Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Aspects in Classification Learning - Review of Recent Developments in Learning Vector Quantization Cover

Aspects in Classification Learning - Review of Recent Developments in Learning Vector Quantization

Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences
Volume 39 (2014): Issue 2 (June 2014)
By: M. Kaden,  M. Lange,  D. Nebel,  M. Riedel,  T. Geweniger and  T. Villmann  
Open Access
|May 2014

References

  1. [1] F. Aiolli and A. Sperduti. A re-weighting strategy for improving margins. Artifiical Intelligence, 137:197-216, 2002.10.1016/S0004-3702(02)00122-4
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. [2] N. Aronszajn. Theory of reproducing kernels. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 68:337-404, 1950.10.1090/S0002-9947-1950-0051437-7
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. [3] A. Backhaus and U. Seiffert. Classification in high-dimensional spectral data: Accuracy vs. interpretability vs. model size. Neurocomputing, page in press, 2014.10.1016/j.neucom.2013.09.048
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. [4] Y. Bengio. Learning deep architectures for AI. Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning, 2(1):1-127, 2009.10.1561/2200000006
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. [5] B.Hammer and A.Hasenfuss. Relational neural gas. Künstliche Intelligenz, pages 190-204, 2007.10.1007/978-3-540-74565-5_16
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. [6] M. Biehl. Admire LVQ: Adaptive distance measures in relevance Learning Vector Quantization. KI - Künstliche Intelligenz, 26:391-395, 2012.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. [7] M. Biehl, K. Bunte, and P. Schneider. Analysis of flow cytometry data by matrix relevance learning vector quantization. PLoS ONE, 8(3):e59401, 2013.10.1371/journal.pone.0059401
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. [8] M. Biehl, A. Ghosh, and B. Hammer. Dynamics and generalization ability of LVQ algorithms. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 8:323-360, 2007.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. [9] M. Biehl, B. Hammer, and T. Villmann. Distance measures for prototype based classification. In N. Petkov, editor, Proceedings of the International Workshop on Brain-Inspired Computing 2013 (Cetraro/Italy), page in press. Springer, 2014.10.1007/978-3-319-12084-3_9
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. [10] M. Biehl, M. Kaden, and T. Villmann. Statistical quality measures and ROC-optimization by learning vector quantization classifiers. In H. Kestler, M. Schmid, H. Binder, and B. Bischl, editors, Proceedings of the 46th Workshop on Statistical Computing (Ulm/Reisensburg 2014), number 2014-xxx in Ulmer Informatik-Berichte, page accepted. University Ulm, Germany, 2014.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. [11] M. Biehl, P. Schneider, D. Smith, H. Stiekema, A. Taylor, B. Hughes, C. Shackleton, P. Stewart, and W. Arlt. Matrix relevance LVQ in steroid metabolomics based classification of adrenal tumors. In M. Verleysen, editor, Proc. of European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks, Computational Intelligence and Machine Learning (ESANN’2012), pages 423-428, Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium, 2012. i6doc.com.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. [12] C. Bishop. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Springer, 2006.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. [13] T. Bojer, B. Hammer, D. Schunk, and T. von Toschanowitz K. Relevance determination in learning vector quantization. In 9th European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks. ESANN’2001. Proceedings. D-Facto, Evere, Belgium, pages 271-6, 2001.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. [14] C. Bouveyron, S. Girard, and C. Schmid. High-dimensional data clustering. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 57(1):502-519, 2007.10.1016/j.csda.2007.02.009
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. [15] A. Bradley. The use of the area under the ROC curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms. Pattern Recognition, 30(7):1149-1155, 1997.10.1016/S0031-3203(96)00142-2
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. [16] K. Bunte, P. Schneider, B. Hammer, F.-M. Schleif, T. Villmann, and M. Biehl. Limited rank matrix learning, discriminative dimension reduction and visualization. Neural Networks, 26(1):159-173, 2012.10.1016/j.neunet.2011.10.00122041220
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. [17] T. Calinski and J. Harabacz. A dendrite method for cluster analysis. Communications in Statistics, 3:1-27, 1974.10.1080/03610917408548446
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. [18] K. Chidanananda and G. Krishna. The condensed nearest neighbor rule using the concept of mutual nearest neighborhood. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 25:488-490, 1979.10.1109/TIT.1979.1056066
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. [19] C. Chow. On optimum recognition error and reject tradeoff. IEEE Transaction on Information Theory, 16(1):41-46, 1970.10.1109/TIT.1970.1054406
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. [20] A. Cichocki, R. Zdunek, A. Phan, and S.-I. Amari. Nonnegative Matrix and Tensor Factorizations. Wiley, Chichester, 2009.10.1002/9780470747278
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. [21] R. Cilibrasi and P. Vitányi. Clustering by compression. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 51(4):1523-1545, 2005.10.1109/TIT.2005.844059
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. [22] T. Cover and P. Hart. Nearest neighbor pattern classification. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 13:21-27, 1967.10.1109/TIT.1967.1053964
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. [23] K. Crammer, R. Gilad-Bachrach, A. Navot, and A.Tishby. Margin analysis of the LVQ algorithm. In S. Becker, S. Thrun, and K. Obermayer, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing (Proc. NIPS 2002), volume 15, pages 462-469, Cambridge, MA, 2003. MIT Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. [24] N. Cristianini and J. Shawe-Taylor. An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and other kernel-based learning methods. Cambridge University Press, 2000.10.1017/CBO9780511801389
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. [25] J. Davis and M. Goadrich. The relationship between precision-recall and ROC curves. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML ’06, pages 233-240, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM.10.1145/1143844.1143874
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. [26] R. Duda and P. Hart. Pattern Classification and Scene Analysis. Wiley, New York, 1973.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. [27] T. Fawcett. An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27:861-874, 2006.10.1016/j.patrec.2005.10.010
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. [28] L. Fischer, D. Nebel, T. Villmann, B. Hammer, and H. Wersing. Rejection strategies for learning vector quantization U a comparison of probabilistic and deterministic approaches. In T. Villmann, F.-M. Schleif, M. Kaden, and M. Lange, editors, Advances in Self-Organizing Maps: 10th International Workshop WSOM 2014 Mittweida, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, page accepted, Berlin, 2014. Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-07695-9_10
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. [29] R. Fisher. The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems. Annals of Eugenics, 7(2):179-188, 1936.10.1111/j.1469-1809.1936.tb02137.x
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. [30] T. Geweniger, P. Schneider, F.-M. Schleif, M. Biehl, and T. Villmann. Extending RSLVQ to handle data points with uncertain class assignments. Machine Learning Reports, 3(MLR-02-2009):1-17, 2009. ISSN:1865-3960, http://www.uni-leipzig.de/~compint/mlr/mlr_02_2009.pdf.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. [31] T. Geweniger and T. Villmann. Extending FSNPC to handle data points with fuzzy class assignments. In M. Verleysen, editor, Proc. of European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks (ESANN’2010), pages 399-404, Evere, Belgium, 2010. d-side publications.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. [32] T. Geweniger, D. Zühlke, B. Hammer, and T. Villmann. Median fuzzy c-means for clustering dissimilarity data. Neurocomputing, 73(7-9):1109-1116, 2010.10.1016/j.neucom.2009.11.020
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. [33] Z. Gu, M. Shao, L. Li, and Y. Fu. Discriminative metric: Schatten norms vs. vector norm. In Proc. of The 21st International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR 2012), pages 1213-1216, 2012.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. [34] B. Hammer, M. Strickert, and T. Villmann. Relevance LVQ versus SVM. In L. Rutkowski, J. Siekmann, R. Tadeusiewicz, and L. Zadeh, editors, Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing (ICAISC 2004), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 3070, pages 592-597. Springer Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg, 2004.10.1007/978-3-540-24844-6_89
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. [35] B. Hammer, M. Strickert, and T. Villmann. On the generalization ability of GRLVQ networks. Neural Processing Letters, 21(2):109-120, 2005.10.1007/s11063-004-1547-1
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. [36] B. Hammer, M. Strickert, and T. Villmann. Supervised neural gas with general similarity measure. Neural Processing Letters, 21(1):21-44, 2005.10.1007/s11063-004-3255-2
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. [37] B. Hammer and T. Villmann. Generalized relevance learning vector quantization. Neural Networks, 15(8-9):1059-1068, 2002.10.1016/S0893-6080(02)00079-5
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. [38] J. Hanley and B. McNeil. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic. Radiology, 143:29-36, 1982.10.1148/radiology.143.1.70637477063747
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. [39] P. Hart. The condensed nearest neighbor rule. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 14:515-516, 1968.10.1109/TIT.1968.1054155
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. [40] T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, and J. Friedman. The Elements of Statistical Learning. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg-Berlin, 2001.10.1007/978-0-387-21606-5
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. [41] S. Haykin. Neural Networks - A Comprehensive Foundation. IEEE Press, New York, 1994.
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. [42] R. Horn and C. Johnson. Matrix Analysis. Cambridge University Press, 2nd edition, 2013.
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. [43] J. Huang and C. X. Ling. Using AUC and accuracy in evaluating learning algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 17(3):299-310, 2005.10.1109/TKDE.2005.50
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. [44] M. Kaden, W. Hermann, and T. Villmann. Optimization of general statistical accuracy measures for classification based on learning vector quantization. In M. Verleysen, editor, Proc. of European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks, Computational Intelligence and Machine Learning (ESANN’2014), pages 47-52, Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium, 2014. i6doc.com.
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. [45] M. Kaden and T. Villmann. A framework for optimization of statistical classification measures based on generalized learning vector quantization. Machine Learning Reports, 7(MLR-02-2013):69-76, 2013. ISSN:1865-3960, http://www.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de/~fschleif/mlr/mlr_02_2013.pdf.
    Search in Google Scholar
  46. [46] M. Kaden and T. Villmann. Attention based classification learning in GLVQ and asymmetric classification error assessment. In T. Villmann, F.-M. Schleif, M. Kaden, and M. Lange, editors, Advances in Self-Organizing Maps: 10th International Workshop WSOM 2014 Mittweida, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, page accepted, Berlin, 2014. Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-07695-9_7
    Search in Google Scholar
  47. [47] M. Kästner, D. Nebel, M. Riedel, M. Biehl, and T. Villmann. Differentiable kernels in generalized matrix learning vector quantization. In Proc. of the Internacional Conference of Machine Learning Applications (ICMLA’12), pages 1-6. IEEE Computer Society Press, 2012.10.1109/ICMLA.2012.231
    Search in Google Scholar
  48. [48] M. Kästner, M. Riedel, M. Strickert, W. Hermann, and T. Villmann. Bordersensitive learning in kernelized learning vector quantization. In I. Rojas, G. Joya, and J. Cabestany, editors, Proc. of the 12th International Workshop on Artificial Neural Networks (IWANN), volume 7902 of LNCS, pages 357-366, Berlin, 2013. Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-38679-4_35
    Search in Google Scholar
  49. [49] M. Kästner, M. Strickert, D. Labudde, M. Lange, S. Haase, and T. Villmann. Utilization of correlation measures in vector quantization for analysis of gene expression data - a review of recent developments. Machine Learning Reports, 6(MLR-04-2012):5-22, 2012. ISSN:1865-3960, http://www.techfak.unibielefeld.de/~fschleif/mlr/mlr_04_2012.pdf.
    Search in Google Scholar
  50. [50] S. Keerthi, O. Chapelle, and D. DeCoste. Building support vector machines with reduced classifier complexity. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 7:1493-1515, 2006.
    Search in Google Scholar
  51. [51] T. Kohonen. Automatic formation of topological maps of patterns in a selforganizing system. In E. Oja and O. Simula, editors, Proc. 2SCIA, Scand. Conf. on Image Analysis, pages 214-220, Helsinki, Finland, 1981. Suomen Hahmontunnistustutkimuksen Seura r. y.
    Search in Google Scholar
  52. [52] T. Kohonen. Self-Organizing Maps, volume 30 of Springer Series in Information Sciences. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1995. (Second Extended Edition 1997).10.1007/978-3-642-97610-0
    Search in Google Scholar
  53. [53] T. Kohonen, J. Kangas, J. Laaksonen, and K. Torkkola. LVQ_PAK: A program package for the correct application of Learning Vector Quantization algorithms. In Proc. IJCNN’92, International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, volume I, pages 725-730, Piscataway, NJ, 1992. IEEE Service Center.
    Search in Google Scholar
  54. [54] M. Lange. Partielle Korrelationen und Partial Mutual Information zur Analyse von fMRT-Zeitreihen. Master’s thesis, University of Applied Sciences Mittweida, Mittweida, Saxony, Germany, 2012.
    Search in Google Scholar
  55. [55] M. Lange, M. Biehl, and T. Villmann. Non-Euclidean principal component analysis by Hebbian learning. Neurocomputing, page in press, 2014.10.1007/978-3-319-07173-2_8
    Search in Google Scholar
  56. [56] M. Lange, D. Nebel, and T. Villmann. Non-Euclidean principal component analysis for matrices by Hebbian learning. In L. Rutkowski, M. Korytkowski, R. Scherer, R. Tadeusiewicz, L. Zadeh, and J. Zurada, editors, Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing - Proc. the International Conference ICAISC, Zakopane, volume 1 of LNAI 8467, pages 77-88, Berlin Heidelberg, 2014. Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-07173-2_8
    Search in Google Scholar
  57. [57] M. Lange and T. Villmann. Derivatives of lp-norms and their approximations. Machine Learning Reports, 7(MLR-04-2013):43-59, 2013. ISSN:1865-3960, http://www.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de/~fschleif/mlr/mlr_04_2013.pdf.
    Search in Google Scholar
  58. [58] M. Lange, D. Zühlke, O. Holz, and T. Villmann. Applications of lp-norms and their smooth approximations for gradient based learning vector quantization. In M. Verleysen, editor, Proc. of European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks, Computational Intelligence and Machine Learning (ESANN’2014), pages 271-276, Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium, 2014. i6doc.com.
    Search in Google Scholar
  59. [59] T. Martinetz and K. Schulten. Topology representing networks. Neural Networks, 7(2), 1994.10.1016/0893-6080(94)90109-0
    Search in Google Scholar
  60. [60] T. M. Martinetz, S. G. Berkovich, and K. J. Schulten. ’Neural-gas’ network for vector quantization and its application to time-series prediction. IEEE Trans. on Neural Networks, 4(4):558-569, 1993.10.1109/72.23831118267757
    Search in Google Scholar
  61. [61] C. Micchelli, Y. Xu, and H. Zhang. Universal kernels. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 7:26051-2667, 2006.
    Search in Google Scholar
  62. [62] M.Strickert, B. Labitzke, A. Kolb, and T. Villmann. Multispectral image characterization by partial generalized covariance. In M. Verleysen, editor, Proc. of European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks (ESANN’2011), pages 105-110, Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium, 2011. i6doc.com.
    Search in Google Scholar
  63. [63] E. Mwebaze, P. Schneider, F.-M. Schleif, J. Aduwo, J. Quinn, S. Haase, T. Villmann, and M. Biehl. Divergence based classification in learning vector quantization. Neurocomputing, 74(9):1429-1435, 2011.10.1016/j.neucom.2010.10.016
    Search in Google Scholar
  64. [64] D. Nebel, B. Hammer, and T. Villmann. Supervised generative models for learning dissimilarity data. In M. Verleysen, editor, Proc. of European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks, Computational Intelligence and Machine Learning (ESANN’2014), pages 35-40, Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium, 2014. i6doc.com.
    Search in Google Scholar
  65. [65] D. Nebel and T. Villmann. About the equivalence of robust soft learning vector quantization and soft nearest prototype classification. Machine Learning Reports, 7(MLR-02-2013):114-118, 2013. ISSN:1865-3960, http://www.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de/~fschleif/mlr/mlr_02_2013.pdf.
    Search in Google Scholar
  66. [66] D. Nebel and T. Villmann. A median variant of generalized learning vector quantization. In M. Lee, A. Hirose, Z.-G. Hou, and R. Kil, editors, Proceedings of International Conference on Neural Information Processing (ICONIP), volume II of LNCS, pages 19-26, Berlin, 2013. Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-3-642-42042-9_3
    Search in Google Scholar
  67. [67] N. Niang and G. Saporta. Supervised classification and AUC. In Workshop Franco-Brésilien sur la fouille de données, pages 32-33, 2009.
    Search in Google Scholar
  68. [68] D. Nova and P. Estévez. A review of learning vector quantization classifiers. Neural Computation and Applications, 2013.10.1007/s00521-013-1535-3
    Search in Google Scholar
  69. [69] J. Principe. Information Theoretic Learning. Springer, Heidelberg, 2010.10.1007/978-1-4419-1570-2
    Search in Google Scholar
  70. [70] J. C. Principe, J. F. III, and D. Xu. Information theoretic learning. In S. Haykin, editor, Unsupervised Adaptive Filtering. Wiley, New York, NY, 2000.
    Search in Google Scholar
  71. [71] A. Qin and P. Suganthan. Initialization insensitive LVQ algorithm based on cost-function adaptation. Pattern Recognition, 38:773 U-776, 2004.10.1016/j.patcog.2004.11.011
    Search in Google Scholar
  72. [72] A. Qin and P. Suganthan. A novel kernel prototype-based learning algorithm. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR’04), volume 4, pages 621-624, 2004.10.1109/ICPR.2004.1333849
    Search in Google Scholar
  73. [73] M. Riedel, D. Nebel, T. Villmann, and B. Hammer. Generative versus discriminative prototype based classification. In T. Villmann, F.-M. Schleif, M. Kaden, and M. Lange, editors, Advances in Self-Organizing Maps: 10th International Workshop WSOM 2014 Mittweida, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, page accepted, Berlin, 2014. Springer.
    Search in Google Scholar
  74. [74] C. Rijsbergen. Information Retrieval. Butterworths, London, 2nd edition edition, 1979.
    Search in Google Scholar
  75. [75] F. Rosenblatt. The perceptron: A probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. Psych. Rev., 65:386-408, 1958.
    Search in Google Scholar
  76. [76] L. Sachs. Angewandte Statistik. Springer Verlag, 7-th edition, 1992.10.1007/978-3-662-05747-6
    Search in Google Scholar
  77. [77] A. Sato and K. Yamada. Generalized learning vector quantization. In D. S. Touretzky, M. C. Mozer, and M. E. Hasselmo, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 8. Proceedings of the 1995 Conference, pages 423-9. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1996.
    Search in Google Scholar
  78. [78] R. Schatten. A Theory of Cross-Spaces, volume 26 of Annals of Mathematics Studies. Princeton University Press, 1950.
    Search in Google Scholar
  79. [79] F.-M. Schleif, T. Villmann, and B. Hammer. Prototype based fuzzy classification in clinical proteomics. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 47(1):4-16, 2008.10.1016/j.ijar.2007.03.005
    Search in Google Scholar
  80. [80] F.-M. Schleif, T. Villmann, B. Hammer, and P. Schneider. Efficient kernelized prototype based classification. International Journal of Neural Systems, 21(6):443-457, 2011.10.1142/S012906571100295X22131298
    Search in Google Scholar
  81. [81] F.-M. Schleif, T. Villmann, M. Kostrzewa, B. Hammer, and A. Gammerman. Cancer informatics by prototype networks in mass spectrometry. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 45(2-3):215-228, 2009.10.1016/j.artmed.2008.07.01818778925
    Search in Google Scholar
  82. [82] F.-M. Schleif, X. Zhu, and B. Hammer. A conformal classifier for dissimilarity data. In L. I. I. Maglogiannis, H. Papadopoulos, K. Karatzas, and S. Siouta, editors, Proceedings of AIAI 2012, Halkidiki, Greece, volume 382 of IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, pages 234-243, Berlin, 2012. Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-33412-2_24
    Search in Google Scholar
  83. [83] B. Schölkopf and A. Smola. Learning with Kernels. MIT Press, 2002.
    Search in Google Scholar
  84. [84] P. Schneider, K. Bunte, H. Stiekema, B. Hammer, T. Villmann, and M. Biehl. Regularization in matrix relevance learning. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 21(5):831-840, 2010.10.1109/TNN.2010.204272920236882
    Search in Google Scholar
  85. [85] P. Schneider, T. Geweniger, F.-M. Schleif, M. Biehl, and T. Villmann. Multivariate class labeling in Robust Soft LVQ. In M. Verleysen, editor, Proc. of European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks (ESANN’2011), pages 17-22, Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium, 2011. i6doc.com.
    Search in Google Scholar
  86. [86] P. Schneider, B. Hammer, and M. Biehl. Adaptive relevance matrices in learning vector quantization. Neural Computation, 21:3532-3561, 2009.10.1162/neco.2009.11-08-90819764875
    Search in Google Scholar
  87. [87] P. Schneider, B. Hammer, and M. Biehl. Distance learning in discriminative vector quantization. Neural Computation, 21:2942-2969, 2009.10.1162/neco.2009.10-08-89219635012
    Search in Google Scholar
  88. [88] C. Scovel, D. Hush, I. Steinwart, and J. Theiler. Radial kernels and their reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces. Journal of Complexity, 26:641-660, 2010.10.1016/j.jco.2010.03.002
    Search in Google Scholar
  89. [89] S. Seo, M. Bode, and K. Obermayer. Soft nearest prototype classification. IEEE Transaction on Neural Networks, 14:390-398, 2003.10.1109/TNN.2003.80940718238021
    Search in Google Scholar
  90. [90] S. Seo and K. Obermayer. Soft learning vector quantization. Neural Computation, 15:1589-1604, 2003.10.1162/08997660332189181912816567
    Search in Google Scholar
  91. [91] G. Shafer and V. Vovk. A tutorial on conformal prediction. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 9:371-421, 2008.
    Search in Google Scholar
  92. [92] R. Shaffer, S. Rose-Pehrsson, and R. A. McGill. Probabilistic neural networks for chemical sensor array pattern recognition: Comparison studies, improvements and automated outlier rejection. Technical Report NRL/FR/6110-98-9879, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC, 1998.
    Search in Google Scholar
  93. [93] J. Shawe-Taylor and N. Cristianini. Kernel Methods for Pattern Analysis and Discovery. Cambridge University Press, 2004.10.1017/CBO9780511809682
    Search in Google Scholar
  94. [94] I. Steinwart. On the influence of the kernel on the consistency of support vector machines. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2:67-93, 2001.
    Search in Google Scholar
  95. [95] M. Strickert and K. Bunte. Soft rank neighbor embeddings. In M. Verleysen, editor, Proc. of European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks, Computational Intelligence and Machine Learning (ESANN’2013), pages 77-82, Louvain- La-Neuve, Belgium, 2013. i6doc.com.
    Search in Google Scholar
  96. [96] M. Strickert, F.-M. Schleif, U. Seiffert, and T. Villmann. Derivatives of Pearson correlation for gradient-based analysis of biomedical data. Inteligencia Artificial, Revista Iberoamericana de Inteligencia Artificial, (37):37-44, 2008.10.4114/ia.v12i37.956
    Search in Google Scholar
  97. [97] M. Strickert, F.-M. Schleif, T. Villmann, and U. Seiffert. Unleashing pearson correlation for faithful analysis of biomedical data. In M. Biehl, B. Hammer, M. Verleysen, and T. Villmann, editors, Similarity-based Clustering, volume 5400 of LNAI, pages 70-91. Springer, Berlin, 2009.10.1007/978-3-642-01805-3_5
    Search in Google Scholar
  98. [98] K. Torkkola. Feature extraction by non-parametric mutual information maximization. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3:1415-1438, 2003.10.1109/ICASSP.2002.1005866
    Search in Google Scholar
  99. [99] S. Vanderlooy and E. Hüllermeier. A critical analysis of variants of the AUC. Machine Learning, 72:247-262, 2008.10.1007/s10994-008-5070-x
    Search in Google Scholar
  100. [100] V. Vapnik. Statistical Learning Theory. Wiley and Sons, New York, 1998.
    Search in Google Scholar
  101. [101] V. Vapnik and A. Chervonenkis. On the uniform convergence of relative frequencies of events to their probabilities. Theory of Probability and its Applications, 16(2):264-280, 1971.10.1137/1116025
    Search in Google Scholar
  102. [102] T. Villmann and S. Haase. Divergence based vector quantization. Neural Computation, 23(5):1343-1392, 2011.10.1162/NECO_a_00110
    Search in Google Scholar
  103. [103] T. Villmann, S. Haase, and M. Kaden. Kernelized vector quantization in gradient-descent learning. Neurocomputing, page in press, 2014. 10.1016/j.neucom.2013.11.048
    Search in Google Scholar
  104. [104] T. Villmann, S. Haase, and M. Kästner. Gradient based learning in vector quantization using differentiable kernels. In P. Estevez, J. Principe, and P. Zegers, editors, Advances in Self-Organizing Maps: 9th International Workshop WSOM 2012 Santiage de Chile, volume 198 of Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, pages 193-204, Berlin, 2013. Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-35230-0_20
    Search in Google Scholar
  105. [105] T. Villmann, B. Hammer, F.-M. Schleif, T. Geweniger, and W. Herrmann. Fuzzy classification by fuzzy labeled neural gas. Neural Networks, 19:772-779, 2006.10.1016/j.neunet.2006.05.026
    Search in Google Scholar
  106. [106] T. Villmann, B. Hammer, F.-M. Schleif, W. Hermann, and M. Cottrell. Fuzzy classification using information theoretic learning vector quantization. Neurocomputing, 71:3070-3076, 2008.10.1016/j.neucom.2008.04.048
    Search in Google Scholar
  107. [107] T. Villmann, F.-M. Schleif, and B. Hammer. Prototype-based fuzzy classification with local relevance for proteomics. Neurocomputing, 69(16-18):2425-2428, October 2006.10.1016/j.neucom.2006.02.003
    Search in Google Scholar
  108. [108] V. Vovk, A. Gammerman, and G. Shafer. Algorithmic learning in a random world. Springer, Berlin, 2005.
    Search in Google Scholar
  109. [109] A. Witoelar, A. Gosh, J. de Vries, B. Hammer, and M. Biehl. Windowbased example selection in learning vector quantization. Neural Computation, 22(11):2924-2961, 2010.10.1162/NECO_a_00030
    Search in Google Scholar
  110. [110] Y. Wu, K. Ianakiev, and V. Govindaraju. Improved k-nearest neighbor classification. Pattern Recognition, 35:2311 - 2318, 2002.10.1016/S0031-3203(01)00132-7
    Search in Google Scholar
  111. [111] D. Zühlke, T. Geweniger, U. Heimann, and T. Villmann. Fuzzy Fleiss-Kappa for comparison of fuzzy classifiers. In M. Verleysen, editor, Proc. of the European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks (ESANN’2009), pages 269-274, Evere, Belgium, 2009. d-side publications.
    Search in Google Scholar
  112. [112] X. Zhu, F.-M. Schleif, and B. Hammer. Semi-supervised vector quantization for proximity data. In M. Verleysen, editor, Proc. of European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks, Computational Intelligence and Machine Learning (ESANN’2013), pages 89-94, Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium, 2013. i6doc.com.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/fcds-2014-0006 | Journal eISSN: 2300-3405 | Journal ISSN: 0867-6356
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 79 - 105
Submitted on: Jan 1, 2014
Published on: May 30, 2014
Published by: Poznan University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
learning vector quantization,
non-standard metrics,
classification,
classification certainty,
statistics
Related subjects:
Computer sciences,
Artificial intelligence,
Software development

© 2014 M. Kaden, M. Lange, D. Nebel, M. Riedel, T. Geweniger, T. Villmann, published by Poznan University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 39 (2014): Issue 2 (June 2014)Next article