BELL, A., KONTOROVICH, E. Challenging the EU’s Illegal Restrictions on Israeli Products in the World Trade Organization. Policy Paper No. 18, Kohelet. Oct. 2015 [online]. Available at: http://kohelet.org.il/uploads/file/KPF35_challenge%20EU_141015PublicElectronic%20november2015.pdf
BOISSON DE CHAZOURNES, L., MCGARRY, B. What Role Can Constitutional Law Play in Investment Arbitration? Journal of World Investment & Trade. 2014, vol. 15, p. 862.
CARDWELL, P. J., WESSEL, R. A. EU External Relations and International Law: Divergence on Questions of „Territory“? In: FAHEY E. (ed.). Framing Convergence with the Global Legal Order: The EU and the World Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2020, p. 9.
CONTARTESE, C., ANDENAS, M. EU Autonomy and Investor-State Dispute Settlement under inter se Agreements between EU Member States: Achmea‘ CMLRev. 2019, pp. 157, 158.
CONTARTESE, C. The Autonomy of the EU Legal Order in the ECJ’s External Relations Case Law: From the ,,Essential“ to the ,,Specific Characteristics“ of the Union and Back‘. CMLRev. 2017, p. 1627.
DE WITTE, B. A Selfish Court? The Court of Justice and the Design of International Dispute Settlement Beyond the European Union. In: CREMONA, M. and THIES, A. (eds.). The European Court of Justice and External Relations Law: Constitutional Challenges. Hart Publishing, 2014, pp. 33–46, 46.
DISTEFANO, G. La notion de titre juridique et les différends territoriaux dans l’ordre international. Revue Générale de Droit International Public. 1995, p. 335.
ECKES, C. International Law as Law of the EU: The Role of the ECJ. In: ENZO CANNIZZARO, E., PALCHETTI, P., WESSEL, R. A. (eds.). International Law as Law of the European Union, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2011, pp. 353–377, CLEER Working Paper 2010/6. Available at: SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2096203
FRANSEN, R., RYNGAERT, C.EU Extraterritorial Obligations with Respect to Trade with Occupied Territories: Reflections after the Case of Front Polisario before EU Courts‘ Europe and the World: A law review. 2018, vol. 2, pp. 7, 19–21 [online]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444.ewlj.2018.07.
FRID DE VRIES, R. Judicial Conduct and Investment Treaty Claims: Lessons from the Israeli Gas Cases and the Eli Lilly Award. Transnational Dispute Management-TDM. 2019, vol. 2.
FRID DE VRIES, R. EU Judicial Review of Trade Agreements Involving Disputed Territories: Lessons From The Front Polisario Judgments, Colombia Journal of European Law. 2018, vol. 24, pp. 498, 522.
GOVAERE, I. Beware of the Trojan Horse: Dispute Settlement in (Mixed) Agreements and the Autonomy of the EU Legal Order. In: HILLION, C., KOUTRAKOS, P. (eds.). Mixed agreements revisited, the EU and its member states in the world. Hart Publishing, 2010, pp. 187, 203–204.
GOVAERE, I. Interconnecting Legal Systems and the Autonomous EU Legal Order: A Balloon Dynamic. In: GOVAERE, I., GARBEN, S. (eds.). The Interface Between EU and International Law: Contemporary Reflections. Hart Publishing, 2019.
HARPAZ, G. The Dispute over the Treatment of Products Exported to the European Union from the Golan Heights, East Jerusalem, the West Bank and the Gaza Strip – The Limits of Power and the Limits of the Law. Journal of World Trade 2004, vol. 38, p. 1049.
HARPAZ, G. The Front Polisario Verdict and the Gap between the EU’s Trade Treatment of Western Sahara and Its Treatment of the Occupied Palestinian Territories‘. Journal of World Trade. 2018, vol. 52, pp. 619, 639.
HAUSWALDT, C. Problems under the EC- Israel Association Agreement: The Export of Goods Produced in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip under the EC-Israel Association Agreement. European Journal of International Law. 2003, vol. 14(3), p. 591.
HELFER, L. R. The Effectiveness of International Adjudicators, Chapter 2. In: ROMANO C., ALTER, K., SHANY, Y. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication. OUP, 2014, pp. 464.
HUMMELBRUNNER, S. What’s in a Name? The Psagot Judgment and Questions of Labelling of Settlement Products Contextualisation of Psagot in Light of Other CJEU Case Law on Occupied Territories, Insights Special Section. 2019, vol. 4, pp. 779, 788–9.
JAREMBA, U., PISCITELLI, G., Investment tribunals vis-à-vis national courts: Lessons on judicial dialogue from the EU. In: BIONDI, A., SANGIUOLO, G. (eds.). The EU and the rule of law in international economic relations: an agenda for an enhanced dialogue. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2021, Chapter 4, pp. 69–88.
KANEVSKAIA, O. EU Labelling Practices for Products Imported from Disputed Territories‘ TILEC Discussion Paper. 2019, pp. 21–23 [online]. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2956308
KANEVSKAIA, O. The Psagot Judgment and Questions of Labelling of Settlement Products Misinterpreting Mislabelling : The Psagot Ruling, Insights Special Section – What’s in a Name? 2019, vol. 4, pp. 763, 775.
KASSOTI, E. The Council v. Front Polisario Case: The Court of Justice’s Selective Reliance on International Rules on Treaty Interpretation (Second Part), European Papers. 2017, vol. 2, pp. 23–42.
KECK A., SCHROPP, S. Working Paper No. 2: Indisputably Essential: The Economics of Dispute Settlement Institutions in Trade Agreements, WTO, 2007 [online]. Available at: www.wto.org/english/res_e/reser_e/ersd200702_e.pdf
KONTOROVITCH, E. Some state practice regarding trade with occupied territories: from the GATT to today. In: DUVAL, A., KASSOTI, E. (eds.). The Legality of Economic Activities in Occupied Territories International, EU Law and Business and Human Rights Perspectives. Routledge, 2020, pp. 65, 68.
LEVY, I. Intra-EU Game Changer or an Exception that Confirms the Rule? EFILA Blog, 20-7-2022 [online]. Available at: https://efilablog.org/2022/07/20/green-power-v-spain-intra-eu-game-changer-or-an-exception-that-confirms-the-rule/
LIEBKIND, A., HOLST, A. Landmark Judgments Rendered by Swedish Courts in the Achmea Saga, EFILA Blog, 20 December 2022 [online]. Available at: Landmark Judgments Rendered by Swedish Courts in the Achmea Saga – EFILA Blog
MARESCEAU, M. The Brita ruling of the European Court of Justice: a few comments, In GOVAERE, I., QUICK, R., BRONCKERS, M. Trade and Competition Law in the Eu and Beyond. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2011, p. 283.
MONT. T State Liability in Investment Treaty Arbitration – Global Constitutional and Administrative Law in the BIT Generation. Hart 2009, p. 293 et seq.
MUNIN, N. Can Customs Rules Solve Difficulties Created by Public International Law?: Thoughts on the ECJ’s Judgment in the Brita Case (C-386/08). Global Trade and Customs Journal. 2011, vol. 6, p. 193.
MUNIN, N. EU Measures Towards Israeli Activities in the Occupied Territories and the BDS: A Diplomatic Achievement or a Pyrrhic Victory? The Journal of Multidisciplinary Research. St. Thomas University, Florida, 2016, vol. 7(3), 19–38.
MUNIN, N., SITBON, O. Between Normative Power and Soft Power: The Psagot case, Australian and New Zealand Journal of European Studies. 2021, Vol 13(1) pp. 25–27. MUNIN, N. The Evolution of Dispute Settlement Provisions in Israel’s PTAs: Is There a Global Lesson? Journal of World Trade. 2010, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 385–403, 386, 401.
NOLLKAEMPER, A. Conversations among Courts: Domestic and International Adjudicators, Chapter 24. In: ROMANO C., ALTER, K., SHANY, Y. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication. OUP, 2014, pp. 523–49, 525.
ODERMATT, J. Council of the European Union v Front populaire pour la libération de la saguia-el-hamra et du rio deoro (Front Polisario) – Case C-104/16 P. American Journal of International Law. 2017, vol. 111(3), p. 738.
ODERMATT, J. Is EU law international? Case C-741/19 Republic of Moldova v Komstroy LLC And the Autonomy of the EU legal order‘ European Papers. 2021, Vol. 6, No 3, pp. 1255–1268.
PARDO S., ZEMER, L. The Image of European Union Law in Bilateral Relations. Vanderbilt Law Review. 2021, vol. 54, pp. 182–196 [online]. Available at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vjtl/vol54/iss1/4
PURNHAGEN P., KAI, P., VAN ZEBEN, J., AHLBORN, C., OOSTERVEER, A. Beyond Food Safety – EU Food Information Standards as a Facilitator of Political Consumerism and International Law Enforcement Mechanism‘. Wageningen Working Papers. In: Law, 2020, p. 1 [online]. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339167245
REUTER, A. Taking Investors‘ Rights Seriously : The Achmea and CETA Rulings of the European Court of Justice Do Not Bar Intra-EU Investment Arbitration, EFILA Blog EU Investment Law and Arbitration. 2020 [online]. Available at: https://efilablog.org/2020/08/12/taking-investors-rights-seriously-the-achmea-and-ceta-rulings-of-the-european-court-of-justice-do-not-bar-intra-eu-investment-a
ROSAS, A. International Responsibility of the EU and the European Court of Justice. In: M. EVANS, M., KOUTRAKOS, P. (eds.). The International Responsibility of the European Union, European and International Perspectives. Hart Publishing, 2013, pp. 139–159 at p. 159.
ROSHER, P., FOUCHARD, C., THIEFFRY, V., ROBERT, E., ADANT, M., CALLOWAY, A. ,Moldova v. Komstroy (Case C- 741/19): Key Lessons and Takeaways, Reed Smith In-depth, 16 September 2021 [online]. Available at: reedsmith.com
RYNGAERT, C. The Concept of Jurisdiction in International Law [online]. Available at: https://unijuris.sites.uu.nl/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/2014/12/The-Concept-of-Jurisdiction-in-International-Law.pdf
RYNGAERT, C. The Psagot Judgment and Questions of Labelling of Settlement Products Indications of Settlement Provenance and the Duty of Non-Recognition Under International Law. What’s in a Name? Insights Special Section. 2019, vol. 4, pp. 791, 793.
SCHILL, S. W. Editorial: The Constitutional Frontiers of International Economic Law, (2017) 18 The Journal of World Investment and Trade. 2017, vol. 18, p. 1.
SHANY, Y. Jurisdiction and Admissibility, Chapter 36. In: ROMANO C., ALTER, K., SHANY, Y. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication. OUP, 2014, pp. 798-9.
VAN ELSUWEGE, P. The principle of self-determination in relations between the EU and its neighbours: Between Realpolitik and respect for international law, Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht. 2018, p. 761.
WUSCHKA, S. Investment tribunals adjudicating claims relating to occupied territories – curse or blessing? In: DUVAL, A., KASSOTI, E. (eds.). The Legality of Economic Activities in Occupied Territories International, EU Law and Business and Human Rights Perspectives. Routledge, 2020, p. 251.
The Energy Charter Treaty (ECT) (concluded 17 December 1994, entered into force 16 April 1998) 2080 UNTS 95 [online]. Available at: www.energycharter.org
Euro-Mediterranean Interim Association Agreement on trade and cooperation between the European Community, of the one part, and the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO) for the benefit of the Palestinian Authority of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip [1997] OJ L 187/3 (EU-PLO AA).
„Interpretative Notice on Indication of Origin of Goods from the Territories Occupied by Israel Since June 1967“, Brussels, 11 Oct. 2015 C(2015) 7834 final (2015 Interpretative Notice).
Case C-399/22, Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 15 June 2022 – Confédération paysanne v Ministère de l’agriculture et de la souveraineté alimentaire, Ministère de l’économie, des finances et de la souveraineté industrielle et numérique [online]. Available at: https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf;jsessionid=F53DAECAE9E2315BDC1951C8C5B494D0?text=&docid=265811&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=req&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=4364
European External Action Service Fact Sheet on indication of origin of goods from the territories occupied by Israel since June 1967, 4 [online]. Available at: https://eeas.europa.eu/sites/eeas/files/20151111_fact_sheet_indication_of_origin_final_en.pdf
2013/C205/05 Guidelines on the Eligibility of Israeli Entities in the Territories Occupied by Israel since June 1967 for Grants, Prizes and Financial Instruments Funded by the EU from 2014 Onwards, OJ C 205/5 of July 19, 2013 (2013 Guidelines).
European Citizens’ initiative to the Commission regarding trade with DTs 8-9-21, Ensuring Common Commercial Policy conformity with EU Treaties and compliance with international law‘
Restrictions applied by Ukraine on exports of certain wood products to the European Union Final Report of the Arbitration Panel established pursuant to Art 307 of the Association Agreement between Ukraine of the one part, and the European Union and its Member States, of the other part, Lugano, 11 December 2020 https://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2020/december/tradoc_159181.pdf