The Constitutional Obligation of the State to Protect the Weaker Party in a Horizontal Relationship

Florczak-Wątor, Monika

doi:10.2478/eustu-2022-0039

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to present how the State’s obligation to protect the weaker party in a horizontal relationship can be reconstructed from the provisions of the constitution. The paper outlines the concept of the protective obligations of the State as well as the peculiarities of the horizontal relationships. It deals with normative grounds for the general obligation to protect an individual by the State and for the specific protective obligations with respect to particular rights and freedoms. The analysis is primarily based on the constitutional provisions of Visegrad Group countries and includes the provisions of the European Convention on Human Rights. The paper concludes that conflicts of the State’s protective obligations resulting from conflicts of the rights and freedoms of individuals should be resolved in the same way in which the theory of law recommends resolving conflicts of constitutional principles.

References

ALEXY, R. Discourse theory and fundamental rights. In: MENENDEZ, A., ERIKSEN, E. (eds.). Arguing fundamental rights, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2006, pp. 15–30.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
ALEXY, R. Rights and liberties as concepts. In: ROSENFELD, M., SAJO, A. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 291–297.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
ALEXY, R. Theorie der Grundrechte, Baden-Baden: Nomos-Verlagsgesellschaft, 1985.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
BARAK, A. Proportionality. Constitutional Rights and their Limitations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
BARAK, A. Proportionality. In: ROSENFELD, M., SAJO, A. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012, pp. 738–755.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
CHEREDNYCHENKO, O. O. Fundamental Rights, Contract Law and the Protection of the Weaker Party. A Comparative Analysis of the Constitutionalisation of Contract Law, with Emphasis on Risky Financial Transactions, Utrecht: Sellier. European Law Publishers 2007.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
COSTA J. P. Human dignity in the jurisprudence of the European court of human rights. In: MCCRUDDEN, Ch. (ed.). Understanding human dignity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 393–403.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
DARWALL, S. The Value of Autonomy and Autonomy of the Will. Ethics, 2006, vol. 116, no. 2, pp. 263–284.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
DEVENNEY, J., KENNY, M. (eds.). European Consumer Protection: Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
DWORKIN, G. The Theory and Practice of Autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
FLORCZAK-WĄTOR, M. Horyzontalny wymiar praw konstytucyjnych, Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, 2014.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
FLORCZAK-WĄTOR, M. Obowiązki ochronne państwa w świetle Konstytucji RP I Europejskiej Konwencji Praw Człowieka. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Księgarnia Akademicka, 2018.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
GARLICKI, L. Relations between private actors and the European Convention on Human Rights. In: SAJO, A., UITZ, R. (eds.). The Constitution in private relations. Expanding constitutionalism, Utrecht: Eleven International Publishing 2005, pp. 129–144.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
GIZBERT-STUDNICKI, T. Zasady i reguły prawne, Państwo i Prawo, 1988, no. 3, pp. 16–26.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
HESELHAUS, S., HEMSLEY, R. Human Dignity and the European Convention on Human Rights, in BECCHI P., MATHIAS K. (eds.). Handbook of Human Dignity in Europe, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017, pp. 969–992.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
LAVRYSEN, L. Human Rights in a Positive State. Rethinking the Relationship between Positive and Negative Obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights. Cambridge, Antwerp, Portland: Intersentia, 2016.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
MAHLMANN, M. Human Dignity and Autonomy in Modern Constitutional Orders, in: ROSENFELD, M., SAJO, A. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012, pp. 370–396.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
MOWBRAY, A. R. The Development of Positive Obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights by the European Court of Human Rights, Oxford, Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing, 2004.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
NOLAN, D., ROBERTSON, A. (eds.). Rights and private law. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2012.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
NOVAK, M. Three models of balancing (in Constitutional Review). Ratio Juris, 2010, no. 1, pp. 101–112.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
RADWAŃSKI, Z. Teoria umów. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 1977.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
SCHABAS, W. The European Convention on Human Rights. A Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
SCHLINK, B. Proportionality. In: ROSENFELD, M., SAJO, A. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012, pp. 718–737.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
SMITS, J. The making of European Private Law. Towards a Ius Commune Europaeum as a Mixed Legal System. Antwerp, Oxford, New York: Intersentia, 2002.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
SONIEWICKA, M., HOLOCHER, J. Human Dignity in Poland. In: BECCHI P., MATHIAS K. (eds.). Handbook of Human Dignity in Europe, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017, pp. 697–718.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
SPIELMANN, D. The European Convention on Human Rights. The European Court of Human Rights. In: OLIVER, D., FEDTKE, J. (eds.). Human rights and the private sphere. A comparative study, New York: Routledge-Cavendish 2007, pp. 427–464.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
XENOS, D. The Positive Obligations of the State under the European Convention of Human Rights, New York: Routledge, 2012.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
YOUNG, R. The Value of Autonomy. The Philosophical Quarterly, 1982, vol. 32, no. 126, pp. 35–44.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

The Constitutional Obligation of the State to Protect the Weaker Party in a Horizontal Relationship

Abstract

Paradigm

My account