system environment. Environmental Earth Sciences, 68(5): 2013,1375–138910.1007/s12665-012-1836-3
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] Baykasoglu, A., Durmusoglu, Z. D. A hybrid MCDM for private primary school assessment using DEMATEL based on ANP and fuzzy cognitive map. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 7(4): 2014, 615-635.10.1080/18756891.2014.960220
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] Buckley, J. J. Ranking alternatives using fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 15(1): 1985, 21-31.10.1016/0165-0114(85)90013-2
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] Denekos, S. N., Koutsoukis, N. S., Fakiolas, E. T., Konstantopoulos, I., & Rachaniotis, N. P. Siting refugee camps in mainland Greece using geographic information systems-based multi-criteria decision-making. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 2021.10.1108/JHLSCM-02-2020-0009
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] Erdin, C., Akbaş, H. E. A comparative analysis of fuzzy topsis and geographic information systems (GIS) for the location selection of shopping malls: A case study from Turkey. Sustainability 11(14): 2019, 3837.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] Gul, M., Guneri, A. F. Hospital Location Selection: A Systematic Literature Review on Methodologies and Applications. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2021.10.1155/2021/6682958
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] Ibrahim, E. H., Mohamed, S. E., Atwan, A. A. Combining fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and GIS to select the best location for a wastewater lift station in El-Mahalla El-Kubra, North Egypt. International Journal of Engineering & Technology 11(5): 2011, 44-50.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] Junian, J., Azizifar, V. The evaluation of temporary shelter areas locations using geographic information system and analytic hierarchy process. Civil Engineering Journal, 4(7), 2018,1678-1688.10.28991/cej-03091104
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] Kabak, M., Erbaş, M., Çetinkaya, C., Özceylan, E. A GIS-based MCDM approach for the evaluation of bike-share stations. Journal of Cleaner Production 201, 2018, 49-60.10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.033
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] Lin, M., Huang, C., Xu, Z. MULTIMOORA based MCDM model for site selection of car sharing station under picture fuzzy environment. Sustainable Cities and Society 53, 2020, 101873.10.1016/j.scs.2019.101873
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] Messaoudi, D., Settou, N., Negrou, B., Settou, B. GIS based multi-criteria decision making for solar hydrogen production sites selection in Algeria. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 44(60), 2019, 31808-31831.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.10.099
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] Pourahmad, A., Hosseini, A., Banaitis, A., Nasiri, H., Banaitienė, N., Tzeng, G. H. Combination of fuzzy-AHP and DEMATEL-ANP with GIS in a new hybrid MCDM model used for the selection of the best space for leisure in a blighted urban site. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 21(5): 2015,773-796.10.3846/20294913.2015.1056279
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] Rahman, M., Chen, N., Islam, M. M., Dewan, A., Pourghasemi, H. R., Washakh, R. M. A., Ahmed, N. Location-allocation modeling for emergency evacuation planning with GIS and remote sensing: A case study of Northeast Bangladesh. Geoscience Frontiers, 12(3), 2021, 101095.10.1016/j.gsf.2020.09.022
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] Rezaur Rahman, N. S. M., Chowdhury, M. A. A., Firoze, A., Rahman, R. M. Fusion of BWM and AHP MCDM Methods to Choose the Most Suitable Secondary School for an Individual in the Context of Bangladesh. Vietnam Journal of Computer Science, 2019, 1-18.10.1142/S2196888819500167
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] Roh, S. Y., Jang, H. M., Han, C. H. Warehouse location decision factors in humanitarian relief logistics. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 29(1), 2013,103-120.10.1016/j.ajsl.2013.05.006
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] Saaty, L. T. 1990. How to make decision. The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research 48,1990, 9-26.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] Timperio, G., Panchal, G. B., Samvedi, A., Goh, M., De Souza, R. Decision support framework for location selection and disaster relief network design. Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 2017.10.1108/JHLSCM-11-2016-0040
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [23] Tsaur, S. H., Chiu, Y. C., & Huang, C. H. Determinants of guest loyalty to international tourist hotels-a neural network approach. Tourism Management, 23(4): 2002, 397-405.10.1016/S0261-5177(01)00097-8
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. [24] Uslu, A., Kiziloglu, K., Isleyen, S. K., Kahya, E. Geographic Information System-Based AHP-TOPSIS Approach for School Site Selection: A Case Study for Ankara, Politeknik Dergisi, 20(4): 2017, 933-943.10.2339/politeknik.369099
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. [25] The United Nations (UN) Report. 2019. Humanitarian needs overview.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/fcds-2021-0022 | Journal eISSN: 2300-3405 | Journal ISSN: 0867-6356
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 361 - 391
Submitted on: Dec 28, 2020
Accepted on: Sep 9, 2021
Published on: Dec 17, 2021
Published by: Poznan University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
conflict,
risk assessment,
dropped-out children,
F-AHP,
GIS,
mathematical model
Related subjects:
Computer sciences,
Artificial intelligence,
Software development

© 2021 Jamil Hallak, Elifcan Göçmen Polat, published by Poznan University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 46 (2021): Issue 4 (December 2021)Next article