References
- BUDÓ, G. EU Common Values at Stake: Is Article 7 TEU an Affective Protection Mechanism? Documents CIDOB, 01, May 2014, pp. 14. Available at: https://www.digitaliapublishing.com/a/33969/documents-cidob--n.-1---eu-common-values-at-stake--is-article-7-teu-an-effective-protection-mechanism-
- Commission Decides to close the Art.7 (1) TEU procedure to Poland, Daily News 29/05/2024, available at: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/mex_24_2986
- HALMAI, G. The Fall of the Rule of Law and Democracy in Hungary and the Complicity of the EU. Available at: https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/itajpul12&div=22&id=&page=&collection=journals
- KIRST, N. Understanding the Commission’s Decision to Close the Art. 7 Procedure against Poland. Online. 2025. Available at: https://dcubrexitinstitute.eu/2024/05/understanding-the-commissions-decision-closing-article-7-against-poland/
- KOCHENOV, D. Busting the Myths Nuclear: A Commentary on Article 7 TEU. EUT Working Papers, Law, 2017, No 10, European University Institute, Department of Law, p. 6. Available at: https://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/46345/LAW_2017_10.pdf
- KOCHENOV, D., PECH, L. Better Late than Never? On the Commission’s Rule of Law Framework and Its First Activation (February 29, 2016). 54 Journal of Common Market Studies. 2016, University of Groningen Faculty of Law Research Paper 2016-08, Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2739893
- LENAERTS, K., MASELIS, I., FUTMAN, K. EU Procedural Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
- PIRIS, J-C. The Lisbon Treaty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2010.
- RUFFER, E. The commission’s New Framework or the Old Infringement Under Article 258 TEU: Which are the effective means for safeguarding the rule of law in the EU? In: PÍTROVÁ, L. (ed.). Rule of law and Its Protection: Czech Perspective, Science and New Media. Passau/Berlin/Prague, 2015.
- SCHROEDER, W. The EU Founding Values – Constitutional Character and Legal Implications. European Studies. The Review of the European Law, Economics and Politics. 2016, vol. 3.
- SYLLOVÁ, J., PÍTROVÁ, L., PALDUSOVÁ, H. a kol. Lisabonská smlouva, komentář. Prague: C. H. Beck, 2010.
- ŠIŠKOVÁ, N. (ed.). The European Union – What is Next? A Legal Analysis and the Political Visions on the Future of the Union. Deutschland, Köln: Wolters Kluwer, 2018.
- ŠIŠKOVÁ, N. Lidskoprávní mechanismy na úrovni EU a otázky související. Prague: Wolters Kluwer, 2021.
- ŠIŠKOVÁ, N. The EU Concept of the Rule of Law and the Procedures de Lege Lata and de Lege Ferenda. International and Comparative Law Review. 2019 vol. 19, no. 2.
- ŠLOSARČÍK, I. Kondicionalita právního státu v unijním rozpětí: Nová pravidla na pomezí práva a politiky. Jurisprudence. 2022, no. 2.
- TOMÁŠEK, M., TÝČ, V. et al. Právo Evropské unie. Prague: Leges, 2015.
- VON BOGDANDY, A. Founding Principles, In: VON BOGDANDY, A., BART, J. (eds.). Principles of European Constitutional Law. 2nd edition. 2009.
- WEATHERILL, S. Law and Values in the European Union. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.
- Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council “A New Framework to Strengthen the Rule of Law”, COM (2014) 158 final. Strasbourg: 12.03.2014.
- European Council v Copenhagen 21–22 June 1993, Conclusions of the Residency, SN 180/93/ Rev1.
- Further strengthening the rule of law within the Union. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council and the Council from 03.04.2019, COM (2019), 163, final.
- Opinion of the Legal Service. Commission’s Communication on a new framework to strengthen the Rule of law: Compatibility with Treaties, Council of European Union, 10296/14, Brussels, 27.05.2014.
- Regulation 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and the Council of 16.12.2022 on a General
- Regime of Conditionality for the Protection of Union Budget, Official Journal L I 433/1. Report on the Rule of law, adopted by the Venice Commission at its Plenary Session, Study No 512/2009, Strasbourg, 2011, CL-AD (2011), 003 rev.
- Case C-286/12 – Commission v Hungary, ECLI: EU: C: 2012:687
- Case C-288/12 – Commission v Hungary, ECLI: EU: C: 2014:237
- Case C-2/13 – Accession of the EU to the ECHR, ECLI: EU: C: 2014: 2454.
- Case C-216/18 PPU – Minister for Justice and Equality (Deficiencies in the system of justice), ECLI: EU:C: 2018:586
- Case C-748/19 to C-754/19 Prokuratura Rejonowa w Mińsku Mazowieckim, ECLI: EU: C: 2021:403.
- Case C-638/19 P – European Commission v European Food SA and Others, ECLI: EU: C: 2022:50
- Case C-156/21 Hungary v EP and Council, para 127, ECLI: EU: 2022:97
- Case C-157/21 – Poland v Parliament and Council, ECLI: EU: C: 2022:98