Automated Decision-Making in The EU Member State’s Public Administration: The Compliance of Automated Decisions of the Estonian Unemployment Insurance Fund with Estonian Administrative Procedure Law

Zolkin, Vladlen; Chochia, Archil; Hoffmann, Thomas

doi:10.2478/eustu-2023-0017

References

ABRUSCI, E., MACKENZIE-GRAY SCOTT, R. The questionable necessity of a new human right against being subject to automated decision-making. International Journal of Law and Information Technology. 2023, vol. 31, issue 2, pp. 114–143.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
AEDMAA, A., LOPMAN, E., PARREST, N., PILVING, I., VENE, E. Haldusmenetluse käsiraamat. Tartu: University of Tartu Press, 2004, pp. 3–511.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
ALEXY, R. kollisioon ja kaalumine kui põhiõiguste dogmaatika põhiprobleemid. Juridica. 2001, issue, 1, 2001; pp. 5–13.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
ALLIKMETS, S. Tuntud või tundmatu hea halduse põhimõte. Juridica. 2014, issue 3, 2014, pp. 221–231.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
ANDRAŠKO, J., HAMUĽÁK, O., MESARČÍK, M., KERIKMÄE, T., KAJANDER, A. Sustainable Data Governance for Cooperative, Connected and Automated Mobility in the European Union. Sustainability. 2021, vol. 2021, no. 19, pp. 1–25. ISSn 2071-1050. DoI 10.3390/su131910610.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
ANDRAŠKO, J., MESARČÍK, M., HAMUĽÁK, O. The regulatory intersections between artificial intelligence, data protection and cyber security: challenges and opportunities for the EU legal framework. AI & Society. 2021, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 623–636. ISSn 0951-5666. DoI 10.1007/s00146-020-01125-5.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
ANNUS, R. Uurimispõhimõte haldusmenetluses. Juridica. 2008, issue 7, 2008, pp 499–506. AnnUS, T. Riigiõigus. Tallinn: AS Juura, 2006, pp. 5–480.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
BATALLI, M., FEJZULLAHU, A. (2018). Principles of good administration under the european code of good administrative behaviour. Pecs Journal of International and European Law. 2018, no. 1, pp 26–35.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
BUOSO, E. Fully Automated Administrative Acts in the German Legal System. European review of Digital Administration & Law – Erdal. 2020, vol. 1, issue 1–2, pp. 113–122.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
DICKINSON, H., YATES, S. From external provision to technological outsourcing: lessons for public sector automation from the outsourcing literature. Public Management Review. 2023, vol. 25, issue 2, pp. 243–261.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
FINCK, M. Automated Decison-Making and Administrative Law. Forthcoming, P. Cane et al. (eds), Oxford Handbook of Comparative Administrative Law. oxford: oxford University Press, 2020. Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition Research Paper no 19–10, pp. 1–24.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
GONTARZ, I. Judical Review of Automated Administrative Decision-making: The Role of Administrative Courts in the Evaluation of Unlawful Regimes. Elte Law Journal. 2023, no. 1, pp. 151–162.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
HARLOW, C., RAWLINGS, R. Proceduralism and Automation: Challenges to the Value of Administrative Law. Forthcoming, E. Fisher, J King and A Young (eds.). The Foundations and Future of Public Law (in honour of Paul Craig) (OUP 2019). LSE Law, Society and Economy Working Papers, 2019, no. 3, 2019, pp. 1–22.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
HONG, M., HUI, C. Towards a digital government: reflections on automated decision-making and the principles of administrative justice. Singapore Academy of Law Journal. 2019, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 875–906.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
KERIKMÄE, T., PÄRN-LEE, E. Legal dilemmas of Estonian artificial intelligence strategy: in between of e-society and global race. AI & SOCIETY: Knowledge, Culture and Communication. 2021, vol. 36, pp. 561–572.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
LEMBER, K. Tehisintellekti kasutamine haldusakti andmisel. Juridica. 2019, issue 10, pp. 749–760.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
MALGIERI, G. Automated decision-making in the EU Member States: The right to explanation and other „suitable safeguards“ in the national legislations. Computer Law & Security Review. 2019, vol. 35, issue 5, pp. 2–26.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
MARUSTE, R. Konstitutsionalism ning põhiõiguste ja vabaduste kaitse. Tallinn: AS Juura, 2004, pp. 3–606.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
MCCANN, S. Discretion in the Automated Administrative State. The Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence. 2023, vol. 36, issue 1, pp. 171–194.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
MONARCHA-MATLAK, A. Automated decision making in public administration. Procedia Computer Science. 2021, vol. 192, pp. 2077–2084.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
NG, Y. Institutional adaptation and the administrative state. Melbourne University Law Review. 2021, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 889–927.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
NG, Y., GRAY, S. Disadvantage and the automated decision. Adelaide Law Review. 2022, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 641–677.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
NYMAN METCALF, K. How to build e-governance in a digital society: the case of Estonia. Revista Catalana de Dret Públic. 2019, no. 58, pp. 1–12.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
OSBORNE, S.; BROWN, L. (eds.). Handbook of Innovation in Public Services. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2013, pp. 1–593.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
OSBORNE, S., BROWN, L., WALKER, R. (eds.). Innovation in Public Services Theoretical, managerial, and international perspectives. oxon: Routledge, 2016, pp. 1–277.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
PARREST, N. Hea halduse põhimõte Euroopa Liidu põhiõiguste hartas. Juridica. 2006, issue 1, 2006, pp 24–33.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
PONCE, J. Good administration and administrative procedures. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies. 2005, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 551–588.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ramon Gil-Garcia, J. Enacting Electronic Government Success. Boston: Springer, 2012, pp. 1–252.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
RANERUP, A., HENRIKSEN, H. Z. Digital Discretion: Unpacking Human and Technological Agency in Automated Decision Making in Sweden’s Social Services. Social Science Computer Review. 2020, vol. 40, issue 2, pp. 445–461.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
SCHASMIN, P., GINTER, C. Euroopa Liidu õigusest tulenevad võimalused jõustunud kohtuotsuste ja haldusaktide uueks läbivaatamiseks. Juridica. 2015, issue III/2015, pp. 184–195.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
SEIN, K., RISTIKIVI, M. Õigusriigi taastamine. Eesti seaduste ja institutsioonide reformid 1992–2002. Tartu: University of Tartu Press, 2022, pp. 8–279.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
STRANDBURG, K. J. Rulemaking and inscrutable automated decision tools. Columbia Law Review. 2019, vol. 119, no. 7, pp. 1851–1886.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
SUKSI, M. Administrative due process when using automated decision-making in public administration: some notes from a Finnish perspective. Artificial Intelligence and Law. 2020, vol. 29, pp. 87–110.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
TORFING, J., PETERS, B. G., PIERRE, J., SØRENSEN, E. Interactive Governance: Advancing the Paradigm. oxford: oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 1–272.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
TORFING, J., TRIANTAFILLOU, P. (eds.). Enhancing Public Innovation by Transforming Public Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016, pp. 1–351.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
VARDANYAN, L., KOCHARYAN, H., HAMUĽÁK, O., MESARČÍK, M., KERIKMÄE, T., KOOKMAA, T. The Unwanted Paradoxes Of the Right to Be Forgotten. Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology. 2023, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 87–109. ISSn 1802-5943. DoI 10.5817/MUJLT2023-1-3.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
VETRO, A. Imbalanced data as risk factor of discriminating automated decisions: measurement-based approach. Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law. 2021, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 272–288.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
WACHTER, S., MITTELSTADT, B., FLORIDI, L. Why a Right to Explanation of Automated Decision-Making Does not Exist in the General Data Protection Regulation. International Data Privacy Law. 2017, vol. 7, issue 2, pp. 76–99.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
WACHTER, S., MITTELSTADT, B., RUSSELL, C. Counterfactual explanations without opening the black box: automated decisions and the GDPR. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology (Harvard JOLT). 2018, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 841–888.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
WILLIAMS, R. Rethinking Administrative Law for Algorithmic Decision Making. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 2022, vol. 42, issue 2, pp. 468–494.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article